Management for Primary Health Care

1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally Johnson

This paper is about the implementation of primary health care and particularly about the role of management in this approach to health care. Just as the organisation for primary health care has a very different 'look' from that of conventional health care systems so does its management. One of the reasons for this is the strong commitment in primary health care to community participation which grounds it solidly in the people whose health is at stake. Best practice in management for primary health care is about shared management, strong organisation with shared meanings, and the making of strategic alliances. The discussion focuses on some of the skills needed by a primary health care manager, and the effective use of these skills for the primary health care organisation. There is no doubt that the role of the manager in the implementation and maintenance of primary health care is critical to achieving best practice in this approach to health care.




2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Hal Swerissen

Considerable interest in reform for primary health care and health more generally has emerged recently. There are concerns that primary and community services are fragmented, inequitable and inefficient, particularly for people with chronic and complex conditions. The evidence suggests there will be a significant increase in demand for these services and that stronger primary health care systems lead to better health outcomes. This paper makes a number of suggestions about the development of funding, payment, governance and organisational arrangements that could be part of a National Primary Health Care Strategy for Australia.



Health Policy ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brogren Per-Olof ◽  
Richard B. Saltman


2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Chris Lockhart

The transition to primary health care (PHC) is often described in an idealised manner, which either ignores or obscures the experiences associated with its implementation at the local level. By adopting an anthropological perspective, this article highlights some of these experiences and the context within which they occur for one health care organisation in remote Western Australia. It Specifically focuses on problems associated with economic rationalism, managerialism, and the inherently fragmented character of health service organisations. Such issues must be allowed to inform idealised PHC models in order to make them more applicable and attuned to local needs and realities.



2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Simoens ◽  
Anthony Scott

Integration in primary health care is occurring in many health-care systems without a clear understanding of the meaning of integration, its form and rationale. This literature review examines the definition and extent of integration, as well as the factors that might encourage it in the context of British integrated primary care organizations (IPCOs). Integration is complex and multifaceted. No commonly agreed definitions of integration have been developed and the range of dimensions examined in the empirical literature was limited. However, some of the dimensions examined in studies of IPCOs may be useful in better understanding the form integration takes. Few studies were designed to examine the determinants of integration or were explicitly based on theory. Research showed that the level of production and transaction costs was not related to the size of the IPCO, although in practice the attitudes of health professionals are likely to be more important influences on the extent of integration. To date, little progress has been made in explaining and measuring integration. If further integration in primary health care is warranted, more research is required to understand its nature, form and rationale.



2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamed Rahimi ◽  
Reza Goudarzi ◽  
Somayeh Noorihekmat ◽  
Aliakbar Haghdoost

Abstract Background: Managers need to measure and evaluate the performance of their subordinates in order to plan, organize, and improve the performance of their organizations. In this study, the performance and efficiency of the district's primary health care system in the southeast of Iran were evaluated using the data envelopment analysis (DEA) model.Methods: The quantitative non-parametric data envelopment analysis was used to evaluate the performance of the primary care system in the districts. On the hand, human forcess, physical facilities, and vehicles were the variables used as the inputs, and the number of services and service recipients was considered as the outputs to measure efficiency. The data were analyzed using the DEAP software, and performance and efficiency were calculated with the output maximization approach and the assumption of variable returns to scale. It was carried out as linear programming with nine scenarios for nine districts in 2018.Results: The mean efficiency of the studied districts with the assumption of variable returns to scale was 0.76, indicating at least 24% capacity to increase efficiency in the primary care system of Kerman University of Medical Sciences without any increase in production factors. According to the mean values, Kerman and Kuhbanan were efficient while the other 7 districts were inefficient. The districts were divided into three groups: efficient, moderately efficient, and inefficient. Accordingly, the most inefficient primary health care systems were those of Shahr-e Babak, Baft, and Orzooieh.Conclusion: The results of this study showed inefficiency in most primary health care systems of the studied districts, indicating that primary care managers can provide more health services to the community through proper management of available resources. Inefficient districts can compare themselves with successful and reference districts and eliminate their shortcomings in order to improve their performance.



2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Aslani ◽  
Marja Naaranoja

Purpose – This paper aims to discuss a model for diffusion of innovation among the professionals of primary health-care centers in Finland. The authors answer partially to one of the important questions of the policymakers titled “How primary health-care centers can move toward systems that continuously improve their innovation?”. Design/methodology/approach – A systematic-qualitative framework based on an action research is presented to assess dynamics of diffusion of innovation in the primary health-care centers in Finland. Findings – The authors conceptualize the innovation systems of primary health-care systems by three different diagrams: subsystem diagram, policy structure diagram and causal loop diagram. The investigation reviews innovation process of Finnish professionals (staffs, nurses and doctors) in the frame of a systematic-qualitative analysis. The relationships and consequences of decisions and policies are discussed with a new way of thinking in the health-care sector studies. Originality/value – The implemented systematic-qualitative research in this article is an innovative approach in the innovation studies of the health-care systems.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document