scholarly journals Controlling flour dust exposure by an intervention focused on working methods in Finnish bakeries: a case study in two bakeries

Author(s):  
Antti Karjalainen ◽  
Maija Leppänen ◽  
Joonas Ruokolainen ◽  
Marko Hyttinen ◽  
Mirella Miettinen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Burstyn ◽  
K. Teschke ◽  
K. Bartlett ◽  
S. Kennedy

2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martie van Tongeren ◽  
Karen S. Galea ◽  
John Ticker ◽  
David While ◽  
Hans Kromhout ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (3(93)) ◽  
pp. 91-120
Author(s):  
Agata Stobnicka ◽  
Rafał Górny

The term "flour dust" refers to particles derived from finely ground cereal grains and "non-cereal" grains. Flour flour usually also contains ingredients that play an important role in improving dough quality, such as enzymes, additives such as baker's yeast, flavors, spices and chemical ingredients such as preservatives. Flour is one of the basic raw materials used in the food industry and in the production of animal feed. Taking into account the nature of the production activities in mentioned industries, the highest occupational exposure to flour dust is usually observed in bakeries and grain mills. Significant exposure to flour dust is also found in factories of pasta, pizzeria and pastry, restaurant kitchens, malt factories, animal feed factories and agriculture. The main route of exposure to flour dust in occupational conditions is respiratory and skin. The main effect of repeated or long-lasting human exposure to flour dust is irritation and allergy. Epidemiological reports have shown that asthma, conjunctivitis, rhinitis and skin reactions are the main adverse health effects of flour dust exposure. Currently in Poland for flour dust the maximum admissible value (MAC, NDS) is the same as for organic dust (plant and animal origin). The MAC values are: for inhalable fraction 2 mg/m3 and for respirable fraction 1 mg/m3 when dust contains 10% or more crystalline silica and when dust contains less than 10% of crystalline silica, 4 mg/m3 for inhalable fraction and 2 mg/m3 for respirable fraction. The need to prepare documentation for flour dust resulted from the fact that existing documentation and MAC values mainly concern the effects of farmers' exposure to organic dust of plant and animal origin. It did not refer to flour dust for which the sensitization effect is critical. The basic mechanism of action of the flour dust on the body is the reaction of hypersensitivity with stimulation antibodies type E (IgE) developing shortly after exposure to the antigen. The value of hygienic norms for flour dust in Poland has not been established, yet. There is no data regarding animal experiments and in vitro studies with flour dust. On the basis of epidemiological studies, the risk of nasal symptoms has been found to increase with dust concentrations of 1 mg/m3 and the risk of asthma at concentrations above 3 mg/m3. The SCOEL assumes that exposure to the inhalable fraction of flour at a concentration of ≤ 1 mg/m3 protects most exposed workers from nasal mucositis and that the predicted symptoms, if present, are mild. However, the concentration of flour dust <1 mg/m3 may cause symptoms in already sensitized workers. The results of the study show that the full protection against allergens present in the flour dust in the air at low concentrations is difficult to achieve. At the same time, ACGIH's recommended TLV value for the inhalable flour dust fraction at 0.5 mg/m3 (8-h TWA). The "dose-response" results suggest that the symptoms of exposure to flour, especially from the lower respiratory tract, asthma, as well as the risk of sensitization, are rare in the inhalable fraction concentration in the range 0.5  1 mg/m3. Considering the above, the Interdepartmental Commission for MAC and MAI at the 84th meeting of 4.11.2016 adopted the TLV value for the inhalable fraction of flour dust at the level of 2 mg/m3, that is, at the level of the current MAC value for inhalable fraction of dust containing > 10% of the crystalline silica. No grounds for determining the short-term limit MAC(STEL) and the limit value in biological material. The standard is marked with "A" (sensitizing substance).


Author(s):  
Andrea Martinelli ◽  
Fabiola Salamon ◽  
Maria Luisa Scapellato ◽  
Andrea Trevisan ◽  
Liviano Vianello ◽  
...  

