scholarly journals Temperature effects on RNA polymerase initiation kinetics reveal which open complex initiates and that bubble collapse is stepwise

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (30) ◽  
pp. e2021941118
Author(s):  
Dylan M. Plaskon ◽  
Kate L. Henderson ◽  
Lindsey C. Felth ◽  
Cristen M. Molzahn ◽  
Claire Evensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rate Constants ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Promoter Sequence ◽  
Bubble Collapse ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Transcription Inhibitors ◽  
Nucleotide Addition ◽  
Mechanisms Of Formation ◽  
Promoter Dna

Transcription initiation is highly regulated by promoter sequence, transcription factors, and ligands. All known transcription inhibitors, an important class of antibiotics, act in initiation. To understand regulation and inhibition, the biophysical mechanisms of formation and stabilization of the “open” promoter complex (OC), of synthesis of a short RNA–DNA hybrid upon nucleotide addition, and of escape of RNA polymerase (RNAP) from the promoter must be understood. We previously found that RNAP forms three different OC with λPR promoter DNA. The 37 °C RNAP-λPR OC (RPO) is very stable. At lower temperatures, RPO is less stable and in equilibrium with an intermediate OC (I3). Here, we report step-by-step rapid quench-flow kinetic data for initiation and growth of the RNA–DNA hybrid at 25 and 37 °C that yield rate constants for each step of productive nucleotide addition. Analyzed together, with previously published data at 19 °C, our results reveal that I3 and not RPO is the productive initiation complex at all temperatures. From the strong variations of rate constants and activation energies and entropies for individual steps of hybrid extension, we deduce that contacts of RNAP with the bubble strands are disrupted stepwise as the hybrid grows and translocates. Stepwise disruption of RNAP-strand contacts is accompanied by stepwise bubble collapse, base stacking, and duplex formation, as the hybrid extends to a 9-mer prior to disruption of upstream DNA–RNAP contacts and escape of RNAP from the promoter.

scholarly journals Kinetic-Mechanistic Evidence for Which E. coli RNA Polymerase-λPR Open Promoter Complex Initiates and for Stepwise Disruption of Contacts in Bubble Collapse

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan Plaskon ◽  
Kate Henderson ◽  
Lindsey Felth ◽  
Cristen Molzahn ◽  
Claire Evensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rate Constants ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Bubble Collapse ◽  
Mechanism Analysis ◽  
Initiation Complex ◽  
Kinetic Measurements ◽  
Activation Barriers ◽  
Promoter Dna ◽  
Lower Temperature

AbstractIn transcription initiation, specific contacts between RNA polymerase (RNAP) and promoter DNA are disrupted as the RNA-DNA hybrid advances into the cleft, resulting in escape of RNAP. From the pattern of large and small rate constants for steps of initiation at λPR promoter at 19°C, we proposed that in-cleft interactions are disrupted in extending 3-mer to 5-mer RNA, −10 interactions are disrupted in extending 6-mer to 9-mer, and −35 interactions are disrupted in extending 10-mer to 11-mer, allowing RNAP to escape. Here we test this mechanism and determine enthalpic and entropic activation barriers of all steps from kinetic measurements at 25°C and 37°C. Initiation at 37°C differs significantly from expectations based on lower-temperature results. At low concentration of the second iNTP (UTP), synthesis of full-length RNA at 37°C is slower than at 25°C and no transient short RNA intermediates are observed, indicating a UTP-dependent bottleneck step early in the 37°C mechanism. Analysis reveals that the 37°C λPR OC (RPO) cannot initiate and must change conformation to a less-stable initiation complex (IC) capable of binding the iNTP. We find that IC is the primary λPR OC species below 25°C, and therefore conclude that IC must be the I3 intermediate in RPO formation. Surprisingly, Arrhenius activation energy barriers to five steps where RNAP-promoter in-cleft and −10 contacts are disrupted are much smaller than for other steps, including a negative barrier for the last of these steps. We interpret these striking effects as enthalpically-favorable, entropically-unfavorable, stepwise bubble collapse accompanying disruption of RNAP contacts.SignificanceTranscription initiation is highly regulated. To understand regulation, mechanisms of initiation and escape of RNA polymerase (RNAP) from the promoter must be understood. RNAP forms a highly-stable open complex (RPO) with λPR promoter at 37°C. From experiments determining effects of temperature on rate constants for each step of RNA synthesis, we find that RPO cannot bind the initiating nucleotides, that the I3 intermediate and not RPO is the initiation complex, and that contacts of RNAP with single-stranded DNA of the discriminator and −10 region and with −35 duplex DNA are disrupted stepwise as the RNA-DNA hybrid moves into the cleft. Evidence is obtained for stepwise bubble collapse and base stacking accompanying disruption of interactions of the single-stranded discriminator and −10 regions with RNAP.

