scholarly journals Day/Night Separation of Oxygenic Energy Metabolism and Nuclear DNA Replication in the Unicellular Red AlgaCyanidioschyzon merolae

mBio ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin-ya Miyagishima ◽  
Atsuko Era ◽  
Tomohisa Hasunuma ◽  
Mami Matsuda ◽  
Shunsuke Hirooka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Energy Metabolism ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Nuclear Dna ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACTThe transition from G1to S phase and subsequent nuclear DNA replication in the cells of many species of eukaryotic algae occur predominantly during the evening and night in the absence of photosynthesis; however, little is known about how day/night changes in energy metabolism and cell cycle progression are coordinated and about the advantage conferred by the restriction of S phase to the night. Using a synchronous culture of the unicellular red algaCyanidioschyzon merolae, we found that the levels of photosynthetic and respiratory activities peak during the morning and then decrease toward the evening and night, whereas the pathways for anaerobic consumption of pyruvate, produced by glycolysis, are upregulated during the evening and night as reported recently in the green algaChlamydomonas reinhardtii. Inhibition of photosynthesis by 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) largely reduced respiratory activity and the amplitude of the day/night rhythm of respiration, suggesting that the respiratory rhythm depends largely on photosynthetic activity. Even when the timing of G1/S-phase transition was uncoupled from the day/night rhythm by depletion of retinoblastoma-related (RBR) protein, the same patterns of photosynthesis and respiration were observed, suggesting that cell cycle progression and energy metabolism are regulated independently. Progression of the S phase under conditions of photosynthesis elevated the frequency of nuclear DNA double-strand breaks (DSB). These results suggest that the temporal separation of oxygenic energy metabolism, which causes oxidative stress, from nuclear DNA replication reduces the risk of DSB during cell proliferation inC. merolae.IMPORTANCEEukaryotes acquired chloroplasts through an endosymbiotic event in which a cyanobacterium or a unicellular eukaryotic alga was integrated into a previously nonphotosynthetic eukaryotic cell. Photosynthesis by chloroplasts enabled algae to expand their habitats and led to further evolution of land plants. However, photosynthesis causes greater oxidative stress than mitochondrion-based respiration. In seed plants, cell division is restricted to nonphotosynthetic meristematic tissues and populations of photosynthetic cells expand without cell division. Thus, seemingly, photosynthesis is spatially sequestrated from cell proliferation. In contrast, eukaryotic algae possess photosynthetic chloroplasts throughout their life cycle. Here we show that oxygenic energy conversion (daytime) and nuclear DNA replication (night time) are temporally sequestrated inC. merolae. This sequestration enables “safe” proliferation of cells and allows coexistence of chloroplasts and the eukaryotic host cell, as shown in yeast, where mitochondrial respiration and nuclear DNA replication are temporally sequestrated to reduce the mutation rate.

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status

2019 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Burby ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.

scholarly journals Identification of DHX9 as a cell cycle regulated nucleolar recruitment factor for CIZ1

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Urvi Thacker ◽  
Tekle Pauzaite ◽  
James Tollitt ◽  
Maria Twardowska ◽  
Charlotte Harrison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Zinc Finger Protein ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Inactive X Chromosome ◽  
Functional Characterisation ◽  
Interaction Partners

Abstract CIP1-interacting zinc finger protein 1 (CIZ1) is a nuclear matrix associated protein that facilitates a number of nuclear functions including initiation of DNA replication, epigenetic maintenance and associates with the inactive X-chromosome. Here, to gain more insight into the protein networks that underpin this diverse functionality, molecular panning and mass spectrometry are used to identify protein interaction partners of CIZ1, and CIZ1 replication domain (CIZ1-RD). STRING analysis of CIZ1 interaction partners identified 2 functional clusters: ribosomal subunits and nucleolar proteins including the DEAD box helicases, DHX9, DDX5 and DDX17. DHX9 shares common functions with CIZ1, including interaction with XIST long-non-coding RNA, epigenetic maintenance and regulation of DNA replication. Functional characterisation of the CIZ1-DHX9 complex showed that CIZ1-DHX9 interact in vitro and dynamically colocalise within the nucleolus from early to mid S-phase. CIZ1-DHX9 nucleolar colocalisation is dependent upon RNA polymerase I activity and is abolished by depletion of DHX9. In addition, depletion of DHX9 reduced cell cycle progression from G1 to S-phase in mouse fibroblasts. The data suggest that DHX9-CIZ1 are required for efficient cell cycle progression at the G1/S transition and that nucleolar recruitment is integral to their mechanism of action.

scholarly journals A Critical Role for Cyclin C in Promotion of the Hematopoietic Cell Cycle by Cooperation with c-Myc

