A mixed-methods feasibility study of the Home Parenting Education and Support Program for families at risk of child maltreatment and recurrence in Australia

Abstract Purpose To describe medium-term physical and mental health and social outcomes following adolescent sexual assault, and examine users’ perceived needs and experiences. Method Longitudinal, mixed methods cohort study of adolescents aged 13–17 years recruited within 6 weeks of sexual assault (study entry) and followed to study end, 13–15 months post-assault. Results 75/141 participants were followed to study end (53% retention; 71 females) and 19 completed an in-depth qualitative interview. Despite many participants accessing support services, 54%, 59% and 72% remained at risk for depressive, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorders 13–15 months post-assault. Physical symptoms were reported more frequently. Persistent (> 30 days) absence from school doubled between study entry and end, from 22 to 47%. Enduring mental ill-health and disengagement from education/employment were associated with psychosocial risk factors rather than assault characteristics. Qualitative data suggested inter-relationships between mental ill-health, physical health problems and disengagement from school, and poor understanding from schools regarding how to support young people post-assault. Baseline levels of smoking, alcohol and ever drug use were high and increased during the study period (only significantly for alcohol use). Conclusion Adolescents presenting after sexual assault have high levels of vulnerability over a year post-assault. Many remain at risk for mental health disorders, highlighting the need for specialist intervention and ongoing support. A key concern for young people is disruption to their education. Multi-faceted support is needed to prevent social exclusion and further widening of health inequalities in this population, and to support young people in their immediate and long-term recovery.

Download Full-text

Exergaming to improve balance and decrease the risk of falling in adults with knee osteoarthritis: a mixed-methods feasibility study

Physiotherapy Theory and Practice ◽

10.1080/09593985.2021.1952670 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-13

Author(s):

Donald G. Manlapaz ◽

Gisela Sole ◽

Prasath Jayakaran ◽

Cathy M. Chapple

Keyword(s):

Mixed Methods ◽

Knee Osteoarthritis ◽

Feasibility Study ◽

Risk Of Falling

Download Full-text

Reamed intramedullary nailing versus circular frame external fixation for segmental tibial fractures (STIFF-F): a mixed methods feasibility study

Pilot and Feasibility Studies ◽

10.1186/s40814-021-00821-3 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Caroline B. Hing ◽

Elizabeth Tutton ◽

Toby O. Smith ◽

Molly Glaze ◽

Jamie R. Stokes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mixed Methods ◽

External Fixation ◽

Intramedullary Nailing ◽

Feasibility Study ◽

Online Survey ◽

Tibial Fracture ◽

Tibial Fractures ◽

Circular Frame ◽

Pilot Rct ◽

Randomised Controlled

Abstract Background Segmental tibial fractures are fractures in two or more areas of the tibial diaphysis resulting in a separate intercalary segment of the bone. Surgical fixation is recommended for patients with segmental tibial fractures as non-operative treatment outcomes are poor. The most common surgical interventions are intramedullary nailing (IMN) and circular frame external fixation (CFEF), but evidence about which is better is of poor quality. An adequately powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) to determine optimum treatment is required. STIFF-F aimed to assess the feasibility of a multicentre RCT comparing IMN with CFEF for segmental tibial fracture. Methods STIFF-F was a mixed-methods feasibility study comprising a pilot RCT conducted at six UK Major Trauma Centres, qualitative interviews drawing on Phenomenology and an online survey of rehabilitation. The primary outcome was recruitment rate. Patients, 16 years and over, with a segmental tibial fracture (open or closed) deemed suitable for IMN or CFEF were eligible to participate. Randomisation was stratified by site using random permuted blocks of varying sizes. Participant or assessor blinding was not possible. Interviews were undertaken with patients about their experience of injury, treatment, recovery and participation. Staff were interviewed to identify contextual factors affecting trial processes, their experience of recruitment and the treatment pathway. An online survey was developed to understand the rehabilitation context of the treatments. Results Eleven patients were screened and three recruited to the pilot RCT. Nineteen staff and four patients participated in interviews, and 11 physiotherapists responded to the survey. This study found the following: (i) segmental tibial fractures were rarer than anticipated, (ii) the complexity of the injury, study setup times and surgeon treatment preferences impeded recruitment, (iii) recovery from a segmental tibial fracture is challenging, and rehabilitation protocols are inconsistent and (iv) despite the difficulty recruiting, staff valued this research question and strived to find a way forward. Conclusion The proposed multicentre RCT comparing IMN with CFEF is not feasible. This study highlighted the difficulty of recruiting patients to an RCT of a complex rare injury over a short time period. Trial registration The study was registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number Registry: ISRCTN11229660

