Gaseous mercury in coastal urban areas

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne L. Soerensen ◽  
Henrik Skov ◽  
Matthew S. Johnson ◽  
Marianne Glasius
Keyword(s):  
Urban Areas ◽  
Marine Boundary Layer ◽  
Elemental Mercury ◽  
Atmospheric Mercury ◽  
Mercury Deposition ◽  
Mercury Emissions ◽  
Gaseous Elemental Mercury ◽  
Gaseous Mercury ◽  
Range Transport ◽  
Aquatic Food

Environmental context Mercury is a neurotoxin that bioaccumulates in the aquatic food web. Atmospheric emissions from urban areas close to the coast could cause increased local mercury deposition to the ocean. Our study adds important new data to the current limited knowledge on atmospheric mercury emissions and dynamics in coastal urban areas. Abstract Approximately 50% of primary atmospheric mercury emissions are anthropogenic, resulting from e.g. emission hotspots in urban areas. Emissions from urban areas close to the coast are of interest because they could increase deposition loads to nearby coastal waters as well as contribute to long range transport of mercury. We present results from measurements of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) and reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) in 15 coastal cities and their surrounding marine boundary layer (MBL). An increase of 15–90% in GEM concentration in coastal urban areas was observed compared with the remote MBL. Strong RGM enhancements were only found in two cities. In urban areas with statistically significant GEM/CO enhancement ratios, slopes between 0.0020 and 0.0087 ng m–3 ppb–1 were observed, which is consistent with other observations of anthropogenic enhancement. The emission ratios were used to estimate GEM emissions from the areas. A closer examination of data from Sydney (Australia), the coast of Chile, and Valparaiso region (Chile) in the southern hemisphere, is presented.

scholarly journals Two new sources of reactive gaseous mercury in the free troposphere

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 29203-29233 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Timonen ◽  
J. L. Ambrose ◽  
D. A. Jaffe
Keyword(s):  
Source Region ◽  
Elemental Mercury ◽  
Anthropogenic Pollution ◽  
Atmospheric Mercury ◽  
Free Troposphere ◽  
Mercury Deposition ◽  
Gaseous Elemental Mercury ◽  
Reactive Gaseous Mercury ◽  
Gaseous Mercury ◽  
The Pacific

Abstract. Mercury (Hg) is a neurotoxin that bioaccumulates in the food chain. Mercury is emitted to the atmosphere primarily in its elemental form, which has a long lifetime allowing global transport. It is known that atmospheric oxidation of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) generates reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) which plays an important role in the atmospheric mercury cycle by enhancing the rate of mercury deposition to ecosystems. However, the primary GEM oxidants, and the sources and chemical composition of RGM are poorly known. Using speciated mercury measurements conducted at the Mt. Bachelor Observatory since 2005 we present two previously unidentified sources of RGM to the free troposphere (FT). Firstly, we observed elevated RGM concentrations, large RGM/GEM-ratios, and anti-correlation between RGM and GEM during Asian long-rang transport events, demonstrating that RGM is formed from GEM by in-situ oxidation in some anthropogenic pollution plumes in the FT. During the Asian pollution events the measured RGM/GEM-ratios reached peak values, up to ~0.20, which are significantly larger than ratios typically measured (RGM/GEM < 0.05) in the Asian source region. Secondly, we observed very high RGM levels – the highest reported in the FT – in clean air masses that were processed upwind of Mt. Bachelor Observatory over the Pacific Ocean. The high RGM concentrations (up to 700 pg m−3), high RGM/GEM-ratios (up to 1), and very low ozone levels during these events provide the first observational evidence indicating significant GEM oxidation in the lower FT. The identification of these processes changes our conceptual understanding of the formation and distribution of oxidized Hg in the global atmosphere.

scholarly journals Global deposition of speciated atmospheric mercury to terrestrial surfaces: an overview

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Peisheng Zhou ◽  
Shuzhen Cao ◽  
Yu Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Dry Deposition ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Wet Deposition ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Elemental Mercury ◽  
Atmospheric Mercury ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Observation System ◽  
Mercury Deposition ◽  
Gaseous Elemental Mercury