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 3445-3454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao-Jun Liu ◽  
Takahiro Ueda ◽  
Tadaaki Miyazaki ◽  
Nobuyuki Tanaka ◽  
Shinichiro Mine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Line ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Early Gene ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin C ◽  
Growth Properties

ABSTRACT Cyclin C, a putative G1 cyclin, was originally isolated through its ability to complement a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain lacking the G1 cyclin geneCLN1-3. Unlike cyclins D1 and E, the other two G1 cyclins obtained by the same approach and subsequently shown to play important roles during the G1/S transition, there is thus far no evidence to support the hypothesis that cyclin C is indeed critical for the promotion of cell cycle progression. In BAF-B03 cells, an interleukin 3 (IL-3)-dependent murine pro-B-cell line, cyclin C gene mRNA was induced at the G1/S phase upon IL-3 stimulation and reached a maximal level in the S phase. Enforced expression of exogenous cyclin C in this cell line failed to alter its growth properties. In the present study, we examined whether cyclin C is capable of cooperating with the cytokine-responsive immediate-early gene products c-Myc and c-Fos in the promotion of cell proliferation. We found that cyclin C is able to cooperate functionally with c-Myc, but not c-Fos, to induce both BAF-B03 cell proliferation in a cytokine-independent fashion and the formation of cell clusters. Furthermore, cyclin C was primarily responsible for the induction of cdc2 gene expression. Our data define a novel role for cyclin C in the regulation of both the G1/S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle, and this effect appears to be independent of the activity of CDK8 in the control of transcription.

scholarly journals The F-Box Protein Dia2 Regulates DNA Replication

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1540-1548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deanna M. Koepp ◽  
Andrew C. Kile ◽  
Swarna Swaminathan ◽  
Veronica Rodriguez-Rivera
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Origin Binding Protein ◽  
Cold Sensitive ◽  
F Box Protein

Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis plays a key role in many pathways inside the cell and is particularly important in regulating cell cycle transitions. SCF (Skp1/Cul1/F-box protein) complexes are modular ubiquitin ligases whose specificity is determined by a substrate-binding F-box protein. Dia2 is a Saccharomyces cerevisiae F-box protein previously described to play a role in invasive growth and pheromone response pathways. We find that deletion of DIA2 renders cells cold-sensitive and subject to defects in cell cycle progression, including premature S-phase entry. Consistent with a role in regulating DNA replication, the Dia2 protein binds replication origins. Furthermore, the dia2 mutant accumulates DNA damage in both S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle. These defects are likely a result of the absence of SCFDia2 activity, as a Dia2 ΔF-box mutant shows similar phenotypes. Interestingly, prolonging G1-phase in dia2 cells prevents the accumulation of DNA damage in S-phase. We propose that Dia2 is an origin-binding protein that plays a role in regulating DNA replication.

scholarly journals DNA replication times the cell cycle and contributes to the mid-blastula transition in Drosophila embryos

2009 ◽  
Vol 187 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark L. McCleland ◽  
Antony W. Shermoen ◽  
Patrick H. O'Farrell
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Drosophila Embryogenesis ◽  
Zygotic Transcription ◽  
Phase Cycle ◽  
Drosophila Embryos

We examined the contribution of S phase in timing cell cycle progression during Drosophila embryogenesis using an approach that deletes S phase rather than arresting its progress. Injection of Drosophila Geminin, an inhibitor of replication licensing, prevented subsequent replication so that the following mitosis occurred with uninemic chromosomes, which failed to align. The effect of S phase deletion on interphase length changed with development. During the maternally regulated syncytial blastoderm cycles, deleting S phase shortened interphase, and deletion of the last of blastoderm S phase (cycle 14) induced an extra synchronous division and temporarily deferred mid-blastula transition (MBT) events. In contrast, deleting S phase after the MBT in cycle 15 did not dramatically affect mitotic timing, which appears to retain its dependence on developmentally programmed zygotic transcription. We conclude that normal S phase and replication checkpoint activities are important timers of the undisturbed cell cycle before, but not after, the MBT.

scholarly journals Caffeine overcomes a restriction point associated with DNA replication, but does not accelerate mitosis.

