scholarly journals Parameter Design for Group Method Data Handling (GMDH) using Taguchi in Software Effort Estimation

2021 ◽  
Vol 2129 (1) ◽  
pp. 012089
Author(s):  
Siti Hajar Arbain ◽  
N H Mustaffa ◽  
N A Ali ◽  
D N A Jawawi

Abstract Recently, the use of data-driven models is becoming increasingly impactful but has proven to offer best prediction with less knowledge of the geological, hydrological, and physical process behaviour and criteria. A Group Data Handling Model (GMDH) is one of the sub-model common neural network data driven. It was first developed for complex systems with a modelling and recognition algorithm. GMDH is known as a self-organizing heuristic modelling approach. For solving modelling issues involving multiple inputs to single output data, it is very successful. While the GMDH model has been implemented in many modelling fields, some modifications in terms of parameter design have been given little attention. In other respects, Dr. Genichi Taguchi suggested that the Taguchi method for improving the process or product design with the help of significant parameter levels that influence the delivery of the product. In this paper, we evaluated the behaviour of GMDH model based on numbers of neuron per layer, hidden layer, alpha, and train ratio parameters using Taguchi method. Cocomo and Kemerer datasets are used to test our hypothesized scenarios. The result shows that number of neurons, layer and train ratio are the important parameters that affects the performance of the GMDH model.

2015 ◽  
Vol 206 ◽  
pp. 293-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Eduardo de Araújo Padilha ◽  
Carlos Alberto de Araújo Padilha ◽  
Domingos Fabiano de Santana Souza ◽  
Jackson Araújo de Oliveira ◽  
Gorete Ribeiro de Macedo ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 652-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Eduardo de Araújo Padilha ◽  
Sérgio Dantas de Oliveira Júnior ◽  
Domingos Fabiano de Santana Souza ◽  
Jackson Araújo de Oliveira ◽  
Gorete Ribeiro de Macedo ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 592-594 ◽  
pp. 97-101
Author(s):  
G. Ugrasen ◽  
H.V. Ravindra ◽  
G.V. Naveen Prakash ◽  
R. Keshavamurthy

Wire Electrical Discharge Machining (WEDM) is a specialized thermal machining process capable of accurately machining parts with varying hardness or complex shapes, which have sharp edges that are very difficult to be machined by the main stream machining processes. This study outlines the development of model and its application to estimation and comparison of machining responses using Multiple Regression Analysis (MRA) and Group Method Data Handling Technique (GMDH). Experimentation was performed as per Taguchi’s L’16 orthogonal array for EN-19 material. Each experiment has been performed under different cutting conditions of pulse-on, pulse-off, current and bed speed. Among different process parameters voltage and flush rate were kept constant. Molybdenum wire having diameter of 0.18 mm was used as an electrode. Four responses namely accuracy, surface roughness, volumetric material removal rate and electrode wear have been considered for each experiment. Estimation and comparison of responses was carried out using MRA and GMDH.


Author(s):  
Ahmad Mozaffari ◽  
Alireza Fathi ◽  
Saeed Behzadipour

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to apply a hybrid neuro-fuzzy paradigm called self-organizing neuro-fuzzy multilayered classifier (SONeFMUC) to classify the operating faults of a hydraulic system. The main motivation behind the use of SONeFMUC is to attest the capabilities of neuro-fuzzy classifier for handling the difficulties associated with fault diagnosis of hydraulic circuits. Design/methodology/approach – In the proposed methodology, first, the neuro-fuzzy nodes at each layer of the SONeFMUC are trained separately using two well-known bio-inspired algorithms, i.e. a semi deterministic method with random walks called co-variance matrix adaptation evolutionary strategy (CMA-ES) and a swarm-based explorer with adaptive fuzzified parameters (SBEAFP). Thereafter, a revised version of the group method data handling (GMDH) policy that uses the Darwinian concepts such as truncation selection and elitism is engaged to connect the nodes of different layers in an effective manner. Findings – Based on comparative numerical experiments, the authors conclude that integration of neuro-fuzzy method and bio-inspired supervisor results in a really powerful classification tool beneficial for uncertain environments. It is proved that the method outperforms some well-known classifiers such as support vector machine (SVM) and particle swarm optimization-based SVM (PSO-SVM). Besides, it is indicated that an efficient bio-inspired method can effectively adjust the constructive parameters of the multi-layered neuro-fuzzy classifier. For the case, it is observed that designing a fuzzy controller for PSO predisposes it to effectively balance the exploration/exploitation capabilities, and consequently optimize the structure of SONeFMUC. Originality/value – The originality of the paper can be considered from both numerical and practical points of view. The signals obtained through the data acquisition possess six different features in order for the hydraulic system to undergo four types of faults, i.e. cylinder fault, pump fault, valve leakage fault and rupture of the piping system. Besides, to elaborate on the authenticity and efficacy of the proposed method, its performance is compared with well-known rival techniques.


Author(s):  
Ugrasen Gonchikar ◽  
Ravindra Holalu Venkatadas ◽  
Naveen Prakash Goravi Vijaya Dev ◽  
Keshavamurthy Ramaiah ◽  
Giridhara Gudekota

Wire Electrical Discharge Machining (WEDM) is a specialized thermo electrical machining process capable of accurately machining parts with varying hardness or complex shapes. Present study outlines the comparison of machining performances in the wire electric discharge machining using group method data handling technique and artificial neural network. HCHCr material was selected as a work material. This work material was machined using different process parameters based on Taguchi’s L27 standard orthogonal array. Parameters such as pulse-on time, pulse-off time, current and bed speed were varied. The response variables measured for the analysis are surface roughness, volumetric material removal rate and dimensional error. Machining performances were compared using sophisticated mathematical models viz., Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) technique and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). GMDH is ideal for complex, unstructured systems where the investigator is only interested in obtaining a high-order input-output relationship. Also, the method is heuristic in nature and is not based on a solid foundation as regression analysis. The GMDH algorithm is designed to learn the process by training the algorithm with the experimental data. The experimental observations are divided into two sets viz., the training set and testing set. The training set is used to make the GMDH learn the process and the testing set will check the performance of GMDH. Different models were obtained by varying the percentage of data in the training set and the best model were selected from these, viz., 50%, 62.5% & 75%. The best model was selected from the said percentages of data. Number of variables selected at each layer is usually taken as a fixed number or a constantly increasing number. It is usually given as fractional increase in number of independent variables present in the previous level. Three different criterion functions, viz., Root Mean Square (Regularity) criterion, Unbiased criterion and Combined criterion were considered for estimation. The choice of the criterion for node selection is another important parameter for proper modeling. The Artificial Neural Network is used to study and predict the machining responses. Input data are fed into the neural network and corresponding weights and bias are extracted. Then weights and bias are integrated in the program which is used to calculate and predict the machining responses. Estimation of machining performances was obtained by using ANN for various cutting conditions. ANN estimates were obtained for various percentages of total data in the training set viz., 50%, 60% & 70%. The best model was selected from the said percentages of data. Estimation and comparison of machining performances were carried out using GMDH and ANN. Estimates from GMDH and ANN were compared and it was observed that ANN with 70% of data in training set gives better results than GMDH.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document