maintain genome stability
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

67
(FIVE YEARS 25)

H-INDEX

19
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Author(s):  
Fernando Luna-Maldonado ◽  
Marco A. Andonegui-Elguera ◽  
José Díaz-Chávez ◽  
Luis A. Herrera

Cellular function is highly dependent on genomic stability, which is mainly ensured by two cellular mechanisms: the DNA damage response (DDR) and the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC). The former provides the repair of damaged DNA, and the latter ensures correct chromosome segregation. This review focuses on recently emerging data indicating that the SAC and the DDR proteins function together throughout the cell cycle, suggesting crosstalk between both checkpoints to maintain genome stability.


Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1779
Author(s):  
MaryElizabeth Stein ◽  
Kristin A. Eckert

Genome instability is an enabling characteristic of cancer, essential for cancer cell evolution. Hotspots of genome instability, from small-scale point mutations to large-scale structural variants, are associated with sequences that potentially form non-B DNA structures. G-quadruplex (G4) forming motifs are enriched at structural variant endpoints in cancer genomes. Chronic inflammation is a physiological state underlying cancer development, and oxidative DNA damage is commonly invoked to explain how inflammation promotes genome instability. We summarize where G4s and oxidative stress overlap, with a focus on DNA replication. Guanine has low ionization potential, making G4s vulnerable to oxidative damage. Impacts to G4 structure are dependent upon lesion type, location, and G4 conformation. Occasionally, G4s pose a challenge to replicative DNA polymerases, requiring specialized DNA polymerases to maintain genome stability. Therefore, chronic inflammation creates a dual challenge for DNA polymerases to maintain genome stability: faithful G4 synthesis and bypassing unrepaired oxidative lesions. Inflammation is also accompanied by global transcriptome changes that may impact mutagenesis. Several studies suggest a regulatory role for G4s within cancer- and inflammatory-related gene promoters. We discuss the extent to which inflammation could influence gene regulation by G4s, thereby impacting genome instability, and highlight key areas for new investigation.


Author(s):  
Karla J Hutt ◽  
Shu Ly Lim ◽  
Qing-Hua Zhang ◽  
Maria Gonzalez ◽  
Anne E O’Connor ◽  
...  

Abstract Piwi-interacting small RNAs (piRNAs) maintain genome stability in animal germ cells, with a predominant role in silencing transposable elements. Mutations in the piRNA pathway in the mouse uniformly lead to failed spermatogenesis and male sterility. By contrast, mutant females are fertile. In keeping with this paradigm, we previously reported male sterility and female fertility associated with loss of the enzyme HENMT1, which is responsible for stabilising piRNAs through the catalysation of 3′-terminal 2′-O-methylation. However, the Henmt1 mutant females were poor breeders, suggesting they could be subfertile. Therefore, we investigated oogenesis and female fertility in these mice in greater detail. Here we show that mutant females indeed have a three- to four-fold reduction in follicle number and reduced litter sizes. In addition, meiosis-II mutant oocytes display various spindle abnormalities and have a dramatically altered transcriptome which includes a down-regulation of transcripts required for microtubule function. This down-regulation could explain the spindle defects observed with consequent reductions in litter size. We suggest these various effects on oogenesis could be exacerbated by asynapsis, an apparently universal feature of piRNA mutants of both sexes. Our findings reveal that loss of the piRNA pathway in females has significant functional consequences.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jac A. Nickoloff ◽  
Neelam Sharma ◽  
Lynn Taylor ◽  
Sage J. Allen ◽  
Robert Hromas

Cells must replicate and segregate their DNA to daughter cells accurately to maintain genome stability and prevent cancer. DNA replication is usually fast and accurate, with intrinsic (proofreading) and extrinsic (mismatch repair) error-correction systems. However, replication forks slow or stop when they encounter DNA lesions, natural pause sites, and difficult-to-replicate sequences, or when cells are treated with DNA polymerase inhibitors or hydroxyurea, which depletes nucleotide pools. These challenges are termed replication stress, to which cells respond by activating DNA damage response signaling pathways that delay cell cycle progression, stimulate repair and replication fork restart, or induce apoptosis. Stressed forks are managed by rescue from adjacent forks, repriming, translesion synthesis, template switching, and fork reversal which produces a single-ended double-strand break (seDSB). Stressed forks also collapse to seDSBs when they encounter single-strand nicks or are cleaved by structure-specific nucleases. Reversed and cleaved forks can be restarted by homologous recombination (HR), but seDSBs pose risks of mis-rejoining by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) to other DSBs, causing genome rearrangements. HR requires resection of broken ends to create 3’ single-stranded DNA for RAD51 recombinase loading, and resected ends are refractory to repair by NHEJ. This Mini Review highlights mechanisms that help maintain genome stability by promoting resection of seDSBs and accurate fork restart by HR.


Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1415
Author(s):  
Apfrida Kendek ◽  
Marieke R. Wensveen ◽  
Aniek Janssen

The eukaryotic nucleus is continuously being exposed to endogenous and exogenous sources that cause DNA breaks, whose faithful repair requires the activity of dedicated nuclear machineries. DNA is packaged into a variety of chromatin domains, each characterized by specific molecular properties that regulate gene expression and help maintain nuclear structure. These different chromatin environments each demand a tailored response to DNA damage. Silenced chromatin domains in particular present a major challenge to the cell’s DNA repair machinery due to their specific biophysical properties and distinct, often repetitive, DNA content. To this end, we here discuss the interplay between silenced chromatin domains and DNA damage repair, specifically double-strand breaks, and how these processes help maintain genome stability.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Mei ◽  
Katarzyna M. Kedziora ◽  
Eun-ah Song ◽  
Jeremy E Purvis ◽  
Jeanette Gowen Cook

MCM complexes are loaded onto chromosomes to license DNA replication origins in G1 phase of the cell cycle, but it is not yet known how mammalian MCM complexes are adequately distributed to both euchromatin and heterochromatin. To address this question, we combined time-lapse live-cell imaging with fixed cell immunofluorescence imaging of single human cells to quantify the relative rates of MCM loading in heterochromatin and euchromatin at different times within G1. We report here that MCM loading in euchromatin is faster than in heterochromatin in very early G1, but surprisingly, heterochromatin loading accelerates faster than euchromatin in middle and late G1. These different loading dynamics require ORCA-dependent differences in ORC distribution during G1. A consequence of heterochromatin origin licensing dynamics is that cells experiencing a truncated G1 phase from premature Cyclin E expression enter S phase with underlicensed heterochromatin, and DNA damage accumulates preferentially in heterochromatin in the subsequent S/G2 phase. Thus G1 length is critical for sufficient MCM loading, particularly in heterochromatin, to ensure complete genome duplication and to maintain genome stability.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katerina Zabrady ◽  
Matej Zabrady ◽  
Peter Kolesar ◽  
Arthur W. H. Li ◽  
Aidan J. Doherty

AbstractCRISPR-Cas pathways provide prokaryotes with acquired “immunity” against foreign genetic elements, including phages and plasmids. Although many of the proteins associated with CRISPR-Cas mechanisms are characterized, some requisite enzymes remain elusive. Genetic studies have implicated host DNA polymerases in some CRISPR-Cas systems but CRISPR-specific replicases have not yet been discovered. We have identified and characterised a family of CRISPR-Associated Primase-Polymerases (CAPPs) in a range of prokaryotes that are operonically associated with Cas1 and Cas2. CAPPs belong to the Primase-Polymerase (Prim-Pol) superfamily of replicases that operate in various DNA repair and replication pathways that maintain genome stability. Here, we characterise the DNA synthesis activities of bacterial CAPP homologues from Type IIIA and IIIB CRISPR-Cas systems and establish that they possess a range of replicase activities including DNA priming, polymerisation and strand-displacement. We demonstrate that CAPPs operonically-associated partners, Cas1 and Cas2, form a complex that possesses spacer integration activity. We show that CAPPs physically associate with the Cas proteins to form bespoke CRISPR-Cas complexes. Finally, we propose how CAPPs activities, in conjunction with their partners, may function to undertake key roles in CRISPR-Cas adaptation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 5391
Author(s):  
Ya-Chu Chang ◽  
Marissa K. Oram ◽  
Anja-Katrin Bielinsky

Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO)-targeted E3 ubiquitin ligases (STUbLs) are specialized enzymes that recognize SUMOylated proteins and attach ubiquitin to them. They therefore connect the cellular SUMOylation and ubiquitination circuits. STUbLs participate in diverse molecular processes that span cell cycle regulated events, including DNA repair, replication, mitosis, and transcription. They operate during unperturbed conditions and in response to challenges, such as genotoxic stress. These E3 ubiquitin ligases modify their target substrates by catalyzing ubiquitin chains that form different linkages, resulting in proteolytic or non-proteolytic outcomes. Often, STUbLs function in compartmentalized environments, such as the nuclear envelope or kinetochore, and actively aid in nuclear relocalization of damaged DNA and stalled replication forks to promote DNA repair or fork restart. Furthermore, STUbLs reside in the same vicinity as SUMO proteases and deubiquitinases (DUBs), providing spatiotemporal control of their targets. In this review, we focus on the molecular mechanisms by which STUbLs help to maintain genome stability across different species.


Author(s):  
Molly R Gordon ◽  
Jin Zhu ◽  
Victoria Qu ◽  
Rong Li

Abstract To maintain genome stability, organisms depend on faithful chromosome segregation, a process affected by diverse genetic pathways, some of which are not directly linked to mitosis. In this study, we set out to explore one such pathway represented by an under-characterized gene, SNO1, identified previously in screens of the Yeast Knockout (YKO) library for mitotic fidelity genes. We found that the causative factor increasing mitotic error rate in the sno1Δ mutant is not loss of the Sno1 protein, but rather perturbation to the mRNA of the neighboring convergent gene, CTF13, encoding an essential component for forming the yeast kinetochore. This is caused by a combination of the Kanamycin resistance gene and the transcriptional terminator used in the YKO library affecting the mRNA level and quality of the neighboring convergent gene. We further provide a list of gene pairs potentially subjected to this artifact, which may be useful for accurate phenotypic interpretation of YKO mutants.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaobing Huang ◽  
Garry Wong

AbstractPIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are small non-coding transcripts that are highly conserved across species and regulate gene expression through pre- and post-transcriptional processes. piRNAs were originally discovered in germline cells and protect against transposable element expression to promote and maintain genome stability. In the recent decade, emerging roles of piRNAs have been revealed, including the roles in sterility, tumorigenesis, metabolic homeostasis, neurodevelopment, and neurodegenerative diseases. In this review, we summarize piRNA biogenesis in C. elegans, Drosophila, and mice, and further elaborate upon how piRNAs mitigate the harmful effects of transposons. Lastly, the most recent findings on piRNA participation in neurological diseases are highlighted. We speculate on the mechanisms of piRNA action in the development and progression of neurodegenerative diseases. Understanding the roles of piRNAs in neurological diseases may facilitate their applications in diagnostic and therapeutic practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document