Enteral Feeding for Children on Bilevel Positive Pressure Ventilation for Status Asthmaticus

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavipriya Komeswaran ◽  
Aayush Khanal ◽  
Kimberly Powell ◽  
Giovanna Caprirolo ◽  
Ryan Majcina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Status Asthmaticus ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Adjunct Therapy ◽  
Retrospective Data Analysis ◽  
Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Nutrition Practices ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation

AbstractA retrospective data analysis was conducted to evaluate enteral nutrition practices for children admitted with status asthmaticus in a single-center pediatric intensive care unit. Of 406 charts, 315 were analyzed (63% male); 135 on bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation (BIPAP) and 180 on simple mask. Overall median age and weight were 6.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.0) years and 24.8 (IQR: 20.8) kg, respectively. All children studied were on full feeds while still on BIPAP and simple mask; 99.3 and 100% were fed per oral, respectively. Median time to initiation of feeds and full feeds was longer in the BIPAP group, 11.0 (IQR: 20) and 23.0 hours (IQR: 26), versus simple mask group, 4.3 (IQR: 7) and 12.0 hours (IQR: 15), p = 0.001. The results remained similar after adjusting for gender, weight, clinical asthma score at admission, use of adjunct therapy, and duration of continuous albuterol. By 24 hours, 81.5% of patients on BIPAP and 96.6% on simple mask were started on feeds. Compared with simple mask, patients on BIPAP were sicker with median asthma score at admission of 4 (IQR: 2) versus 3 (IQR: 2) on simple mask, requiring more adjunct therapy (80.0 vs. 43.9%), and a longer median length of therapy of 41.0 (IQR: 41) versus 20.0 hours (IQR: 29), respectively, p = 0.001. There were no complications such as aspiration pneumonia, and none required invasive mechanical ventilation in either group. Enteral nutrition was effectively and safely initiated and continued for children admitted with status asthmaticus, including those on noninvasive bilevel ventilation therapy.

scholarly journals Self-contained system for mitigation of contaminated aerosol sources of SARS-CoV-2 

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhavesh Patel ◽  
Erica Forzani ◽  
Amelia Lowell ◽  
Kelly McKay ◽  
Karam Abi Karam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Transmission ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Face Mask ◽  
Health Care Facilities ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Full Face

Abstract Contaminated aerosols and micro droplets are easily generated by infected hosts through sneezing, coughing, speaking and breathing1-3 and harm humans’ health and the global economy. While most of the efforts are usually targeted towards protecting individuals from getting infected,4 eliminating transmissions from infection sources is also important to prevent disease transmission. Supportive therapies for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) pneumonia such as oxygen supplementation, nebulizers and non-invasive mechanical ventilation all carry an increased risk for viral transmission via aerosol to healthcare workers.5-9 In this work, we study the efficacy of five methods for self-containing aerosols emitted from infected subjects undergoing nebulization therapies with a diverse spectrum on oxygen delivery therapies. The work includes five study cases: Case I: Use of a Full-Face Mask with biofilter in bilevel positive airway pressure device (BPAP) therapy, Case II: Use of surgical mask in High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) therapy, Case III: Use of a modified silicone disposable mask in a HFNC therapy, Case IV: Use of a modified silicone disposable mask with a regular nebulizer and normal breathing, Case V: Use of a mitigation box with biofilter in a Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilator (NIPPV). We demonstrate that while cases I, III and IV showed efficacies of 98-100%; cases II and V, which are the most commonly used, resulted with significantly lower efficacies of 10-24% to mitigate the dispersion of nebulization aerosols. Therefore, implementing cases I, III and IV in health care facilities may help battle the contaminations and infections via aerosol transmission during a pandemic.

scholarly journals Use of volume-targeted non-invasive bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation in a patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Montserrat Diaz-Abad ◽  
John Edward Brown
Keyword(s):  
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Minute Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Lateral Sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease in which most patients die of respiratory failure. Although volume-targeted non-invasive bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) ventilation has been studied in patients with chronic respiratory failure of various etiologies, its use in ALS has not been reported. We present the case of a 66-year-old woman with ALS and respiratory failure treated with volume-targeted BPAP ventilation for 15 weeks. Weekly data downloads showed that disease progression was associated with increased respiratory muscle weakness, decreased spontaneous breathing, and increased use of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, whereas tidal volume and minute ventilation remained relatively constant.

