A Rosa canina – Urtica dioica – Harpagophytum procumbens/zeyheri Combination Significantly Reduces Gonarthritis Symptoms in a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Study

Planta Medica ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (18) ◽  
pp. 1384-1391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margret Moré ◽  
Joerg Gruenwald ◽  
Ute Pohl ◽  
Ralf Uebelhack
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Urtica Dioica ◽  
Womac Pain ◽  
Root Extract ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Rosa Canina ◽  
Hplc Fingerprint ◽  
Harpagophytum Procumbens

AbstractThe special formulation MA212 (Rosaxan) is composed of rosehip (Rosa canina L.) puree/juice concentrate, nettle (Urtica dioica L.) leaf extract, and devilʼs claw (Harpagophytum procumbens DC. ex Meisn. or Harpagophytum zeyheri Decne.) root extract and also supplies vitamin D. It is a food for special medical purposes ([EU] No 609/2013) for the dietary management of pain in patients with gonarthritis.This 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind parallel-design study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of MA212 versus placebo in patients with gonarthritis.A 3D-HPLC-fingerprint (3-dimensional high pressure liquid chromatography fingerprint) of MA212 demonstrated the presence of its herbal ingredients. Ninety-two randomized patients consumed 40 mL of MA212 (n = 46) or placebo (n = 44) daily. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), quality-of-life scores at 0, 6, and 12 weeks, and analgesic consumption were documented. Statistically, the initial WOMAC subscores/scores did not differ between groups. During the study, their means significantly improved in both groups. The mean pre-post change of the WOMAC pain score (primary endpoint) was 29.87 in the MA212 group and 10.23 in the placebo group. The group difference demonstrated a significant superiority in favor of MA212 (pU < 0.001; pt < 0.001). Group comparisons of all WOMAC subscores/scores at 6 and 12 weeks reached same significances. Compared to placebo, both physical and mental quality of life significantly improved with MA212. There was a trend towards reduced analgesics consumption with MA212, compared to placebo. In the final efficacy evaluation, physicians (pChi < 0.001) and patients (pChi < 0.001) rated MA212 superior to placebo. MA212 was well tolerated.This study demonstrates excellent efficacy for MA212 in gonarthritis patients.

Final results from ClarIDHy, a global, phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of ivosidenib (IVO) versus placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with previously treated cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and an isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4069-4069
Author(s):  
Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa ◽  
Teresa Macarulla ◽  
Milind M. Javle ◽  
Robin Kate Kelley ◽  
Sam Joseph Lubner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Failure Time ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Idh1 Mutation ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Grade 3

4069 Background: CCA is a rare cancer for which there are limited effective therapies. IDH1 mutations occur in ̃20% of intrahepatic CCAs, resulting in production of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate, which promotes oncogenesis. IVO (AG-120) is a first-in-class, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1 (mIDH1). ClarIDHy aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of IVO vs PBO in pts with unresectable or metastatic m IDH1 CCA. The primary endpoint was met with significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiology center (IRC) with IVO vs PBO (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37, p < 0.0001). Objective response rate (ORR) and stable disease for IVO were 2.4% (3 partial responses) and 50.8% (n = 63) vs 0% and 27.9% (n = 17) for PBO. IVO pts experienced significantly less decline in physical and emotional functioning domains of quality of life at cycle 2 day 1 vs PBO pts (nominal p < 0.05). Methods: Pts with m IDH1 CCA were randomized 2:1 to IVO (500 mg PO QD) or matched PBO and stratified by prior systemic therapies (1 or 2). Key eligibility: unresectable or metastatic m IDH1 CCA based on central testing; ECOG PS 0–1; measurable disease (RECIST v1.1). Crossover from PBO to IVO was permitted at radiographic progression. Primary endpoint: PFS by IRC. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS; by intent-to-treat), ORR, PFS (by investigator), safety, and quality of life. The planned crossover-adjusted OS was derived using the rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) model. Results: As of 31 May 2020, ̃780 pts were prescreened for an IDH1 mutation and 187 were randomized to IVO (n = 126) or PBO (n = 61); 13 remain on IVO. Median age 62 y; M/F 68/119; 91% intrahepatic CCA; 93% metastatic disease; 47% had 2 prior therapies. 70% of PBO pts crossed over to IVO. OS data were mature, with 79% OS events in IVO arm and 82% in PBO. Median OS (mOS) was 10.3 months for IVO and 7.5 months for PBO (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.56–1.12; one-sided p = 0.093). The RPSFT-adjusted mOS was 5.1 months for PBO (HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34–0.70; p < 0.0001). Common all-grade treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs, ≥ 15%) in the IVO arm: nausea 41%, diarrhea 35%, fatigue 31%, cough 25%, abdominal pain 24%, decreased appetite 24%, ascites 23%, vomiting 23%, anemia 18%, and constipation 15%. Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were reported in 50% of IVO pts vs 37% of PBO pts, with grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs in 7% of IVO pts vs 0% in PBO. 7% of IVO pts experienced an AE leading to treatment discontinuation vs 9% of PBO pts. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: IVO was well tolerated and resulted in a favorable OS trend vs PBO despite a high rate of crossover. These data – coupled with statistical improvement in PFS, supportive quality of life data, and favorable safety profile – demonstrate the clinical benefit of IVO in advanced m IDH1 CCA. Clinical trial information: NCT02989857.

