Real-world economic burden of hematopoietic cell transplantation among a large US commercially insured population with hematologic malignancies

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1244-1251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Machaon Bonafede ◽  
Akshara Richhariya ◽  
Qian Cai ◽  
Neil C. Josephson ◽  
Donna McMorrow ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. 2308-2316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Talha Badar ◽  
Aniko Szabo ◽  
Anjali Advani ◽  
Martha Wadleigh ◽  
Shukaib Arslan ◽  
...  

Abstract The availability and use of blinatumomab symbolizes a paradigm shift in the management of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort analysis of 239 ALL patients (227 relapsed refractory [RR], n = 227; minimal residual disease [MRD], n = 12) who received blinatumomab outside of clinical trials to evaluate safety and efficacy in the “real-world” setting. The median age of patients at blinatumomab initiation was 48 years (range, 18-85). Sixty-one (26%) patients had ≥3 prior therapies and 46 (19%) had allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation before blinatumomab. The response rate (complete remission/complete remission with incomplete count recovery) in patients with RR disease was 65% (47% MRD−). Among 12 patients who received blinatumomab for MRD, 9 (75%) patients achieved MRD negativity. In patients with RR disease, median relapse-free survival and overall survival (OS) after blinatumomab was 32 months and 12.7 months, respectively. Among patients who received blinatumomab for MRD, median relapse-free survival was not reached (54% MRD− at 2 years) and OS was 34.7 months. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and hepatotoxicity were observed in 3%, 7%, and 10% of patients, respectively. Among patients who achieved complete remission/complete remission with incomplete count recovery, consolidation therapy with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation retained favorable prognostic significance for OS (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.97; P = .04). In this largest “real-world” experience published to date, blinatumomab demonstrated responses comparable to those reported in clinical trials. The optimal sequencing of newer therapies in ALL requires further study.


Author(s):  
Patrick Derigs ◽  
Aleksandar Radujkovic ◽  
Maria-Luisa Schubert ◽  
Paul Schnitzler ◽  
Tilman Schöning ◽  
...  

AbstractMorbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) are still essentially affected by reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV). We evaluated 80 seropositive patients transplanted consecutively between March 2018 and March 2019 who received letermovir (LET) prophylaxis from engraftment until day +100 and retrospectively compared them with 80 patients without LET allografted between January 2017 and March 2018. The primary endpoint of this study was the cumulative incidence (CI) of clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi) defined as CMV reactivation demanding preemptive treatment or CMV disease. With 14% CI of CS-CMVi at day +100 (11 events) was significantly lower in the LET cohort when compared to the control group (33 events, 41%; HR 0.29; p < 0.001). Whereas therapy with foscarnet could be completely avoided in the LET group, 7 out of 80 patients in the control cohort received foscarnet, resulting in 151 extra in-patient days for foscarnet administration (p = 0.002). One-year overall survival was 72% in the control arm vs 84% in the LET arm (HR 0.75 [95%CI 0.43–1.30]; p < 0.306). This study confirms efficacy and safety of LET for prophylaxis of CS-CMVi after alloHCT in a real-world setting, resulting in a significant patient benefit by reducing hospitalization needs and exposure to potentially toxic antiviral drugs for treatment of CMV reactivation.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (13) ◽  
pp. 4606-4613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed L. Sorror ◽  
Sergio Giralt ◽  
Brenda M. Sandmaier ◽  
Marcos De Lima ◽  
Munir Shahjahan ◽  
...  

A new hematopoietic cell transplantation–specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was effective in predicting outcomes among patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent HCT at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC). Here, we compared the performance of the HCT-CI to 2 other indices and then tested its capacity to predict outcomes among 2 cohorts of patients diagnosed with a single disease entity, acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission, who underwent transplantation at either FHCRC or M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). FHCRC patients less frequently had unfavorable cytogenetics (15% versus 36%) and HCT-CI scores of 3 or more (21% versus 58%) compared with MDACC patients. We found that the HCT-CI had higher sensitivity and outcome predictability compared with the other indices among both cohorts. HCT-CI scores of 0, 1 to 2, and 3 or more predicted comparable nonrelapse mortality (NRM) among FHCRC and MDACC patients. In multivariate models, HCT-CI scores were associated with the highest hazard ratios (HRS) for NRM and survival among each cohort. The 2-year survival rates among FHCRC and MDACC patients were 71% versus 56%, respectively. After adjustment for risk factors, including HCT-CI scores, no difference in survival was detected (HR: 0.98, P = .94). The HCT-CI is a sensitive and informative tool for comparing trial results at different institutions. Inclusion of comorbidity data in HCT trials provides valuable, independent information.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7046-7046
Author(s):  
Eric Jessen Chow ◽  
Kara Cushing-Haugen ◽  
Michael Boeckh ◽  
Paul Carpenter ◽  
Mary Flowers ◽  
...  

7046 Background: Infections are a major complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Few studies have compared the incidence of late infections occurring ≥2y post-HCT to other cancer patients and the general population. Methods: Single center records of ≥2y HCT survivors who were Washington residents treated from 1992-2009 (n = 1,792; median age 46y; 53% allogeneic; 90% hematologic malignancies) were linked to the state’s hospital discharge and death registries. Individuals randomly selected from the state cancer registry (n = 5,455, non-HCT) and driver’s license files (n = 16,340, DOL) who survived ≥2y formed two comparison groups, matched on sex, age, year, and cancer diagnosis (non-HCT group only). Based on hospital and death registry codes, incidence rate ratios (IRR) with confidence intervals (CI) of infections by organism type and organ system were estimated using Poisson regression. Results: With 6y (range 2-20) median follow up, the incidence rate (per 1000 person-y) of all infections was 65 in HCT survivors vs. 40 in the non-HCT group (IRR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-1.9). In contrast, the DOL group’s infection rate was 7 (HCT vs. DOL IRR 10.0, 95% CI 8.3-12.1). Specifically, bacterial and fungal infections were each 70% more common in HCT vs non-HCT cancer survivors (IRRs 1.7; p < 0.01). Differences in viral infection rates were more modest (IRR 1.4, p = 0.07). Infections attributed to staphylococcus, streptococcus, and non-Candida fungi including Aspergillus were twice as common in the HCT vs. non-HCT cancer survivors (IRRs 2.1-2.3; p < 0.05). IRRs for nervous system, respiratory, and musculoskeletal infections between these 2 groups were 1.9-2.8 (p < 0.05). Among potentially vaccine-preventable organisms, the IRR was 3.2 (95% CI 2.2-4.6). While the absolute incidences decreased with time, the relative risks in almost all categories were even greater when restricted to ≥5y HCT vs. non-HCT cancer survivors. Conclusions: ≥2y HCT survivors had a significantly increased incidence of infections vs. matched non-HCT cancer survivors. Providers caring for long-term HCT survivors should maintain high vigilance for infections in this population and ensure adherence to HCT antimicrobial prophylaxis and vaccination guidelines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document