Case selection for robust generalisation: lessons from QuIP impact evaluation studies

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
James Copestake
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrainolo Ravalihasy ◽  
Lidia Kardas-Sloma ◽  
Yazdan Yazdanpanah ◽  
Valéry Ridde

Abstract Background Combination prevention is currently considered the best approach to combat HIV epidemic. It is based upon the combination of structural, behavioral and biomedical interventions. Such interventions are frequently implemented in a health promoting manner due to their aims, the approach that was adopted and their complexity. The impact evaluation of these interventions often relies on methods inherited from the biomedical field. However, these methods have limitations and should be adapted to be relevant for these complex interventions. This systematic review aims to map the evidence-based methods used to quantify the impact of these interventions and analyze how these methods are implemented. Methods Three databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed) will be used to identify impact evaluation studies of health promotion interventions that aimed at reducing the incidence or prevalence of HIV infection. Only studies based on quantitative design assessing intervention impact on HIV prevalence or incidence will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen studies based on titles and abstracts and then on the full text. The information about study characteristics will be extracted to understand the context in which the interventions are implemented. The information specific to quantitative methods of impact evaluation will be extracted using items from the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), the guidelines for reporting Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature (SAMPL) and the guidelines for Strengthening The Reporting of Empirical Simulation Studies (STRESS). This review will be conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Discussion The impact evaluation of HIV prevention interventions is a matter of substantial importance given the growing need for evidence of the effectiveness of these interventions whereas they are increasingly complex. These evaluations allow to identify the most effective strategies to be implemented to fight the epidemic. It is therefore relevant to map the methods to better implement them and adapt them according to the type of intervention to be evaluated. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020210825


Author(s):  
A.H. Rajput

ABSTRACTEpidemiology of parkinsonism for 13 years (1967 to 1979) in Rochester, Minnesota is evaluated. For each patient, two age- and sex-matched controls with comparable medical follow-up (mean 40 years before diagnosis) were selected from the same community. Smoking habits, dementia, acute and chronic illnesses and mortality patterns in the two groups are compared. The annual incidence rate was 20.5/100,000, which is virtually unchanged from previous reports on Rochester population. Cigarette smoking habits of cases and the controls before the index date were not significantly different. Prior to diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, dementia was diagnosed significantly more frequently among the patients than the controls (P = 0.048). After diagnosis of parkinsonism dementia emerged nearly three times more frequently in patients than among the controls. Mortality rate in the entire parkinsonian population was similar to that reported from the same community between 1935 and 1966. Only 50% of the patients were treated with levodopa. Among those treated with levodopa the mortality rate was comparable to their controls. Because there were no definite criteria for administering levodopa therapy, higher frequency of dementia and prolonged survival in those treated with this drug could be attributed to the bias of case selection for treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document