Daflon 500 mg: Symptoms and Edema

Angiology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 56 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. S25-S32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert-Adrien Ramelet
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Significant Difference

Patients suffering from any class of the Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathophysiological (CEAP) classification of chronic venous disease (CVD) may be symptomatic (C0s-C6s). Leg heaviness, discomfort, itching, cramps, pain, paresthesia, and edema (C3) are the most frequent manifestations of CVD and a major reason for medical consultation. Daflon 500 mg (micronized purified flavonoid fraction [MPFF]) is an effective treatment for symptoms and edema in CVD as demonstrated in several randomized controlled studies. A 2-month, double-blind study in 40 patients established the superiority of Daflon 500 mg over placebo with regard to symptoms and objective signs. This was confirmed in another double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (2 months’ treatment, 160 patients), and in the Reflux assEssment and quaLity of lIfe improvEment with micronized Flavonoids (RELIEF) study. The latter included 5,052 patients in 23 countries, using a visual analog scale for evaluating pain, leg heaviness, cramps, and a sensation of swelling. All symptoms showed significant and progressive improvement. The quality-of-life results (scores on the ChronIc Venous Insufficiency quality of life Questionnaire [CIVIQ]) paralleled those of symptoms. The decrease in the ankle and calf circumferences was significantly greater (p<0.001) in the group of patients treated with Daflon 500 mg in two studies, and correlated well with the improvement in the sensation of swelling (p<0.001). This was confirmed with more sophisticated measurement techniques as in the RELIEF study or in a trial assessing edema with an optoelectronic volumeter in 20 patients. A further double-blind, randomized, controlled study established a statistically significant difference in favor of Daflon 500 mg in comparison with diosmin, both on symptoms and edema. The therapeutic efficacy of Daflon 500 mg on CVD symptoms and edema has been demonstrated in double-blind, randomized, controlled studies. Further studies using a new approach may define the most precise and validated methodology for application in future research in phlebology.

Treatment of Intermittent Claudication with Mesoglycan – A Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (11) ◽  
pp. 1181-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Gresele ◽  
Gianni Ferrari ◽  
Luigi Santoro ◽  
Francesco Gianese ◽  
Giuseppe Nenci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Intermittent Claudication ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Walking Distance ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Walking Capacity

Summary Objective: To assess the effect of treatment with mesoglycan, a sulphated polysaccharide compound, on the walking capacity of patients with stage II peripheral arterial disease. Methods: Non-diabetic out-patients with intermittent claudication, duplex ultrasound evidence of peripheral atherosclerosis, ankle/arm index <0.80, systolic ankle pressure >50 mmHg, and absolute walking distance (AWD) between 100 and 300 m (standardised treadmill test) were eligible. After a 5-week run-in on single-blind placebo, patients were randomised to double-blind treatment with mesoglycan, 30 mg/day intramuscularly for 3 weeks followed by 100 mg/day orally for 20 weeks, or matching placebo. All patients received low-dose aspirin and lifestyle instructions. Clinical response was defined as an AWD increase at Week 23 >50% over baseline. Health-related quality of life and ischaemic events were assessed as secondary efficacy variables. Results: 242 patients were randomised and 237 were assessed for clinical response. Patients achieving clinical response were 59/118 with mesoglycan (50.0%) and 31/119 with placebo (26.1%; p <0.001). Geometric mean AWD increased from 192 to 298 m with mesoglycan, and from 192 to 238 m with placebo (p <0.001). Pain-free walking distance showed a non-significant increase with mesoglycan (p = 0.057). Changes in quality of life scores were in favour of mesoglycan. The rate of ischaemic events was 1/120 on mesoglycan and 6/122 on placebo (p = 0.053). The rate of non-ischaemic adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation was 7/120 and 4/122, respectively. Conclusion: Treatment with mesoglycan improves the walking capacity of patients with intermittent claudication, and might confer additional antithrombotic protection over that of aspirin.

scholarly journals Dry cupping in the treatment of individuals with non-specific chronic low back pain: a protocol for a placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e032416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Jário de Almeida Silva ◽  
Bruno T Saragiotto ◽  
Rodrigo Scattone Silva ◽  
Caio Alano de Almeida Lins ◽  
Marcelo Cardoso de Souza
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Cupping Therapy ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Double Blind

