scholarly journals Condensin II initiates sister chromatid resolution during S phase

2013 ◽  
Vol 200 (4) ◽  
pp. 429-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takao Ono ◽  
Daisuke Yamashita ◽  
Tatsuya Hirano
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Chromosome Condensation ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Binding Property ◽  
Chromatin Binding ◽  
Structural Reorganization ◽  
Mitotic Entry ◽  
Replicative Stress ◽  
Chromosomal Loci

Condensins I and II are multisubunit complexes that play essential yet distinct functions in chromosome condensation and segregation in mitosis. Unlike condensin I, condensin II localizes to the nucleus during interphase, but it remains poorly understood what functions condensin II might have before mitotic entry. Here, we report that condensin II changes its chromatin-binding property during S phase. Remarkably, advanced premature chromosome condensation (PCC) assays enabled us to visualize condensin II forming “sister axes” in replicated regions of chromosomes in S phase cells. Depletion of condensin II compromised PCC-driven sister chromatid resolution during S phase. Moreover, fluorescence in situ hybridization assays revealed that condensin II, but not condensin I, promotes disjoining duplicated chromosomal loci during S phase. Application of mild replicative stress partially impaired this process and further exacerbated phenotypes arising from condensin II depletion. Our results suggest that condensin II initiates structural reorganization of duplicated chromosomes during S phase to prepare for their proper condensation and segregation in mitosis.

scholarly journals A CDK-regulated chromatin segregase promoting chromosome replication

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Chacin ◽  
Priyanka Bansal ◽  
Karl-Uwe Reusswig ◽  
Luis M. Diaz-Santin ◽  
Pedro Ortega ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atp Hydrolysis ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Chromosome Replication ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Replicative Stress ◽  
Cdk Phosphorylation ◽  
Nucleosome Disassembly

The replication of chromosomes during S phase is critical for cellular and organismal function. Replicative stress can result in genome instability, which is a major driver of cancer. Yet how chromatin is made accessible during eukaryotic DNA synthesis is poorly understood.Here, we report the identification of a novel class of chromatin remodeling enzyme, entirely distinct from classical SNF2-ATPase family remodelers. Yta7 is a AAA+-ATPase that assembles into ~ 1 MDa hexameric complexes capable of segregating histones from DNA. Yta7 chromatin segregase promotes chromosome replication both in vivo and in vitro. Biochemical reconstitution experiments using purified proteins revealed that Yta7’s enzymatic activity is regulated by S phase-forms of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (S-CDK). S-CDK phosphorylation stimulates ATP hydrolysis by Yta7, promoting nucleosome disassembly and chromatin replication.Our results present a novel mechanism of how cells orchestrate chromatin dynamics in co-ordination with the cell cycle machinery to promote genome duplication during S phase.

scholarly journals The Role of Specific Checkpoint-Induced S-Phase Transcripts in Resistance to Replicative Stress

PLoS ONE ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. e6944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaitali Dutta ◽  
Nicholas Rhind
Keyword(s):  
S Phase ◽  
Replicative Stress

The relationship between cell proliferation and the transcription of the nuclear oncogenes c-myc, c-myb and c-ets-1 during feather morphogenesis in the chick embryo

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 699-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Desbiens ◽  
C. Queva ◽  
T. Jaffredo ◽  
D. Stehelin ◽  
B. Vandenbunder
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Chick Embryo ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Skin Morphogenesis ◽  
Dermal Cells ◽  
The Relationship

We have described the expression of three nuclear protooncogenes, c-myc, c-myb and c-ets-1 during feather morphogenesis in the chick embryo. In parallel with the expression patterns obtained by in situ hybridization, we have mapped the spatial distribution of S-phase cells by monitoring the incorporation of 5-bromodeoxyuridine. We do not detect c-myc or c-myb transcripts during the early stages when S-phase cells are scattered in the dermis and in the epidermis. Rather c-ets-1 transcripts are abundant in the dermal cells which divide and accumulate under the uniform epidermis. At the onset of the formation of the feather bud, cells within each rudiment cease DNA replicative activities and c-myc transcripts are detected both in the epidermis and in the underlying dermis. This expression precedes the reentry into the S phase. The transcription of c-myb, which has been previously tightly linked to hemopoietic cells is also detected in the developing skin. This expression is essentially located in proliferating epidermal cells on and after the beginning of feather outgrowth. As feather outgrowth proceeds, the distribution of c-myc and c-myb transcripts is restricted to the highly proliferating epidermis. In contrast c-ets-1 transcripts are never detected in the epidermis. During the later stages of skin morphogenesis, the transcription of c-ets-1 is restricted to the endothelial cells of blood vessels, as previously described. We suggest that the differential expression of these nuclear oncogenes reflects the activation of different mitotic controlling pathways during the development of the skin.

