scholarly journals Rad51 Accumulation at Sites of DNA Damage and in Postreplicative Chromatin

2000 ◽  
Vol 150 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Tashiro ◽  
Joachim Walter ◽  
Akira Shinohara ◽  
Nanao Kamada ◽  
Thomas Cremer

Rad51, a eukaryotic RecA homologue, plays a central role in homologous recombinational repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in yeast and is conserved from yeast to human. Rad51 shows punctuate nuclear localization in human cells, called Rad51 foci, typically during the S phase (Tashiro, S., N. Kotomura, A. Shinohara, K. Tanaka, K. Ueda, and N. Kamada. 1996. Oncogene. 12:2165–2170). However, the topological relationships that exist in human S phase nuclei between Rad51 foci and damaged chromatin have not been studied thus far. Here, we report on ultraviolet microirradiation experiments of small nuclear areas and on whole cell ultraviolet C (UVC) irradiation experiments performed with a human fibroblast cell line. Before UV irradiation, nuclear DNA was sensitized by the incorporation of halogenated thymidine analogues. These experiments demonstrate the redistribution of Rad51 to the selectively damaged, labeled chromatin. Rad51 recruitment takes place from Rad51 foci scattered throughout the nucleus of nonirradiated cells in S phase. We also demonstrate the preferential association of Rad51 foci with postreplicative chromatin in contrast to replicating chromatin using a double labeling procedure with halogenated thymidine analogues. This finding supports a role of Rad51 in recombinational repair processes of DNA damage present in postreplicative chromatin.

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1949-1957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huimei Lu ◽  
Xu Guo ◽  
Xiangbing Meng ◽  
Jingmei Liu ◽  
Chris Allen ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Homologous recombinational repair (HRR) of DNA damage is critical for maintaining genome stability and tumor suppression. RAD51 and BRCA2 colocalization in nuclear foci is a hallmark of HRR. BRCA2 has important roles in RAD51 focus formation and HRR of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). We previously reported that BCCIPα interacts with BRCA2. We show that a second isoform, BCCIPβ, also interacts with BRCA2 and that this interaction occurs in a region shared by BCCIPα and BCCIPβ. We further show that chromatin-bound BRCA2 colocalizes with BCCIP nuclear foci and that most radiation-induced RAD51 foci colocalize with BCCIP. Reducing BCCIPα by 90% or BCCIPβ by 50% by RNA interference markedly reduces RAD51 and BRCA2 foci and reduces HRR of DSBs by 20- to 100-fold. Similarly, reducing BRCA2 by 50% reduces RAD51 and BCCIP foci. These data indicate that BCCIP is critical for BRCA2- and RAD51-dependent responses to DNA damage and HRR.


2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivnarayan Dhuppar ◽  
Sitara Roy ◽  
Aprotim Mazumder

ABSTRACT Ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a major environmental mutagen. Exposure to UV leads to a sharp peak of γH2AX, the phosphorylated form of the histone variant H2AX, in the S phase within an asynchronous population of cells. γH2AX is often considered a definitive marker of DNA damage inside a cell. In this report, we show that γH2AX in the S-phase cells after UV irradiation reports neither on the extent of primary DNA damage in the form of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers nor on the extent of its secondary manifestations in the form of DNA double-strand breaks or in the inhibition of global transcription. Instead, γH2AX in the S phase corresponds to the sites of active replication at the time of UV irradiation. This accumulation of γH2AX at replication sites slows down the replication. However, the cells do complete the replication of their genomes and arrest within the G2 phase. Our study suggests that it is not DNA damage, but the response elicited, which peaks in the S phase upon UV irradiation.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5624-5624
Author(s):  
Dhyani Anamika ◽  
Patricia Favaro ◽  
Sara Teresinha Olalla Saad

