OriCiro® Cell-Free Cloning System/PASS V4.1.2 v1

OriCiro® Cell-Free Cloning System is a rapid and powerful tool replacing cumbersome DNA cloning (plasmid construction) process relying on E. coli. The system consists of two kits. OriCiro Assembly Kit allows seamless assembly of multiple overlapping DNA fragments. The assembly product can be added directly to OriCiro Amp Kit to get selective amplification of your target circular DNA (Figure 1). The amplified product is supercoiled DNA topologically identical to plasmid DNA isolated from E. coli. 1. OriCiro Assembly Kit: Multiple DNA fragments are assembled seamlessly at 42 ̊C for 30 minutes via ~40 bp overlapping ends (Figure 2). DNA fragments generated by PCR or restriction enzyme digestion are available. Our unique enzyme-based annealing mechanism allows powerful assembly up to 50 fragments simultaneously. 2. OriCiro Amp Kit: The reaction consists of 26 purified enzymes involved in chromosome replication of E. coli. The chromosome replication cycle repeats autonomously at around 30 ̊C, enabling exponential amplification of circular DNA having oriC with extremely high fidelity (10-8 error/base/cycle) (Figure 3). The kit yields up to 1 μg circular DNA per 10 μL reaction at 33 ̊C for 6 hr. The maximum amplification size is 50 kb in the current version of the kit. n.b. OriCiro Amp NEEDS oriC Cassette (0.4 kb) which can be inserted into circular DNA using OriCiro assembly kit. References: 1. T. Mukai, T. Yoneji, K. Yamada, H. Fujita, S. Nara, M. Su'etsugu, Overcoming the Challenges of Megabase-Sized Plasmid Construction in Escherichia coli, ACS Synthetic Biology, 2020, 9 (6), 1315- 1327 2. T. Hasebe, K. Narita, S. Hidaka, M. Su'etsugu, Efficient Arrangement of the Replication Fork Trap for In Vitro Propagation of Monomeric Circular DNA in the Chromosome-Replication Cycle Reaction. Life, 2018, 8 (43) 3. M. Su’etsugu, H. Takada, T. Katayama, H. Tsujimoto, Exponential propagation of large circular DNA by reconstitution of a chromosome-replication cycle, Nucleic Acids Research, 2017, 45 (20), 11525– 11534

Two different cell-cycle processes determine the timing of cell division in Escherichia coli

Cells must control the cell cycle to ensure that key processes are brought to completion. In Escherichia coli, it is controversial whether cell division is tied to chromosome replication or to a replication-independent inter-division process. A recent model suggests instead that both processes may limit cell division with comparable odds in single cells. Here, we tested this possibility experimentally by monitoring single-cell division and replication over multiple generations at slow growth. We then perturbed cell width, causing an increase of the time between replication termination and division. As a consequence, replication became decreasingly limiting for cell division, while correlations between birth and division and between subsequent replication-initiation events were maintained. Our experiments support the hypothesis that both chromosome replication and a replication-independent inter-division process can limit cell division: the two processes have balanced contributions in non-perturbed cells, while our width perturbations increase the odds of the replication-independent process being limiting.

Blocking, Bending, and Binding: Regulation of Initiation of Chromosome Replication During the Escherichia coli Cell Cycle by Transcriptional Modulators That Interact With Origin DNA