scholarly journals Structures of E. coli σS-transcription initiation complexes provide new insights into polymerase mechanism

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (15) ◽  
pp. 4051-4056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Liu ◽  
Yuhong Zuo ◽  
Thomas A. Steitz
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Active Site ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Addition Reaction ◽  
Specific Interactions ◽  
Promoter Recognition ◽  
Nucleotide Addition ◽  
Promoter Dna

In bacteria, multiple σ factors compete to associate with the RNA polymerase (RNAP) core enzyme to form a holoenzyme that is required for promoter recognition. During transcription initiation RNAP remains associated with the upstream promoter DNA via sequence-specific interactions between the σ factor and the promoter DNA while moving downstream for RNA synthesis. As RNA polymerase repetitively adds nucleotides to the 3′-end of the RNA, a pyrophosphate ion is generated after each nucleotide incorporation. It is currently unknown how the release of pyrophosphate affects transcription. Here we report the crystal structures of E. coli transcription initiation complexes (TICs) containing the stress-responsive σS factor, a de novo synthesized RNA oligonucleotide, and a complete transcription bubble (σS-TIC) at about 3.9-Å resolution. The structures show the 3D topology of the σS factor and how it recognizes the promoter DNA, including likely specific interactions with the template-strand residues of the −10 element. In addition, σS-TIC structures display a highly stressed pretranslocated initiation complex that traps a pyrophosphate at the active site that remains closed. The position of the pyrophosphate and the unusual phosphodiester linkage between the two terminal RNA residues suggest an unfinished nucleotide-addition reaction that is likely at equilibrium between nucleotide addition and pyrophosphorolysis. Although these σS-TIC crystals are enzymatically active, they are slow in nucleotide addition, as suggested by an NTP soaking experiment. Pyrophosphate release completes the nucleotide addition reaction and is associated with extensive conformational changes around the secondary channel but causes neither active site opening nor transcript translocation.

scholarly journals Effects of distortions by A-tracts of promoter B-DNA spacer region on the kinetics of open complex formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.

2003 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 909-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iwona K Kolasa ◽  
Tomasz Łoziński ◽  
Kazimierz L Wierzchowski
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Specific Interaction ◽  
Structural Data ◽  
Structural Morphology ◽  
Promoter Dna ◽  
Sigma Subunit ◽  
Kinetics Of

A-tracts in DNA due to their structural morphology distinctly different from the canonical B-DNA form play an important role in specific recognition of bacterial upstream promoter elements by the carboxyl terminal domain of RNA polymerase alpha subunit and, in turn, in the process of transcription initiation. They are only rarely found in the spacer promoter regions separating the -35 and -10 recognition hexamers. At present, the nature of the protein-DNA contacts formed between RNA polymerase and promoter DNA in transcription initiation can only be inferred from low resolution structural data and mutational and crosslinking experiments. To probe these contacts further, we constructed derivatives of a model Pa promoter bearing in the spacer region one or two An (n = 5 or 6) tracts, in phase with the DNA helical repeat, and studied the effects of thereby induced perturbation of promoter DNA structure on the kinetics of open complex (RPo) formation in vitro by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. We found that the overall second-order rate constant ka of RPo formation, relative to that at the control promoter, was strongly reduced by one to two orders of magnitude only when the A-tracts were located in the nontemplate strand. A particularly strong 30-fold down effect on ka was exerted by nontemplate A-tracts in the -10 extended promoter region, where an involvement of nontemplate TG (-14, -15) sequence in a specific interaction with region 3 of sigma-subunit is postulated. A-tracts in the latter location caused also 3-fold slower isomerization of the first closed transcription complex into the intermediate one that precedes formation of RPo, and led to two-fold faster dissociation of the latter. All these findings are discussed in relation to recent structural and kinetic models of RPo formation.

