scholarly journals A specialized spinal circuit for command amplification and directionality during escape behavior

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (42) ◽  
pp. e2106785118
Author(s):  
Na N. Guan ◽  
Lulu Xu ◽  
Tianrui Zhang ◽  
Chun-Xiao Huang ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Information Transfer ◽  
Escape Behavior ◽  
Central Component ◽  
Synaptic Connections ◽  
Adult Zebrafish ◽  
Evaluative Process ◽  
Motor Actions ◽  
Local Circuits ◽  
Spinal Circuit

In vertebrates, action selection often involves higher cognition entailing an evaluative process. However, urgent tasks, such as defensive escape, require an immediate implementation of the directionality of escape trajectory, necessitating local circuits. Here we reveal a specialized spinal circuit for the execution of escape direction in adult zebrafish. A central component of this circuit is a unique class of segmentally repeating cholinergic V2a interneurons expressing the transcription factor Chx10. These interneurons amplify brainstem-initiated escape commands and rapidly deliver the excitation via a feedforward circuit to all fast motor neurons and commissural interneurons to direct the escape maneuver. The information transfer within this circuit relies on fast and reliable axo-axonic synaptic connections, bypassing soma and dendrites. Unilateral ablation of cholinergic V2a interneurons eliminated escape command propagation. Thus, in vertebrates, local spinal circuits can implement directionality of urgent motor actions vital for survival.

scholarly journals Prepontine non-giant neurons drive flexible escape behavior in zebrafish

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory D. Marquart ◽  
Kathryn M. Tabor ◽  
Sadie A. Bergeron ◽  
Kevin L. Briggman ◽  
Harold A. Burgess
Keyword(s):  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Escape Behavior ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Perceived Threat ◽  
Sensory Cues ◽  
Fast Reaction ◽  
Threat Level ◽  
Drive Motor ◽  
Motor Actions

AbstractMany species execute ballistic escape reactions to avoid imminent danger. Despite fast reaction times, responses are often highly regulated, reflecting a trade-off between costly motor actions and perceived threat level. However, how sensory cues are integrated within premotor escape circuits remains poorly understood. Here we show that in zebrafish, less precipitous threats elicit a delayed escape, characterized by flexible trajectories, that are driven by a cluster of 38 prepontine neurons that are completely separate from the fast escape pathway. Whereas neurons that initiate rapid escapes receive direct auditory input and drive motor neurons, input and output pathways for delayed escapes are indirect, facilitating integration of cross-modal sensory information. Rapid decision making in the escape system is thus enabled by parallel pathways for ballistic responses and flexible delayed actions.

Connections between thoraco-coxal proprioceptive afferents and motor neurons in the locust

2000 ◽  
Vol 203 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-445
Author(s):  
M. Wildman
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Sensory Neurons ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Chordotonal Organ ◽  
Synaptic Connections ◽  
Afferent Neurons ◽  
Postsynaptic Potentials ◽  
The Common ◽  
Proprioceptive Afferents ◽  
Stimulation Of

The position of the coxal segment of the locust hind leg relative to the thorax is monitored by a variety of proprioceptors, including three chordotonal organs and a myochordotonal organ. The sensory neurons of two of these proprioceptors, the posterior joint chordotonal organ (pjCO) and the myochordotonal organ (MCO), have axons in the purely sensory metathoracic nerve 2C (N2C). The connections made by these afferents with metathoracic motor neurons innervating thoraco-coxal and wing muscles were investigated by electrical stimulation of N2C and by matching postsynaptic potentials in motor neurons with afferent spikes in N2C. Stretch applied to the anterior rotator muscle of the coxa (M121), with which the MCO is associated, evoked sensory spikes in N2C. Some of the MCO afferent neurons make direct excitatory chemical synaptic connections with motor neurons innervating the thoraco-coxal muscles M121, M126 and M125. Parallel polysynaptic pathways via unidentified interneurons also exist between MCO afferents and these motor neurons. Connections with the common inhibitor 1 neuron and motor neurons innervating the thoraco-coxal muscles M123/4 and wing muscles M113 and M127 are polysynaptic. Afferents of the pjCO also make polysynaptic connections with motor neurons innervating thoraco-coxal and wing muscles, but no evidence for monosynaptic pathways was found.

scholarly journals Prominent Inhibitory Projections Guide Sensorimotor Computation: An Invertebrate Perspective

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Hughes ◽  
Tansu Celikel
Keyword(s):  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Neural Circuits ◽  
Neural Circuit ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Circuit Complexity ◽  
Inhibitory Circuits ◽  
Invertebrate Species ◽  
Gating Mechanism ◽  
Motor Actions ◽  
Sensorimotor Representations