Genome duplication is a critical event in the reproduction cycle of every cell. Because all daughter cells must inherit a complete genome, chromosome replication is tightly regulated, with multiple mechanisms focused on controlling when chromosome replication begins during the cell cycle. In bacteria, chromosome duplication starts when nucleoprotein complexes, termed orisomes, unwind replication origin (oriC) DNA and recruit proteins needed to build new replication forks. Functional orisomes comprise the conserved initiator protein, DnaA, bound to a set of high and low affinity recognition sites in oriC. Orisomes must be assembled each cell cycle. In Escherichia coli, the organism in which orisome assembly has been most thoroughly examined, the process starts with DnaA binding to high affinity sites after chromosome duplication is initiated, and orisome assembly is completed immediately before the next initiation event, when DnaA interacts with oriC’s lower affinity sites, coincident with origin unwinding. A host of regulators, including several transcriptional modulators, targets low affinity DnaA-oriC interactions, exerting their effects by DNA bending, blocking access to recognition sites, and/or facilitating binding of DnaA to both DNA and itself. In this review, we focus on orisome assembly in E. coli. We identify three known transcriptional modulators, SeqA, Fis (factor for inversion stimulation), and IHF (integration host factor), that are not essential for initiation, but which interact directly with E. coli oriC to regulate orisome assembly and replication initiation timing. These regulators function by blocking sites (SeqA) and bending oriC DNA (Fis and IHF) to inhibit or facilitate cooperative low affinity DnaA binding. We also examine how the growth rate regulation of Fis levels might modulate IHF and DnaA binding to oriC under a variety of nutritional conditions. Combined, the regulatory mechanisms mediated by transcriptional modulators help ensure that at all growth rates, bacterial chromosome replication begins once, and only once, per cell cycle.

A CDK-regulated chromatin segregase promoting chromosome replication

The replication of chromosomes during S phase is critical for cellular and organismal function. Replicative stress can result in genome instability, which is a major driver of cancer. Yet how chromatin is made accessible during eukaryotic DNA synthesis is poorly understood. Here, we report the characterization of a chromatin remodeling enzyme—Yta7—entirely distinct from classical SNF2-ATPase family remodelers. Yta7 is a AAA+ -ATPase that assembles into ~1 MDa hexameric complexes capable of segregating histones from DNA. The Yta7 chromatin segregase promotes chromosome replication both in vivo and in vitro. Biochemical reconstitution experiments using purified proteins revealed that the enzymatic activity of Yta7 is regulated by S phase-forms of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (S-CDK). S-CDK phosphorylation stimulates ATP hydrolysis by Yta7, promoting nucleosome disassembly and chromatin replication. Our results present a mechanism for how cells orchestrate chromatin dynamics in co-ordination with the cell cycle machinery to promote genome duplication during S phase.

Transcriptional Activity of the Bacterial Replication Initiator DnaA

In bacteria, DnaA is the most conserved DNA replication initiator protein. DnaA is a DNA binding protein that is part of the AAA+ ATPase family. In addition to initiating chromosome replication, DnaA can also function as a transcription factor either as an activator or repressor. The first gene identified to be regulated by DnaA at the transcriptional levels was dnaA. DnaA has been shown to regulate genes involved in a variety of cellular events including those that trigger sporulation, DNA repair, and cell cycle regulation. DnaA’s dual functions (replication initiator and transcription factor) is a potential mechanism for DnaA to temporally coordinate diverse cellular events with the onset of chromosome replication. This strategy of using chromosome replication initiator proteins as regulators of gene expression has also been observed in archaea and eukaryotes. In this mini review, we focus on our current understanding of DnaA’s transcriptional activity in various bacterial species.

Energy Starvation Induces a Cell Cycle Arrest in Escherichia coli by Triggering Degradation of the DnaA Initiator Protein

During steady-state Escherichia coli growth, the amount and activity of the initiator protein, DnaA, controls chromosome replication tightly so that initiation only takes place once per origin in each cell cycle, regardless of growth conditions. However, little is known about the mechanisms involved during transitions from one environmental condition to another or during starvation stress. ATP depletion is one of the consequences of long-term carbon starvation. Here we show that DnaA is degraded in ATP-depleted cells. A chromosome replication initiation block is apparent in such cells as no new rounds of DNA replication are initiated while replication events that have already started proceed to completion.