Abstract. One of the most important processes in the global mercury biogeochemical cycling is the deposition of atmospheric mercury, including gaseous elemental mercury (GEM), gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM), and particulate-bound mercury (PBM), to terrestrial surfaces. In this paper, methods for the observation of wet, dry, litterfall, throughfall, and cloud/fog deposition and models for mercury dry deposition are reviewed. Surrogate surface methods with cation exchange membranes are widely used for GOM dry deposition measurements, while observation methods for GEM dry deposition are more diverse. The methodology for Hg wet deposition is more mature, but the influence of cloud/fog scavenging is easy to neglect. Dry deposition models for speciated mercury have high uncertainties owing to the presence of sensitive parameters related to GOM chemical forms. Observation networks for mercury wet deposition have been developed worldwide, with the Global Mercury Observation System (GMOS) covering the northern hemisphere, the tropics, and the southern hemisphere. Wet deposition implies the spatial distribution of atmospheric mercury pollution, while GOM dry deposition depends highly on the elevation. Litterfall Hg deposition is crucial to forests. Urban areas have high wet deposition and PBM dry deposition because of high reactive mercury levels. Grasslands and forests have significant GOM and GEM dry deposition, respectively. Evergreen broadleaf forests bear high litterfall Hg deposition. Future research needs have been proposed based on the current knowledge of global mercury deposition to terrestrial surfaces.

scholarly journals Gaseous elemental mercury depletion events observed at Cape Point during 2007–2008

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 1121-1131 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.-G. Brunke ◽  
C. Labuschagne ◽  
R. Ebinghaus ◽  
H. H. Kock ◽  
F. Slemr
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Marine Boundary Layer ◽  
Elemental Mercury ◽  
Atmospheric Mercury ◽  
Chemical Mechanism ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Gaseous Elemental Mercury ◽  
Transport Distance ◽  
Gaseous Mercury ◽  
Urban Emissions

Abstract. Gaseous mercury in the marine boundary layer has been measured with a 15 min temporal resolution at the Global Atmosphere Watch station Cape Point since March 2007. The most prominent features of the data until July 2008 are the frequent occurrences of pollution (PEs) and depletion events (DEs). Both types of events originate mostly within a short transport distance (up to about 100 km), which are embedded in air masses ranging from marine background to continental. The Hg/CO emission ratios observed during the PEs are within the range reported for biomass burning and industrial/urban emissions. The depletion of gaseous mercury during the DEs is in many cases almost complete and suggests an atmospheric residence time of elemental mercury as short as a few dozens of hours, which is in contrast to the commonly used estimate of approximately 1 year. The DEs observed at Cape Point are not accompanied by simultaneous depletion of ozone which distinguishes them from the halogen driven atmospheric mercury depletion events (AMDEs) observed in Polar Regions. Nonetheless, DEs similar to those observed at Cape Point have also been observed at other places in the marine boundary layer. Additional measurements of mercury speciation and of possible mercury oxidants are hence called for to reveal the chemical mechanism of the newly observed DEs and to assess its importance on larger scales.

scholarly journals Enhanced production of oxidised mercury over the tropical Pacific Ocean: a key missing oxidation pathway

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 1323-1335 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Wang ◽  
A. Saiz-Lopez ◽  
A. S. Mahajan ◽  
J. C. Gómez Martín ◽  
D. Armstrong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Marine Boundary Layer ◽  
Oxidation Mechanism ◽  
Elemental Mercury ◽  
Atmospheric Mercury ◽  
Mercury Oxidation ◽  
Gaseous Elemental Mercury ◽  
Enhanced Production ◽  
Modelling Studies ◽  
Aquatic Food ◽  
The Stability