From single-cell organisms to complex neural networks, all evolved to provide control solutions to generate context and goal-specific actions. Neural circuits performing sensorimotor computation to drive navigation employ inhibitory control as a gating mechanism, as they hierarchically transform (multi)sensory information into motor actions. Here, we focus on this literature to critically discuss the proposition that prominent inhibitory projections form sensorimotor circuits. After reviewing the neural circuits of navigation across various invertebrate species, we argue that with increased neural circuit complexity and the emergence of parallel computations inhibitory circuits acquire new functions. The contribution of inhibitory neurotransmission for navigation goes beyond shaping the communication that drives motor neurons, instead, include encoding of emergent sensorimotor representations. A mechanistic understanding of the neural circuits performing sensorimotor computations in invertebrates will unravel the minimum circuit requirements driving adaptive navigation.

Synaptic connections between nonspiking afferent neurons and motor neurons underlying phase-dependent reflexes in crayfish

1992 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 664-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Skorupski
Keyword(s):  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Active State ◽  
Synaptic Delay ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Synaptic Connections ◽  
Afferent Neurons ◽  
Motor Patterns ◽  
Dependent Inhibition ◽  
Receptor Organ ◽  
Group 1

1. This paper analyzes the synaptic connections made by nonspiking afferent neurons of the thoracocoxal muscle receptor organ (TCMRO) with basal limb motor neurons in the crayfish. The T fiber, a dynamically sensitive afferent, monosynaptically excites promotor motor neurons. Evidence suggests that both tonic graded chemical transmission and electrical synaptic transmission may be involved, depending on the motor neuron under consideration. 2. In preparations in the active state (spontaneously producing reciprocal motor patterns), the T fiber also inhibits promotor motor neurons in a phase-dependent manner. This inhibitory pathway is probably indirect, because it involves additional synaptic delay. 3. The statically sensitive S fiber also excites promotor motor neurons, but phase-dependent inhibition of promotor motor neurons by the S fiber was not seen. 4. The T fiber excites a subclass of remotor motor neurons (group 1) by a combination of direct chemical input and electrical input. This connection underlies the positive feedback reflex that excites these remotor motor neurons, in a phase-dependent manner, on stretch of the TCMRO during the active state. In inactive preparations, this connection remains subthreshold. 5. Central synaptic outputs of group 1 remotor motor neurons can also inhibit promotor motor neurons. This pathway may contribute to the phase-dependent reflex inhibition of promotor motor neurons that occurs in the active state.

Synaptic integrative properties at hyperbaric pressure

1988 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 1497-1512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Grossman ◽  
J. J. Kendig
Keyword(s):  
Synaptic Transmission ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Repetitive Stimulation ◽  
Inhibitory Synapses ◽  
Synaptic Connections ◽  
Paired Pulse ◽  
Inhibitory Transmission ◽  
Inhibitory Synaptic Transmission ◽  
Hyperbaric Pressure ◽  
Per Se

1. Because hyperbaric pressure profoundly depresses excitatory synaptic transmission, it has proved difficult to account for its excitatory effects in the CNS. We tested the hypothesis that hyperbaric pressure might increase excitation by enhancing facilitation and potentiation during repetitive synaptic activation, and/or by selectively depressing inhibitory synaptic transmission. Intracellular microelectrode recordings were obtained from crustacean muscle fibers innervated by single identifiable excitor and inhibitor motor neurons; the preparations were exposed to pressures of 0.1-10.1 MPa. 2. Hyperbaric pressure reduced the amplitude of the singly evoked excitatory junctional potential (EJP), enhanced paired-pulse facilitation, and increased the potentiation elicited by trains of stimuli. The potentiated EJP at 10.1 MPa approached the comparable response evoked at normobaric pressure. 3. Hyperbaric pressure also depressed inhibitory synaptic transmission, measured as depression of the EJP by the inhibitor motor neuron. However, pressure depressed excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission to the same extent. Thus there appears to be no selective effect of pressure on the GABA-activated chloride channel. The amplitude of the inhibited EJP at 10.1 MPa remained below that at normobaric pressure, even during repetitive stimulation. 4. The results do not support the hypothesis that pressure increases central excitation by selectively depressing inhibitory transmission per se; enhancement of potentiation, however, probably plays an important role. In this preparation, in which inhibitory transmission also displays facilitation, pressure did not increase overall excitation or alter the balance between excitation and inhibition. 5. These results predict that a pressure-excitable network should encompass excitatory synaptic connections which exhibit pronounced facilitation and inhibitory synapses with little or no facilitation.

scholarly journals Long-term sensitization training in Aplysia leads to an increase in the expression of BiP, the major protein chaperon of the ER.

