Combination therapy with daptomycin, vancomycin, and rifampin for recurrent, severe bone and prosthetic joint infections involving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh J. Antony
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S201-S201
Author(s):  
Michael Henry ◽  
Alberto V Carli ◽  
Milan Kapadia ◽  
Yu-fen Chiu ◽  
Barry Brause ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) total hip and knee prosthetic joint infections (PJI) can be highly morbid and difficult to treat. Other clinical factors notwithstanding, explantation is usually recommended, although comparative treatment data are lacking. We sought to compare the success of implant retention to two-stage exchange in MRSA-infected PJI to better understand treatment options in this difficult cohort. Methods A retrospective cohort of hip and knee PJIs from 2009 to 2016 were identified by ICD code and surgical treatment. All cases met MSIS criteria for PJI, and had culture-confirmed MRSA from synovial or intra-articular tissue culture. PJIs were either treated with exchange arthroplasty or debridement with antibiotic and implant retention (DAIR). Success was defined as no further surgical treatment for infection at two years. Kaplan–Meier estimates were used to calculate the 2-year survival rate free from treatment failure. Univariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with treatment failure. Results 65 MRSA PJIs were identified with 42 undergoing explantation and 23 undergoing DAIR. Demographics, Charlson comorbidities, infection type (early post-operative, hematogenous or late chronic), and history of prior PJI were not significantly different between treatment groups. Survivorship at two years was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61–88%) for exchange compared with 29% (95% CI 10–48%) for DAIR, P = 0.0002. Within the exchange group, knee PJIs were more likely to fail than hip PJI (odds ratio [OR] 7.1, CI 1.3–38, P = 0.02), and patients with diabetes were more likely to fail (OR 17, CI 1.6–178, P = 0.02). Conclusion MRSA PJIs treated with DAIR have worse outcomes than those treated with prosthesis exchange. Further investigation is needed to identify predictors of DAIR success, to optimize surgical treatment choice, and to improve outcomes of these difficult infections. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (10) ◽  
pp. 5080-5086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared A. Niska ◽  
Jonathan H. Shahbazian ◽  
Romela Irene Ramos ◽  
Kevin P. Francis ◽  
Nicholas M. Bernthal ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTTreatment of prosthetic joint infections often involves a two-stage exchange, with implant removal and antibiotic spacer placement followed by systemic antibiotic therapy and delayed reimplantation. However, if antibiotic therapy can be improved, one-stage exchange or implant retention may be more feasible, thereby decreasing morbidity and preserving function. In this study, a mouse model of prosthetic joint infection was used in whichStaphylococcus aureuswas inoculated into a knee joint containing a surgically placed metallic implant extending from the femur. This model was used to evaluate whether combination therapy of vancomycin plus rifampin has increased efficacy compared with vancomycin alone against these infections. On postoperative day 7, vancomycin with or without rifampin was administered for 6 weeks with implant retention.In vivobioluminescence imaging,ex vivoCFU enumeration, X-ray imaging, and histologic analysis were carried out. We found that there was a marked therapeutic benefit when vancomycin was combined with rifampin compared with vancomycin alone. Taken together, our results suggest that the mouse model used could serve as a valuablein vivopreclinical model system to evaluate and compare efficacies of antibiotics and combinatory therapy for prosthetic joint infections before more extensive studies are carried out in human subjects.