Abstract. Mercury is a contaminant of global concern. It is transported in the atmosphere primarily as gaseous elemental mercury, but its reactivity and deposition to the surface environment, through which it enters the aquatic food chain, is greatly enhanced following oxidation. Measurements and modelling studies of oxidised mercury in the polar to sub-tropical marine boundary layer (MBL) have suggested that photolytically produced bromine atoms are the primary oxidant of mercury. We report year-round measurements of elemental and oxidised mercury, along with ozone, halogen oxides (IO and BrO) and nitrogen oxides (NO2), in the MBL over the Galápagos Islands in the equatorial Pacific. Elemental mercury concentration remained low throughout the year, while higher than expected levels of oxidised mercury occurred around midday. Our results show that the production of oxidised mercury in the tropical MBL cannot be accounted for by bromine oxidation only, or by the inclusion of ozone and hydroxyl. As a two-step oxidation mechanism, where the HgBr intermediate is further oxidised to Hg(II), depends critically on the stability of HgBr, an additional oxidant is needed to react with HgBr to explain more than 50% of the observed oxidised mercury. Based on best available thermodynamic data, we show that atomic iodine, NO2, or HO2 could all play the potential role of the missing oxidant, though their relative importance cannot be determined explicitly at this time due to the uncertainties associated with mercury oxidation kinetics. We conclude that the key pathway that significantly enhances atmospheric mercury oxidation and deposition to the tropical oceans is missing from the current understanding of atmospheric mercury oxidation.

scholarly journals Speciated Atmospheric Mercury during Haze and Non-haze Days in an Inland City in China

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qianqian Hong ◽  
Zhouqing Xie ◽  
Cheng Liu ◽  
Feiyue Wang ◽  
Pinhua Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elemental Mercury ◽  
Atmospheric Mercury ◽  
Central China ◽  
Mercury Emissions ◽  
Gaseous Elemental Mercury ◽  
Enhanced Production ◽  
Mercury Transport ◽  
Haze Pollution ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Haze Days

Abstract. Long-term continuous measurements of speciated atmospheric mercury were conducted at Hefei, a mid-latitude inland city in east central China, from July 2013 to June 2014. The mean concentrations (± standard deviation) of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM), reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) and particle-bound mercury (PBM) were 3.95 ± 1.93 ng m−3, 2.49 ± 2.41 pg m−3 and 23.3 ± 90.8 pg m−3, respectively, during non-haze days, and 4.74 ± 1.62 ng m−3, 4.32 ± 8.36 pg m−3 and 60.2 ± 131.4 pg m−3, respectively, during haze days. Potential source contribution function (PSCF) analysis suggested that the atmospheric mercury pollution during haze days was caused primarily by local mercury emissions, instead of via long-range mercury transport. In addition, the disadvantageous diffussion during haze days will also enhance the level of atmospheric mercury. Compared to the GEM and RGM, change in PBM was more sensitive to the haze pollution. The mean PBM concentration during haze days was 2.5 times that during non-haze days due to elevated concentrations of particulate matter. A remarkable seasonal trend in PBM was observed with concentration decreasing in the following order in response to the frequency of haze days: autumn, winter, spring, summer. A distinct diurnal relationship was found between GEM and RGM during haze days, with the peak values of RGM coinciding with the decline in GEM. Using HgOH as an intermediate product during GEM oxidation, our results suggest that NO2 aggregation with HgOH could explain the enhanced production of RGM during the daytime in haze days. Increasing level of NOx will potentially accelerate the oxidation of GEM despite the decrease of solar radiation.

scholarly journals Effects of Brownfield Remediation on Total Gaseous Mercury Concentrations in an Urban Landscape

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 387
Author(s):  
Linghui Meng ◽  
Charles T. Driscoll ◽  
Mario Montesdeoca ◽  
Huiting Mao
Keyword(s):  
Urban Areas ◽  
Urban Landscape ◽  
Urban Ecosystems ◽  
Atmospheric Mercury ◽  
Soil Restoration ◽  
Total Gaseous Mercury ◽  
Annual Average ◽  
Mercury Emissions ◽  
Gaseous Mercury ◽  
Parking Lot