1990 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. 1855-1859 ◽  
Author(s):  
C S Downes ◽  
S R Musk ◽  
J V Watson ◽  
R T Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Normal Cycle ◽  
Restriction Point ◽  
Nuclear Structures ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome Condensation ◽  
In Cells

Mitotic chromosome condensation is normally dependent on the previous completion of replication. Caffeine spectacularly deranges cell cycle controls after DNA polymerase inhibition or DNA damage; it induces the condensation, in cells that have not completed replication, of fragmented nuclear structures, analogous to the S-phase prematurely condensed chromosomes seen when replicating cells are fused with mitotic cells. Caffeine has been reported to induce S-phase condensation in cells where replication is arrested, by accelerating cell cycle progression as well as by uncoupling it from replication; for, in BHK or CHO hamster cells arrested in early S-phase and given caffeine, condensed chromosomes appear well before the normal time at which mitosis occurs in cells released from arrest. However, we have found that this apparent acceleration depends on the technique of synchrony and cell line employed. In other cells, and in synchronized hamster cells where the cycle has not been subjected to prolonged continual arrest, condensation in replication-arrested cells given caffeine occurs at the same time as normal mitosis in parallel populations where replication is allowed to proceed. This caffeine-induced condensation is therefore "premature" with respect to the chromatin structure of the S-phase nucleus, but not with respect to the timing of the normal cycle. Caffeine in replication-arrested cells thus overcomes the restriction on the formation of mitotic condensing factors that is normally imposed during DNA replication, but does not accelerate the timing of condensation unless cycle controls have previously been disturbed by synchronization procedures.

scholarly journals Cyclin-dependent kinase control of motile ciliogenesis

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eszter K Vladar ◽  
Miranda B Stratton ◽  
Maxwell L Saal ◽  
Glicella Salazar-De Simone ◽  
Xiangyuan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators ◽  
Airway Epithelial ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Multiciliated Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Machinery

Cycling cells maintain centriole number at precisely two per cell in part by limiting their duplication to S phase under the control of the cell cycle machinery. In contrast, postmitotic multiciliated cells (MCCs) uncouple centriole assembly from cell cycle progression and produce hundreds of centrioles in the absence of DNA replication to serve as basal bodies for motile cilia. Although some cell cycle regulators have previously been implicated in motile ciliogenesis, how the cell cycle machinery is employed to amplify centrioles is unclear. We use transgenic mice and primary airway epithelial cell culture to show that Cdk2, the kinase responsible for the G1 to S phase transition, is also required in MCCs to initiate motile ciliogenesis. While Cdk2 is coupled with cyclins E and A2 during cell division, cyclin A1 is required during ciliogenesis, contributing to an alternative regulatory landscape that facilitates centriole amplification without DNA replication.

scholarly journals Host and Symbiont Cell Cycle Coordination Is Mediated by Symbiotic State, Nutrition, and Partner Identity in a Model Cnidarian-Dinoflagellate Symbiosis

mBio ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor R. Tivey ◽  
John Everett Parkinson ◽  
Virginia M. Weis
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Host Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Host Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Specific Regulation ◽  
Species Specific

ABSTRACT The cell cycle is a critical component of cellular proliferation, differentiation, and response to stress, yet its role in the regulation of intracellular symbioses is not well understood. To explore host-symbiont cell cycle coordination in a marine symbiosis, we employed a model for coral-dinoflagellate associations: the tropical sea anemone Aiptasia (Exaiptasia pallida) and its native microalgal photosymbionts (Breviolum minutum and Breviolum psygmophilum). Using fluorescent labeling and spatial point-pattern image analyses to characterize cell population distributions in both partners, we developed protocols that are tailored to the three-dimensional cellular landscape of a symbiotic sea anemone tentacle. Introducing cultured symbiont cells to symbiont-free adult hosts increased overall host cell proliferation rates. The acceleration occurred predominantly in the symbiont-containing gastrodermis near clusters of symbionts but was also observed in symbiont-free epidermal tissue layers, indicating that the presence of symbionts contributes to elevated proliferation rates in the entire host during colonization. Symbiont cell cycle progression differed between cultured algae and those residing within hosts; the endosymbiotic state resulted in increased S-phase but decreased G2/M-phase symbiont populations. These phenotypes and the deceleration of cell cycle progression varied with symbiont identity and host nutritional status. These results demonstrate that host and symbiont cells have substantial and species-specific effects on the proliferation rates of their mutualistic partners. This is the first empirical evidence to support species-specific regulation of the symbiont cell cycle within a single cnidarian-dinoflagellate association; similar regulatory mechanisms likely govern interpartner coordination in other coral-algal symbioses and shape their ecophysiological responses to a changing climate. IMPORTANCE Biomass regulation is critical to the overall health of cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbioses. Despite the central role of the cell cycle in the growth and proliferation of cnidarian host cells and dinoflagellate symbionts, there are few studies that have examined the potential for host-symbiont coregulation. This study provides evidence for the acceleration of host cell proliferation when in local proximity to clusters of symbionts within cnidarian tentacles. The findings suggest that symbionts augment the cell cycle of not only their enveloping host cells but also neighboring cells in the epidermis and gastrodermis. This provides a possible mechanism for rapid colonization of cnidarian tissues. In addition, the cell cycles of symbionts differed depending on nutritional regime, symbiotic state, and species identity. The responses of cell cycle profiles to these different factors implicate a role for species-specific regulation of symbiont cell cycles within host cnidarian tissues.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document