Abstract Ankyrin repeat and KH domain-containing protein 1, ANKHD1, is highly expressed in myeloma cells and plays an important role in multiple myeloma (MM) progression and growth. ANKHD1 is found to be overexpressed in S phase of cell cycle in MM cells and silencing of ANKHD1 expression leads to accumulation of cells in S phase, suggesting a role in S phase progression (1). Earlier studies by our group reported that ANKHD1 silencing downregulates all replication dependent histones and that this downregulation may be associated with replication stress and DNA damage (2). We observed increased expression of γH2AX protein (phosphorylated histone H2A variant, H2AX, at Serine 139), a marker for DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and an early sign of DNA damage induced by replication stress, in ANKHD1 silenced MM cells. In the present study we further sought to investigate the mechanisms underlying the induction of DNA damage on ANKHD1 silencing. We first confirmed the increased expression of γH2AX by flow cytometry analysis and observed that both the mean fluorescence intensity as well as percentage of γH2AX positive cells were higher in ANKHD1 silenced MM cells as compared to control cells. Phosphorylation of histone 2AX requires activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-OH-kinase-like family of protein kinases, DNA-PKcs (DNA-dependent protein kinase), ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated)andATR (ATM-Rad3-related) that serves as central components of the signaling cascade initiated by DSBs. Hence, we checked for the expression of these kinases and observed increased phosphorylation of both ATM and ATR kinases in ANKHD1 silenced MM cells. There was no difference in the expressions of DNA-PKcs in control and ANKHD1 silenced cells by western blot. We next checked for the expression of CHK1 (checkpoint kinase 1) and CHK2 (checkpoint kinase 2), essential serine threonine kinases downstream of ATM and ATR. We observed a decrease in pCHK2 (phosphorylated CHK2 at Thr 68), with no change in expression of pCHK1 (phosphorylated CHK1 at Ser 345) total CHK1 or total CHK2. We also checked for expression of CDC25a (a member of the CDC25 family of dual-specificity phosphatases), that is specifically degraded in response to DNA damage (DSBs) and delays S phase progression via activation of ATM /ATR-CHK2 signaling pathway. Expression of CDC25a was significantly decreased in ANKHD1 silencing cells, confirming the induction of DSBs, and probably accounting for S phase delay on ANKHD1 silencing. Since there was decrease in active CHK2 (pCHK2) and no change in CHK1 required for degradation of CDC25a, we assume that decrease in CDC25a in ANKHD1 silenced MM cells may be via activation of ATM/ ATR pathway independent of CHK2/CHK1. Expression of several other downstream factors of DSBs induced DNA damage response and repair such as BRCA1, PTEN, DNMT1, SP1, HDAC2 were also found to be modulated in ANKHD1 silenced MM cells. In conclusion, ANKHD1 silencing in MM cells leads to DNA damage and modulates expression of several genes implicated in DNA damage and repair. DNA damage induced after ANKHD1 silencing in MM cells activates ATM/ ATR-CDC25a pathway which may lead to the activation of S phase checkpoint in MM cells. Results however are preliminary and further studies are required to understand the role of ANKHD1 in intra S phase check point. References: 1) ANKHD1 regulates cell cycle progression and proliferation in multiple myeloma cells. Dhyani et al. FEBS letters 2012; 586: 4311-18. 2) ANKHD1 is essential for repair of DNA double strand breaks in multiple myeloma. Dhyani et al. ASH Abstract, Blood 2015; 126:1762. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuefeng Pan ◽  
Li Yang ◽  
Nan Jiang ◽  
Xifang Chen ◽  
Bo Li ◽  
...  

AbstractFaithful duplication of genomic DNA relies not only on the fidelity of DNA replication itself, but also on fully functional DNA repair and homologous recombination machinery. We report a molecular mechanism responsible for deciding homologous recombinational repair pathways during replication dictated by binding of RecO and RecG to SSB in E.coli. Using a RecG-yfp fusion protein, we found that RecG-yfp foci appeared only in the ΔrecG, ΔrecO and ΔrecA, ΔrecO double mutants. Surprisingly, foci were not observed in wild-type ΔrecG, or double mutants where recG and either recF or, separately recR were deleted. In addition, formation of RecG-yfp foci in the ΔrecO::kanR required wildtype ssb, as ssb-113 could not substitute. This suggests that RecG and RecO binding to SSB is competitive. We also found that the UV resistance of recO alone mutant increased to certain extent by supplementing RecG. In an ssb-113 mutant, RecO and RecG worked following a different pattern. Both RecO and RecG were able to participate in repairing UV damages when grown at permissive temperature, while they could also be involved in making DNA double strand breaks when grown at nonpermissive temperature. So, our results suggested that differential binding of RecG and RecO to SSB in a DNA replication fork in Escherichia coli.may be involved in determining whether the SDSA or DSBR pathway of homologous recombinational repair is used.Author summarySingle strand DNA binding proteins (SSB) stabilize DNA holoenzyme and prevent single strand DNA from folding into non-B DNA structures in a DNA replication fork. It has also been revealed that SSB can also act as a platform for some proteins working in DNA repair and recombination to access DNA molecules when DNA replication fork needs to be reestablished. In Escherichia coli, several proteins working primarily in DNA repair and recombination were found to participate in DNA replication fork resumption by physically interacting with SSB, including RecO and RecG etc. However the hierarchy of these proteins interacting with SSB in Escherichia coli has not been well defined. In this study, we demonstrated a differential binding of RecO and RecG to SSB in DNA replication was used to establish a RecO-dependent pathway of replication fork repair by abolishing a RecG-dependent replication fork repair. We also show that, RecG and RecO could randomly participate in DNA replication repair in the absence of a functional SSB, which may be responsible for the generation of DNA double strand breaks in an ssb-113 mutant in Escherichia coli.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1762-1762
Author(s):  
Anamika Dhyani ◽  
Patricia Favaro ◽  
Sara T. Olalla Saad