In order to obtain a better perspective of the impacts of brownfields on the land–atmosphere exchange of mercury in urban areas, total gaseous mercury (TGM) was measured at two heights (1.8 m and 42.7 m) prior to 2011–2012 and after 2015–2016 for the remediation of a brownfield and installation of a parking lot adjacent to the Syracuse Center of Excellence in Syracuse, NY, USA. Prior to brownfield remediation, the annual average TGM concentrations were 1.6 ± 0.6 and 1.4 ± 0.4 ng · m − 3 at the ground and upper heights, respectively. After brownfield remediation, the annual average TGM concentrations decreased by 32% and 22% at the ground and the upper height, respectively. Mercury soil flux measurements during summer after remediation showed net TGM deposition of 1.7 ng · m − 2 · day − 1 suggesting that the site transitioned from a mercury source to a net mercury sink. Measurements from the Atmospheric Mercury Network (AMNet) indicate that there was no regional decrease in TGM concentrations during the study period. This study demonstrates that evasion from mercury-contaminated soil significantly increased local TGM concentrations, which was subsequently mitigated after soil restoration. Considering the large number of brownfields, they may be an important source of mercury emissions source to local urban ecosystems and warrant future study at additional locations.

scholarly journals Investigation of processes controlling GEM oxidation at mid-latitudinal marine, coastal, and inland sites

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Ye ◽  
H. Mao ◽  
C.-J. Lin ◽  
S. Y. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Marine Boundary Layer ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Elemental Mercury ◽  
Atmospheric Mercury ◽  
Chemical Mechanism ◽  
Atmospheric Conditions ◽  
Gaseous Elemental Mercury ◽  
Mixing Ratios ◽  
Marine Site ◽  
Study Sites

Abstract. A box model incorporating a state-of-the-art chemical mechanism for atmospheric mercury (Hg) cycling was developed to investigate oxidation of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) at three locations in the northeastern United States: Appledore Island (marine), Thompson Farm (coastal, rural), and Pack Monadnock (inland, rural, elevated). The chemical mechanism improved model's ability to simulate the formation of gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM) at the study sites. At the coastal and inland sites, GEM oxidation was predominated by O3 and OH, contributing 80–99 % of total GOM production during daytime. H2O2 initiated GEM oxidation was significant (~ 33 % of the total GOM) at the inland site during nighttime. In the marine boundary layer (MBL), Br and BrO were dominant GEM oxidants contributing ~ 70 % of the total GOM production during mid-day, while O3 dominated GEM oxidation (50–90 % of GOM production) over the remaining day. Following the production of HgBr from GEM + Br, HgBr was oxidized by BrO, HO2, OH, ClO, and IO to form Hg(II) brominated GOM species. However, under atmospheric conditions, the prevalent GEM oxidants in the MBL could be Br / BrO or O3 / OH depending on Br and BrO mixing ratios. Relative humidity and products of the CH3O2 + BrO reaction possibly affected significantly the mixing ratios of Br or BrO radicals and subsequently GOM formation. Gas-particle partitioning could be potentially important in the production of GOM as well as Br and BrO at the marine site.

scholarly journals Atmospheric mercury over sea ice during the OASIS-2009 campaign

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 7007-7021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Steffen ◽  
J. Bottenheim ◽  
A. Cole ◽  
T. A. Douglas ◽  
R. Ebinghaus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Elemental Mercury ◽  
Atmospheric Mercury ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Mercury Deposition ◽  
International Polar Year ◽  
Bromine Oxide ◽  
Gaseous Elemental Mercury ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mercury Cycle

