Exergaming to improve balance and decrease the risk of falling in adults with knee osteoarthritis: a mixed-methods feasibility study

Author(s):  
Donald G. Manlapaz ◽  
Gisela Sole ◽  
Prasath Jayakaran ◽  
Cathy M. Chapple
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline B. Hing ◽  
Elizabeth Tutton ◽  
Toby O. Smith ◽  
Molly Glaze ◽  
Jamie R. Stokes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Segmental tibial fractures are fractures in two or more areas of the tibial diaphysis resulting in a separate intercalary segment of the bone. Surgical fixation is recommended for patients with segmental tibial fractures as non-operative treatment outcomes are poor. The most common surgical interventions are intramedullary nailing (IMN) and circular frame external fixation (CFEF), but evidence about which is better is of poor quality. An adequately powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) to determine optimum treatment is required. STIFF-F aimed to assess the feasibility of a multicentre RCT comparing IMN with CFEF for segmental tibial fracture. Methods STIFF-F was a mixed-methods feasibility study comprising a pilot RCT conducted at six UK Major Trauma Centres, qualitative interviews drawing on Phenomenology and an online survey of rehabilitation. The primary outcome was recruitment rate. Patients, 16 years and over, with a segmental tibial fracture (open or closed) deemed suitable for IMN or CFEF were eligible to participate. Randomisation was stratified by site using random permuted blocks of varying sizes. Participant or assessor blinding was not possible. Interviews were undertaken with patients about their experience of injury, treatment, recovery and participation. Staff were interviewed to identify contextual factors affecting trial processes, their experience of recruitment and the treatment pathway. An online survey was developed to understand the rehabilitation context of the treatments. Results Eleven patients were screened and three recruited to the pilot RCT. Nineteen staff and four patients participated in interviews, and 11 physiotherapists responded to the survey. This study found the following: (i) segmental tibial fractures were rarer than anticipated, (ii) the complexity of the injury, study setup times and surgeon treatment preferences impeded recruitment, (iii) recovery from a segmental tibial fracture is challenging, and rehabilitation protocols are inconsistent and (iv) despite the difficulty recruiting, staff valued this research question and strived to find a way forward. Conclusion The proposed multicentre RCT comparing IMN with CFEF is not feasible. This study highlighted the difficulty of recruiting patients to an RCT of a complex rare injury over a short time period. Trial registration The study was registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number Registry: ISRCTN11229660


Physiotherapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. e94
Author(s):  
N. Clague-Baker ◽  
T. Robinson ◽  
C. Gillies ◽  
S. Drewry ◽  
A. Hagenberg ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia F. Corbett ◽  
Elizabeth M. Combs ◽  
Peyton S. Chandarana ◽  
Isabel Stringfellow ◽  
Karen Worthy ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Medication non-adherence is a global public health challenge that results in sub-optimal health outcomes and increases healthcare costs. Forgetting to take medicines is one of the most common reasons for unintentional non-adherence. Research findings indicate that voice-activated virtual home assistants (VHAs), such as Amazon Echo and Google Home devices, may be useful in promoting medication adherence. OBJECTIVE Create a medication adherence app (skill) for Amazon Echo devices and measure the use, usability, and usefulness of that skill. METHODS A single-group mixed methods cohort feasibility study was conducted with females who took oral contraceptives (n=25). Participants were undergraduate students (mean age = 21.8, SD 6.2) at an urban university in the Southeast United States. Participants were given an Amazon Echo Dot with MedBuddy, a new medication reminder skill for Echo devices created by our team, attached to their study account, which they used for 60 days. Participants self-reported baseline and post-study medication adherence. MedBuddy use was objectively evaluated by tracking the participants’ interaction with MedBuddy through Amazon Alexa. The usability and usefulness of MedBuddy were evaluated through a post-study interview with participants responding to both quantitative and qualitative questions. RESULTS Participants’ interactions with MedBuddy, as tracked through Amazon Alexa, only occurred on half of the study days (mean of 50.97, SD 29.5). Compared to baseline, at study end participants reported missing their medication less in the past one and six months (χ 2 = .884 and .420 respectively, McNemar’s test p < .001 for both). However, there was no significant difference in participants’ reported adherence to consistently taking medication within the same two-hour time frame each day the past one or six months at the end of the study compared to baseline (χ 2 = 3.544 and 5.526 respectively, McNemar’s test p = .63 and p = .13 respectively). Overall feedback about usability was positive, and participants provided constructive feedback about features of the skill that could be improved. Participants’ evaluation of the usefulness of Medbuddy was overwhelmingly positive. Most participants (65.2%, n=15) said they would continue to use MedBuddy as a medication reminder in the future if provided the opportunity and the majority (91.3%, n=21) said they would recommend it to others. MedBuddy features that participants enjoyed were an external prompt separate from their phone, being able to hear the reminder prompt from a separate room, multiple reminders, and verbal responses as prompts. CONCLUSIONS The results of this feasibility study indicate the MedBuddy medication reminder skill may be useful in promoting medication adherence, but the skill could benefit from further usability enhancements.


2021 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
pp. 105356
Author(s):  
Rebecca Giallo ◽  
Holly Rominov ◽  
Catherine Fisher ◽  
Andi Jones ◽  
Kirsty Evans ◽  
...  

Brain Injury ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 899-915
Author(s):  
Whitney Schneider-Cline ◽  
Erin Bush ◽  
Miechelle McKelvey

Physiotherapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. e38-e39
Author(s):  
B. Smith ◽  
P. Hendrick ◽  
M.Bateman ◽  
F. Moffatt ◽  
M. Rathleff ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1816-1824 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Bynoe ◽  
N. Unwin ◽  
C. Taylor ◽  
M. M. Murphy ◽  
L. Bartholomew ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 1060-1073 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Miller ◽  
F van Wijck ◽  
L Lamont ◽  
J Preston ◽  
M Hair

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document