Pattern of use and efficacy of daratumumab-based therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory light chain amyloidosis in a real-world setting: a single institution experience

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Danai Dima ◽  
Xiao Hu ◽  
Joshua Dower ◽  
Diana Zhang ◽  
Raymond Comenzo ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. S131-S132
Author(s):  
Heather Landau ◽  
Hani Hassoun ◽  
Christina Bello ◽  
Joanne Chou ◽  
Sean Devlin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danai Dima ◽  
Xiao Hu ◽  
Joshua Dower ◽  
Diana Zhang ◽  
Raymond Comenzo ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematologic malignancy, caused by the accelerated growth of clonal plasma cells leading to severe multiorgan failure. Several novel agents have been recently approved for the treatment of this diseases, including daratumumab, a human IgG kappa monoclonal antibody that targets CD38 on the surface of plasma cells. The objective of this retrospective study is to explore the pattern of use, safety and efficacy of daratumumab-based therapy among patients with both newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in a real-world setting at a single institution. Methods: 57 patients with MM treated with daratumumab based therapy, from 11/16/2015 to 3/16/2020, were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to hematologic response, as well as progression free survival (PFS) after daratumumab initiation. Log-rank tests were applied to compare PFS among subgroups. Results: The overall hematologic response (ORR) to daratumumab based-therapy was 82.5% and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 23.5 months. The ORR and PFS among NDMM patients vs RRMM patients were 80% and not reached vs 84.8% and 22 months respectively. Importantly, subgroup analysis based on cytogenetic risks, demonstrated that patients with standard risk cytogenetics sustained a marginally significantly prolonged PFS (24.0 vs 10.0 months, p=0.065) compared to those with high/intermediate risk cytogenetics. When stratified by the treatment line (1st vs 2nd-3rd vs >3rd) and treatment pattern (dara monotherapy vs. combination with PI vs. IMiD vs. PI + IMiD), there were no significant differences in PFS. Daratumumab was generally well tolerated, with no discontinuations due to adverse events.Conclusion: Daratumumab-based therapy has significant efficacy and very good tolerability among MM patients, in a real-world setting.


Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian Kordes ◽  
Jingru Yu ◽  
Oscar Malgerud ◽  
Maria Gustafsson Liljefors ◽  
J. -Matthias Löhr

Clinical outcomes of chemotherapy for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a real-world setting might differ from outcomes in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Here we show in a single-institution cohort of 595 patients that median overall survival (OS) of patients who received gemcitabine alone (n = 185; 6.6 months (95% CI; 5.5–7.7)) was the same as in pivotal RCTs. Gemcitabine/capecitabine (n = 60; 10.6 months (95% CI; 7.8–13.3)) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (n = 66; 9.8 months (95% CI; 7.9–11.8)) resulted in a longer median OS and fluorouracil/oxaliplatin/irinotecan (n = 31, 9.9 months (95% CI; 8.1–11.7)) resulted in a shorter median OS than previously reported. Fluorouracil/oxaliplatin (n = 35, 5.8 months (95% CI; 4.5–7)) and best supportive care (n = 206, 1.8 months (95% CI; 1.5–2.1)) could not be benchmarked against any RCTs. The degree of protocol adherence explained differences between real-world outcomes and the respective RCTs, while exposure to second-line treatments did not.


2018 ◽  
Vol 183 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faye A. Sharpley ◽  
Richa Manwani ◽  
Shameem Mahmood ◽  
Sajitha Sachchithanantham ◽  
Helen Lachmann ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 22-22
Author(s):  
Giovanni Palladini ◽  
Paolo Milani ◽  
Simone Celant ◽  
Valentina Summa ◽  
Giovanni Affronti ◽  
...  