Abstract ANKHD1, Ankyrin repeat and KH domain-containing protein is highly expressed and plays an important role in the proliferation and cell cycle progression of multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Inhibition of ANKHD1 expression upregulates p21 (CDKN1A, Cyclin Dependent Kinase Inhibitor), a potent cell cycle regulator, and its expression represses p21 promoter. Upregulation of p21 was found to be irrespective of the TP53 mutational status of MM cell lines. A study by our group has shown that ANKHD1 is highly expressed in S phase and that the inhibition of ANKHD1 expression downregulates replication dependent histones suggesting that it might be required for histone transcription (1). Assuming that ANKHD1 might be involved in the transcripitional activation of histones, we studied the effect of ANKHD1 silencing on nuclear protein of the ataxia telangiectasia mutated locus (NPAT), a component of the cell-cycle-dependent histone gene transcription machinery. NPAT associates with histone gene promoters in S phase and suppression of NPAT expression impedes expression of all histone subtypes. In present study, there was a decreased expression of NPAT in ANKHD1 silenced MM cells. Despite the fact that both ANKHD1 and NPAT were localized in the nucleus of MM cells, they did not appear to associate, as observed by confocal microscopy, suggesting at present that ANKHD1 does not modulate histones via NPAT. Since DNA replication is coupled with histone synthesis and downregulation of histones is associated with replication stress and DNA damage, we checked for expression of PCNA (Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen), protein involved in DNA replication and repair. PCNA expression was found to be significantly decreased in ANKHD1 inhibited MM cells, suggesting its role in PCNA mediated DNA replication and repair (Fig. 1). To confirm this, we studied the effect of ANKHD1 silencing on some of the components of DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway. We observed increased expression of gamma- H2AX (γ-H2AX i.e Phosphorylated Histone H2AX), marker for DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and an early sign of DNA damage induced by replication stress (Fig. 1). We also observed a decrease in phosphorylated CHK2 (Check Point Kinase 2), an essential serine threonine kinase involved in DDR. Accumulation of γ-H2AX on ANKHD1 silencing confirms DNA damage and suggests the possible mechanism of ANKHD1 mediated histones downregulation. In summary, ANKHD1 silencing in MM cells leads to DNA damage (DSBs), suggesting that ANKHD1 is essential for DNA replication and repair. Furthermore, as ANKHD1 negatively regulates p21, and p21 controls DNA replication and repair by interacting with PCNA, we hypothesize that ANKHD1 might be playing role in DNA repair via modulation of the p21-PCNA pathway. Results of the role of ANKHD1 in DNA repair are however preliminary and need to be explored. References: 1) ANKHD1 Is Required for S Phase Progression and Histone Gene Transcription in Multiple Myeloma. Dhyani et al. ASH Abstract; Blood 2014. Figure 1. Western blot analysis of proteins: a) PCNA and b) γ-H2AX, in control and ANKHD1 silenced U266 MM cell line. Tubulin and GAPDH were used as endogenous controls. Figure 1. Western blot analysis of proteins: a) PCNA and b) γ-H2AX, in control and ANKHD1 silenced U266 MM cell line. Tubulin and GAPDH were used as endogenous controls. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (21) ◽  
pp. 2620-2625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Smith ◽  
Eric E. Bryant ◽  
Fraulin J. Joseph ◽  
Rodney Rothstein

