Cancer vaccines as a targeted immunotherapy approach for breast cancer: an update of clinical evidence

Author(s):  
Maryam Abbaspour ◽  
Vajihe Akbari
2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javad Behravan ◽  
Atefeh Razazan ◽  
Ghazal Behravan

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among women. National cancer institute of the US estimates that one in eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer during their lifetime. Considering the devastating effects of the disease and the alarming numbers many scientists and research groups have devoted their research to fight breast cancer. Several recommendations are to be considered as preventing measures which include living a healthy lifestyle, regular physical activity, weight control and smoking cessation. Early detection of the disease by annual and regular mammography after the age of 40 is recommended by many healthcare institutions. This would help the diagnosis of the disease at an earlier stage and the start of the treatment before it is spread to other parts of the body. Current therapy for breast cancer includes surgical ablation, radiotherapy and chemotherapy which is often associated with adverse effects and even may lead to a relapse of the disease at a later stage. In order to achieve a long-lasting anticancer response with minimal adverse effects, development of breast cancer vaccines is under investigation by many laboratories. The immune system can be stimulated by a vaccine against breast cancer. This approach has attracted a great enthusiasm in recent years. No breast cancer vaccines have been approved for clinical use today. One breast cancer vaccine (NeuVax) has now completed clinical trial phase III and a few preventive and therapeutic breast cancer vaccines are at different steps of development. We think that with the recent advancements in immunotherapy, a breast cancer vaccine is not far from reach.


Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
Federica Biello ◽  
Francesca Platini ◽  
Francesca D’Avanzo ◽  
Carlo Cattrini ◽  
Alessia Mennitto ◽  
...  

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common neoplasm in women. Many clinical and preclinical studies investigated the possible relationship between host metabolism and BC. Significant differences among BC subtypes have been reported for glucose metabolism. Insulin can promote tumorigenesis through a direct effect on epithelial tissues or indirectly by affecting the levels of other modulators, such as the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) family of receptors, sex hormones, and adipokines. The potential anti-cancer activity of metformin is based on two principal effects: first, its capacity for lowering circulating insulin levels with indirect endocrine effects that may impact on tumor cell proliferation; second, its direct influence on many pro-cancer signaling pathways that are key drivers of BC aggressiveness. Methods: In the present review, the interaction between BC, host metabolism, and patients’ prognosis has been reviewed across available literature evidence. Conclusions: Obesity, metabolic syndrome, and insulin resistance are all involved in BC growth and could have a relevant impact on prognosis. All these factors act through a pro-inflammatory state, mediated by cytokines originated in fat tissue, and seem to be related to a higher risk of BC development and worse prognosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A72-A72
Author(s):  
Orsolya Lorincz ◽  
Levente Molnar ◽  
Zsolt Csiszovszki ◽  
Eszter Somogyi ◽  
Jozsef Toth ◽  
...  

