scholarly journals Nuclear GIT2 Is an ATM Substrate and Promotes DNA Repair

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 1081-1096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daoyuan Lu ◽  
Huan Cai ◽  
Sung-Soo Park ◽  
Sana Siddiqui ◽  
Richard T. Premont ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Nuclear Dna ◽  
Polymerase Activity ◽  
Receptor Internalization ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Atm Kinase ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Insults to nuclear DNA induce multiple response pathways to mitigate the deleterious effects of damage and mediate effective DNA repair. G-protein-coupled receptor kinase-interacting protein 2 (GIT2) regulates receptor internalization, focal adhesion dynamics, cell migration, and responses to oxidative stress. Here we demonstrate that GIT2 coordinates the levels of proteins in the DNA damage response (DDR). Cellular sensitivity to irradiation-induced DNA damage was highly associated with GIT2 expression levels. GIT2 is phosphorylated by ATM kinase and forms complexes with multiple DDR-associated factors in response to DNA damage. The targeting of GIT2 to DNA double-strand breaks was rapid and, in part, dependent upon the presence of H2AX, ATM, and MRE11 but was independent of MDC1 and RNF8. GIT2 likely promotes DNA repair through multiple mechanisms, including stabilization of BRCA1 in repair complexes; upregulation of repair proteins, including HMGN1 and RFC1; and regulation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity. Furthermore, GIT2-knockout mice demonstrated a greater susceptibility to DNA damage than their wild-type littermates. These results suggest that GIT2 plays an important role in MRE11/ATM/H2AX-mediated DNA damage responses.

scholarly journals Recent advances in the nucleolar responses to DNA double-strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (17) ◽  
pp. 9449-9461
Author(s):  
Lea Milling Korsholm ◽  
Zita Gál ◽  
Blanca Nieto ◽  
Oliver Quevedo ◽  
Stavroula Boukoura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Repetitive Sequences ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

Abstract DNA damage poses a serious threat to human health and cells therefore continuously monitor and repair DNA lesions across the genome. Ribosomal DNA is a genomic domain that represents a particular challenge due to repetitive sequences, high transcriptional activity and its localization in the nucleolus, where the accessibility of DNA repair factors is limited. Recent discoveries have significantly extended our understanding of how cells respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the nucleolus, and new kinases and multiple down-stream targets have been identified. Restructuring of the nucleolus can occur as a consequence of DSBs and new data point to an active regulation of this process, challenging previous views. Furthermore, new insights into coordination of cell cycle phases and ribosomal DNA repair argue against existing concepts. In addition, the importance of nucleolar-DNA damage response (n-DDR) mechanisms for maintenance of genome stability and the potential of such factors as anti-cancer targets is becoming apparent. This review will provide a detailed discussion of recent findings and their implications for our understanding of the n-DDR. The n-DDR shares features with the DNA damage response (DDR) elsewhere in the genome but is also emerging as an independent response unique to ribosomal DNA and the nucleolus.

Heterochromatin and the DNA damage response: the need to relaxThis paper is one of a selection of papers in a Special Issue entitled 31st Annual International Asilomar Chromatin and Chromosomes Conference, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendra L. Cann ◽  
Graham Dellaire
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Atm Kinase ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Chromosomal Mutations

Higher order chromatin structure has an impact on all nuclear functions, including the DNA damage response. Over the past several years, it has become increasingly clear that heterochromatin and euchromatin represent separate entities with respect to both damage sensitivity and repair. The chromatin compaction present in heterochromatin helps to protect this DNA from damage; however, when lesions do occur, the compaction restricts the ability of DNA damage response proteins to access the site, as evidenced by its ability to block the expansion of H2AX phosphorylation. As such, DNA damage in heterochromatin is refractory to repair, which requires the surrounding chromatin structure to be decondensed. In the case of DNA double-strand breaks, this relaxation is at least partially mediated by the ATM kinase phosphorylating and inhibiting the function of the transcriptional repressor KAP1. This review will focus on the functions of KAP1 and other proteins involved in the maintenance or restriction of heterochromatin, including HP1 and TIP60, in the DNA damage response. As heterochromatin is important for maintaining genomic stability, cells must maintain a delicate balance between allowing repair factors access to these regions and ensuring that these regions retain their organization to prevent increased DNA damage and chromosomal mutations.

scholarly journals The chromatin-remodeling factor CHD4 coordinates signaling and repair after DNA damage