scholarly journals Direct binding of TFEα opens DNA binding cleft of RNA polymerase

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Hoon Jun ◽  
Jaekyung Hyun ◽  
Jeong Seok Cha ◽  
Hoyoung Kim ◽  
Michael S. Bartlett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Transcription Bubble ◽  
Cryo Electron Microscopy ◽  
Direct Binding ◽  
Binding Cleft ◽  
Promoter Dna ◽  
Winged Helix Domain

AbstractOpening of the DNA binding cleft of cellular RNA polymerase (RNAP) is necessary for transcription initiation but the underlying molecular mechanism is not known. Here, we report on the cryo-electron microscopy structures of the RNAP, RNAP-TFEα binary, and RNAP-TFEα-promoter DNA ternary complexes from archaea, Thermococcus kodakarensis (Tko). The structures reveal that TFEα bridges the RNAP clamp and stalk domains to open the DNA binding cleft. Positioning of promoter DNA into the cleft closes it while maintaining the TFEα interactions with the RNAP mobile modules. The structures and photo-crosslinking results also suggest that the conserved aromatic residue in the extended winged-helix domain of TFEα interacts with promoter DNA to stabilize the transcription bubble. This study provides a structural basis for the functions of TFEα and elucidates the mechanism by which the DNA binding cleft is opened during transcription initiation in the stalk-containing RNAPs, including archaeal and eukaryotic RNAPs.

scholarly journals Np4A alarmones function in bacteria as precursors to RNA caps

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (7) ◽  
pp. 3560-3567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Luciano ◽  
Joel G. Belasco
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Promoter Sequence ◽  
Rna Degradation ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
E Coli ◽  
N Incorporation ◽  
Nascent Transcripts

Stresses that increase the cellular concentration of dinucleoside tetraphosphates (Np4Ns) have recently been shown to impact RNA degradation by inducing nucleoside tetraphosphate (Np4) capping of bacterial transcripts. However, neither the mechanism by which such caps are acquired nor the function of Np4Ns in bacteria is known. Here we report that promoter sequence changes upstream of the site of transcription initiation similarly affect both the efficiency with which Escherichia coli RNA polymerase incorporates dinucleoside polyphosphates at the 5′ end of nascent transcripts in vitro and the percentage of transcripts that are Np4-capped in E. coli, clear evidence for Np4 cap acquisition by Np4N incorporation during transcription initiation in bacterial cells. E. coli RNA polymerase initiates transcription more efficiently with Np4As than with ATP, particularly when the coding strand nucleotide that immediately precedes the initiation site is a purine. Together, these findings indicate that Np4Ns function in bacteria as precursors to Np4 caps and that RNA polymerase has evolved a predilection for synthesizing capped RNA whenever such precursors are abundant.

scholarly journals E. coli TraR allosterically regulates transcription initiation by altering RNA polymerase conformation and dynamics

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Chen ◽  
Saumya Gopalkrishnan ◽  
Courtney Chiu ◽  
Albert Y. Chen ◽  
Elizabeth A. Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Bacterial Proteins ◽  
Cryo Electron Microscopy ◽  
Promoter Complex ◽  
Promoter Dna ◽  
Induced Changes