Abstract. Measurements of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM), reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) and particulate mercury (PHg) were collected on the Beaufort Sea ice near Barrow, Alaska, in March 2009 as part of the Ocean-Atmosphere-Sea Ice-Snowpack (OASIS) and OASIS-Canada International Polar Year programmes. These results represent the first atmospheric mercury speciation measurements collected on the sea ice. Concentrations of PHg averaged 393.5 pg m−3 (range 47.1–900.1 pg m−3) and RGM concentrations averaged 30.1 pg m−3 (range 3.5–105.4 pg m−3) during the two-week-long study. The mean concentration of GEM during the study was 0.59 ng m−3 (range 0.01–1.51 ng m−3) and was depleted compared to annual Arctic ambient boundary layer concentrations. It is shown that when ozone (O3) and bromine oxide (BrO) chemistry were active there is a positive linear relationship between GEM and O3, a negative one between PHg and O3, a positive correlation between RGM and BrO, and none between RGM and O3. For the first time, GEM was measured simultaneously over the tundra and the sea ice. The results show a significant difference in the magnitude of the emission of GEM from the two locations, with significantly higher emission over the tundra. Elevated chloride levels in snow over sea ice are proposed to be the cause of lower GEM emissions over the sea ice because chloride has been shown to suppress photoreduction processes of RGM to GEM in snow. Since the snowpack on sea ice retains more mercury than inland snow, current models of the Arctic mercury cycle may greatly underestimate atmospheric deposition fluxes because they are based predominantly on land-based measurements. Land-based measurements of atmospheric mercury deposition may also underestimate the impacts of sea ice changes on the mercury cycle in the Arctic. The predicted changes in sea ice conditions and a more saline future snowpack in the Arctic could enhance retention of atmospherically deposited mercury and increase the amount of mercury entering the Arctic Ocean and coastal ecosystems.

Global Concentrations of Gaseous Elemental Mercury and Reactive Gaseous Mercury in the Marine Boundary Layer

2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (19) ◽  
pp. 7425-7430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne L. Soerensen ◽  
Henrik Skov ◽  
Daniel J. Jacob ◽  
Britt T. Soerensen ◽  
Matthew S. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Marine Boundary Layer ◽  
Elemental Mercury ◽  
Gaseous Elemental Mercury ◽  
Reactive Gaseous Mercury ◽  
Gaseous Mercury

scholarly journals Investigation of processes controlling summertime gaseous elemental mercury oxidation at midlatitudinal marine, coastal, and inland sites

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (13) ◽  
pp. 8461-8478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuyun Ye ◽  
Huiting Mao ◽  
Che-Jen Lin ◽  
Su Youn Kim
Keyword(s):  
Marine Boundary Layer ◽  
Elemental Mercury ◽  
Atmospheric Mercury ◽  
Box Model ◽  
Chemical Mechanism ◽  
Gaseous Elemental Mercury ◽  
Diurnal Cycles ◽  
Mixing Ratios ◽  
Halogen Chemistry ◽  
Marine Site

Abstract. A box model incorporating a state-of-the-art chemical mechanism for atmospheric mercury (Hg) cycling was developed to investigate the oxidation of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) at three locations in the northeastern United States: Appledore Island (AI; marine), Thompson Farm (TF; coastal, rural), and Pack Monadnock (PM; inland, rural, elevated). The chemical mechanism in this box model included the most up-to-date Hg and halogen chemistry. As a result, the box model was able to simulate reasonably the observed diurnal cycles of gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM) and chemical speciation bearing distinct differences between the three sites. In agreement with observations, simulated GOM diurnal cycles at AI and TF showed significant daytime peaks in the afternoon and nighttime minimums compared to flat GOM diurnal cycles at PM. Moreover, significant differences in the magnitude of GOM diurnal amplitude (AI > TF > PM) were captured in modeled results. At the coastal and inland sites, GEM oxidation was predominated by O3 and OH, contributing 80–99 % of total GOM production during daytime. H2O2-initiated GEM oxidation was significant (∼ 33 % of the total GOM) at the inland site during nighttime. In the marine boundary layer (MBL) atmosphere, Br and BrO became dominant GEM oxidants, with mixing ratios reaching 0.1 and 1 pptv, respectively, and contributing ∼ 70 % of the total GOM production during midday, while O3 dominated GEM oxidation (50–90 % of GOM production) over the remaining day when Br and BrO mixing ratios were diminished. The majority of HgBr produced from GEM+Br was oxidized by NO2 and HO2 to form brominated GOM species. Relative humidity and products of the CH3O2+BrO reaction possibly significantly affected the mixing ratios of Br or BrO radicals and subsequently GOM formation. Gas–particle partitioning could potentially be important in the production of GOM as well as Br and BrO at the marine site.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document