scholarly journals Cell Cycle Dysregulation by Human Cytomegalovirus: Influence of the Cell Cycle Phase at the Time of Infection and Effects on Cyclin Transcription

1998 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 3729-3741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan S. Salvant ◽  
Elizabeth A. Fortunato ◽  
Deborah H. Spector
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Hcmv Infection ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Time Of Infection

ABSTRACT Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection inhibits cell cycle progression and alters the expression of cyclins E, A, and B (F. M. Jault, J.-M. Jault, F. Ruchti, E. A. Fortunato, C. Clark, J. Corbeil, D. D. Richman, and D. H. Spector, J. Virol. 69:6697–6704, 1995). In this study, we examined cell cycle progression, cyclin gene expression, and early viral events when the infection was initiated at different points in the cell cycle (G0, G1, and S). In all cases, infection led to cell cycle arrest. Cells infected in G0 or G1phase also showed a complete or partial absence, respectively, of cellular DNA synthesis at a time when DNA synthesis occurred in the corresponding mock-infected cells. In contrast, when cells were infected near or during S phase, many cells were able to pass through S phase and undergo mitosis prior to cell cycle arrest. S-phase infection also produced a delay in the appearance of the viral cytopathic effect and in the synthesis of immediate-early and early proteins. Labeling of cells with bromodeoxyuridine immediately prior to HCMV infection in S phase revealed that viral protein expression occurred primarily in cells which were not engaged in DNA synthesis at the time of infection. The viral-mediated induction of cyclin E, maintenance of cyclin-B protein levels, and inhibitory effects on the accumulation of cyclin A were not significantly affected when infection occurred during different phases of the cell cycle (G0, G1, and S). However, there was a delay in the observed inhibition of cyclin A in cells infected during S phase. This finding was in accord with the pattern of cell cycle progression and delay in viral gene expression associated with S-phase infection. Analysis of the mRNA revealed that the effects of the virus on cyclin E and cyclin A, but not on cyclin B, were primarily at the transcriptional level.

scholarly journals Cellular Ras and Cyclin D1 Are Required during Different Cell Cycle Periods in Cycling NIH 3T3 Cells

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 4623-4632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Hitomi ◽  
Dennis W. Stacey
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
S Phase ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Nih 3T3 ◽  
Nih 3T3 Cells

ABSTRACT Novel techniques were used to determine when in the cell cycle of proliferating NIH 3T3 cells cellular Ras and cyclin D1 are required. For comparison, in quiescent cells, all four of the inhibitors of cell cycle progression tested (anti-Ras, anti-cyclin D1, serum removal, and cycloheximide) became ineffective at essentially the same point in G1 phase, approximately 4 h prior to the beginning of DNA synthesis. To extend these studies to cycling cells, a time-lapse approach was used to determine the approximate cell cycle position of individual cells in an asynchronous culture at the time of inhibitor treatment and then to determine the effects of the inhibitor upon recipient cells. With this approach, anti-Ras antibody efficiently inhibited entry into S phase only when introduced into cells prior to the preceding mitosis, several hours before the beginning of S phase. Anti-cyclin D1, on the other hand, was an efficient inhibitor when introduced up until just before the initiation of DNA synthesis. Cycloheximide treatment, like anti-cyclin D1 microinjection, was inhibitory throughout G1 phase (which lasts a total of 4 to 5 h in these cells). Finally, serum removal blocked entry into S phase only during the first hour following mitosis. Kinetic analysis and a novel dual-labeling technique were used to confirm the differences in cell cycle requirements for Ras, cyclin D1, and cycloheximide. These studies demonstrate a fundamental difference in mitogenic signal transduction between quiescent and cycling NIH 3T3 cells and reveal a sequence of signaling events required for cell cycle progression in proliferating NIH 3T3 cells.

scholarly journals The jun and fos protein families are both required for cell cycle progression in fibroblasts.