AbstractTraR and its homolog DksA are bacterial proteins that regulate transcription initiation by binding directly to RNA polymerase (RNAP) rather than to promoter DNA. Effects of TraR mimic the combined effects of DksA and its cofactor ppGpp. How TraR and its homologs regulate transcription is unclear. Here, we use cryo-electron microscopy to determine structures of Escherichia coli RNAP, with or without TraR, and of an RNAP-promoter complex. TraR binding induced RNAP conformational changes not seen in previous crystallographic analyses, and a quantitative analysis of RNAP conformational heterogeneity revealed TraR-induced changes in RNAP dynamics. These changes involve mobile regions of RNAP affecting promoter DNA interactions, including the βlobe, the clamp, the bridge helix, and several lineage-specific insertions. Using mutational approaches, we show that these structural changes, as well as effects on σ70 region 1.1, are critical for transcription activation or inhibition, depending on the kinetic features of regulated promoters.

scholarly journals RNA polymerase II clustering through CTD phase separation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Boehning ◽  
C. Dugast-Darzacq ◽  
M. Rankovic ◽  
A. S. Hansen ◽  
T. Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Ctd Phosphorylation

The carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase (Pol) II is an intrinsically disordered low-complexity region that is critical for pre-mRNA transcription and processing. The CTD consists of hepta-amino acid repeats varying in number from 52 in humans to 26 in yeast. Here we report that human and yeast CTDs undergo cooperative liquid phase separation at increasing protein concentration, with the shorter yeast CTD forming less stable droplets. In human cells, truncation of the CTD to the length of the yeast CTD decreases Pol II clustering and chromatin association whereas CTD extension has the opposite effect. CTD droplets can incorporate intact Pol II and are dissolved by CTD phosphorylation with the transcription initiation factor IIH kinase CDK7. Together with published data, our results suggest that Pol II forms clusters/hubs at active genes through interactions between CTDs and with activators, and that CTD phosphorylation liberates Pol II enzymes from hubs for promoter escape and transcription elongation.

scholarly journals Structural basis for transcription activation by Crl through tethering of σS and RNA polymerase

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (38) ◽  
pp. 18923-18927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Jaramillo Cartagena ◽  
Amy B. Banta ◽  
Nikhil Sathyan ◽  
Wilma Ross ◽  
Richard L. Gourse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Functional Importance ◽  
Structural Element ◽  
Cryo Electron Microscopy ◽  
Promoter Complex ◽  
Σ Factor ◽  
Promoter Dna ◽  
Transcription Activators

In bacteria, a primary σ-factor associates with the core RNA polymerase (RNAP) to control most transcription initiation, while alternative σ-factors are used to coordinate expression of additional regulons in response to environmental conditions. Many alternative σ-factors are negatively regulated by anti–σ-factors. In Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and many other γ-proteobacteria, the transcription factor Crl positively regulates the alternative σS-regulon by promoting the association of σS with RNAP without interacting with promoter DNA. The molecular mechanism for Crl activity is unknown. Here, we determined a single-particle cryo-electron microscopy structure of Crl-σS-RNAP in an open promoter complex with a σS-regulon promoter. In addition to previously predicted interactions between Crl and domain 2 of σS (σS2), the structure, along with p-benzoylphenylalanine cross-linking, reveals that Crl interacts with a structural element of the RNAP β′-subunit that we call the β′-clamp-toe (β′CT). Deletion of the β′CT decreases activation by Crl without affecting basal transcription, highlighting the functional importance of the Crl-β′CT interaction. We conclude that Crl activates σS-dependent transcription in part through stabilizing σS-RNAP by tethering σS2 and the β′CT. We propose that Crl, and other transcription activators that may use similar mechanisms, be designated σ-activators.

Investigations of the modular structure of bacterial promoters

2006 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora S. Miroslavova ◽  
Stephen J.W. Busby
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Dna Sequence ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Promoter Activity ◽  
Modular Structure ◽  
Bacterial Rna ◽  
Sequence Elements ◽  
Promoter Dna ◽  
Transcript Initiation ◽  
Rna Polymerase Holoenzyme

Bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme carries different determinants that contact different promoter DNA sequence elements. These contacts are essential for the recognition of promoters prior to transcript initiation. Here, we have investigated how active promoters can be built from different combinations of elements. Our results show that the contribution of different contacts to promoter activity is critically dependent on the overall promoter context, and that certain combinations of contacts can hinder transcription initiation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document