scholarly journals Respiratory Modalities in Preventing Reintubation in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 2333794X2199153
Author(s):  
Ameer Al-Hadidi ◽  
Morta Lapkus ◽  
Patrick Karabon ◽  
Begum Akay ◽  
Paras Khandhar
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
P Value

Post-extubation respiratory failure requiring reintubation in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) results in significant morbidity. Data in the pediatric population comparing various therapeutic respiratory modalities for avoiding reintubation is lacking. Our objective was to compare therapeutic respiratory modalities following extubation from mechanical ventilation. About 491 children admitted to a single-center PICU requiring mechanical ventilation from January 2010 through December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Therapeutic respiratory support assisted in avoiding reintubation in the majority of patients initially extubated to room air or nasal cannula with high-flow nasal cannula (80%) or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (100%). Patients requiring therapeutic respiratory support had longer PICU LOS (10.92 vs 6.91 days, P-value = .0357) and hospital LOS (16.43 vs 10.20 days, P-value = .0250). Therapeutic respiratory support following extubation can assist in avoiding reintubation. Those who required therapeutic respiratory support experienced a significantly longer PICU and hospital LOS. Further prospective clinical trials are warranted.

Comparative study between noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with respiratory failure

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed N Al Shafi'i ◽  
Doaa M. Kamal El-din ◽  
Mohammed A. Abdulnaiem Ismaiel ◽  
Hesham M Abotiba
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has been increasingly used in the management of respiratory failure in intensive care unit (ICU). Aim of the Work is to compare the efficacy and resource consumption of NIPPMV delivered through face mask against invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) delivered by endotracheal tube in the management of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Patients and Methods This prospective randomized controlled study included 78 adults with acute respiratory failure who were admitted to the intensive care unit. The enrolled patients were randomly allocated to receive either noninvasive ventilation or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). Results Severity of illness, measured by the simplified acute physiologic score 3 (SAPS 3), were comparable between the two patient groups with no significant difference between them. Both study groups showed a comparable steady improvement in PaO2:FiO2 values, indicating that NIPPV is as effective as CMV in improving the oxygenation of patients with ARF. The PaCO2 and pH values gradually improved in both groups during the 48 hours of ventilation. 12 hours after ventilation, NIPPMV group showed significantly more improvement in PaCO2 and pH than the CMV group. The respiratory acidosis was corrected in the NIPPV group after 24 hours of ventilation compared with 36 hours in the CMV group. NIPPV in this study was associated with a lower frequency of complications than CMV, including ventilator acquired pneumonia (VAP), sepsis, renal failure, pulmonary embolism, and pancreatitis. However, only VAP showed a statistically significant difference. Patients who underwent NIPPV in this study had lower mortality, and lower ventilation time and length of ICU stay, compared with patients on CMV. Intubation was required for less than a third of patients who initially underwent NIV. Conclusion Based on our study findings, NIPPV appears to be a potentially effective and safe therapeutic modality for managing patients with ARF.

scholarly journals Risk Factors Associated with Mechanical Ventilation in Critical Bronchiolitis

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1035
Author(s):  
Rachel K. Marlow ◽  
Sydney Brouillette ◽  
Vannessa Williams ◽  
Ariann Lenihan ◽  
Nichole Nemec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Lengths Of Stay

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends supportive care for the management of bronchiolitis. However, patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe (critical) bronchiolitis define a unique group with varying needs for both non-invasive and invasive respiratory support. Currently, no guidance exists to help clinicians discern who will progress to invasive mechanical support. Here, we sought to identify key clinical features that distinguish pediatric patients with critical bronchiolitis requiring invasive mechanical ventilation from those that did not. We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary pediatric medical center. Children ≤2 years old admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) from January 2015 to December 2019 with acute bronchiolitis were studied. Patients were divided into non-invasive respiratory support (NRS) and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) groups; the IMV group was further subdivided depending on timing of intubation relative to PICU admission. Of the 573 qualifying patients, 133 (23%) required invasive mechanical ventilation. Median age and weight were lower in the IMV group, while incidence of prematurity and pre-existing neurologic or genetic conditions were higher compared to the NRS group. Multi-microbial pneumonias were diagnosed more commonly in the IMV group, in turn associated with higher severity of illness scores, longer PICU lengths of stay, and more antibiotic usage. Within the IMV group, those intubated earlier had a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and PICU length of stay, associated with lower pathogen load and, in turn, shorter antibiotic duration. Taken together, our data reveal that critically ill patients with bronchiolitis who require mechanical ventilation possess high risk features, including younger age, history of prematurity, neurologic or genetic co-morbidities, and a propensity for multi-microbial infections.