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 4466-4472 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kovary ◽  
R Bravo
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Serum Stimulation ◽  
Fos Protein ◽  
Stimulation Of

The expression of different members of the Jun and Fos families of transcription factors is rapidly induced following serum stimulation of quiescent fibroblasts. To determine whether these proteins are required for cell cycle progression, we microinjected affinity-purified antibodies directed against c-Fos, FosB, Fra-1, c-Jun, JunB, and JunD, and antibodies that recognize either the Fos or the Jun family of proteins, into Swiss 3T3 cells and determined their effects in cell cycle progression by monitoring DNA synthesis. We found that microinjection of anti-Fos and anti-Jun family antibodies efficiently blocked the entrance to the S phase of serum-stimulated or asynchronously growing cells. However, the antibodies against single members of the Fos family only partially inhibited DNA synthesis. In contrast, all three Jun antibodies prevented DNA synthesis more effectively than did any of the anti-Fos antibodies.

scholarly journals A Protein Encoded by the Latency-Related Gene of Bovine Herpesvirus 1 Is Expressed in Trigeminal Ganglionic Neurons of Latently Infected Cattle and Interacts with Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 during Productive Infection

1998 ◽  
Vol 72 (10) ◽  
pp. 8133-8142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunquan Jiang ◽  
Ashfaque Hossain ◽  
Maria Teresa Winkler ◽  
Todd Holt ◽  
Alan Doster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Acute Infection ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Bovine Herpesvirus 1 ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Latently Infected ◽  
Herpesvirus 1

ABSTRACT Despite productive viral gene expression in the peripheral nervous system during acute infection, the bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV-1) infection cycle is blocked in sensory ganglionic neurons and consequently latency is established. The only abundant viral transcript expressed during latency is the latency-related (LR) RNA. LR gene products inhibit S-phase entry, and binding of the LR protein (LRP) to cyclin A was hypothesized to block cell cycle progression. This study demonstrates LRP is a nuclear protein which is expressed in neurons of latently infected cattle. Affinity chromatography indicated that LRP interacts with cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (cdk2)-cyclin complexes or cdc2-cyclin complexes in transfected human cells or infected bovine cells. After partial purification using three different columns (DEAE-Sepharose, Econo S, and heparin-agarose), LRP was primarily associated with cdk2-cyclin E complexes, an enzyme which is necessary for G1-to-S-phase cell cycle progression. During acute infection of trigeminal ganglia or following dexamethasone-induced reactivation, BHV-1 induces expression of cyclin A in neurons (L. M. Schang, A. Hossain, and C. Jones, J. Virol. 70:3807–3814, 1996). Expression of S-phase regulatory proteins (cyclin A, for example) leads to neuronal apoptosis. Consequently, we hypothesize that interactions between LRP and cell cycle regulatory proteins promote survival of postmitotic neurons during acute infection and/or reactivation.

scholarly journals Multiple Functions of Fubp1 in Cell Cycle Progression and Cell Survival

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingyu Kang ◽  
Hyeon Ji Kim ◽  
Tae-Jun Kim ◽  
Jin-Seok Byun ◽  
Jae-Ho Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Metabolic Stress ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Double Agent

The discovery of novel and critical genes implicated in malignant development is a topic of high interest in cancer research. Intriguingly, a group of genes named “double-agent” genes were reported to have both oncogenic and tumor-suppressive functions. To date, less than 100 “double-agent” genes have been documented. Fubp1 is a master transcriptional regulator of a subset of genes by interacting with a far upstream element (FUSE). Mounting evidence has collectively demonstrated both the oncogenic and tumor suppressive roles of Fubp1 and the debate regarding its roles in tumorigenesis has been around for several years. Therefore, the detailed molecular mechanisms of Fubp1 need to be determined in each context. In the present study, we showed that the Fubp1 protein level was enriched in the S phase and we identified that Fubp1 deficiency altered cell cycle progression, especially in the S phase, by downregulating the mRNA expression levels of Ccna genes encoding cyclin A. Although this Fubp1-cyclin A axis appears to exist in several types of tumors, Fubp1 showed heterogeneous expression patterns among various cancer tissues, suggesting it exhibits multiple and complicated functions in cancer development. In addition, we showed that Fubp1 deficiency confers survival advantages to cells against metabolic stress and anti-cancer drugs, suggesting that Fubp1 may play both positive and negative roles in malignant development.

scholarly journals Histone supply regulates S phase timing and cell cycle progression

eLife ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ufuk Günesdogan ◽  
Herbert Jäckle ◽  
Alf Herzig
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
De Novo ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Histone Genes ◽  
Nucleosome Assembly ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Surveillance Mechanism

