Minimal effectiveness of native and non-native seeding following three high-severity wildfires

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken A. Stella ◽  
Carolyn H. Sieg ◽  
Pete Z. Fulé
Keyword(s):  
Native Species ◽  
Plant Cover ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Experimental Tests ◽  
Native Plant ◽  
Vegetative Cover ◽  
Bare Ground ◽  
High Severity ◽  
Litter Cover ◽  
Study Sites

The rationale for seeding following high-severity wildfires is to enhance plant cover and reduce bare ground, thus decreasing the potential for soil erosion and non-native plant invasion. However, experimental tests of the effectiveness of seeding in meeting these objectives in forests are lacking. We conducted three experimental studies of the effectiveness of seeding with non-native and native species following three Arizona wildfires. Seeding treatments were largely ineffective in increasing vegetative cover or decreasing exposed bare ground. At one treatment at one fire, wheat seeding at the Warm Fire, senesced seeded annuals increased litter cover and resulted in lower bare ground values than unseeded controls. Only on one fire, the Warm Fire, did seeded non-native annuals establish well, resulting in 20–29% vegetative cover. On the other two fires, seeded cereal grains accounted for <3% cover. At all fires, native seeded species contributed between <1 and ∼12% vegetative cover. Vegetative cover on all treatments, including unseeded treatments, was at or near 40% the first year following fire, at all three study sites. Non-native species richness and abundance did not differ among treatments at any fire. This study adds to growing evidence that post-fire seeding is ineffective in enhancing post-fire plant cover and reducing invasive non-native plants.

Impacts of erosion control treatments on native vegetation recovery after severe wildfire in the Eastern Cascades, USA

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erich K. Dodson ◽  
David W. Peterson ◽  
Richy J. Harrod
Keyword(s):  
Species Richness ◽  
Plant Species ◽  
Native Species ◽  
Plant Cover ◽  
Plant Species Richness ◽  
Tree Regeneration ◽  
Vegetation Recovery ◽  
Native Vegetation ◽  
Individual Plant ◽  
Native Plant

Slope stabilisation treatments like mulching and seeding are used to increase soil cover and reduce runoff and erosion following severe wildfires, but may also retard native vegetation recovery. We evaluated the effects of seeding and fertilisation on the cover and richness of native and exotic plants and on individual plant species following the 2004 Pot Peak wildfire in Washington State, USA. We applied four seeding and three fertilisation treatments to experimental plots at eight burned sites in spring 2005 and surveyed vegetation during the first two growing seasons after fire. Seeding significantly reduced native non-seeded species richness and cover by the second year. Fertilisation increased native plant cover in both years, but did not affect plant species richness. Seeding and fertilisation significantly increased exotic cover, especially when applied in combination. However, exotic cover and richness were low and treatment effects were greatest in the first year. Seeding suppressed several native plant species, especially disturbance-adapted forbs. Fertilisation, in contrast, favoured several native understorey plant species but reduced tree regeneration. Seeding, even with native species, appears to interfere with the natural recovery of native vegetation whereas fertilisation increases total plant cover, primarily by facilitating native vegetation recovery.

Post-fire seeding with ryegrass: implications for understorey plant communities and overall effectiveness

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 518
Author(s):  
Melissa A. McMaster ◽  
Andrea Thode ◽  
Michael Kearsley
Keyword(s):  
Ponderosa Pine ◽  
Plant Cover ◽  
Ground Cover ◽  
Plant Invasions ◽  
Bare Soil ◽  
Italian Ryegrass ◽  
Exotic Plant ◽  
Vegetative Cover ◽  
High Severity ◽  
Significant Difference

Seeding following high-severity wildfires is motivated by the goals of increasing vegetative cover and decreasing bare soil in order to minimise soil erosion and exotic plant invasions. We compared the ground cover and vegetation response of seeded versus non-seeded areas located in the Warm Fire in northern Arizona, where post-fire seeding treatments with Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne spp. multiflorum (L.)) were conducted in 4000 ha of high-severity burned areas. Over the course of the study, we observed no significant difference between seeded and non-seeded plots in percentage of bare soil, total vegetative cover or exotic plant cover. However, there were significant differences in plant community composition as revealed by PERMANOVA and Indicator Species Analysis. Two years post-fire there were significantly fewer ponderosa pine seedlings, and the cover of annual and biennial forbs was significantly lower in plots that were seeded with Italian ryegrass. In the third year, the cover of native bunch grasses was significantly lower in seeded plots. The differences we observed may be due to differences in pre-existing vegetation composition because of the geographic separation of the plots across the landscape. Our results illustrate the ineffectiveness of post-fire seeding in achieving the goals of increasing vegetative cover and decreasing the invasion of non-native plants, and we suggest that alternative post-fire remediation should be considered in the future.

