The cognitive and linguistic reasoning process of the speaker’s choice of modal expressions from the system network

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumi Kato
Keyword(s):  
Reasoning Process

scholarly journals Designing a scaffold for mechanistic reasoning in organic chemistry

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Graulich ◽  
Ira Caspari
Keyword(s):  
Organic Chemistry ◽  
Contrasting Cases ◽  
Chemistry Teaching ◽  
Surface Approach ◽  
Reasoning Process ◽  
Mechanistic Reasoning ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
Course Material ◽  
Asking Questions ◽  
Deep Reasoning

AbstractDesigning problems and learning activities is a key factor to initiating students’ engagement with the course material and influencing their reasoning processes. Although tasks and problems are a central part of teaching and assessments in the chemistry classroom, they may not engage students in deep reasoning or in a way that is intended through a task. Some problems may cause an algorithmic or a surface approach. Even with designing clever problems, students may not use a larger variety of chemistry ideas and connect them in meaningful ways. Here the idea of scaffolding students’ answering process comes into play. Structuring students’ reasoning process through instructional prompts or structured worksheets supports students in activating and connecting knowledge pieces in a more meaningful way and positively slows down their fast decision-making process. This paper will discuss the importance of asking questions in chemistry teaching and highlights the idea of contrasting cases, drawn from cognitive psychology, as a task design principle. In addition to having contrasting cases as a good problem format, the idea of scaffolding students’ reasoning while solving contrasting cases through the use of instructional prompts that scaffold the reasoning process will be exemplarily showcased for mechanistic reasoning in organic chemistry.

Model-based diagnosis of the space shuttle main engine

1992 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin O. Hofmann ◽  
Thomas L. Cost ◽  
Michael Whitley
Keyword(s):  
Space Shuttle ◽  
Diagnostic System ◽  
End User ◽  
Reasoning Process ◽  
Domain Experts ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Modeling Analysis ◽  
Engine Design ◽  
Main Engine

The process of reviewing test data for anomalies after a firing of the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) is a complex, time-consuming task. A project is under way to provide the team of SSME experts with a knowledge-based system to assist in the review and diagnosis task. A model-based approach was chosen because it can be adapted to changes in engine design, is easier to maintain, and can be explained more easily. A complex thermodynamic fluid system like the SSME introduces problems during modeling, analysis, and diagnosis which have as yet been insufficiently studied. We developed a qualitative constraint-based diagnostic system inspired by existing qualitative modeling and constraint-based reasoning methods which addresses these difficulties explicitly. Our approach combines various diagnostic paradigms seamlessly, such as the model-based and heuristic association-based paradigms, in order to better approximate the reasoning process of the domain experts. The end-user interface allows expert users to actively participate in the reasoning process, both by adding their own expertise and by guiding the diagnostic search performed by the system.

scholarly journals Wise reasoning, intergroup positivity, and attitude polarization across contexts

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin P. Brienza ◽  
Franki Y. H. Kung ◽  
Melody M. Chao
Keyword(s):  
Intergroup Relations ◽  
Intergroup Bias ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Reasoning Process ◽  
Attitude Polarization ◽  
Experimental Induction ◽  
Epistemic Humility ◽  
Polarization Studies

AbstractWe hypothesized that a wisdom-based reasoning process comprised of epistemic humility, accounting for context, and integrating different perspectives and interests, would be helpful in overcoming intergroup bias and attitude polarization in societal conflicts. Here we test the hypothesis using both the Situated Wise Reasoning Scale and experimental induction. In each study, we recruited participants who self-identified as members of a group implicated in an ongoing intergroup situation. In five correlational studies (Studies 1-5) we examined the relations between measured wise reasoning and intergroup positivity and attitude polarization. In two experiments, we tested the effects of a brief online wise-reasoning thought exercise on intergroup positivity and polarization (Studies 6-7), and charitable behaviors to an outgroup (Study 6). We found that wise reasoning relates to more positivity toward outgroups and less attitude polarization across different groups and conflicts. The results have implications for theory and may also have implications for future research on interventions to improve intergroup relations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document