scholarly journals COVID-19 in pediatrics: case report with many complications and a good clinical outcome

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arianne Gaspar ◽  
Paulo João ◽  
Gabriela Kuzma ◽  
Idilla Floriani ◽  
Luana Amancio
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Older Individuals ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
Previous Diagnosis ◽  
Acute Infectious Disease

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute infectious disease that caused the emergence of the new serious global pandemic. The infection in children is much less prevalent than in adults and most cases are asymptomatic or have mild symptoms. Severe cases represent less than 1% of the total, therefore information about the disease in this age group is scarce compared to data in older individuals. We exposed a case of a 16-year-old male adolescent with a previous diagnosis of myelomeningocele, hydrocephalus with peritoneal ventricle bypass (PVB), recurrent urinary tract infection, epilepsy, and obesity. The patient presented cough and convulsive crises, which worsened during hospitalization with severe acute respiratory syndrome due to SARS-CoV-2, septic shock, and cardiorespiratory arrest and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for 9 days was required. Also presented several other complications and factors of critical prognosis, such as elevated inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, D-dimer), elevated cardiac troponin, and the necessity of renal replacement therapy. Nevertheless, the clinical outcome was satisfactory and he was discharged after a 40-day stay in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

scholarly journals Intubation and Ventilation amid the COVID-19 Outbreak

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 1317-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingzhong Meng ◽  
Haibo Qiu ◽  
Li Wan ◽  
Yuhang Ai ◽  
Zhanggang Xue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rapid Sequence Induction ◽  
Mainland China ◽  
Lung Protective Ventilation ◽  
Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Rapid Sequence ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
High Flow Oxygen ◽  
Essential Components ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Self Protection

Abstract The COVID-19 outbreak has led to 80,409 diagnosed cases and 3,012 deaths in mainland China based on the data released on March 4, 2020. Approximately 3.2% of patients with COVID-19 required intubation and invasive ventilation at some point in the disease course. Providing best practices regarding intubation and ventilation for an overwhelming number of patients with COVID-19 amid an enhanced risk of cross-infection is a daunting undertaking. The authors presented the experience of caring for the critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan. It is extremely important to follow strict self-protection precautions. Timely, but not premature, intubation is crucial to counter a progressively enlarging oxygen debt despite high-flow oxygen therapy and bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation. Thorough preparation, satisfactory preoxygenation, modified rapid sequence induction, and rapid intubation using a video laryngoscope are widely used intubation strategies in Wuhan. Lung-protective ventilation, prone position ventilation, and adequate sedation and analgesia are essential components of ventilation management.

Emergency Pediatric Noninvasive Ventilation and Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

2020 ◽  
pp. 51-63
Author(s):  
Garrett S. Pacheco
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Emergency Physician ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Supportive Treatment ◽  
Airway Clearance Therapy ◽  
Respiratory Complaints ◽  
Ventilator Settings

Respiratory complaints are common conditions for children to present to emergency departments. Typically, patients respond to simple supportive treatment, whether it is airway clearance therapy, oxygen therapy, or bronchodilators. When these patients are critically ill, they often require aggressive oxygenation/ventilation with noninvasive strategies, or even tracheal intubation. The use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation has led to a significant reduction in the necessity for endotracheal intubation in children. The emergency physician should be familiar with the indications and appropriate application of these modalities. Furthermore, when patients require invasive mechanical ventilation, the emergency physician should have an understanding of initial ventilator settings, troubleshooting alarms, and an approach to the decompensating pediatric ventilated patient.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document