During S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, chromosomal loci become mobile in response to DNA double-strand breaks both at the break site (local mobility) and throughout the nucleus (global mobility). Increased nuclear exploration is regulated by the recombination machinery and the DNA damage checkpoint and is likely an important aspect of homology search. While mobility in response to DNA damage has been studied extensively in S phase, the response in interphase has not, and the question of whether homologous recombination proceeds to completion in G1 phase remains controversial. Here, we find that global mobility is triggered in G1 phase. As in S phase, global mobility in G1 phase is controlled by the DNA damage checkpoint and the Rad51 recombinase. Interestingly, despite the restriction of Rad52 mediator foci to S phase, Rad51 foci form at high levels in G1 phase. Together, these observations indicate that the recombination and checkpoint machineries promote global mobility in G1 phase, supporting the notion that recombination can occur in interphase diploids.


eLife ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shauna L Houlihan ◽  
Yuanyi Feng

Successfully completing the S phase of each cell cycle ensures genome integrity. Impediment of DNA replication can lead to DNA damage and genomic disorders. In this study, we show a novel function for NDE1, whose mutations cause brain developmental disorders, in safeguarding the genome through S phase during early steps of neural progenitor fate restrictive differentiation. Nde1 mutant neural progenitors showed catastrophic DNA double strand breaks concurrent with the DNA replication. This evoked DNA damage responses, led to the activation of p53-dependent apoptosis, and resulted in the reduction of neurons in cortical layer II/III. We discovered a nuclear pool of Nde1, identified the interaction of Nde1 with cohesin and its associated chromatin remodeler, and showed that stalled DNA replication in Nde1 mutants specifically occurred in mid-late S phase at heterochromatin domains. These findings suggest that NDE1-mediated heterochromatin replication is indispensible for neuronal differentiation, and that the loss of NDE1 function may lead to genomic neurological disorders.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivnarayan Dhuppar ◽  
Sitara Roy ◽  
Aprotim Mazumder

AbstractUltraviolet (UV) radiation is a major environmental mutagen. Exposure to UV leads to a sharp peak of γH2AX – the phosphorylated form of a histone variant H2AX – in the S phase within an asynchronous population of cells. γH2AX is often considered as a definitive marker of DNA damage inside a cell. In this report we show that γH2AX in the S phase cells after UV irradiation does not report on the extent of primary DNA damage in the form of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers or on the extent of its secondary manifestations as DNA double strand breaks or in the inhibition of global transcription. Instead γH2AX in the S phase corresponds to the sites of active replication at the time of UV irradiation – despite which, the cells complete the replication of their genomes and arrest within the G2 phase. Moreover, cells in all the phases of the cell cycle develop similar levels of DNA damage. Our study suggests that it is not DNA damage but the response elicited, which peaks in the S phase upon UV damage.


2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 1081-1096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daoyuan Lu ◽  
Huan Cai ◽  
Sung-Soo Park ◽  
Sana Siddiqui ◽  
Richard T. Premont ◽  
...  

Insults to nuclear DNA induce multiple response pathways to mitigate the deleterious effects of damage and mediate effective DNA repair. G-protein-coupled receptor kinase-interacting protein 2 (GIT2) regulates receptor internalization, focal adhesion dynamics, cell migration, and responses to oxidative stress. Here we demonstrate that GIT2 coordinates the levels of proteins in the DNA damage response (DDR). Cellular sensitivity to irradiation-induced DNA damage was highly associated with GIT2 expression levels. GIT2 is phosphorylated by ATM kinase and forms complexes with multiple DDR-associated factors in response to DNA damage. The targeting of GIT2 to DNA double-strand breaks was rapid and, in part, dependent upon the presence of H2AX, ATM, and MRE11 but was independent of MDC1 and RNF8. GIT2 likely promotes DNA repair through multiple mechanisms, including stabilization of BRCA1 in repair complexes; upregulation of repair proteins, including HMGN1 and RFC1; and regulation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity. Furthermore, GIT2-knockout mice demonstrated a greater susceptibility to DNA damage than their wild-type littermates. These results suggest that GIT2 plays an important role in MRE11/ATM/H2AX-mediated DNA damage responses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document