scholarly journals One single-center serological survey on measles, rubella and mumps antibody levels of people in Youyang, China

Author(s):  
Qing Wang ◽  
Xiaoping Cheng ◽  
Dandan Liu ◽  
Changhui Chen ◽  
Kaihu Yao
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Ruetalo ◽  
Ramona Businger ◽  
Karina Althaus ◽  
Simon Fink ◽  
Felix Ruoff ◽  
...  

The majority of infections with SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic or mild without the necessity of hospitalization. It is of importance to reveal if these patients develop an antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 and to define which antibodies confer virus neutralization. We conducted a comprehensive serological survey of 49 patients with a mild course of disease and quantified neutralizing antibody responses against a clinical SARS-CoV-2 isolate employing human cells as targets. Four patients (8%), even though symptomatic, did not develop antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and two other patients (4%) were only positive in one of the six serological assays employed. For the remainder, antibody response against the S-protein correlated with serum neutralization whereas antibodies against the nucleocapsid were poor predictors of virus neutralization. Regarding neutralization, only six patients (12%) could be classified as highly neutralizers. Furthermore, sera from several individuals with fairly high antibody levels had only poor neutralizing activity. In addition, employing a novel serological Western blot system to characterize antibody responses against seasonal coronaviruses, we found that antibodies against the seasonal coronavirus 229E might contribute to SARS-CoV-2 neutralization. Altogether, we show that there is a wide breadth of antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 in patients that differentially correlate with virus neutralization. This highlights the difficulty to define reliable surrogate markers for immunity against SARS-CoV-2.


2002 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. van den HOF ◽  
J. WALLINGA ◽  
M.-A. WIDDOWSON ◽  
M. A. E. CONYN-VAN SPAENDONCK

We investigated which vaccination schedule gives best protection to the vaccinating population, in case there is a measles epidemic in an area with low vaccine coverage. We considered combinations of an early measles vaccination (none, at 6 months or at 9 months), a measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) vaccination around the first birthday (at either 11 or 14 months), and MMR vaccination at an older age (at either 4 or 9 years). The different estimates on measures of protection (percentage of susceptibles, number of reported cases in an epidemic year, percentage of lifetime spent susceptible) relied on a mathematical model of decline of maternal antibody levels with age, and the impact of that antibody level on seroconversion and immunity. Model parameters were estimated from a Dutch population-based serological survey on measles antibodies. Different measures of protection favoured different vaccination schedules, but dropping the age of second MMR vaccination prevents considerably more cases than an extra early measles vaccination or dropping the age of first MMR vaccination.


2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 1496-1498 ◽  
Author(s):  
S K Bae ◽  
T Gushima ◽  
N Saito ◽  
I Yamanaka ◽  
T Shimokawa ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 577-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Özgür Can ◽  
Ali Murat Gökçe ◽  
Mustafa Canbakan ◽  
Pınar Ata ◽  
Gülizar Manga Şahin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Maria Classen ◽  
Anna Muzalyova ◽  
Sandra Nagl ◽  
Carola Fleischmann ◽  
Alanna Ebigbo ◽  
...  

COVID-19 was first described in 2019, with significant impact on everyday life since then. In 2020, the first vaccine against COVID-19 was approved. Little is known about immune response to vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Aim of our study was to investigate antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in IBD patients receiving immunomodulators/biologics compared to healthy controls. This was a single-center retrospective study. 72 patients with IBD were included. Data from 72 healthy employees were used as control group matched by propensity score. Blood samples were analyzed for antibody response. 65 (90.3%) patients of the IBD group received immunomodulatory therapy. Mean antibody level for IBD patients was 1257.1 U/ml (SD 1109.626) in males and 1500.1 U/ml (SD 1142.760) in females (reduced antibody response IBD group 1383.76 U/ml SD 1125.617; control group 1885.65 U/ml SD 727.572, p < 0.05)). There was no vaccination failure in IBD group. After first vaccination, side effects were reported more often in IBD patients (total symptoms IBD group 58.3 %, control group 34.5 %, p < 0.007) with the opposite after the second vaccination (total symptoms IBD group 55.4 %, control group 76 %, p = 0.077)). There was a trend to reduced immune response in elderly. Disease duration and immunomodulatory therapy had no impact on immune response. Longer time to last medication given and time passed to vaccination in IBD group seem to have a positive impact on antibody levels. High antibody response to vaccination in all patients with IBD was seen. Vaccination was well tolerated. Concomitant immunomodulatory therapy had no impact on seroconversion. Antibody levels in the IBD group were lower compared to control group.


2000 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 797-799 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Takahashi ◽  
M. Takagi ◽  
K. Yamamoto ◽  
M. Nakamura

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document