Ecological Characteristics of Sites Invaded by Buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare)

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott R. Abella ◽  
Lindsay P. Chiquoine ◽  
Dana M. Backer
Keyword(s):  
Seed Bank ◽  
Sonoran Desert ◽  
Native Species ◽  
Plant Cover ◽  
The United States ◽  
Slope Aspect ◽  
Plant Colonization ◽  
Native Plant ◽  
Organic C ◽  
Ecological Characteristics

AbstractUnderstanding the ecological characteristics of areas invaded and not invaded by exotic plants is a priority for invasive plant science and management. Buffelgrass is an invasive perennial species that managers view as a major threat to indigenous ecosystems of conservation lands in Australia, Mexico, the United States, and other locations where the species is not native. At 14 sites in Saguaro National Park in the Arizona Uplands of the Sonoran Desert, we compared the soil, vegetation, and soil seed bank of patches invaded and not invaded by buffelgrass. Abiotic variables, such as slope aspect and soil texture, did not differ between buffelgrass patches and patches without buffelgrass. In contrast, variables under primarily biotic control differed between patch types. Soil nutrients, such as organic C and NO3–N, were approximately twofold greater in buffelgrass compared with nonbuffelgrass patches. Average native species richness was identical (14 species 100 m−2) between patch types, but native plant cover was 43% lower in buffelgrass patches. Unexpectedly, native seed-bank densities did not differ significantly between patch types and were 40% greater than buffelgrass seed density below buffelgrass canopies. Results suggest that (1) soil nutrient status should not be unfavorable for native plant colonization at buffelgrass sites if buffelgrass is treated; (2) at least in the early stages of buffelgrass patch formation (studied patches were about 10 yr old), native vegetation species were not excluded, but rather, their cover was reduced; and (3) native soil seed banks were not reduced in buffelgrass patches.

scholarly journals Native Plant Recovery following Three Years of Common Reed (Phragmites australis) Control

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 175-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher L. Zimmerman ◽  
Rebecca R. Shirer ◽  
Jeffrey D. Corbin
Keyword(s):  
Phragmites Australis ◽  
Native Species ◽  
Plant Cover ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Species Abundance ◽  
Common Reed ◽  
Exotic Plant ◽  
Native Plant ◽  
Native Community ◽  
Native Plant Community

AbstractProjects that aim to control invasive species often assume that a reduction of the target species will increase native species abundance. However, reports of the responses of native species following exotic species control are relatively rare. We assessed the recovery of the native community in five tidal wetland locations in which we attempted to eradicate the invasive common reed [Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud.]. We tested whether 3 yr of treatment were able to eradicate Phragmites and promote recovery of the native plant community. After 3 yr of treatment, Phragmites density declined sharply in all treated stands, though it was not eradicated in any of them. Native plant cover increased significantly in treated areas, and community composition, particularly in smaller stands, converged toward that of uninvaded habitat. Thus, even within the relatively short timescale of the treatments and monitoring, significant progress was made toward achieving the goals of controlling Phragmites infestations and promoting native biodiversity. There was a trend toward greater promise for success in smaller stands than larger stands, as has been observed in other studies. A greater emphasis on monitoring whole-community responses to exotic plant control, across a range of conditions, would enhance our ability to plan and design successful management strategies.

scholarly journals Sowing Mixtures of Native Plant Species: Are There Any Differences between Hydroseeding and Regular Seeding?

