scholarly journals Inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation by platelet factor-4 involves a unique action on S phase progression.

1994 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 1121-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
S K Gupta ◽  
J P Singh
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Endothelial Cell ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Endothelial Cell Proliferation ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Cycle Progression

Modulation of endothelial cell proliferation and cell cycle progression by the "chemokine" platelet factor-4 (PF-4) was investigated. PF-4 inhibited DNA synthesis, as well as proliferation of endothelial cells derived from large and small blood vessels. Inhibition by PF-4 was independent of the type and the concentration of stimuli used for the induction of endothelial cell proliferation. Inhibition of cell growth by PF-4 was reversible. The effects of PF-4 were antagonized by heparin. Cell cycle analysis using [3H]thymidine pulse labeling during traverse of synchronous cells from G0/G1 to S phase revealed that addition of PF-4 during G1 phase completely abolished the entry of cells into S phase. In addition, PF-4 also inhibited DNA synthesis in cells that were already in S phase. In exponentially growing cells, addition of PF-4 resulted in an accumulation of > 70% of the cells in early S phase, as determined by FACS (Becton-Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, Mountain View, CA). In cells synchronized in S phase by hydroxyurea and then released, addition of PF-4 promptly blocked further progression of DNA synthesis. These results demonstrate that in G0/G1-arrested cells, PF-4 inhibited entry of endothelial cells into S phase. More strikingly, our studies have revealed a unique mode of endothelial cell growth inhibition whereby PF-4 effectively blocked cell cycle progression during S phase.

Delphinidin inhibits endothelial cell proliferation and cell cycle progression through a transient activation of ERK-1/-2

2003 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 669-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Martin ◽  
Laure Favot ◽  
Rachel Matz ◽  
Claire Lugnier ◽  
Ramaroson Andriantsitohaina
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Endothelial Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Endothelial Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Transient Activation

scholarly journals Cellular Ras and Cyclin D1 Are Required during Different Cell Cycle Periods in Cycling NIH 3T3 Cells

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 4623-4632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Hitomi ◽  
Dennis W. Stacey
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
S Phase ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Nih 3T3 ◽  
Nih 3T3 Cells

ABSTRACT Novel techniques were used to determine when in the cell cycle of proliferating NIH 3T3 cells cellular Ras and cyclin D1 are required. For comparison, in quiescent cells, all four of the inhibitors of cell cycle progression tested (anti-Ras, anti-cyclin D1, serum removal, and cycloheximide) became ineffective at essentially the same point in G1 phase, approximately 4 h prior to the beginning of DNA synthesis. To extend these studies to cycling cells, a time-lapse approach was used to determine the approximate cell cycle position of individual cells in an asynchronous culture at the time of inhibitor treatment and then to determine the effects of the inhibitor upon recipient cells. With this approach, anti-Ras antibody efficiently inhibited entry into S phase only when introduced into cells prior to the preceding mitosis, several hours before the beginning of S phase. Anti-cyclin D1, on the other hand, was an efficient inhibitor when introduced up until just before the initiation of DNA synthesis. Cycloheximide treatment, like anti-cyclin D1 microinjection, was inhibitory throughout G1 phase (which lasts a total of 4 to 5 h in these cells). Finally, serum removal blocked entry into S phase only during the first hour following mitosis. Kinetic analysis and a novel dual-labeling technique were used to confirm the differences in cell cycle requirements for Ras, cyclin D1, and cycloheximide. These studies demonstrate a fundamental difference in mitogenic signal transduction between quiescent and cycling NIH 3T3 cells and reveal a sequence of signaling events required for cell cycle progression in proliferating NIH 3T3 cells.

scholarly journals A Critical Role for Cyclin C in Promotion of the Hematopoietic Cell Cycle by Cooperation with c-Myc

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 3445-3454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao-Jun Liu ◽  
Takahiro Ueda ◽  
Tadaaki Miyazaki ◽  
Nobuyuki Tanaka ◽  
Shinichiro Mine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Line ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Early Gene ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin C ◽  
Growth Properties

ABSTRACT Cyclin C, a putative G1 cyclin, was originally isolated through its ability to complement a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain lacking the G1 cyclin geneCLN1-3. Unlike cyclins D1 and E, the other two G1 cyclins obtained by the same approach and subsequently shown to play important roles during the G1/S transition, there is thus far no evidence to support the hypothesis that cyclin C is indeed critical for the promotion of cell cycle progression. In BAF-B03 cells, an interleukin 3 (IL-3)-dependent murine pro-B-cell line, cyclin C gene mRNA was induced at the G1/S phase upon IL-3 stimulation and reached a maximal level in the S phase. Enforced expression of exogenous cyclin C in this cell line failed to alter its growth properties. In the present study, we examined whether cyclin C is capable of cooperating with the cytokine-responsive immediate-early gene products c-Myc and c-Fos in the promotion of cell proliferation. We found that cyclin C is able to cooperate functionally with c-Myc, but not c-Fos, to induce both BAF-B03 cell proliferation in a cytokine-independent fashion and the formation of cell clusters. Furthermore, cyclin C was primarily responsible for the induction of cdc2 gene expression. Our data define a novel role for cyclin C in the regulation of both the G1/S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle, and this effect appears to be independent of the activity of CDK8 in the control of transcription.

scholarly journals The jun and fos protein families are both required for cell cycle progression in fibroblasts.