Eukaryotes package DNA into nucleosomes that contain a core of histone proteins. During DNA replication, nucleosomes are disrupted and re-assembled with newly synthesized histones and DNA. Despite much progress, it is still unclear why higher eukaryotes contain multiple core histone genes, how chromatin assembly is controlled, and how these processes are coordinated with cell cycle progression. We used a histone null mutation of Drosophila melanogaster to show that histone supply levels, provided by a defined number of transgenic histone genes, regulate the length of S phase during the cell cycle. Lack of de novo histone supply not only extends S phase, but also causes a cell cycle arrest during G2 phase, and thus prevents cells from entering mitosis. Our results suggest a novel cell cycle surveillance mechanism that monitors nucleosome assembly without involving the DNA repair pathways and exerts its effect via suppression of CDC25 phosphatase String expression.

scholarly journals Regulation of Late G1/S Phase Transition and APCCdh1 by Reactive Oxygen Species

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 4701-4711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney G. Havens ◽  
Alan Ho ◽  
Naohisa Yoshioka ◽  
Steven F. Dowdy
Keyword(s):  
Reactive Oxygen Species ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Reactive Oxygen ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Oxygen Species ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Mitochondrial Mass

ABSTRACT Proliferating cells have a higher metabolic rate than quiescent cells. To investigate the role of metabolism in cell cycle progression, we examined cell size, mitochondrial mass, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels in highly synchronized cell populations progressing from early G1 to S phase. We found that ROS steadily increased, compared to cell size and mitochondrial mass, through the cell cycle. Since ROS has been shown to influence cell proliferation and transformation, we hypothesized that ROS could contribute to cell cycle progression. Antioxidant treatment of cells induced a late-G1-phase cell cycle arrest characterized by continued cellular growth, active cyclin D-Cdk4/6 and active cyclin E-Cdk2 kinases, and inactive hyperphosphorylated pRb. However, antioxidant-treated cells failed to accumulate cyclin A protein, a requisite step for initiation of DNA synthesis. Further examination revealed that cyclin A continued to be ubiquitinated by the anaphase promoting complex (APC) and to be degraded by the proteasome. This antioxidant arrest could be rescued by overexpression of Emi1, an APC inhibitor. These observations reveal an intrinsic late-G1-phase checkpoint, after transition across the growth factor-dependent G1 restriction point, that links increased steady-state levels of endogenous ROS and cell cycle progression through continued activity of APC in association with Cdh1.

scholarly journals p15PAF Is an Rb/E2F-Regulated S-Phase Protein Essential for DNA Synthesis and Cell Cycle Progression

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. e61196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Ning Chang ◽  
Mow-Jung Feng ◽  
Yu-Ling Chen ◽  
Ray-Hwang Yuan ◽  
Yung-Ming Jeng
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Phase Protein

scholarly journals The Human Cytomegalovirus IE86 Protein Can Block Cell Cycle Progression after Inducing Transition into the S Phase of Permissive Cells

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (15) ◽  
pp. 7108-7118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eain A. Murphy ◽  
Daniel N. Streblow ◽  
Jay A. Nelson ◽  
Mark F. Stinski
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Protein Expression ◽  
Human Cytomegalovirus ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Hcmv Infection ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Green Fluorescent

ABSTRACT Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection of permissive cells has been reported to induce a cell cycle halt. One or more viral proteins may be involved in halting progression at different stages of the cell cycle. We investigated how HCMV infection, and specifically IE86 protein expression, affects the cell cycles of permissive and nonpermissive cells. We used a recombinant virus that expresses the green fluorescent protein (GFP) to determine the effects of HCMV on the cell cycle of permissive cells. Fluorescence by GFP allowed us to select for only productively infected cells. Replication-defective adenovirus vectors expressing the IE72 or IE86 protein were also used to efficiently transduce 95% or more of the cells. The adenovirus-expressed IE86 protein was determined to be functional by demonstrating negative autoregulation of the major immediate-early promoter and activation of an early viral promoter in the context of the viral genome. To eliminate adenovirus protein effects, plasmids expressing GFP for fluorescent selection of only transfected cells and wild-type IE86 protein or a mutant IE86 protein were tested in permissive and nonpermissive cells. HCMV infection induced the entry of U373 cells into the S phase. All permissive cells infected with HCMV were blocked in cell cycle progression and could not divide. After either transduction or transfection and IE86 protein expression, the number of all permissive or nonpermissive cell types in the S phase increased significantly, but the cells could no longer divide. The IE72 protein did not have a significant effect on the S phase. Since IE86 protein inhibits cell cycle progression, the IE2 gene in a human fibroblast IE86 protein-expressing cell line was sequenced. The IE86 protein in these retrovirus-transduced cells has mutations in a critical region of the viral protein. The locations of the mutations and the function of the IE86 protein in controlling cell cycle progression are discussed.