Plants ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2507
Author(s):  
Vilma Gudyniene ◽  
Sigitas Juzenas ◽  
Vaclovas Stukonis ◽  
Egle Norkeviciene
Keyword(s):  
Species Richness ◽  
Plant Species ◽  
Native Species ◽  
Growth Traits ◽  
Plant Cover ◽  
Species Abundance ◽  
Legume Species ◽  
Competitive Growth ◽  
Native Plant ◽  
Native Plant Species

Hydroseeding is a convenient, low-cost way to plant seeds. Traditionally, fast-growing commercial species that are cheap to obtain are preferred in hydroseeding, while native species have limited use. Nowadays, the use of native species is often desired in revegetation projects. However, there is a paucity of information about hydroseeding native species in Northern areas of Europe. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether hydroseeding has any effects on native plant cover formation, species richness and abundance, the development of plant morphological features, or aboveground biomass. A total of 40 native plant species in Lithuania were sowed using hydroseeding and regular seeding. The experimental plots were assessed for two years. The results show a relatively small and short positive effect of hydroseeding on plant cover formation. No significant differences were found in species richness between the sowing treatments. However, a comparison of species composition revealed significant differences between the sowing treatments that were more associated with species abundance than species diversity. Hydroseeding was favoured by legume species, such as Onobrychis viciifolia, Ononis arvensis, Lotus corniculatus, and Trifolium medium, while Festuca rubra favoured the regular seeding treatment. Overall, our findings emphasize that legume species that display more competitive growth traits should be included in the seed mixture in lower proportions when hydroseeding is applied.

scholarly journals Effects of cutting and sowing seeds of native species on giant ragweed invasion and plant diversity in a field experiment

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaeho Byun ◽  
Ho Choi ◽  
Hojeong Kang
Keyword(s):  
Field Experiment ◽  
Plant Diversity ◽  
Native Species ◽  
Native Plants ◽  
Biotic Resistance ◽  
Plant Cover ◽  
Effective Control ◽  
Native Plant ◽  
Effective Measure ◽  
Ambrosia Trifida

Abstract Background Ambrosia trifida is a highly invasive annual plant, but effective control methods have not been proposed. Among various eradication methods, cutting is a simple measure to control invasive plants, and sowing seeds of native plants may effectively increase biotic resistance to invasion. In this study, we conducted a field experiment with two treatments: cutting and sowing seeds of six native or naturalized plants. Results We found a significantly lower A. trifida abundance after cutting than in the control (77% decrease). Sowing seeds of native species did not provide any additional benefit for the control of A. trifida, but increased the importance values and diversity of other native vegetation. The abundance of A. trifida was negatively correlated with that of other plant taxa based on plant cover, biomass, and density. However, biotic resistance of sown plants was not effective to control invasion because A. trifida was so competitive. Conclusions We concluded that cutting is an effective measure to control Ambrosia trifida while sowing seeds of native plants can increase native plant diversity.

Prescribed burning for control of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) and enhanced native plant diversity

Weed Science ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. DiTomaso ◽  
Guy B. Kyser ◽  
Marla S. Hastings
Keyword(s):  
Plant Diversity ◽  
Prescribed Burning ◽  
Plant Cover ◽  
First Year ◽  
Native Plant ◽  
Vegetative Cover ◽  
Seedling Density ◽  
Yellow Starthistle ◽  
Burned Areas ◽  
Broadleaf Species

Two separate open grassland areas within Sugarloaf Ridge State Park, Sonoma County, CA, were burned for three consecutive years (1993–1995 [Site A] and 1995–1997 [Site B]) for control of yellow starthistle. Burns were conducted in late June to early July following seed dispersal and senescence of desirable grasses and forbs but prior to viable seed production in yellow starthistle. After the first year burn, there was no significant reduction in yellow starthistle cover the following spring and summer. Despite the lack of control, the first year burn reduced the yellow starthistle soil seedbank by 74% and the number of seedlings the following spring by 83%. However, total plant diversity and species richness increased dramatically in the burned areas. This was due primarily to an increase in the number of native broadleaf species. A second burn the next summer (1995–1997 site) reduced seedbank, seedling density, and summer vegetative cover the following year by 94, 92, and 85%, respectively, while maintaining significantly higher native plant cover and richness. A third consecutive summer burn decreased yellow starthistle seedbank and seedling density by 96, 98, and 85%, respectively, in the 1995–1997 burn site. Three consecutive years of burning in the 1993–1995 site reduced yellow starthistle seedbank and seedling density by over 99% and summer vegetative cover by 91%. These results indicate that prescribed burning can be an effective tool for the management of yellow starthistle and can have a long-term benefit on native broadleaf diversity and richness.