Smc5/6 functions with Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1 to complete chromosome replication at natural pause sites

Smc5/6 is essential for genome structural integrity by yet unknown mechanisms. Here we find that Smc5/6 co-localizes with the DNA crossed-strand processing complex Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1 (STR) at genomic regions known as natural pausing sites (NPSs) where it facilitates Top3 retention. Individual depletions of STR subunits and Smc5/6 cause similar accumulation of joint molecules (JMs) composed of reversed forks, double Holliday Junctions and hemicatenanes, indicative of Smc5/6 regulating Sgs1 and Top3 DNA processing activities. We isolate an intra-allelic suppressor of smc6-56 proficient in Top3 retention but affected in pathways that act complementarily with Sgs1 and Top3 to resolve JMs arising at replication termination. Upon replication stress, the smc6-56 suppressor requires STR and Mus81-Mms4 functions for recovery, but not Srs2 and Mph1 helicases that prevent maturation of recombination intermediates. Thus, Smc5/6 functions jointly with Top3 and STR to mediate replication completion and influences the function of other DNA crossed-strand processing enzymes at NPSs.

Two different cell-cycle processes determine the timing of cell division in Escherichia coli

Cells must control the cell cycle to ensure that key processes are brought to completion. In Escherichia coli, it is controversial whether cell division is tied to chromosome replication or to a replication-independent inter-division process. A recent model suggests instead that both processes may limit cell division with comparable odds in single cells. Here, we tested this possibility experimentally by monitoring single-cell division and replication over multiple generations at slow growth. We then perturbed cell width, causing an increase of the time between replication termination and division. As a consequence, replication became decreasingly limiting 21 for cell division, while correlations between birth and division and between subsequent replication-initiation events were maintained. Our experiments support the hypothesis that both chromosome replication and a replication-independent inter-division process can limit cell division: the two processes have balanced contributions in non-perturbed cells, while our width perturbations increase the odds of the replication-independent process being limiting.

Evolutionary Trajectory of the Replication Mode of Bacterial Replicons

ABSTRACT As typical bacterial replicons, circular chromosomes replicate bidirectionally and circular plasmids replicate either bidirectionally or unidirectionally. Whereas the finding of chromids (plasmid-derived chromosomes) in multiple bacterial lineages provides circumstantial evidence that chromosomes likely evolved from plasmids, all experimentally assayed chromids were shown to use bidirectional replication. Here, we employed a model system, the marine bacterial genus Pseudoalteromonas, members of which consistently carry a chromosome and a chromid. We provide experimental and bioinformatic evidence that while chromids in a few strains replicate bidirectionally, most replicate unidirectionally. This is the first experimental demonstration of the unidirectional replication mode in bacterial chromids. Phylogenomic and comparative genomic analyses showed that the bidirectional replication evolved only once from a unidirectional ancestor and that this transition was associated with insertions of exogenous DNA and relocation of the replication terminus region (ter2) from near the origin site (ori2) to a position roughly opposite it. This process enables a plasmid-derived chromosome to increase its size and expand the bacterium’s metabolic versatility while keeping its replication synchronized with that of the main chromosome. A major implication of our study is that the uni- and bidirectionally replicating chromids may represent two stages on the evolutionary trajectory from unidirectionally replicating plasmids to bidirectionally replicating chromosomes in bacteria. Further bioinformatic analyses predicted unidirectionally replicating chromids in several unrelated bacterial phyla, suggesting that evolution from unidirectionally to bidirectionally replicating replicons occurred multiple times in bacteria. IMPORTANCE Chromosome replication is an essential process for cell division. The mode of chromosome replication has important impacts on the structure of the chromosome and replication speed. Bidirectional replication is the rule for bacterial chromosomes, and unidirectional replication has been found only in plasmids. To date, no bacterial chromosomes have been experimentally demonstrated to replicate unidirectionally. Here, we showed that the chromids (plasmid-derived chromosomes) in Pseudoalteromonas replicate either uni- or bidirectionally and that a single evolutionary transition from uni- to bidirectionality explains this diversity. These uni- and bidirectionally replicating chromids likely represent two stages during the evolution from a small and unidirectionally replicating plasmid to a large and bidirectionally replicating chromosome. This study provides insights into both the physiology of chromosome replication and the early evolutionary history of bacterial chromosomes.