BackgroundVaccines have little chance of destroying heterogeneous tumor cells since they rarely induce polyclonal T-cell responses against the tumor. The main challenge is the accurate identification of tumor targets recognizable by T cells. Presently, 6–8% of neoepitopes selected based on the patients‘ tumor biopsies are confirmed as real T cell targets.1 2. To overcome this limitation, we developed a computational platform called Personal Antigen Selection Calculator (PASCal) that identifies frequently presented immunogenic peptide sequences built on HLA-genetics and tumor profile of thousands of real individuals.3 Here we show the performance of PASCal for the identification of both shared and personalized tumor targets in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and breast cancer subjects.MethodsExpression frequency of the tumor-specific antigens (TSAs) ranked in PASCal’s database (based on 7,548 CRC specimen) was compared to the RNA-sequencing data of CRC tumors obtained from TCGA. Using PASCal, 12 shared PEPIs (epitopes restricted to at least 3 HLA class I alleles of a subject from an in silico cohort) derived from 7 TSAs were selected as frequent targets (calculated probability: average 2.5 [95%CI 2.4–2.8] TSAs/patient). Spontaneous immune responses against each of the twelve 9mer peptides were determined by ELISpot using PBMCs of 10 mCRC subjects who participated in the OBERTO-101 study.4 PEPIs selected for a breast cancer subject based on her HLA genotype were also tested.ResultsEach of the 106 tumors analyzed expressed at least 13, average 15 of the 20 top-ranked TSAs in PASCal’s database confirming their prevalence in CRC. 7/10 subjects had spontaneous CD8+ T-cell responses against at least one peptide selected with PASCal. Each peptide (12/12) was recognized by at least one patient. Patients‘ T-cells reacted with average 3.6/12 (30%) peptides confirming the expression of average 2.8 [95%CI 1.0–4.6] TSAs (n=10). After HLA-matching, among the subjects for whom we could select at least 4 PEPIs (average 5) from the list of 12 peptides (n=6), average 2.5 (50%) peptides were positive. Of the 12 PEPIs selected with PASCal for a breast cancer subject, we detected spontaneous T-cell responses against 9 PEPIs, indicating that at least 75% of the selected peptides were present in the subject’s tumor and were recognized by T-cells.ConclusionsPASCal platform accommodates both tumor- and patient heterogeneity and identifies non-mutated tumor targets that may trigger polyclonal cytotoxic T-cell responses. It is a rapid tool for the design of both off-the-shelf and personalized cancer vaccines negating the need for tumor biopsy.ReferencesWells DK, van Buuren MM, Dang KK, et al. Key parameters of tumor epitope immunogenicity revealed through a consortium approach improve neoantigen prediction. Cell 2020:183(3):818–34.e13.Bulik-Sullivan B, Busby J, Palmer CD, et al. Deep learning using tumor HLA peptide mass spectrometry datasets improves neoantigen identification. Nat Biotech 2018:37:55–63.Somogyi E, Csiszovszki Z, Lorincz O, et al. 1181PDPersonal antigen selection calculator (PASCal) for the design of personal cancer vaccines. Annal Oncol 2019:30(Supplement_5):v480-v81.Hubbard J, Cremolini C, Graham R, et al. P329 PolyPEPI1018 off-the shelf vaccine as add-on to maintenance therapy achieved durable treatment responses in patients with microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer patients (MSS mCRC). J ImmunoTher Cancer 2019:7(1):282.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117822341877480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Issam Makhoul ◽  
Mohammad Atiq ◽  
Ahmed Alwbari ◽  
Thomas Kieber-Emmons

The immune system plays a major role in cancer surveillance. Harnessing its power to treat many cancers is now a reality that has led to cures in hopeless situations where no other solutions were available from traditional anticancer drugs. These spectacular achievements rekindled the oncology community’s interest in extending the benefits to all cancers including breast cancer. The first section of this article reviews the biological foundations of the immune response to different subtypes of breast cancer and the ways cancer may overcome the immune attack leading to cancer disease. The second section is dedicated to the actual immune treatments including breast cancer vaccines, checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and the “unconventional” immune role of chemotherapy.


2020 ◽  
pp. 159-189
Author(s):  
Sheyda Ranjbar ◽  
Seyed Afshin Seyednejad ◽  
Shahab Edalatian Zakeri ◽  
Hossein Rezaeizadeh ◽  
Roja Rahimi

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117955811982839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Lambertini ◽  
François Richard ◽  
Bastien Nguyen ◽  
Giulia Viglietti ◽  
Cynthia Villarreal-Garza

Chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is one of the potential drawbacks of chemotherapy use of particular concern for newly diagnosed premenopausal breast cancer patients. Temporary ovarian suppression obtained pharmacologically with the administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during chemotherapy has been specifically developed as a method to counteract chemotherapy-induced gonadotoxicity with the main goal of diminishing the risk of POI. In recent years, important clinical evidence has become available on the efficacy and safety of this strategy that should now be considered a standard option for ovarian function preservation in premenopausal breast cancer patients, including women who are not interested in conceiving after treatment or that would not be candidates for fertility preservation strategies because of their age. Nevertheless, in women interested in fertility preservation, this is not an alternative to gamete cryopreservation, which remains as the first option to be offered. In this setting, temporary ovarian suppression with GnRHa during chemotherapy should be also proposed following gamete cryopreservation or to women who have no access, refuse, or have contraindications to surgical fertility preservation techniques. In this article, we present an overview about the role of temporary ovarian suppression with GnRHa during chemotherapy in breast cancer patients by addressing the available clinical evidence with the aim of identifying both the best candidates for the use of this strategy and the still existing gray zones requiring further investigation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document