2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 350-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. N. Peel ◽  
K. L. Buising ◽  
M. M. Dowsey ◽  
C. A. Aboltins ◽  
J. R. Daffy ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe management of prosthetic joint infections remains a clinical challenge, particularly infections due to methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Previously, this infection was considered a contraindication to debridement and retention strategies. This retrospective cohort study examined the treatment and outcomes of patients with arthroplasty infection by methicillin-resistant staphylococci managed by debridement and retention in conjunction with rifampin-fusidic acid combination therapy. Over an 11-year period, there were 43 patients with infection by methicillin-resistant staphylococci managed with debridement and retention. This consisted of close-interval repeated arthrotomies with pulsatile lavage. Rifampin was combined with fusidic acid for the majority of patients (88%). Patients were monitored for a median of 33.5 months (interquartile range, 20 to 54 months). Overall, 9 patients experienced treatment failure, with 12- and 24-month estimates of infection-free survival of 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71 to 93%) and 77% (95% CI, 60 to 87%), respectively. The following factors were associated with treatment failure: methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) arthroplasty infection, a single surgical debridement or ≥4 debridements, and the receipt of less than 90 days of antibiotic therapy. Patients with infection by methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CNS) were less likely to fail treatment. The overall treatment success rate reported in this study is comparable to those of other treatment modalities for prosthetic joint infections by methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Therefore, the debridement and retention of the prosthesis and rifampin-based antibiotic therapy are a valid treatment option for carefully selected patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 110-117
Author(s):  
Géraldine Bart ◽  
Valérie Zeller ◽  
Younes Kerroumi ◽  
Beate Heym ◽  
Vanina Meyssonnier ◽  
...  

Abstract. Introduction: Treatment of methicillin-resistant (MR) staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remains a matter of discussion, with vancomycin-rifampin combination therapy being the preferred treatment for DAIR and one-stage exchange arthroplasty strategies. This study analyzes the outcomes of patients with chronic methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococcal PJIs treated with vancomycin-minocycline combination therapy.Methods: This prospective, single center cohort study included all chronic MR coagulase-negative staphylococcal PJIs (01/2004-12/2014) treated with exchange arthroplasty and at least 4 weeks of minocycline-vancomycin. The following endpoints were considered: reinfection including relapse (same microorganism) and a new infection (different microorganism) and PJI-related deaths. Their outcomes were compared with PJIs treated with rifampin-vancomycin during the same period.Results: Thirty-four patients (median age, 69 years) with 22 hip and 12 knee arthroplasty infections were included. Sixteen (47%) had previously been managed in another center. Median vancomycin MIC of strains was 3 mg/L. Nineteen underwent one-stage, 15 two-stage exchange arthroplasty. After a median [IQR] follow-up of 43 [26-68] months, 2 patients relapsed and 6 developed a new PJI. Compared to 36 rifampin-vancomycin treated PJIs, relapse- or reinfection-free survival rates didn't differ, but more new infections developed in the minocycline group (6 vs 3; P 0.3).Conclusions: Minocycline-vancomycin combination therapy for chronic MR coagulase-negative staphylococcal PJIs seems to be an interesting therapeutic alternative.


2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 4255-4260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmela T. M. Mascio ◽  
Jeff D. Alder ◽  
Jared A. Silverman

ABSTRACT Most antibiotics with bactericidal activity require that the bacteria be actively dividing to produce rapid killing. However, in many infections, such as endocarditis, prosthetic joint infections, and infected embedded catheters, the bacteria divide slowly or not at all. Daptomycin is a lipopeptide antibiotic with a distinct mechanism of action that targets the cytoplasmic membrane of gram-positive organisms, including Staphylococcus aureus. Daptomycin is rapidly bactericidal against exponentially growing bacteria (a 3-log reduction in 60 min). The objectives of this study were to determine if daptomycin is bactericidal against nondividing S. aureus and to quantify the extent of the bactericidal activity. In high-inoculum methicillin-sensitive S. aureus cultures in stationary phase (1010 CFU/ml), daptomycin displayed concentration-dependent bactericidal activity, requiring 32 μg/ml to achieve a 3-log reduction. In a study comparing several antibiotics at 100 μg/ml, daptomycin demonstrated faster bactericidal activity than nafcillin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and vancomycin. In experiments where bacterial cell growth was halted by the metabolic inhibitor carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone or erythromycin, daptomycin (10 μg/ml) achieved the bactericidal end point (a 3-log reduction) within 2 h. In contrast, ciprofloxacin (10 μg/ml) did not produce bactericidal activity. Daptomycin (2 μg/ml) remained bactericidal against cold-arrested S. aureus, which was protected from the actions of ciprofloxacin and nafcillin. The data presented here suggest that, in contrast to that of other classes of antibiotics, the bactericidal activity of daptomycin does not require cell division or active metabolism, most likely as a consequence of its direct action on the bacterial membrane.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document