Tobin's $q$ Ratio and Industrial Organization

1981 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric B. Lindenberg ◽  
Stephen A. Ross
CFA Digest ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-49
Author(s):  
Edgar J. Sullivan
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Lim

Mengukur kinerja perusahaan berdasarkan pendekatan objektif dan subjektif. Pengukuran secara objektif dilakukan dengan menggunakan ROA, Tobin's Q, TFP, dan firm value growth. Di sisi lain, pengukuran subjektif dilakukan dengan mengunakan likert scale.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Agustin Ekadjaja ◽  
Vony Vony

This study aims to determine the effect of CSR Index to the value and performance of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI), and to find out how much the ability of the variable CSR Index in explaining the variable Tobin’s Q, ROA, and ROE manufacturing companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI). This study uses data sampled during the 75 years from 2007 to 2009. A statistical method used to test the research hypothesis is a simple linear regression model. Therefore, before performing hypothesis testing carried out tests of classical assumptions. The results of this study prove that, CSR Index has a significant effect on Tobin’s Q and ROE with 95% confidence level. However, CSR Index has no significant influence on ROA with 95% confidence level. Key words : CSR Index, Variabel Tobin’s Q, ROA, ROE


1987 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Lustgarten ◽  
Stavros Thomadakis

2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 2118-2124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos Vizcaíno ◽  
Juan P. Chousa
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saif Ullah ◽  
Dan Zhang

<p>This study compares performance for founder-managed firms and professional-managed firms by analyzing 138 Canadian IPO firms that went public from 2004 to 2013. In this paper, we measure firm performance in two ways: Tobin’s Q and ROA are used to measure a firm’s financial performance, while firm survival status is used as a supplementary performance measure. We find that founder-managed firms underperform and underlive their counterparts when firm performance is measured by Tobin’s Q and survival status. Founder status is proved to be unrelated to ROA. The negative influence of founder status can be explained by the relevant transaction hypothesis, which states that founder-managers may act for the controlling family and are more concerned with the associated private income stream than with maximizing the value of the firm.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eko Sarjono ◽  
◽  
Kartika Hendra Titisari ◽  
Supawi Pawenang

The financial performance can be used as a benchmark of the ability of an organization or company in achieving its goals. Performance measurement is one of the most important factors for an organization or company, performance measurement is a process of measuring the extent to which a company does work to achieve its goals. The research investigated the impact of infrastructure, economic growth and inflation on financial performance of infrastructure support companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange Period 2014-2019 which is proxied by ROA (Return on Assets), Tobin’s Q and PBV (Price to Book Value). The population of this research was the infrastructure support companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange period 2014-2019. Research sampling was conducted using The Purposive Sampling Method. The data analysis was camed out using classical assumption test, multiple linear regression analysis, t-test, F-test and determinan (R2) test with SPSS 21. The research finding showed that the model has an effect on the financial performance as proxied by ROA. So the results of the hypothesis test show that: (1) Infrastructure development has a negative and significant effect on ROA. (2) The inflation rate has a positive and significant effect on ROA. (3) Economic growth has no significant effect on ROA. Meanwhile, the model has no effect on financial performance which is proxied in Tobin's Q and PBV.


MIS Quarterly ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 1025-1058
Author(s):  
Pouya Rahmati ◽  
◽  
Ali Tafti ◽  
J. Christopher Westland ◽  
Cesar Hidalgo ◽  
...  

During the last four decades, digital technologies have disrupted many industries. Car control systems have gone from mechanical to digital. Telephones have changed from sound boxes to portable computers. But have the firms that digitized their products and services become more valuable than firms that didn’t? Here we introduce the construct of digital proximity, which considers the interdependent activities of firms linked in an economic network. We then explore how the digitization of products and services affects a company’s Tobin’s q—the ratio of market value over assets—a measure of the intangible value of a firm. Our panel regression methods and robustness tests suggest the positive influence of a firm’s digital proximity on its Tobin’s q. This implies that firms able to come closer to the digital sector have increased their intangible value compared to those that have failed to do so. These findings contribute a new way of measuring digitization and its impact on firm performance that is complementary to traditional measures of information technology (IT) intensity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document