The adverse effects associated with exposure to flour dust have been known since the 1700s. The aim of the study was to assess the occupational exposure to flour dust in Italian facilities, identify the activities characterized by the highest exposure, and provide information to reduce workers’ exposure. The study was performed in different facilities such as flourmills (n = 2), confectioneries (n = 2), bakeries (n = 24), and pizzerias (n = 2). Inhalable flour dust was assessed by personal and area samplings (n = 250) using IOM (Institute of Occupational Medicine) samplers. The results showed personal occupational exposure to flour dust over the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygiene (ACGIH) and the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limit (SCOEL) occupational limits (mean 1.987 mg/m3; range 0.093–14.055 mg/m3). The levels were significantly higher for dough makers in comparison to the dough formers and packaging area subjects. In four bakeries the industrial hygiene surveys were re-performed after some control measures, such as installation of a sleeve to the end of pipeline, a lid on the mixer tub or local exhaust ventilation system, were installed. The exposure levels were significantly lower than those measured before the introduction of control measures. The exposure level reduction was observed not only in the dough making area but also in all bakeries locals.


1989 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 238-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis M. O'brien ◽  
Thomas J. Fischbach ◽  
Thomas C. Cooper ◽  
William F. Todd ◽  
Michael G. Gressel ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 28-32
Author(s):  
Vivek Kanjiyangat ◽  
Manikandan Hareendran

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 327-334
Author(s):  
Torgeir Storaas ◽  
Ågot Irgens ◽  
Erik Florvaag ◽  
Sverre K. Steinsvåg ◽  
Laila Årdal ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Seema P. ◽  
Shashi Kumar M. ◽  
Deepthi R.

Background: Flour mill workers are highly exposed to organic wheat flour dust with a large diversity of antigenic/allergic component leading to respiratory morbidity and skin allergies. This work environment may affect workers health and safety if the effects are unchecked periodically.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 194 workers of 4 flour mills in Bangalore Rural district. Prior permission (factory) and informed consent *(workers) were obtained. Pre-structured interview-schedule was administered. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) readings were measured by using wrights flow meter and best of 3 readings recorded. Respiratory morbidity was assessed on PEFR classification - based on American lung association (ALA) colour coding - red, yellow and green zones. Respiratory morbidity was compared with years of experience, type of work, smoking habits and usage of appropriate PPEs. Data was analyzed using Epi-info 08.Results: Among 194 workers studied, 188 were males, 6 were females. They were in the age group of 15-50 years. 143 (73.7%) were engaged in work with direct dust exposure. 84 (43%) were working for more than 3 years, 50 (25%) between 1-3 years and 60 (30%) for less than a year. 7.2% regularly smoked. According to ALA classification, PEFRs of 71 (36%) of the workers were classified into RED, 91 (46%) to yellow and 32 (16%) to green zones respectively. Usage of PPEs was only among 126 (64%).Conclusions: Respiratory morbidity among flour mill workers was high. Adequate use of PPEs was low. Half of the workers fell into yellow zone that had a potential to fall into red zone if external factors were not considered.


2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Viegas ◽  
Ana Monteiro ◽  
Edna Ribeiro ◽  
Liliana Aranha Caetano ◽  
Elisabete Carolino ◽  
...  

AbstractLiterature about occupational health in small-animal veterinary practices is scarce, but most of it has recognised a number of risks to be considered, including organic dust exposure. The aim of this pilot study was to assess organic dust, bacterial, and fungal contamination in the indoor environment of a typical Portuguese veterinary clinic but also to screen for azoleresistant fungi. To complement these findings we also analysed workers’ nasal exudates for resistant bacteriota. Particles measurements included mass concentrations (PMC) of five particle sizes (PM0.5, PM1, PM2.5, PM5, PM10) and their counts (PNC). Indoor air samples were obtained from six locations as well as before and during cat dental cleaning and cultured on four media for bacterial and fungal assessment. An outdoor sample was also collected for reference Surface samples were taken from the same indoor locations using swabs and we also use electrostatic dust cloths as passive methods. PM10 showed the highest concentrations across the locations. Indoor air fungal loads ranged from 88 to 504 CFU m−3. The azole-resistant Aspergillus section Nigri was identified in one sample. Indoor air bacterial loads ranged from 84 to 328 CFU m-3. Nasopharyngeal findings in the 14 veterinary clinic workers showed a remarkably low prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus (7.1 %). Our results point to contamination with organic dusts above the WHO limits and to the need for better ventilation. Future studies should combine the same sampling protocol (active and passive methods) with molecular tools to obtain more accurate risk characterisation. In terms of prevention, animals should be caged in rooms separate from where procedures take place, and worker protection should be observed at all times.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document