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 4466-4472 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kovary ◽  
R Bravo
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Serum Stimulation ◽  
Fos Protein ◽  
Stimulation Of

The expression of different members of the Jun and Fos families of transcription factors is rapidly induced following serum stimulation of quiescent fibroblasts. To determine whether these proteins are required for cell cycle progression, we microinjected affinity-purified antibodies directed against c-Fos, FosB, Fra-1, c-Jun, JunB, and JunD, and antibodies that recognize either the Fos or the Jun family of proteins, into Swiss 3T3 cells and determined their effects in cell cycle progression by monitoring DNA synthesis. We found that microinjection of anti-Fos and anti-Jun family antibodies efficiently blocked the entrance to the S phase of serum-stimulated or asynchronously growing cells. However, the antibodies against single members of the Fos family only partially inhibited DNA synthesis. In contrast, all three Jun antibodies prevented DNA synthesis more effectively than did any of the anti-Fos antibodies.

scholarly journals Cell Cycle Dysregulation by Human Cytomegalovirus: Influence of the Cell Cycle Phase at the Time of Infection and Effects on Cyclin Transcription

1998 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 3729-3741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan S. Salvant ◽  
Elizabeth A. Fortunato ◽  
Deborah H. Spector
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Hcmv Infection ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Time Of Infection

ABSTRACT Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection inhibits cell cycle progression and alters the expression of cyclins E, A, and B (F. M. Jault, J.-M. Jault, F. Ruchti, E. A. Fortunato, C. Clark, J. Corbeil, D. D. Richman, and D. H. Spector, J. Virol. 69:6697–6704, 1995). In this study, we examined cell cycle progression, cyclin gene expression, and early viral events when the infection was initiated at different points in the cell cycle (G0, G1, and S). In all cases, infection led to cell cycle arrest. Cells infected in G0 or G1phase also showed a complete or partial absence, respectively, of cellular DNA synthesis at a time when DNA synthesis occurred in the corresponding mock-infected cells. In contrast, when cells were infected near or during S phase, many cells were able to pass through S phase and undergo mitosis prior to cell cycle arrest. S-phase infection also produced a delay in the appearance of the viral cytopathic effect and in the synthesis of immediate-early and early proteins. Labeling of cells with bromodeoxyuridine immediately prior to HCMV infection in S phase revealed that viral protein expression occurred primarily in cells which were not engaged in DNA synthesis at the time of infection. The viral-mediated induction of cyclin E, maintenance of cyclin-B protein levels, and inhibitory effects on the accumulation of cyclin A were not significantly affected when infection occurred during different phases of the cell cycle (G0, G1, and S). However, there was a delay in the observed inhibition of cyclin A in cells infected during S phase. This finding was in accord with the pattern of cell cycle progression and delay in viral gene expression associated with S-phase infection. Analysis of the mRNA revealed that the effects of the virus on cyclin E and cyclin A, but not on cyclin B, were primarily at the transcriptional level.

scholarly journals Day/Night Separation of Oxygenic Energy Metabolism and Nuclear DNA Replication in the Unicellular Red AlgaCyanidioschyzon merolae

