scholarly journals Metagoverning social work knowledge structures

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Verner Denvall ◽  
Kettil Nordesjö ◽  
Kerstin Johansson

Social workers have played a key role in political settings from the profession’s historic roots to present day. Their knowledge, skills and values position social workers to practice in political settings. Social work faculty and students were interviewed to assess a) how field placements in legislative offices and participation in Campaign School and NASW-sponsored Legislative Education and Advocacy Day (LEAD) impacted students’ professional development and perspectives on political social work, and b) social work faculties’ perception of these activities in students’ social work education and necessary political social work knowledge and skills. Initial results demonstrate a high level of support for these activities among faculty and students with opportunities to further include them in the explicit and implicit social work curriculum.


2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve King ◽  
Michael J. Holosko

Empathy is a core principle essential to social work. Despite this emphasis, minimal empirical research of empathy has been undertaken by social work researchers. The purpose of this study was to develop and initially validate the Empathy Scale for Social Workers (ESSW). The ESSW is a 41-item self-report inventory designed to assess empathy in social work practitioners. The sample ( N = 271) consisted of social workers who had attained the Master of Social Work (MSW) degree. Findings revealed promising psychometric properties for the ESSW, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) demonstrated content, construct, and factorial validity. Results were encouraging and they lay the ground work for the continued development of the ESSW. This scale addresses a gap in social work knowledge regarding the empirical evaluation of empathy. Results have implications for social work as the scale may be used to assess student training needs and/or as a screening tool for social work supervisors and practitioners.


Social Work ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 97-114
Author(s):  
Guy Shennan

The chapter considers changes and developments in the content of social work education under the three headings of social science disciplines, understanding human development and relationships, and theories, approaches and methods for practice. At the start of the period under review, social science knowledge (primarily from sociology and social policy) and human development theories predominated, but as their research base and published literature have expanded, theories and methods for practice have become more prominent. The contribution to knowledge from research conducted by social workers themselves is acknowledged, as is the contribution made by experts by experience, both directly and through research interviews. The prominence of sequences on law for social workers is noted. The chapter concludes by asserting that the broad partnership of interests which should determine the content of the social work knowledge base is threatened by Government's much-expanded role, but that most social work programmes continue to ensure a balanced curriculum.


2018 ◽  
pp. 153-180
Author(s):  
Noel Timms ◽  
Rita Timms ◽  
Chris Blow
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Darlyne Bailey

Ruby B. Pernell (1917–2001) was a scholar and leader in the development of social group work knowledge, values, and skills. She was professor emerita of Social Work at the School of Applied Social Sciences at Case Western Reserve University (1968–2001).


1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alonzo Cavazos ◽  
Sandra Galvan-Posada

This study replicates and builds on an earlier study (Cavazos, 1996), which found that baccalaureate students' knowledge of the social work foundation did not deepen as a result of field education. Seventy field interns were tested during the first and last week of the block field internship. Two baccalaureate programs with significant differences related to the interns' ethnicity, duration of the internship, and the use of foundation-related field assignments were selected for comparison. Interns took the Area Concentration Achievement Test in Social Work (ACAT), which tests knowledge of the social work foundation. No pretest, posttest ACAT performance differences were found for either program, further challenging the assumption that social work knowledge deepens as a result of field education. Implications are discussed and recommendations are offered for continued research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document