Particle Measurement Programme (PMP) Light-Duty Inter-Laboratory Exercise: Repeatability and Reproducibility of the Particle Number Method

2008 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 528-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barouch Giechaskiel ◽  
Panagiota Dilara ◽  
Jon Andersson
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 2275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barouch Giechaskiel ◽  
Simone Casadei ◽  
Michele Mazzini ◽  
Mario Sammarco ◽  
Gisella Montabone ◽  
...  

The recently introduced Real Driving Emissions (RDE) light-duty vehicle emissions regulation requires testing with Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) during type approval and in-service conformity. The studies on the accuracy of PEMS today are limited. An inter-laboratory correlation exercise with PEMS took place in Italy in 2017. Eight laboratories measured exhaust emissions from a Golden Euro 6 gasoline vehicle with a Golden PEMS installed in it, along with the individual lab’s own PEMS, following the regulated laboratory method (bags from the dilution tunnel). The data of the exercise were used to estimate the repeatability and reproducibility of the methodology with PEMS. The statistical analysis estimated reproducibility of 2.9% (bags) to 5.5% (lab PEMS) for CO2, 20–25% for CO (all methods), 23–31% for NOx (all methods), and 29% (tunnel, Golden PEMS) to 39% (lab PEMS) for particle number. The mean differences of the PEMS to the regulated method were ±1.5 g/km (or ±1%) for CO2, <16 mg/km (or <5%) for CO, <4 mg/km (or <11%) for NOx and 1 × 1011 particles/km (40%) for particle number. The results of this study confirm the satisfactory performance of PEMS and the permissible tolerances introduced in RDE regulation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barouch Giechaskiel ◽  
Tero Lähde ◽  
Yannis Drossinos

2012 ◽  
Vol 149 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-21
Author(s):  
Piotr BIELACZYC ◽  
Jerzy MERKISZ ◽  
Piotr PAJDOWSKI ◽  
Joseph WOODBURN

As a result of increased concern over the toxicological effects of particulate matter (PM) emitted by compression ignition vehicles, the European Union (EU) has introduced a particle number (PN) limit. This represents a significant departure from the traditional gravimetric approach of quantifying PM emissions, and introduces unique challenges to the automotive testing process. The legislation sets certain limits and guidelines for systems designed to quantify particle number emissions, but the legislation currently has some flexibility regarding system layout, operating temperatures, etc. In this work, two commercially available particle counting systems were tested with a variety of Euro 5 light-duty CI vehicles equipped with particulate filters (DPFs). The results indicate a small but reasonably consistent discrepancy between the two systems, with a mean difference of 9.3%. Possible causes of this difference (which was not observed in all cases) are discussed in the context of the current EU light-duty CI PN limit, and possibilities for future research directions are suggested.


Vehicles ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 342-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barouch Giechaskiel ◽  
Anastasios D. Melas ◽  
Tero Lähde ◽  
Giorgio Martini

Vehicle regulations include limits for non-volatile particle number emissions with sizes larger than 23 nm. The measurements are conducted with systems that remove the volatile particles by means of dilution and heating. Recently, the option of measuring from 10 nm was included in the Global Technical Regulation (GTR 15) as an additional option to the current >23 nm methodology. In order to avoid artefacts, i.e., measuring volatile particles that have nucleated downstream of the evaporation tube, a heated oxidation catalyst (i.e., catalytic stripper) is required. This review summarizes the studies with laboratory aerosols that assessed the volatile removal efficiency of evaporation tube and catalytic stripper-based systems using hydrocarbons, sulfuric acid, mixture of them, and ammonium sulfate. Special emphasis was given to distinguish between artefacts that happened in the 10–23 nm range or below. Furthermore, studies with vehicles’ aerosols that reported artefacts were collected to estimate critical concentration levels of volatiles. Maximum expected levels of volatiles for mopeds, motorcycles, light-duty and heavy-duty vehicles were also summarized. Both laboratory and vehicle studies confirmed the superiority of catalytic strippers in avoiding artefacts. Open issues that need attention are the sulfur storage capacity and the standardization of technical requirements for catalytic strippers.


Fuel ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 197 ◽  
pp. 373-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pi-qiang Tan ◽  
Yuan Li ◽  
Zhi-yuan Hu ◽  
Di-ming Lou

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document