Translation of the UK-Birth-Satisfaction-Scale-Revised (BSS-R) into Brazilian (Portuguese) and description of initial measurement properties

Author(s):  
Renata Bullio Ferrari ◽  
Colin Martin ◽  
Caroline Hollins Martin ◽  
Felipe Granado de Souza ◽  
Julia Vale Clini ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. IJCBIRTH-D-21-00001
Author(s):  
Shamsa Zafar ◽  
Fareeha Tayyab ◽  
Asma Liaqat ◽  
Siham Sikander ◽  
Caroline J. Hollins Martin ◽  
...  

BACKGROUNDSatisfaction with the birth experience is increasingly recognized as critical to the well-being of mother and baby and thus accurate assessment of this key dimension is essential. The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) has been shown to be a robust, valid, and reliable measure of birth experience. The current study sought to develop an Urdu version of the measure to be used in Pakistan.METHODSFollowing translation, a cross-sectional design was used to examine the measurement properties of the Pakistan (Urdu)-BSS-R (P-BSS-R). Participants were a purposive sample of Pakistani postnatal women (n = 200). Key psychometric properties were examined using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), internal consistency evaluation, and known-groups discriminant validity testing.RESULTSThe majority of measurement parameters for clinical application of the P-BSS-R were found to be acceptable with good know-groups discriminant validity and data fit to the tri-dimensional theoretical model of the BSS-R observed. However, some idiosyncratic observations were highlighted, including unexpected low internal consistency.CONCLUSIONSThe P-BSS-R was found to be a generally valid and reliable measure of the experience, a caveat being low internal consistency warranting further investigation.


Author(s):  
Ricardo Rodrigues Sousa Junior ◽  
Ana Paula Bensemann Gontijo ◽  
Thiago Ribeiro Teles Santos ◽  
F. Virginia Wright ◽  
Marisa C. Mancini

Author(s):  
Raquel LL. Teixeira ◽  
Ann K. Jansen ◽  
Danielle AG. Pereira ◽  
Gabriela L. de M Ghisi ◽  
Lilian P. da Silva ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiana Foltran Mescollotto ◽  
Ester Moreira de Castro ◽  
Elisa Bizetti Pelai ◽  
Adriana Pertille ◽  
Delaine Rodrigues Bigaton

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Høyrup Christiansen ◽  
Gareth McCray ◽  
Trine Nøhr Winding ◽  
Johan Hviid Andersen ◽  
Kent Jacob Nielsen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) has been developed to measure musculoskeletal health status across musculoskeletal conditions and settings. However, the MSK-HQ needs to be further evaluated across settings and different languages.Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare measurement properties of the MSK-HQ across Danish (DK) and English (UK) cohorts of patients from primary care physiotherapy services with musculoskeletal pain. Methods: MSK-HQ was translated into Danish according to international guidelines. Measurement invariance was assessed by differential item functioning (DIF) analyses. Test-retest reliability, measurement error, responsiveness and minimal clinically important change (MCIC) were evaluated and compared between DK (n=153) and UK (n=166) cohorts. Results: The Danish version demonstrated acceptable face and construct validity. Out of the 14 MSK-HQ items, three items showed DIF for language (pain/stiffness at night, understanding condition and confidence in managing symptoms) and three items showed DIF for pain location (walking, washing/dressing and physical activity levels). Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for test-retest were 0.86 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.91) for DK cohort and 0.77 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.90) for the UK cohort. The systematic measurement error was 1.6 and 3.9 points for the DK and UK cohorts respectively, with random measurement error being 8.6 and 9.9 points. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the change scores against patients’ own judgment at 3 months exceeded 0.70 in both cohorts. Absolute and relative MCIC estimates were 8-10 points and 26% for the DK cohort and 6-8 points and 29% for the UK cohort.Conclusions: The measurement properties of MSK-HQ were acceptable across countries, but seem more suited for group than individual level evaluation. Researchers and clinicians should be aware that some discrepancy exits and should take the observed measurement error into account when evaluating change in scores over time.


Midwifery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 610-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline J. Hollins Martin ◽  
Colin R. Martin

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoi Vardavaki ◽  
Caroline J. Hollins Martin ◽  
Colin R. Martin

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Hollins Martin ◽  
Valerie Fleming

Author(s):  
Reza Omani-Samani ◽  
Caroline J. Hollins Martin ◽  
Colin R. Martin ◽  
Saman Maroufizadeh ◽  
Azadeh Ghaheri ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document