The Conservatism Scale: A Factor-Structure Comparison of English, Dutch, and New Zealand Samples

1970 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Bagley ◽  
Glenn D. Wilson ◽  
Roger Boshier
1977 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 453-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Wayne Hogan

Based on the responses of 273 university and business school students residing in New Orleans, Louisiana, the reliability and factor structure of the Wilson-Patterson Conservatism Scale as used with American, English, Netherlands, New Zealand, and Australian subjects were examined. Similar mean-item scores and factor structures across samples suggest the cross-cultural usefulness of the scale as a measure for conservatism.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e0160567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiko Yamada ◽  
Tomonori Adachi ◽  
Akira Mibu ◽  
Tomohiko Nishigami ◽  
Yasushi Motoyama ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelique C. van Rensburg ◽  
Linda C. Theron ◽  
Michael Ungar

Purpose: The factor structure of the Child and Youth Resilience Measure (CYRM-28) was originally established using a Canadian sample. This factor structure was not confirmed in a study with New Zealand youth. Given such variability, the current study investigated the factor structure of the CYRM-28 in a sample of Sesotho-speaking South African youth who participated in Pathways to Resilience Study. Method: Using latent variable modeling, we tested six varied models in two randomly selected samples ( n1 = 559; n2 = 578). Results: Fit statistics indicated that a three-factor variation of the New Zealand model, namely, individual, family/relational, and composite context, fitted best. The contextual composite synthesizes the CYRM-28 clusters that measure social skills, educational, spiritual, community, and cultural resources. Conclusion: The contextual composite reflects traditional African ways of being. Accordingly, understanding the factor structure of the CYRM-28 precedes practitioner capacity to promote resilience in an evidence-informed way.


1996 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. O'Connor ◽  
Joseph P. Carbonari ◽  
Carlo C. DiClemente

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0247932
Author(s):  
John M. D. Thompson ◽  
Rebecca F. Slykerman ◽  
Clare R. Wall ◽  
Rinki Murphy ◽  
Edwin A. Mitchell ◽  
...  

Objective The objective of this study was to assess the validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a cohort of New Zealand children followed from birth to the age of eleven. The study also aimed to assess the stability of the child data in relation to behavioural outcomes during this period. Methods Children in the Auckland Birthweight Collaborative Study were assessed at approximately 3½, 7 and 11 years of age. At all time-points parents completed the parent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, and the children themselves completed the self-report version at 11 years of age. The validity and internal consistency were assessed using exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, and McDonald’s Omega. Cross tabulations and Chi-square statistics were used to determine whether Total Difficulty scores, as per accepted cut-offs, remained stable over time (between normal and abnormal/borderline categories). Results The factor structure remained relatively consistent across all three time-points, though several questions did not load as per the originally published factor analysis at the earliest age. The internal consistency of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire was good at all time-points and for parent- and child-completed versions. There was low agreement in the total scores between time points. Conclusions The factor analysis shows that the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire has a similar factor structure, particularly in older ages, to that previously published and shows good internal consistency. At the pre-school follow up, a larger than expected proportion of children were identified with high scores, particularly in the conduct sub-scale. Children’s behaviour changes over time, with only poor to moderate agreement between those identified as abnormal or borderline over the longitudinal follow up.


2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 431-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin L. Davies ◽  
Chris G. Sibley ◽  
James H. Liu

The Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ) measures five universal moral foundations of Harm/care, Fairness/reciprocity, Ingroup/loyalty, Authority/respect, and Purity/sanctity. This study provided an independent test of the factor structure of the MFQ using Confirmatory Factor Analysis in a large New Zealand national probability sample (N = 3,994). We compared the five-factor model proposed by Moral Foundations Theory against alternative single-factor, two-factor, three-factor, and hierarchical (five foundations as nested in two second order factors) models of morality. The hypothesized five-factor model proposed by Moral Foundations Theory provided a reasonable fit. These findings indicate that the five-factor model of moral foundations holds in New Zealand, and provides the first independent test of the factor structure of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document