Vertical collusion in the shipping container transport chain over the deregulation tariff of port authority

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Gang Dong ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
Paul Tae-Woo Lee
Pomorstvo ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-110
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Bartosiewicz

The rapid growth in the volume of international container transport enforces the improvement of competitiveness in the entire transport chain, including maritime container terminals. Reports and scientific surveys on the Baltic Sea Region (BSR) tend to concentrate on annual results achieved by entire ports, largely ignoring the efficiency of individual terminals. The aim of the article is to fill this research gap and consequently examine the competitiveness of the most important maritime container terminals in Poland and their Russian competitors. To this end, selected Polish and Russian bases were examined with regard to a number of criteria, such as the length of the quay (c1), the number of RTG (c2) and STS (c3) cranes, the number of shortsea shipping connections (c4), the maximum depth at the quay (c5), the distance from motorways and expressways/national roads (c6) or the distance from the national railway station (c7). The above seven criteria were subsequently used to perform a strategic group mapping as well as AHP and PROMETHEE II multi-criteria rankings that enabled to specify those Baltic Sea container nodes which are in the area of strategic benefits for the analysed market sector. According to the results obtained, the Russian Petrolesport and the Polish DCT Gdańsk are the leaders of the market. This fact confirms their competitive advantage over other market players of the sector in question.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 99-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiel de Bok ◽  
Gerard de Jong ◽  
Lóri Tavasszy ◽  
Jaco van Meijeren ◽  
Igor Davydenko ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (Special-Issue) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.H. Venus Lun

Abstract To secure cargoes, containerships operate double or triple calling of ports in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region in China. Such shipping operations generate high CO2 emissions. This paper suggest a green shipping network (GSN) as a useful tool to transship containers from feeder ports to hub ports to lower the overall CO2 emissions in the region. From the perspective of scale operations from using the hub-and-spoke approach and the deployment of mega ships, developing a GSN within the PRD region can be beneficial, both economically and environmentally, to port users in the container transport chain.


2011 ◽  
Vol 361-363 ◽  
pp. 1987-2002
Author(s):  
Zhong Ning ◽  
Jing Yu Cao ◽  
Xian Yu Ning

Confronted with the unstable global environment and the threat of transitional terrorism, besides from the traditional function of supervising the economy frontier, the non-tradition functions Customs has become more and more important. In the supervision of foreign trade, Customs not only ensure the enforcement of legislations, but protect the country from terrorism attack. However, the tremendous amount of containers and the request of trade facilitation have always challenged the sufficiency of Customs supervision. Customs must adopt risk management into its work. This paper studies the risk assessment of container security using FTA and FMECA in order to quantitative the risk in the container cargo shipping process and help Customs regulate efficiently.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serđo Kos ◽  
Luka Vukić ◽  
David Brčić

The proposed paper discusses multimodal container transport due to savings in external costs. Relevant data have been analysed by reviewing previous research and published works for making a synthesis of one’s own conclusions. The research findings showed that there is no significant difference in the share of external costs of container transport and transport of other types of cargo in great European seaports as well as in energy consumption of multimodal rail-inland ship container transport and the same transport mode of bulk cargo. Intermodal terminals have also their own external costs. In spite of a double railway operational cost, it is important to include the railway in the intermodal terminal. The inland waterway transport has much higher external costs than sea transport. Multimodal container transport does not necessarily lower external costs. The savings are more common if the location and type of intermodal terminal are selected properly, and the sea transportation is involved in the multimodal transport chain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document