scholarly journals The RASSF1A Tumor Suppressor Blocks Cell Cycle Progression and Inhibits Cyclin D1 Accumulation

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 4309-4318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Latha Shivakumar ◽  
John Minna ◽  
Toshiyuki Sakamaki ◽  
Richard Pestell ◽  
Michael A. White
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest

ABSTRACT The RASSF1A locus at 3p21.3 is epigenetically inactivated at high frequency in a variety of solid tumors. Expression of RASSF1A is sufficient to revert the tumorigenicity of human cancer cell lines. We show here that RASSF1A can induce cell cycle arrest by engaging the Rb family cell cycle checkpoint. RASSF1A inhibits accumulation of native cyclin D1, and the RASSF1A-induced cell cycle arrest can be relieved by ectopic expression of cyclin D1 or of other downstream activators of the G1/S-phase transition (cyclin A and E7). Regulation of cyclin D1 is responsive to native RASSF1A activity, because RNA interference-mediated downregulation of endogenous RASSF1A expression in human epithelial cells results in abnormal accumulation of cyclin D1 protein. Inhibition of cyclin D1 by RASSF1A occurs posttranscriptionally and is likely at the level of translational control. Rare alleles of RASSF1A, isolated from tumor cell lines, encode proteins that fail to block cyclin D1 accumulation and cell cycle progression. These results strongly suggest that RASSF1A is an important human tumor suppressor protein acting at the level of G1/S-phase cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals Legionella pneumophila translocated translation inhibitors are required for bacterial-induced host cell cycle arrest

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asaf Sol ◽  
Erion Lipo ◽  
Dennise A. de Jesús ◽  
Connor Murphy ◽  
Mildred Devereux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Host Cell ◽  
Legionella Pneumophila ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Bacterial Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Machinery

AbstractThe cell cycle machinery controls diverse cellular pathways and is tightly regulated. Misregulation of cell division plays a central role in the pathogenesis of many disease processes. Various microbial pathogens interfere with the cell cycle machinery to promote host cell colonization. Although cell cycle modulation is a common theme among pathogens, the role that this interference plays in promoting diseases is unclear. Previously we demonstrated that the G1 and G2/M phases of the host cell cycle are permissive for Legionella pneumophila replication, while S phase provides a toxic environment for bacterial replication. In this study we show that L. pneumophila avoids host S phase by blocking host DNA synthesis and preventing cell cycle progression into S phase. Cell cycle arrest upon Legionella contact is dependent on the Icm/Dot secretion system. In particular, we found that cell cycle arrest is dependent on the intact enzymatic activity of translocated substrates that inhibits host translation. Moreover, we show that early in infection, the presence of these translation inhibitors is crucial to induce the degradation of the master regulator cyclin D1. Our results demonstrate that the bacterial effectors that inhibit translation are associated with preventing entry of host cells into a phase associated with restriction of L. pneumophila. Furthermore, control of cyclin D1 may be a common strategy used by intracellular pathogens to manipulate the host cell cycle and promote bacterial replication.SignificanceRecently, we showed that host cell cycle regulatory proteins control L. pneumophila growth. In particular, bacterial replication was found to be depressed in S-phase. This indicates that bacterial control of the host cell cycle can limit exposure of the pathogen to antimicrobial events that are cycle-specific. Here we uncovered bacterial factors that induce host cell cycle arrest by inhibiting host protein synthesis and preventing S phase transition. These data are consistent with S-phase toxicity serving as an important antimicrobial response that limits growth of some intracellular pathogens. Moreover, identification of microbial factors that block cell cycle progression and uncovering host cell cycle partners are candidates for future drug development. Our data point to a unifying role of the cell cycle in multiple disease processes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document