1992 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 1069-1076 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Kuhl ◽  
T E Kennedy ◽  
A Barzilai ◽  
E R Kandel
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
State Level ◽  
Long Term Memory ◽  
Major Protein ◽  
Synaptic Connections ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
Long Term Facilitation

Long-term memory for sensitization of the gill- and siphon-withdrawal reflexes in Aplysia californica requires RNA and protein synthesis. These long-term behavioral changes are accompanied by long-term facilitation of the synaptic connections between the gill and siphon sensory and motor neurons, which are similarly dependent on transcription and translation. In addition to showing an increase in over-all protein synthesis, long-term facilitation is associated with changes in the expression of specific early, intermediate, and late proteins, and with the growth of new synaptic connections between the sensory and motor neurons of the reflex. We previously focused on early proteins and have identified four proteins as members of the immunoglobulin family of cell adhesion molecules related to NCAM and fasciclin II. We have now cloned the cDNA corresponding to one of the late proteins, and identified it as the Aplysia homolog of BiP, an ER resident protein involved in the folding and assembly of secretory and membrane proteins. Behavioral training increases the steady-state level of BiP mRNA in the sensory neurons. The increase in the synthesis of BiP protein is first detected 3 h after the onset of facilitation, when the increase in overall protein synthesis reaches its peak and the formation of new synaptic terminals becomes apparent. These findings suggest that the chaperon function of BiP might serve to fold proteins and assemble protein complexes necessary for the structural changes characteristic of long-term memory.

Segmental giant: evidence for a driver neuron interposed between command and motor neurons in the crayfish escape system

1982 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 761-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Roberts ◽  
F. B. Krasne ◽  
G. Hagiwara ◽  
J. J. Wine ◽  
A. P. Kramer
Keyword(s):  
Motor Neuron ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Functional Significance ◽  
Escape Behavior ◽  
Dendritic Branch ◽  
Command Neurons ◽  
Firing Threshold ◽  
Conventional Tests ◽  
Bilateral Pair

1. The giant command neurons for tailflip escape behavior in crayfish have been thought to excite the nongiant fast flexor (tailflip producing) motor neurons (FFs) via monosynaptic connections. We show here that excitation of FFs instead occurs via a bilateral pair of segmental giant neurons (SGs) interposed between the command axons and FFs in each segment. 2. Anatomically, the SGs appear to make numerous contacts with ipsilateral command axons and FFs and fewer contacts contralaterally. In contrast, the command axons have only sparse direct connections to the FFs. An SG has an axon in the ipsilateral first ganglionic root and may be a modified swimmeret motor neuron. 3. Each SG is depolarized well beyond threshold by the firing of an ipsilateral command axon and is depolarized to near threshold by the firing of a contralateral command axon. The synapses between command axons and SGs are electrical and probably rectifying. 4. Each FF is excited to a level near firing threshold by the SG ipsilateral to its axon and is excited weakly by the contralateral SG. The synapses between SGs and FFs are electrical and nonrectifying. 5. Variations in excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) recorded in FFs during prolonged, high-frequency firing of the command axons can be accounted for by refractoriness of SG spikes, as opposed to refractoriness of dendritic branch spikes as had previously been delivered. 6. These findings illustrate the limitations of conventional tests for monosynapticity. 7. The functional significance of having driver neurons interposed between command neurons and motor neurons is discussed.

A retrograde signal is involved in activity-dependent remodeling at a C. elegans neuromuscular junction

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (6) ◽  
pp. 1253-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Zhao ◽  
M.L. Nonet
Keyword(s):  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Synaptic Activity ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
Synaptic Connections ◽  
Developmentally Regulated ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Larval Stages ◽  
Retrograde Signal

We have characterized how perturbations of normal synaptic activity influence the morphology of cholinergic SAB motor neurons that innervate head muscle in C. elegans. Mutations disrupting components of the presynaptic release apparatus, acetylcholine (ACh) synthesis or ACh loading into synaptic vesicles each induced sprouting of SAB axonal processes. These sprouts usually arose in the middle of the normal innervation zone and terminated with a single presynaptic varicosity. Sprouting SAB neurons with a similar morphology were also observed upon reducing activity in muscle, either by using mutants lacking a functional nicotinic ACh receptor subunit or through muscle-specific expression of a gain-of-function potassium channel. Analysis of temperature-sensitive mutants in the choline acetyltransferase gene revealed that the sprouting response to inactivity was developmentally regulated; reduction of synaptic activity in early larval stages, but not in late larval stages, induced both sprouting and addition of varicosities. Our results indicate that activity levels regulate the structure of certain synaptic connections between nerve and muscle in C. elegans. One component of this regulatory machinery is a retrograde signal from the postsynaptic cell that mediates the formation of synaptic connections.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document