Current status of inclusion of black subjects in neuropsychological studies: A scoping review and call to action

Author(s):  
Courtney G. L. Ray ◽  
Kyr Hudson Mariouw ◽  
Kendra M. Anderson ◽  
Elisa George ◽  
Natalie Bisignano ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Mary Casey ◽  
David Coghlan ◽  
Áine Carroll ◽  
Diarmuid Stokes ◽  
Kinley Roberts ◽  
...  

Background: Traditional research approaches are increasingly challenged in healthcare contexts as they produce abstract thinking rather than practical application. In this regard, action research is a growing area of popularity and interest, essentially because of its dual focus on theory and action. However, there is a need for action researchers not only to justify their research approach but also to demonstrate the quality of their empirical studies. Therefore, the authors set out to examine the current status of the quality of extant action research studies in healthcare to encourage improved scholarship in this area. The aim of this scoping review is to identify, explore and map the literature regarding the application of action research in either individual, group or organisational domains in any healthcare context. Methods: The systematic scoping review will search the literature within the databases of CINAHL, PubMed and ABI/Inform within the recent five-year period to investigate the scientific evidence of the quality of action research studies in healthcare contexts. The review will be guided by Arksey and O'Malley’s five mandatory steps, which have been updated and published online by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The review will follow the PRISMA-ScR framework guidelines to ensure the standard of the methodological and reporting approaches are exemplary. Conclusion: This paper outlines the protocol for an exploratory scoping review to systematically and comprehensively map out the evidence as to whether action research studies demonstrate explicitly how the essential factors of a comprehensive framework of action research are upheld. The review will summarise the evidence on the quality of current action research studies in healthcare. It is anticipated that the findings will inform future action researchers in designing studies to ensure the quality of the studies is upheld.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 1693-1705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anette Wu ◽  
Betty Leask ◽  
Edward Choi ◽  
Lisa Unangst ◽  
Hans de Wit

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Nana Shinozaki ◽  
Xiaoyi Yuan ◽  
Kentaro Murakami ◽  
Satoshi Sasaki

Abstract Objective: To summarise the existing evidence of development, validation and current status of utilisation of dish-based dietary assessment tools. Design: Scoping review. Setting: Systematic search using PubMed and Web of Science. Results: We identified twelve tools from seventy-four eligible publications. They were developed for Koreans (n 4), Bangladeshis (n 2), Iranians (n 1), Indians/Malays/Chinese (n 1), Japanese (n 3) and Chinese Americans (n 1). Most tools (10/12) were composed of a dish-based FFQ. Although the development process of a dish list varied among the tools, six studies classified mixed dishes based on the similarity of their characteristics such as food ingredients and cooking methods. Tools were validated against self-reported dietary information (n 9) and concentration biomarkers (n 1). In the eight studies assessing the differences between the tool and a reference, the mean (or median) intake of energy significantly differed in five studies, and 26–83 % of nutrients significantly differed in eight studies. Correlation coefficients for energy ranged from 0·15 to 0·87 across the thirteen studies, and the median correlation coefficients for nutrients ranged from 0·12 to 0·77. Dish-based dietary assessment tools were used in fifty-nine studies mainly to assess diet–disease relationships in target populations. Conclusions: Dish-based dietary assessment tools have exclusively been developed and used for Asian-origin populations. Further validation studies, particularly biomarker-based studies, are needed to assess the applicability of tools.


2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (10) ◽  
pp. e119
Author(s):  
Sanghee Moon ◽  
Pedram Ahmadnezhad ◽  
Hyun-je Song ◽  
Jeffrey Thompson ◽  
Kristof Kipp ◽  
...  

Haemophilia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Humphries ◽  
C. M. Kessler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document