scholarly journals Comparison of two probiotic preparations on growth performance, intestinal microbiota, nutrient digestibility and cytokine gene expression in broiler chickens

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mojtaba Zaghari ◽  
Parisa Sarani ◽  
Hosna Hajati
Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Ahmed A. Saleh ◽  
Mustafa Shukry ◽  
Foad Farrag ◽  
Mohamed M. Soliman ◽  
Abdel-Moneim Eid Abdel-Moneim

The present study evaluated the effect of three feeding methods (dry feed, wet feed or wet feed fermented with Bacillus licheniformis) on the growth performance, intestinal histomorphometry and gene expression of the lipid metabolism- and growth-related genes of broiler chickens. A total of 360 one-day-old Cobb-500 broiler chicks were randomly allotted into three groups containing four replicates with 30 birds each. The first group (control) was fed a dry mash basal diet. The second and third groups were fed wet feed and fermented wet feed. The final body weight and weight gain were reduced (p < 0.01) in the wet feed group, while they did not differ between the fermented wet feed and dry feed groups. Feed intake was not altered, and feeding on wet feed significantly (p < 0.01) increased the feed-to-gain ratio compared to the remaining groups. No differences between the three feeding methods in carcass characteristics, blood biochemistry and nutrient digestibility were observed except for crude protein digestibility, which was increased (p < 0.01) in the fermented wet feed group. Duodenal and ileal villi heights were elevated in birds fed fermented wet feeds, while crypt depth was not altered. The expression fold of IGF-1, GH and m-TOR genes in the pectoral muscle of birds fed wet feed was decreased (p < 0.05), while myostatin gene expression was elevated. Feeding on wet feed reduced the hepatic gene expression of PPARγ and increased that of FAS. In conclusion, wet feed negatively affected the broiler chickens’ efficiency under heat stress; however, fermenting the wet feed with Bacillus licheniformis improved feed utilization and birds’ performance compared to the dry feed group.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 981-991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samiru Sudharaka Wickramasuriya ◽  
Hyun Min Cho ◽  
Shemil Priyan Macelline ◽  
Eunjoo Kim ◽  
Taeg Kyun Shin ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate calcium stearoyl-2 lactylate (CSL) performance as an exogenous emulsifier together with lipase for broiler diets.Methods: In total, 252 one-day-old Ross 308 broiler chickens were allocated in a completely randomized design to give 6 replications per treatment with 7 birds in each cage. There were six dietary treatments representing a 2×3 factorial arrangement consisted of two energy levels (standard energy [positive control, PC] and –100 kcal/kg of the requirement level [negative control, NC]) and three dietary treatments (without additives [CON], CON+CSL [CSL], and CON+CSL+lipase [CSL-Lipase]). Corn and soybean meal-based experimental diets containing vegetable oil were formulated. Growth performance, blood parameters, visceral organ weights, ileal morphology, nutrient digestibility, and cytokine gene expression were measured.Results: Birds fed a diet including CSL increased (p<0.05) lipase level in blood compared to birds fed a diet including CSL-Lipase on day 21. Similarly, higher (p<0.05) liver weight was observed in birds fed a diet including either CSL or CSL-Lipase on day 21. Birds fed NC diet with CSL improved (p<0.05) nutrient digestibility compared to the NC diet on day 21. However, birds fed a diet supplemented with CSL or CSL-Lipase did not affect (p>0.05) the weight gain, feed efficiency, ileal morphology, and cytokine concentrations during the experiment period, regardless of dietary energy levels.Conclusion: Our results indicated that CSL has a role in improving nutrient digestibility in young birds when supplemented to a corn-soybean meal based broiler diet.


2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 282-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruhiko Ohtsu ◽  
Makoto Yamazaki ◽  
Hiroyuki Abe ◽  
Hitoshi Murakami ◽  
Masaaki Toyomizu

Immunology ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 242-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
WICHER ◽  
SCAROZZA ◽  
RAMSINGH ◽  
WICHER

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document