Control of proliferin gene expression in serum-stimulated mouse cells

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 2080-2086
Author(s):  
D I Linzer ◽  
E L Wilder
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Serum Stimulation ◽  
Posttranscriptional Processing ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Mouse Cells ◽  
Stimulation Of

The serum-inducible expression of proliferin genes in BALB/c 3T3 cells was found to be dependent on both protein synthesis and an extended presence of serum in the medium. Even though no mature proliferin mRNA was detected in serum-starved cells, transcription of the proliferin genes occurred in these resting-cell cultures, indicating that posttranscriptional events may be important for regulating proliferin mRNA levels. These results suggest that protein synthesis after serum stimulation of quiescent mouse fibroblasts is required for posttranscriptional processing or stabilization of proliferin RNA. Proliferin RNA levels were found to be heterogeneous among serum-stimulated cells analyzed by in situ hybridization. This heterogeneity is probably due to asynchrony in the population and may point to a correlation between the time of proliferin expression and the time of entry of a cell into S phase.

scholarly journals PCNA Controls Establishment of Sister Chromatid Cohesion during S Phase

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 723-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
George-Lucian Moldovan ◽  
Boris Pfander ◽  
Stefan Jentsch
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

scholarly journals DNA replication and spindle checkpoints cooperate during S phase to delay mitosis and preserve genome integrity

2014 ◽  
Vol 204 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria M. Magiera ◽  
Elisabeth Gueydon ◽  
Etienne Schwob
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Mitotic Entry ◽  
Transient Activation ◽  
Spindle Checkpoints ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoints

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication and chromosome segregation must occur in ordered sequence to maintain genome integrity during cell proliferation. Checkpoint mechanisms delay mitosis when DNA is damaged or upon replication stress, but little is known on the coupling of S and M phases in unperturbed conditions. To address this issue, we postponed replication onset in budding yeast so that DNA synthesis is still underway when cells should enter mitosis. This delayed mitotic entry and progression by transient activation of the S phase, G2/M, and spindle assembly checkpoints. Disabling both Mec1/ATR- and Mad2-dependent controls caused lethality in cells with deferred S phase, accompanied by Rad52 foci and chromosome missegregation. Thus, in contrast to acute replication stress that triggers a sustained Mec1/ATR response, multiple pathways cooperate to restrain mitosis transiently when replication forks progress unhindered. We suggest that these surveillance mechanisms arose when both S and M phases were coincidently set into motion by a unique ancestral cyclin–Cdk1 complex.

scholarly journals Exo1 phosphorylation inhibits exonuclease activity and prevents fork collapse in rad53 mutants independently of the 14-3-3 proteins

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 3053-3070
Author(s):  
Esther C Morafraile ◽  
Alberto Bugallo ◽  
Raquel Carreira ◽  
María Fernández ◽  
Cristina Martín-Castellanos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Stability ◽  
Nuclease Activity ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Exonuclease Activity ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Replicative Stress ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks ◽  
Maintain Genome Stability ◽  
Specific Contribution

Abstract The S phase checkpoint is crucial to maintain genome stability under conditions that threaten DNA replication. One of its critical functions is to prevent Exo1-dependent fork degradation, and Exo1 is phosphorylated in response to different genotoxic agents. Exo1 seemed to be regulated by several post-translational modifications in the presence of replicative stress, but the specific contribution of checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation to Exo1 control and fork stability is not clear. We show here that Exo1 phosphorylation is Dun1-independent and Rad53-dependent in response to DNA damage or dNTP depletion, and in both situations Exo1 is similarly phosphorylated at multiple sites. To investigate the correlation between Exo1 phosphorylation and fork stability, we have generated phospho-mimic exo1 alleles that rescue fork collapse in rad53 mutants as efficiently as exo1-nuclease dead mutants or the absence of Exo1, arguing that Rad53-dependent phosphorylation is the mayor requirement to preserve fork stability. We have also shown that this rescue is Bmh1–2 independent, arguing that the 14-3-3 proteins are dispensable for fork stabilization, at least when Exo1 is downregulated. Importantly, our results indicated that phosphorylation specifically inhibits the 5' to 3'exo-nuclease activity, suggesting that this activity of Exo1 and not the flap-endonuclease, is the enzymatic activity responsible of the collapse of stalled replication forks in checkpoint mutants.

scholarly journals Control of proliferin gene expression in serum-stimulated mouse cells.

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 2080-2086 ◽  
Author(s):  
D I Linzer ◽  
E L Wilder
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Serum Stimulation ◽  
Posttranscriptional Processing ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Mouse Cells ◽  
Stimulation Of

The serum-inducible expression of proliferin genes in BALB/c 3T3 cells was found to be dependent on both protein synthesis and an extended presence of serum in the medium. Even though no mature proliferin mRNA was detected in serum-starved cells, transcription of the proliferin genes occurred in these resting-cell cultures, indicating that posttranscriptional events may be important for regulating proliferin mRNA levels. These results suggest that protein synthesis after serum stimulation of quiescent mouse fibroblasts is required for posttranscriptional processing or stabilization of proliferin RNA. Proliferin RNA levels were found to be heterogeneous among serum-stimulated cells analyzed by in situ hybridization. This heterogeneity is probably due to asynchrony in the population and may point to a correlation between the time of proliferin expression and the time of entry of a cell into S phase.

scholarly journals Hst3 Is Regulated by Mec1-dependent Proteolysis and Controls the S Phase Checkpoint and Sister Chromatid Cohesion by Deacetylating Histone H3 at Lysine 56

2007 ◽  
Vol 282 (52) ◽  
pp. 37805-37814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safia Thaminy ◽  
Benjamin Newcomb ◽  
Jessica Kim ◽  
Tonibelle Gatbonton ◽  
Eric Foss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Histone H3 ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document