Passive Reestablishment of Riparian Vegetation Following Removal of Invasive Knotweed (Polygonum)

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon M. Claeson ◽  
Peter A. Bisson
Keyword(s):  
Species Diversity ◽  
Plant Species ◽  
Native Species ◽  
Vascular Plant ◽  
Tree Cover ◽  
Native Plant ◽  
Japanese Knotweed ◽  
Vegetative Cover ◽  
Reference Sites ◽  
Habitat Features

AbstractJapanese knotweed and congeners are invasive to North America and Europe and spread aggressively along rivers establishing dense monotypic stands, thereby reducing native riparian plant diversity, structure, and function. Noxious weed control programs attempt to eradicate the knotweed with repeated herbicide applications under the assumption that the system will recover to a native assemblage which will inhibit future invasions. However, eradication efficacy studies typically only measure the amount of knotweed reduced, not the reestablished species diversity or plant origins. For a community scale efficacy study, we measured vascular plant species diversity and cover in riparian areas along five rivers in Washington State, 3 to 6 years after Bohemian knotweed was initially treated with herbicide. Plant species composition was compared between riparian sites treated to remove knotweed and reference sites where knotweed was absent. Sites where knotweed had been removed had significantly more exotic species and vegetative cover than reference sites; however, native species richness and cover were greater in reference sites and areas with more overstory vegetation. The native plants observed were primarily shade tolerant and perennial, as opposed to many of the exotics, which were shade-intolerant annuals. In general, reestablishment of native and exotic vegetation was not related to pretreatment knotweed stem count, size of the invaded area, or timing of herbicide application. However, residual native tree cover was negatively correlated with initial knotweed stem count. Monitoring the success of restoration objectives (e.g., native plant reestablishment or increased species diversity) and characterizing associated habitat features following knotweed eradication will help in the development of site-specific protocols for successful plant community scale restoration.

scholarly journals Vegetation Baseline Study for the Knife River Indian Villages National Historic Site

1984 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 75-78
Author(s):  
Gary Clambey
Keyword(s):  
Native Species ◽  
Prescribed Burning ◽  
Plant Cover ◽  
Vegetation Patterns ◽  
Vegetative Cover ◽  
Historic Site ◽  
Disturbed Land ◽  
Reference Plant ◽  
Poison Ivy ◽  
Plant Collection

Objectives of this study include: 1. An inventory of the flora, together with establishment of reference plant collection; 2. Delimitation and description of the plant communities, including compsitional analysis; 3. Assessment of the contemporary plant cover relative to various management considerations, such as: a. The use of prescribed burning, particularly in grassland areas; b. Control of nuisance plant species, e.g., leafy spurge, poison ivy; c. Present vegetative cover on formerly disturbed land and further efforts to restore or increase native species on those sites; 4. Clarification of vegetation patterns as they might have existed in the 1804-05 period.

Understory responses to fire and artificial seeding in an eastern Cascades Abies grandis forest, U.S.A.

1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1393-1401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tania L Schoennagel ◽  
Donald M Waller
Keyword(s):  
Native Species ◽  
Plant Cover ◽  
Native Grasses ◽  
Native Plant ◽  
Abies Grandis ◽  
Lactuca Serriola ◽  
Epilobium Angustifolium ◽  
Eastern Cascades ◽  
Conifer Tree ◽  
Total Plant

To mitigate erosion after fire, land managers often seed non-native grasses onto burned slopes. To assess how post-fire seeding affects plant recovery, we compared areas that were either unseeded or artificially seeded after high-intensity fire in a dry Abies grandis (Dougl.) Lindl. forest in the northeastern Cascades. Seeding with a mix of non-native grasses and a legume significantly reduced the cover of native plants and shifted patterns of relative abundance after 2 years. Although seeding did not significantly affect total cover or native species richness, it reduced overall native plant cover by 47%. Species that recolonize via wind-dispersed seeds (e.g., Epilobium angustifolium L., Lactuca serriola L., and Arenaria macrophylla Hook.), species with long-lived seeds that germinate after fire (e.g., Ceanothus velutinus Dougl.), and species with wide successional amplitudes that resprout after fire (e.g., Apocynum androsaemifolium L. and Salix scouleriana Barratt) all declined steeply in cover on seeded plots. In addition, conifer seedlings were only half as abundant on seeded plots. As seeding after fire does not boost total plant cover and limits conifer tree establishment on the study area, it appears to do little to reduce the risk of soil erosion. It also appears to inhibit native shrub and herb re-establishment. These substantial effects on native species appear to alter plant communities well beyond the life of the seeded species.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document