scholarly journals Train–track–bridge modelling and review of parameters

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1051-1064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Cantero ◽  
Therese Arvidsson ◽  
Eugene OBrien ◽  
Raid Karoumi
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Ye Liu ◽  
Yan Han ◽  
Peng Hu ◽  
C. S. Cai ◽  
Xuhui He

In this study, the influences of wind barriers on the aerodynamic characteristics of trains (e.g. a CRH2 train) on a highway-railway one-story bridge were investigated by using wind pressure measurement tests, and a reduction factor of overturning moment coefficients was analyzed for trains under wind barriers. Subsequently, based on a joint simulation employing SIMPACK and ANSYS, a wind–train–track–bridge system coupled vibration model was established, and the safety and comfort indexes of trains on the bridge were studied under different wind barrier parameters. The results show that the mean wind pressures and fluctuating wind pressures on the trains’ surface decrease generally if wind barriers are used. As a result, the dynamic responses of the trains also decrease in the whole process of crossing the bridge. Of particular note, the rate of the wheel load reductions and lateral wheel-axle forces can change from unsafe states to relative safe states due to the wind barriers. The influence of the porosity of the wind barriers on the mean wind pressures and fluctuating wind pressures on the windward sides and near the top corner surfaces of the trains are significantly greater than the influence from the height of the wind barriers. Within a certain range, decreasing the wind barrier porosities and increasing the wind barrier heights will significantly reduce the safety and comfort index values of trains on the bridge. It is found that when the porosity of the wind barrier is 40%, the optimal height of the wind barrier is determined as approximately 3.5[Formula: see text]m. At this height, the trains on the bridges are safer and run more smoothly and comfortably. Besides, through the dynamic response analysis of the wind–train–track–bridge system, it is found that the installation of wind barriers in cases with high wind speeds (30[Formula: see text]m/s) may have an adverse effect on the vertical vibration of the train–track–bridge system.


2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 3-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanming Zhai ◽  
He Xia ◽  
Chengbiao Cai ◽  
Mangmang Gao ◽  
Xiaozhen Li ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Zhaowei Chen ◽  
Hui Fang

Train-track interaction (TTI) is a classic research topic in railway engineering, which consists of three main parts, namely, train model, track model, and wheel-rail interaction. To improve the computational accuracy and broaden the application range, an alternative calculation method to investigate TTI based on secondary development technology of the commercial software ANSYS through APDL language is introduced in this article. Primarily, the train-track interaction theory is briefly presented. On this basis, TTI is programmed and implemented on the computing platform of ANSYS by fully taking the nonlinear wheel-rail interaction into consideration. In this calculation method, the train model, which is established based on multibody dynamics theory and solved by an advanced explicit integration method, is programmed into ANSYS through APDL language, while the track part is simulated according to finite element theory. Then, the proposed calculation method is validated with field test results to verify the validity. Finally, a numerical demonstration is conducted employing the present method. Results show that the introduced method is effective and able to investigate TTI. Different complicated track systems can be accurately simulated employing this method. Moreover, this method is also adoptable to explore train-bridge interaction and train-track-bridge interaction.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohui Zhang ◽  
Yao Shan ◽  
Xinwen Yang

A model based on the theory of train-track-bridge coupling dynamics is built in the article to investigate how high-speed railway bridge pier differential settlement can affect various railway performance-related criteria. The performance of the model compares favorably with that of a 3D finite element model and train-track-bridge numerical model. The analysis of the study demonstrates that all the dynamic response for a span of 24 m is slightly larger than that for a span of 32 m. The wheel unloading rate increases with pier differential settlement for all of the calculation conditions considered, and its maximum value of 0.695 is well below the allowable limit. Meanwhile, the vertical acceleration increases with pier differential settlement and train speed, respectively, and the values for a pier differential settlement of 10 mm and speed of 350 km/h exceed the maximum allowable limit stipulated in the Chinese standards. On this basis, a speed limit for the exceeding pier differential settlement is determined for comfort consideration. Fasteners that had an initial tensile force due to pier differential settlement experience both compressive and tensile forces as the train passes through and are likely to have a lower service life than those which solely experience compressive forces.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 919-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xun Zhang ◽  
Zhipeng Wen ◽  
Wensu Chen ◽  
Xiyang Wang ◽  
Yan Zhu

With the increasing popularity of high-speed railway, more and more bridges are being constructed in Western China where debris flows are very common. A debris flow with moderate intensity may endanger a high-speed train traveling on a bridge, since its direct impact leads to adverse dynamic responses of the bridge and the track structure. In order to address this issue, a dynamic analysis model is established for studying vibrations of coupled train–track–bridge system subjected to debris flow impact, in which a model of debris flow impact load in time domain is proposed and applied on bridge piers as external excitation. In addition, a six-span simply supported box girder bridge is considered as a case study. The dynamic responses of the bridge and the running safety indices such as derailment factor, offload factor, and lateral wheel–rail force of the train are investigated. Some influencing factors are then discussed based on parametric studies. The results show that both bridge responses and running safety indices are greatly amplified due to debris flow impact loads as compared with that without debris flow impact. With respect to the debris flow impact load, the boulder collision has a more negative impact on the dynamic responses of the bridge and train than the dynamic slurry pressure. Both the debris flow impact intensity and train speed determine the running safety indices, and the debris flow occurrence time should be also carefully considered to investigate the worst scenario.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Carnevale ◽  
Andrea Collina ◽  
Tim Peirlinck