BackgroundLow back pain is a very prevalent condition in the population and cupping therapy has been presented as a frequently used non-pharmacological treatment in this population. However, there is a lack of well-designed studies that evaluate the effects of this technique. This protocol describes a placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind study that aims to evaluate the effect of dry cupping therapy on pain, physical function, trunk range of motion, quality of life and psychological symptoms in individuals with non-specific chronic low back pain.Methods and analysisNinety individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain, aged from 18 to 59 years, will be randomised into two groups: intervention group, which will be submitted to dry cupping therapy application with two suctions; and placebo group which will undergo placebo dry cupping therapy. Both applications will occur bilaterally in parallel to the vertebrae from L1 to L5. The application will be performed once a week for 8 weeks. The volunteers will be evaluated before the treatment (T0), immediately after the first intervention (T1), after 4 weeks of intervention (T4) and after 8 weeks of intervention (T8). The primary outcome will be pain intensity, and secondary outcomes will be physical function, lumbar range of motion, patient expectation, overall perception of effect, quality of life and psychological factors.Ethics and disseminationThis protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of FACISA/UFRN (number: 3639814). The results of the study will be disseminated to participants through social networks and will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and scientific meetings.Trial registration numberNCT03909672.

scholarly journals 0740 Quality of Life in Phase 3, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Withdrawal Study of JZP-258 in Adults with Narcolepsy with Cataplexy

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A281-A282
Author(s):  
N Foldvary-Schaefer ◽  
M J Thorpy ◽  
Y Dauvilliers ◽  
A Roy ◽  
L Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Sodium Oxybate ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Sf 36

Abstract Introduction Narcolepsy negatively impacts health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Sodium oxybate is a standard of care for the treatment of cataplexy and excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy. JZP-258 is an oxybate product candidate with 92% less sodium. Efficacy and safety of JZP-258 were established in a double-blind randomized withdrawal study in adults with narcolepsy with cataplexy. Methods Participants 18-70 years of age began JZP-258 treatment during a 12-week, open-label, optimized treatment and titration period, followed by a 2-week stable-dose period (SDP). Participants were then randomized to receive placebo or continue JZP-258 treatment during a 2-week, double-blind, randomized withdrawal period (DBRWP). HRQoL assessments included the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36) and 5-level EuroQoL 5-Dimensions Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Results 201 participants enrolled; 134 were randomized and received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication (efficacy population; placebo, n=65; JZP-258, n=69). Decreased scores (worsening) were observed in participants randomized to placebo compared with participants randomized to continue JZP-258 treatment for the SF-36 physical component summary (median [Q1, Q3], −1.92 [−3.46, 1.73] for placebo and −0.03 [−2.07, 2.41] for JZP-258; nominal P=0.02), SF-36 mental component summary (−1.92 [−6.28, 1.34] for placebo and 1.55 [−1.88, 3.78] for JZP-258; nominal P=0.03), and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (−5.00 [−10.0, 5.00] for placebo and 0 [0, 5.00] for JZP-258; nominal P=0.01). No change was observed in the EQ-5D-5L crosswalk index (0 [−0.05, 0.03] for placebo and 0 [−0.01, 0.03] for JZP-258; nominal P=0.39). The overall safety profile of JZP-258 was similar to sodium oxybate. Conclusion HRQoL worsened in those randomized to placebo during DBRWP but remained stable in participants who continued JZP-258 treatment. Support Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Antidepressant efficacy and quality of life in depression: a double-blind study with moclobemide and fluoxetine

1994 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 363-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Lonnqvist ◽  
H. Sintonen ◽  
E. Syvälahti ◽  
B. Appelberg ◽  
T. Koskinen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Antidepressant Efficacy

scholarly journals Oxybutynin vs Placebo for Hot Flashes in Women With or Without Breast Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial (ACCRU SC-1603)

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto A Leon-Ferre ◽  
Paul J Novotny ◽  
Eric G Wolfe ◽  
Stephanie S Faubion ◽  
Kathryn J Ruddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Hot Flashes ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Clinical Trial

Abstract Background Hot flashes (HFs) negatively affect quality of life among perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. This study investigated the efficacy of oxybutynin vs placebo in decreasing HFs. Methods In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind study, women with and without breast cancer with 28 or more HFs per week, lasting longer than 30 days, who were not candidates for estrogen-based therapy, were assigned to oral oxybutynin (2.5 mg twice a day or 5 mg twice a day) or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the intrapatient change from baseline in weekly HF score between each oxybutynin dose and placebo using a repeated-measures mixed model. Secondary endpoints included changes in weekly HF frequency, HF-related daily interference scale questionnaires, and self-reported symptoms. Results We enrolled 150 women. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Mean (SD) age was 57 (8.2) years. Two-thirds (65%) were taking tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. Patients on both oxybutynin doses reported greater reductions in the weekly HF score (5 mg twice a day: −16.9 [SD 15.6], 2.5 mg twice a day: −10.6 [SD 7.7]), placebo −5.7 (SD 10.2); P &lt; .005 for both oxybutynin doses vs placebo), HF frequency (5 mg twice a day: −7.5 [SD 6.6], 2.5 mg twice a day: −4.8 [SD 3.2], placebo: −2.6 [SD 4.3]; P &lt; .003 for both oxybutynin doses vs placebo), and improvement in most HF-related daily interference scale measures and in overall quality of life. Patients on both oxybutynin arms reported more side effects than patients on placebo, particularly dry mouth, difficulty urinating, and abdominal pain. Most side effects were grade 1 or 2. There were no differences in study discontinuation because of adverse effects. Conclusion Oxybutynin is an effective and relatively well-tolerated treatment option for women with HFs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document