2010 ◽  
Vol 190 (5) ◽  
pp. 731-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorthe Helena Larsen ◽  
Catherine Poinsignon ◽  
Thorkell Gudjonsson ◽  
Christoffel Dinant ◽  
Mark R. Payne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Clonogenic Survival ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Delay Cell

In response to ionizing radiation (IR), cells delay cell cycle progression and activate DNA repair. Both processes are vital for genome integrity, but the mechanisms involved in their coordination are not fully understood. In a mass spectrometry screen, we identified the adenosine triphosphate–dependent chromatin-remodeling protein CHD4 (chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 4) as a factor that becomes transiently immobilized on chromatin after IR. Knockdown of CHD4 triggers enhanced Cdc25A degradation and p21Cip1 accumulation, which lead to more pronounced cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition and extended cell cycle delay. At DNA double-strand breaks, depletion of CHD4 disrupts the chromatin response at the level of the RNF168 ubiquitin ligase, which in turn impairs local ubiquitylation and BRCA1 assembly. These cell cycle and chromatin defects are accompanied by elevated spontaneous and IR-induced DNA breakage, reduced efficiency of DNA repair, and decreased clonogenic survival. Thus, CHD4 emerges as a novel genome caretaker and a factor that facilitates both checkpoint signaling and repair events after DNA damage.

scholarly journals Screen identifies DYRK1B network as mediator of transcription repression on damaged chromatin

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (29) ◽  
pp. 17019-17030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Dong ◽  
Kirk L. West ◽  
Xin Yi Tan ◽  
Junshi Li ◽  
Toyotaka Ishibashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Gene Silencing ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Active Chromatin ◽  
Chemical Library ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) trigger transient pausing of nearby transcription, an emerging ATM-dependent response that suppresses chromosomal instability. We screened a chemical library designed to target the human kinome for new activities that mediate gene silencing on DSB-flanking chromatin, and have uncovered the DYRK1B kinase as an early respondent to DNA damage. We showed that DYRK1B is swiftly and transiently recruited to laser-microirradiated sites, and that genetic inactivation of DYRK1B or its kinase activity attenuated DSB-induced gene silencing and led to compromised DNA repair. Notably, global transcription shutdown alleviated DNA repair defects associated with DYRK1B loss, suggesting that DYRK1B is strictly required for DSB repair on active chromatin. We also found that DYRK1B mediates transcription silencing in part via phosphorylating and enforcing DSB accumulation of the histone methyltransferase EHMT2. Together, our findings unveil the DYRK1B signaling network as a key branch of mammalian DNA damage response circuitries, and establish the DYRK1B–EHMT2 axis as an effector that coordinates DSB repair on transcribed chromatin.

scholarly journals The BRCA2-Interacting Protein BCCIP Functions in RAD51 and BRCA2 Focus Formation and Homologous Recombinational Repair

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1949-1957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huimei Lu ◽  
Xu Guo ◽  
Xiangbing Meng ◽  
Jingmei Liu ◽  
Chris Allen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Recombinational Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Focus Formation ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Recombinational Repair ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
Nuclear Foci

ABSTRACT Homologous recombinational repair (HRR) of DNA damage is critical for maintaining genome stability and tumor suppression. RAD51 and BRCA2 colocalization in nuclear foci is a hallmark of HRR. BRCA2 has important roles in RAD51 focus formation and HRR of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). We previously reported that BCCIPα interacts with BRCA2. We show that a second isoform, BCCIPβ, also interacts with BRCA2 and that this interaction occurs in a region shared by BCCIPα and BCCIPβ. We further show that chromatin-bound BRCA2 colocalizes with BCCIP nuclear foci and that most radiation-induced RAD51 foci colocalize with BCCIP. Reducing BCCIPα by 90% or BCCIPβ by 50% by RNA interference markedly reduces RAD51 and BRCA2 foci and reduces HRR of DSBs by 20- to 100-fold. Similarly, reducing BRCA2 by 50% reduces RAD51 and BCCIP foci. These data indicate that BCCIP is critical for BRCA2- and RAD51-dependent responses to DNA damage and HRR.

scholarly journals Multiple autophosphorylation sites are dispensable for murine ATM activation in vivo

2008 ◽  
Vol 183 (5) ◽  
pp. 777-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy A. Daniel ◽  
Manuela Pellegrini ◽  
Ji-Hoon Lee ◽  
Tanya T. Paull ◽  
Lionel Feigenbaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Activation Mechanism ◽  
Mutant Form ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Atm Kinase ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Physiological Importance ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved

Cellular responses to both physiological and pathological DNA double-strand breaks are initiated through activation of the evolutionarily conserved ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase. Upon DNA damage, an activation mechanism involving autophosphorylation has been reported to allow ATM to phosphorylate downstream targets important for cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair. In humans, serine residues 367, 1893, and 1981 have been shown to be autophosphorylation sites that are individually required for ATM activation. To test the physiological importance of these sites, we generated a transgenic mouse model in which all three conserved ATM serine autophosphorylation sites (S367/1899/1987) have been replaced with alanine. In this study, we show that ATM-dependent responses at both cellular and organismal levels are functional in mice that express a triple serine mutant form of ATM as their sole ATM species. These results lend further support to the notion that ATM autophosphorylation correlates with the DNA damage–induced activation of the kinase but is not required for ATM function in vivo.

scholarly journals DNA damage induces nuclear actin filament assembly by Formin-2 and Spire-1/2 that promotes efficient DNA repair

eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittany J Belin ◽  
Terri Lee ◽  
R Dyche Mullins
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Protein Misfolding ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Nuclear Actin ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Serum Stimulation

Actin filaments assemble inside the nucleus in response to multiple cellular perturbations, including heat shock, protein misfolding, integrin engagement, and serum stimulation. We find that DNA damage also generates nuclear actin filaments—detectable by phalloidin and live-cell actin probes—with three characteristic morphologies: (i) long, nucleoplasmic filaments; (ii) short, nucleolus-associated filaments; and (iii) dense, nucleoplasmic clusters. This DNA damage-induced nuclear actin assembly requires two biologically and physically linked nucleation factors: Formin-2 and Spire-1/Spire-2. Formin-2 accumulates in the nucleus after DNA damage, and depletion of either Formin-2 or actin's nuclear import factor, importin-9, increases the number of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), linking nuclear actin filaments to efficient DSB clearance. Nuclear actin filaments are also required for nuclear oxidation induced by acute genotoxic stress. Our results reveal a previously unknown role for nuclear actin filaments in DNA repair and identify the molecular mechanisms creating these nuclear filaments.

scholarly journals Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation temporally confines SUMO-dependent ataxin-3 recruitment to control DNA double-strand break repair

2021 ◽  
pp. jcs.247809
Author(s):  
Annika Pfeiffer ◽  
Laura K. Herzog ◽  
Martijn S. Luijsterburg ◽  
Rashmi G. Shah ◽  
Magdalena B. Rother ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Time Window ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Dna Repair Proteins ◽  
Short Time Window ◽  
Short Time

DNA damage-induced SUMOylation serves as a signal for two antagonizing proteins that both stimulate repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). Here, we demonstrate that the SUMO-dependent recruitment of the deubiquitylating enzyme ataxin-3 to DSBs, unlike recruitment of the ubiquitin ligase RNF4, additionally depends on PARP1-mediated poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation). The co-dependence of ataxin-3 recruitment on PARylation and SUMOylation temporally confines its presence at DSBs to a short time window directly following detection of the DNA damage. We propose that this mechanism ensures that ataxin-3 prevents the premature removal of DNA repair proteins only during the early phase of the DSB response and does not interfere with the subsequent timely displacement of DNA repair proteins by RNF4. Thus, our data show that PARylation differentially regulates SUMO-dependent recruitment of ataxin-3 and RNF4 to DSBs, explaining how both proteins can play a stimulatory role at DSBs despite their opposing activities.

scholarly journals Genomic Instability and Cancer Risk Associated with Erroneous DNA Repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (22) ◽  
pp. 12254
Author(s):  
Ken-ichi Yoshioka ◽  
Rika Kusumoto-Matsuo ◽  
Yusuke Matsuno ◽  
Masamichi Ishiai
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Genomic Instability ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genomic Rearrangements ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Strand Breaks

Many cancers develop as a consequence of genomic instability, which induces genomic rearrangements and nucleotide mutations. Failure to correct DNA damage in DNA repair defective cells, such as in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutated backgrounds, is directly associated with increased cancer risk. Genomic rearrangement is generally a consequence of erroneous repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), though paradoxically, many cancers develop in the absence of DNA repair defects. DNA repair systems are essential for cell survival, and in cancers deficient in one repair pathway, other pathways can become upregulated. In this review, we examine the current literature on genomic alterations in cancer cells and the association between these alterations and DNA repair pathway inactivation and upregulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document