Damage identification and localization in railway bridges is a widely studied topic. Strain, displacement, or acceleration sensors installed on the bridge structure are normally used to detect changes in the global behavior of the structure, whereas approaches like ultra-sonic testing, acoustic emission, and magnetic inspection are used to check a small portion of structure near localized damage. The aim of this paper is to explore another perspective for monitoring the structural status of railway bridges, i.e., to detect structural damage from the dynamic response of the train transiting the bridge. This approach can successfully be implemented in the case of resonant bridges, thanks to the high level of acceleration generated, but its application becomes more challenging when the excitation frequencies due to train passage do not excite the first mode of vibration of the bridge. The paper investigates the feasibility of the method in the latter case, through numerical simulations of the complete train-track-bridge system. Accelerations on axleboxes and bogies are processed through suitable algorithms to detect differences arising when the train crosses a defective bridge or a healthy one. The results outline the main operational parameters affecting the method, the best placement for sensors, and the best frequency range to be considered in the signal processing, also addressing the issues that are related to track irregularity. Good performance can be achieved in the case of short bridges, but a few practical issues must be tackled before the method could be tested in practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 306 ◽  
pp. 02003
Author(s):  
Haoran Xie ◽  
Bin Yan ◽  
Jie Huang

In order to investigate the vertical dynamic response characteristics of train-track-bridge system on CWR (Continunously Welded Rail) under dynamic load of train on HSR (High-Speed Railway) bridge. Based on the principle of vehicle train-track-bridge coupling dynamics, taking the 32m simply supported bridge of a section of Zhengzhou-Xuzhou Passenger Dedicated Line as an example, the finite element software ANSYS and the dynamic analysis software SIMPACK are used for co-simulation, and bridge model of the steel spring floating slab track and the CRTSIII ballastless track (China Railway Track System) considering the shock absorbing steel spring, the limit barricade and the contact characteristics of track structure layers are established. On this basis, in order to study the dynamic response laws of the design of ballastless track structure parameters to the system when the train crosses the bridge and provide the basis for the design and construction, by studying the influence of the speed of train on the bridge, the damage of fasteners and the parameters of track structure on the train-track-bridge system, the displacement of rail, vertical vibration acceleration and wheel-rail force response performance are analyzed. Studies have shown that: At the train speed of 40 km/h, the displacement and acceleration of the rail and track slab in the CRTSIII ballastless track are smaller than the floating slab track structure, but the floating slab track structure has better vibration reduction performance for bridges. The acceleration of rail, track slab and bridge increases obviously with the increase of train speed, the rail structure has the largest increasement. Reducing the stiffness of fasteners could decrease the vertical acceleration response of the steel spring floating slab track system, the ability to absorb shock can be enhanceed by reducing the stiffness of the fastener appropriately. Increasing the density of the floating slab can increase the vertical acceleration of the floating slab and the bridge, thereby decreasing the vibration amplitude of the system.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Yuexing Wu ◽  
Jianting Zhou ◽  
Jinquan Zhang ◽  
Qiang Wen ◽  
Xuan Li

Long-span cable-stayed bridge (LCB) with unequal-height towers is being designed and constructed in metro lines due to its better adaptability to environment and terrain conditions compared to traditional cable-stayed bridge with equal-height towers. However, the asymmetrical arrangement of towers leads to obvious nonuniformity of the structural stiffness along the longitudinal direction, which intensifies the wheel-rail coupled vibration behaviour, and affects the running safety of operating trains and ride comfort. Therefore, train-bridge dynamic behaviour of long-span asymmetrical-stiffness cable-stayed bridge is deeply investigated in this work. Primarily, considering the comprehensive index of frequency difference and modal assurance criterion (MAC), a nonlinear model updating technique (NMUT) based on penalty function theory is proposed, which can be used to optimize the bridge numerical model. Secondly, on the basis of the train-track-bridge dynamic interaction theory (TDIT), a train-track-bridge coupled dynamic model (TCDM) is established. Finally, a LCB with unequal-height towers is applied as a case to illustrate the influence of asymmetrical stiffness on the train-track-bridge dynamic characteristics. Results show that the proposed NMUT is efficacious and practical. For the LCB with unequal-height towers, a significant difference between the bridge vibration at low tower location and that at high tower location appears. The vertical displacement difference of the main beam on both sides of the bridge increases with the distance from the observation point to the bridge tower increasing. The variation of acceleration difference on both sides of the bridge is influenced by the speed of the train and the position of the observation point simultaneously. In general, vibrations of the main beam at low tower location are larger than those at high tower location.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document