scholarly journals Cooperate, coordinate, communicate or collaborate?

2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Sandra G Leggat

IN HEALTH CARE we use these ?C? words regularly ? describing what health professionals, patients, consumers, politicians and managers need to do to improve health care systems. A snapshot of each of these is provided below. The Institute of Medicine?s Crossing the Quality Chasm report suggested that cooperation among clinicians was a priority.1 Yet game theorists have long shown that cooperation results in better individual outcomes than competitive behaviour. 2 Driven to achieve the best outcomes, people will choose to cooperate more often than they choose to compete. Most recently, game theory analysis has even been applied to the evolution of cancer, with the resulting conclusion of ?malignancy from cooperation?3 ? tumours grow because it is the nature of cells to cooperate. Given this tremendous innate ?force? for cooperation, why is there the appearance of less cooperation among health system components than we would like?

2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherri Lee Simons

SINCE THE RELEASE OF THE Institute of Medicine report “To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System,” much attention has been focused on redesigning health care systems and implementing safer practices.1 At the same time, health care providers continue to grapple with the ways in which institutions and caregivers respond when preventable injuries occur.2–5


2011 ◽  
pp. 57-64
Author(s):  
Daniel Carbone

A lack of health services has long been the thorn in the side of many communities, especially rural and regional communities. The high costs of treating ever growing chronic and complex conditions in traditional settings, where rural allied health services providers are non-existent and doctors are already overcommitted, are prompting a shift in focus to more efficient technology driven delivery of health services. Moreover, these days it is also increasingly unlikely that health professionals will encounter patients who have not used information technology to influence their health knowledge, health behaviour, perception of symptoms, and illness behaviour. Advances in Internet technologies offer promise towards the development of an e-health care system. This article will postulate whether portal technologies can play a role facilitating the transition to such e-health care systems. This article aims at reviewing the literature to present to the reader the barriers and opportunities out here for effective health portals. However, the article does not intend to provide a one-fits-all technical/content solution, only to make implementers and developers aware of the potential implications.


2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (S1) ◽  
pp. s59-s68 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kastrup

AbstractHealth care and health care systems should be seen and understood in their socio-cultural context. Modern urbanized societies are likely to exhibit health care pluralism, and different therapeutic approaches are available side-by-side. The various models may take their origin in different cultural traditions, but in most societies one type of care is at a given time considered “above” the others. However health care activities in all societies show a degree of interrelation, reflecting societal changes in which normative practices, value systems and structures change over time. In the current Western health systems evidence-based biomedical care is the prevailing system taught to all professionals.The present paper outlines the prevailing health paradigms, and the advantages and shortcomings of the various approaches and their relation to modern care will be discussed. With increased multicultural backgrounds of patients there is a need for mental health professionals to recognize the existence of traditional approaches and be aware of the parallel systems of care. Competent treatment of such patients requires that mental health professionals are aware of this and exhibit a willingness and ability to bridge between the more traditional and the Western approaches to treatment. The delineations and various aspects of the concept cultural competence and its dimensions will be discussed from a clinical perspective.Comparative studies of the various Western and the traditional approaches respectively will be reviewed.


ISRN Nursing ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Anne Xippolitos ◽  
Marie Ann Marino ◽  
Norman H. Edelman

Transformation of the current healthcare system is critical to achieve improved quality, safety, value, and access. Patients with multiple, chronic health conditions require integrated care coordination yet the current health care system is fragmented and complex. Nursing must play a key role in constructing a system that is value based and patient focused. The Robert Wood Johnson/Institute of Medicine (RWJ/IOM) report on the future of nursing outlines strategic opportunities for nursing to take a lead role in this transformation. Partnerships across academic institutions and health care systems have the potential to address issues through mutual goal setting, sharing of risks, responsibilities, and accountability, and realignment of resources. The purpose of this paper is to present Stony Brook University Medical Center's (SBUMC) academic-service partnership which implemented several of the RWJ/IOM recommendations. The partnership resulted in several initiatives that improved quality, safety, access, and value. It also characterized mutual goal setting, shared missions and values, and a united vision for health care.


Author(s):  
Carla Wallimann ◽  
Andreas Balthasar

Growing migration in European countries has simultaneously increased cultural diversity in health care. Migrants’ equal access to health care systems and migrant friendly health care have therefore become relevant topics. Findings gathered in recent years have mainly focussed on the perspective of care providers, whereas this study includes migrant perspectives. It explores the primary care network of Eritrean immigrants in Switzerland as well as their experiences of interacting with health professionals. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews with intercultural interpreters from Eritrea were conducted. On the basis of a thematic analysis, the study identified the important informal and formal contacts in these Eritrean immigrants’ primary care networks and the specific forms of support each actor provides. In this network, encounters with health professionals were predominately expressed positively. The main barriers reported were language difficulties and intercultural understanding. On the basis of the participants’ statements, six key lessons for practice have been derived. These lessons are specifically important for facilitating Eritrean immigrants’ access to the Swiss health care system. Nevertheless, they are also relevant for other groups of migrants in European countries.


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (S14) ◽  
pp. 10-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne J. Katon

The 2001 Institute of Medicine Report “Crossing the Quality Chasm,” summarized the current care of chronic illness in the United States by emphasizing “Between the health care we have and the health care we could have lies not just a gap, but a chasm.” Across multiple chronic illnesses within primary and specialty care systems, this summary statement illustrates that clinicians and other health professionals are not adequately providing patients guideline levels of treatment–levels that can lower the risk for complications of those illnesses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document