Background: There is no licensed therapy for light chain (AL) amyloidosis; however, bortezomib (B) is considered standard upfront treatment. Existing data on safety and efficacy of B in AL amyloidosis derive from clinical trials and retrospective series from few referral centers and only partly reflect real-world practice. In 2011, the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) started a program to grant access to upfront B to patients with AL amyloidosis. Treated patients had to be enrolled in an online registry and prospectively followed during therapy. We report the treatment experience in this real-world setting. Methods: AL amyloidosis diagnosis required tissue typing with mass spectrometry or immuno-electron microscopy. Patients samples could be sent to the Pavia specialized center for typing, but patients were not treated under the supervision of the referral center. Subjects with multiple myeloma were excluded. Variables were collected at baseline and hematologic and cardiac responses were assessed after 8 weeks (approximately 2 cycles) according to the International Society of Amyloidosis criteria. The cox proportional model has been adopted to assess the risk of treatment discontinuation according to the baseline characteristics. Results: A total of 754 patients were treated between May 2011 and October 2019 and 605 were included in the analysis. Most common reasons for exclusion were retrospective data collection (45%), and incomplete data set (31%). Median age was 67 years (range 26-89 years). 82% of patients had heart involvement. Cardiac stage was I in 18% of subjects, II in 45%, IIIa in 21%, and IIIb, in 16%. Sixty-seven percent of patients had renal involvement, and 13% and 14% had severe (glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] between 30 and 15 mL/min) and end-stage (eGFR <15 mL/min) renal insufficiency, respectively. Differential free light chain level (dFLC) was >180 mg/L in 41% of cases. Bortezomib was administered with dexamethasone (D) alone in 41% of patients, with cyclophosphamide and D (CyBorD) in 44%, and with melphalan and D (BMDex) in 13% of subjects. Other combinations were used in 2% of patients. In the overall population, the initial dose of B was attenuated (<1.3 mg/m2) in 22% of patients. The proportion of patients receiving attenuated dosage was higher in stage III patients (38%). Fourteen percent of subjects required B dose reduction during therapy, while B dosage could be increased in 7% of patients who started at a reduced dose. A twice-weekly B schedule at treatment initiation was used in 22% of all subjects and in 16% of stage III patients. Fourteen percent of patients initially treated with the twice weekly schedule needed to be shifted to the once weekly schedule. After 8 weeks (approximately 2 cycles) the overall hematologic response rate was 58% (CR 3%, VGPR 20%) and cardiac response was attained in 14% of patients. The median number of cycles performed was 3 (range 1-9), median duration of monitored treatment was 4.3 months. Treatment was discontinued during monitoring due to achievement of satisfactory response or completion of maximum (9) allowed number of cycles in 3% of cases, progression in 14%, death in 8%, and toxicity in 1% of patients. The cause of discontinuation was defined as independent of drug and disease in the remaining 25.1% of subjects. Risk of treatment discontinuation was lower in patients who could tolerate a 1.3 mg/m2 dose of B from cycle 1 (HR 0.70, 95%CI 0.54-0.91). Second-line therapy with immunomodulators (most commonly lenalidomide) was started in 14% of patients. Conclusions: Patients with AL amyloidosis start treatment at an advanced stage and early deaths are common. The rate of severe/end-stage renal failure was higher (27%) than expected, possibly indicating that these patients are less likely to be referred to specialized centers. Remarkably, outside referral centers B is commonly administered with D alone. Dose reductions are frequently applied, but dosage can be escalated during therapy. Response rates at 8 weeks are comparable to those reported in other large studies and early cardiac responses are possible. To the best of our knowledge this is the only study prospectively evaluating treatment with B in a real-world setting. Treatment registries under the supervision of regulatory agencies are precious tools to assess common therapeutic practice in rare disease, to evaluate candidate comparators for future trials, and to assess unmet medical needs. Disclosures Palladini: Celgene: Other: Travel support; Jannsen Cilag: Honoraria, Other. Milani:Janssen: Other: Speaker honoraria; Celgene: Other: Travel support; Pfizer: Other: Speaker honoraria. Nuvolone:Janssen: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Bortezomib in AL amyloidosis


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document