mBio ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin-ya Miyagishima ◽  
Atsuko Era ◽  
Tomohisa Hasunuma ◽  
Mami Matsuda ◽  
Shunsuke Hirooka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Energy Metabolism ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Nuclear Dna ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACTThe transition from G1to S phase and subsequent nuclear DNA replication in the cells of many species of eukaryotic algae occur predominantly during the evening and night in the absence of photosynthesis; however, little is known about how day/night changes in energy metabolism and cell cycle progression are coordinated and about the advantage conferred by the restriction of S phase to the night. Using a synchronous culture of the unicellular red algaCyanidioschyzon merolae, we found that the levels of photosynthetic and respiratory activities peak during the morning and then decrease toward the evening and night, whereas the pathways for anaerobic consumption of pyruvate, produced by glycolysis, are upregulated during the evening and night as reported recently in the green algaChlamydomonas reinhardtii. Inhibition of photosynthesis by 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) largely reduced respiratory activity and the amplitude of the day/night rhythm of respiration, suggesting that the respiratory rhythm depends largely on photosynthetic activity. Even when the timing of G1/S-phase transition was uncoupled from the day/night rhythm by depletion of retinoblastoma-related (RBR) protein, the same patterns of photosynthesis and respiration were observed, suggesting that cell cycle progression and energy metabolism are regulated independently. Progression of the S phase under conditions of photosynthesis elevated the frequency of nuclear DNA double-strand breaks (DSB). These results suggest that the temporal separation of oxygenic energy metabolism, which causes oxidative stress, from nuclear DNA replication reduces the risk of DSB during cell proliferation inC. merolae.IMPORTANCEEukaryotes acquired chloroplasts through an endosymbiotic event in which a cyanobacterium or a unicellular eukaryotic alga was integrated into a previously nonphotosynthetic eukaryotic cell. Photosynthesis by chloroplasts enabled algae to expand their habitats and led to further evolution of land plants. However, photosynthesis causes greater oxidative stress than mitochondrion-based respiration. In seed plants, cell division is restricted to nonphotosynthetic meristematic tissues and populations of photosynthetic cells expand without cell division. Thus, seemingly, photosynthesis is spatially sequestrated from cell proliferation. In contrast, eukaryotic algae possess photosynthetic chloroplasts throughout their life cycle. Here we show that oxygenic energy conversion (daytime) and nuclear DNA replication (night time) are temporally sequestrated inC. merolae. This sequestration enables “safe” proliferation of cells and allows coexistence of chloroplasts and the eukaryotic host cell, as shown in yeast, where mitochondrial respiration and nuclear DNA replication are temporally sequestrated to reduce the mutation rate.

scholarly journals Distinct Signaling Pathways Mediate Stimulation of Cell Cycle Progression and Prevention of Apoptotic Cell Death by Estrogen in Rat Pituitary Tumor PR1 Cells

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 5051-5059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Caporali ◽  
Manami Imai ◽  
Lucia Altucci ◽  
Massimo Cancemi ◽  
Silvana Caristi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cell Survival ◽  
Pituitary Tumor ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Rat Pituitary ◽  
Stimulation Of

Estrogens control cell growth and viability in target cells via an interplay of genomic and extragenomic pathways not yet elucidated. Here, we show evidence that cell proliferation and survival are differentially regulated by estrogen in rat pituitary tumor PR1 cells. Pico- to femtomolar concentrations of 17β-estradiol (E2) are sufficient to foster PR1 cell proliferation, whereas nanomolar concentrations of the same are needed to prevent cell death that occurs at a high rate in these cells in the absence of hormone. Activation of endogenous (PRL) or transfected estrogen-responsive genes occurs at the same, higher concentrations of E2 required to promote cell survival, whereas stimulation of cyclin D3 expression and DNA synthesis occur at lower E2 concentrations. Similarly, the pure antiestrogen ICI 182,780 inhibits estrogen response element-dependent trans-activation and cell death more effectively than cyclin-cdk activity, G1-S transition, or DNA synthesis rate. In antiestrogen-treated and/or estrogen-deprived cells, death is due predominantly to apoptosis. Estrogen-induced cell survival, but not E2-dependent cell cycle progression, can be prevented by an inhibitor of c-Src kinase or by blockade of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathway. These data indicate the coexistence of two distinguishable estrogen signaling pathways in PR1 cells, characterized by different functions and sensitivity to hormones and antihormones.

scholarly journals β1 integrin and IL-3R coordinately regulate STAT5 activation and anchorage-dependent proliferation

2005 ◽  
Vol 168 (7) ◽  
pp. 1099-1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Defilippi ◽  
Arturo Rosso ◽  
Patrizia Dentelli ◽  
Cristina Calvi ◽  
Giovanni Garbarino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Serine Phosphorylation ◽  
Β1 Integrin ◽  
Adherent Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Phase Entry

We previously demonstrated that integrin-dependent adhesion activates STAT5A, a well known target of IL-3–mediated signaling. Here, we show that in endothelial cells the active β1 integrin constitutively associates with the unphosphorylated IL-3 receptor (IL-3R) β common subunit. This association is not sufficient for activating downstream signals. Indeed, only upon fibronectin adhesion is Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2) recruited to the β1 integrin–IL-3R complex and triggers IL-3R β common phosphorylation, leading to the formation of docking sites for activated STAT5A. These events are IL-3 independent but require the integrity of the IL-3R β common. IL-3 treatment increases JAK2 activation and STAT5A and STAT5B tyrosine and serine phosphorylation and leads to cell cycle progression in adherent cells. Expression of an inactive STAT5A inhibits cell cycle progression upon IL-3 treatment, identifying integrin-dependent STAT5A activation as a priming event for IL-3–mediated S phase entry. Consistently, overexpression of a constitutive active STAT5A leads to anchorage-independent cell cycle progression. Therefore, these data provide strong evidence that integrin-dependent STAT5A activation controls IL-3–mediated proliferation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document