Teacher-student dialogue during one-to-one interactions in a post-16 mathematics classroom

2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-194
Author(s):  
Clarissa Grandi
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 462-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Howe ◽  
Sara Hennessy ◽  
Neil Mercer ◽  
Maria Vrikki ◽  
Lisa Wheatley

Author(s):  
Maiken Adelsten ◽  
Christian Lauridsen ◽  
Berit Noer ◽  
Lone Dirckinck-Holmfeld

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Danli

AbstractBased upon sociocultural theory, this study investigates the dynamics of the teacher’s roles and learner autonomy in the process of scaffolding in teacher-student negotiation of meaning in an EFL classroom. The participants were 25 undergraduate students and a Chinese teacher of English at a university in China. The teacher-student dialogue was the central mechanism mediating the construction of negotiation of meaning and form in language learning. The analysis of classroom discourse and the teacher’s retrospection from an interview illustrated the teacher’s different roles in interaction, where scaffolding acted as a structured pedagogical tool. The study revealed that the learners were afforded assistance to progress from other-regulation to self-regulation, and consequently, the teacher exploited opportunities to enhance learner autonomy in negotiation of spaces for autonomy in classroom teaching. The study has probed into the significance of the teacher’s capacity of controlling scaffolding effectively and generated implications for teacher development and learner training.


1971 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 304-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewis R. Aiken

Recent investigations pertaining to the importance of verbal factors in the learning of mathematics are reviewed. The paper is divided into 3 sections: (a) the relationships of mathematical ability to reading ability and general intelligence, (b) reading instruction and mathematics learning, and (c) student and teacher verbalizations. The importance of general intelligence for mathematics achievement is recognized, but the evidence for a group factor of mathematical ability is not convincing. Training in careful, analytical reading appears to have a beneficial effect on achievement in mathematics, but more controlled experiments with larger samples need to be conducted. The influence of verbalizing awareness of mathematical generalizations and the effects of teacher–student verbal interactions in mathematics classroom settings are other promising directions for research. Finally, an appeal is made for long–term multivariate investigations rather than piecemeal, one–shot studies.


1995 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn Stewart ◽  
Lucindia Chance

Can the national focus on the NCTM's Standards be combined with the focus on writing to learn to streng then mathematics instruction? The NCTM's Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (1991) supports the use of writing as an instructional technique. The possibilities suggested for journal writing in the mathematics classroom challenged these authors to explore the available literature. Several studies appeared promising (Linn 1989; Miller and England 1989; Powell and Lopez 1989; Richards 1990; Rose 1989; Skiba 1990; Vukovich 1985; White and Dunn 1989). Where as most of these projects indicated that journal writing increased mathematical ability and decreased anxiety, too few studies actually delineated the content of the journal entries to any great extent. Moreover, many of the investigations did not consider the context within which students and teachers operate. The relevance and interaction of teacher, student, and subject matter were often overlooked. This situation further challenged the authors to extend and broaden the investigation of journal writing into a more global study-one of practical inquiry, not only exploring the cognitive and affective influences of journal writing but seeking situational insight into, and understanding of, the mathematics classroom.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (24) ◽  
pp. 10428
Author(s):  
Beatriz Sánchez-Barbero ◽  
José María Chamoso ◽  
Santiago Vicente ◽  
Javier Rosales

The analysis of teacher–student interaction when jointly solving routine problems in the primary education mathematics classroom has revealed that there is scarce reasoning and little participation on students’ part. To analyze whether this fact is due to the routine nature of the problems, a sample of teachers who solved, together with their students, a routine problem involving three questions with different cognitive difficulty levels (task 1) was analyzed, describing on which part of the problem-solving process (selection of information or reasoning) they focused their interaction. Results showed that they barely focused the interaction on reasoning, and participation of students was scarce, regardless of the cognitive difficulty of the question to be answered. To check whether these results could be due to the routine nature of the problem, a nonroutine problem (task 2) was solved by the same sample of teachers and students. The results revealed an increase in both reasoning and participation of students in processes that required complex reasoning. This being so, the main conclusion of the present study is that including nonroutine problem solving in the primary education classroom as a challenging task is a reasonable way to increase students’ ability to use their own reasoning to solve problems, and to promote greater teacher–student collaboration. These two aspects are relevant for students to become creative, critical, and reflective citizens.


Author(s):  
Marionella Y. Dolgushina

We consider the aspect of students’ patriotic education in the professional instrumental training class on the basis of a selection of the most relevant for the pedagogical process meaning of the concept “patriotism” and the use of information from the field of musical local lore. The need to include in the pedagogical process intellectual conversations on patriotism as a subject of philosophy, political science is justified by a brief analysis of the existence in the Russian cultural environment of a popular quote from the heritage of S. Johnson. The concept of “patriotism” is comprehended in accordance with the definition of the German philosopher M. Merton, as well as in accordance with the works of I. Vernadsky, B. Chicherin and others. The main thesis being proved is that patriotism is not only a goal, but also a mean of education. The declared pedagogical position is based on the experience of patriotic education in domestic pedagogy, presented by the works of K.D. Ushinsky, V.P. Vakhterov, N.A. Korf, N.I. Pirogov, L.N. Tolstoy, P.P. Blonsky, P.F. Kapterev and others. Intellectualization in the “teacher-student” dialogue space is used as the main technique for the implementation of patriotic education. A selection of works recommended for inclusion in the repertoire of an instrumental musician is presented. The theoretical attitude is confirmed by examples of musicians’ works, whose names are cultural symbols of the Tambov Region: A.N. Verstovsky, S.V. Rachmaninov, F.I. Chaliapin, V.I. Agapkin, I.A. Shatrov. Particular emphasis is placed on the theme of the Great Patriotic War in the work of the modern Tambov composer – O.I. Egorova.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document