Download Full-text

Mixed Methods Research With Groups at Risk

Journal of Mixed Methods Research ◽

10.1177/1558689814527916 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 8 (3) ◽

pp. 207-211 ◽

Cited By ~ 19

Author(s):

Teresa Sorde Marti ◽

Donna M. Mertens

Keyword(s):

At Risk ◽

Mixed Methods ◽

Mixed Methods Research

Download Full-text

Cardiac rehabilitation for people with sub-acute, mild to moderate stroke: results from a mixed methods feasibility study

Physiotherapy ◽

10.1016/j.physio.2020.03.131 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 107 ◽

pp. e94

Author(s):

N. Clague-Baker ◽

T. Robinson ◽

C. Gillies ◽

S. Drewry ◽

A. Hagenberg ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mixed Methods ◽

Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽

Feasibility Study

Download Full-text

Medication Adherence Reminder System for Virtual Home Assistants: Mixed Methods Evaluative Study (Preprint)

10.2196/preprints.27327 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Cynthia F. Corbett ◽

Elizabeth M. Combs ◽

Peyton S. Chandarana ◽

Isabel Stringfellow ◽

Karen Worthy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mixed Methods ◽

Medication Adherence ◽

Feasibility Study ◽

Global Public Health ◽

Constructive Feedback ◽

The Past ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Mcnemar’S Test ◽

Medication Reminder ◽

Mcnemar's Test

BACKGROUND Medication non-adherence is a global public health challenge that results in sub-optimal health outcomes and increases healthcare costs. Forgetting to take medicines is one of the most common reasons for unintentional non-adherence. Research findings indicate that voice-activated virtual home assistants (VHAs), such as Amazon Echo and Google Home devices, may be useful in promoting medication adherence. OBJECTIVE Create a medication adherence app (skill) for Amazon Echo devices and measure the use, usability, and usefulness of that skill. METHODS A single-group mixed methods cohort feasibility study was conducted with females who took oral contraceptives (n=25). Participants were undergraduate students (mean age = 21.8, SD 6.2) at an urban university in the Southeast United States. Participants were given an Amazon Echo Dot with MedBuddy, a new medication reminder skill for Echo devices created by our team, attached to their study account, which they used for 60 days. Participants self-reported baseline and post-study medication adherence. MedBuddy use was objectively evaluated by tracking the participants’ interaction with MedBuddy through Amazon Alexa. The usability and usefulness of MedBuddy were evaluated through a post-study interview with participants responding to both quantitative and qualitative questions. RESULTS Participants’ interactions with MedBuddy, as tracked through Amazon Alexa, only occurred on half of the study days (mean of 50.97, SD 29.5). Compared to baseline, at study end participants reported missing their medication less in the past one and six months (χ 2 = .884 and .420 respectively, McNemar’s test p < .001 for both). However, there was no significant difference in participants’ reported adherence to consistently taking medication within the same two-hour time frame each day the past one or six months at the end of the study compared to baseline (χ 2 = 3.544 and 5.526 respectively, McNemar’s test p = .63 and p = .13 respectively). Overall feedback about usability was positive, and participants provided constructive feedback about features of the skill that could be improved. Participants’ evaluation of the usefulness of Medbuddy was overwhelmingly positive. Most participants (65.2%, n=15) said they would continue to use MedBuddy as a medication reminder in the future if provided the opportunity and the majority (91.3%, n=21) said they would recommend it to others. MedBuddy features that participants enjoyed were an external prompt separate from their phone, being able to hear the reminder prompt from a separate room, multiple reminders, and verbal responses as prompts. CONCLUSIONS The results of this feasibility study indicate the MedBuddy medication reminder skill may be useful in promoting medication adherence, but the skill could benefit from further usability enhancements.

Download Full-text