scholarly journals Landfill Leachate Treatment Methods and Its Potential for Ammonia Removal and Recovery - A Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 1051 (1) ◽  
pp. 012064
Author(s):  
H Haslina ◽  
J NorRuwaida ◽  
M Dewika ◽  
M Rashid ◽  
Abd Halim Md Ali ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 49-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Kwarciak-Kozłowska ◽  
Aleksandra Krzywicka

Abstract The goal of this article was to compare the efficiency of Fenton and photo-Fenton reaction used for stabilised landfill leachate treatment. The mass ratio of COD:H2O2 was fixed to 1:2 for every stages. The dose of reagents (ferrous sulphate/hydrogen peroxide) was different and ranged from 0.1 to 0.5. To determine the efficiency of treatment, the BOD (biochemical oxygen demand COD (chemical oxygen demand), TOC (total organic carbon) , ammonia nitrogen and BOD/COD ratio was measured. The experiment was carried out under the following conditions: temperature was 25ºC, the initial pH was adjusted to 3.0. Every processes were lasting 60 minutes. The most appropriate dose of reagents was 0.25 (Fe2+/H2O2). It was found that the application of UV contributed to increase of COD, TOC and ammonia removal efficiencies by an average of 14%.


1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 854-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
D M Shiskowski ◽  
D S Mavinic

This bench-scale study investigated the nitrogen-removal capabilities of two different biological process configurations treating methanogenic-state landfill leachate containing up to 1200 mg N/L of ammonia. The first configuration was a pre-denitrification system known as the modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) process. Large clarifier sludge recycle flows, set to yield clarifier recycle ratios of 7:1 and 8:1, were evaluated as a means to reduce effluent NOx concentrations. A pre- and post-denitrification system, known as the four-stage Bardenpho process, was the second configuration evaluated. The MLE systems (20 day aerobic solids retention time (SRT)) were capable of producing effluent containing about 50 mg N/L of ammonia and 200-235 mg N/L of total inorganic nitrogen (ammonia + NOx) when treating leachate containing approximately 1200 mg N/L of ammonia. In contrast, effluent from the four-stage Bardenpho system contained less than 1 mg N/L of ammonia and 15 mg N/L of NOx, when treating 1100 mg N/L ammonia leachate. An aerobic number 1 SRT of 20 days (total aerobic SRT approximately equal to 40 days) was used with aerobic number 1 and clarifier sludge recycle ratios of 4:1 and 3:1, respectively. The ammonia-removal potential of both systems was clearly demonstrated but each system also showed certain disadvantages, characteristic of each process.Key words: ammonia-N, anoxic denitrification, leachate treatment, nitrification, pre-denitrification.


2007 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
pp. 175-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Neczaj ◽  
M. Kacprzak

In this study, the effects of low energy ultrasound irradiation on landfill leachate treatment by means of sequencing bath reactor were investigated. The aim of this work was to estimate the influence of leachate irradiation time on aerobic treatment efficiency. The sonification of the leachate was carried out in static conditions using the disintegrator UD-20. The field frequency of 22 kHz (the power output equals to 180 W) and amplitude of 12 μm was applied. The sonification time was changed in the range of 30–140 s. It was found that ultrasonic pretreatment enhances the subsequent aerobic digestion resulting in a better degradation of landfill leachate. The sonification of raw leachate leads to enhancement of COD and ammonia removal as compare to experiment without ultrasound.


1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 992-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Paul Henderson ◽  
James W. Atwater

A pre-denitrifying anaerobic filter and a rotating biological contactor (RBC) were used to remove nitrogen from a high ammonia landfill leachate collected from a municipal and industrial solid waste landfill in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China. The research indicated that greater than 95% ammonia removal from high ammonia-N (2140 mg/L) leachate can be achieved with RBC ammonia-N loading rates up to 1.5 g/(m2∙d). At RBC loading rates of 1.5–3.0 g/(m2∙d), ammonia removal ranged from 80% to 90%. Nitrogen removal averaged 66%, including an estimated 54% removal in the RBC. Nitrogen removal in the RBC was the result of either simultaneous nitrification and denitrification or air stripping of ammonia in combination with nitrification. Both alkalinity consumption and COD removal results support the explanation of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (potentially aerobic denitrification); but since RBC off-gasses were not monitored, neither theory can be confirmed. The high nitrogen removal in the RBC suggests that for this leachate the anaerobic filter was not required for ammonia and nitrogen removal. BOD and COD removal averaged 92% and 49% respectively. Key words: landfill, leachate, treatment, ammonia, rotating biological contactor (RBC), nitrification, denitrification.


2019 ◽  
pp. 183-194
Author(s):  
Cecilia Öman ◽  
Christian Junestedt

A number of the compounds detected in landfill leachates have proved to be harmful to humans and to the natural environment. As a result, appropriate landfill leachate treatment methods must be developed, with the aim to reduce harmful concentrations of pollutants to levels which do not impose a threat to the natural environment. The complex nature of the leachates makes it difficult to select the most appropriate set of treatment methods for a specific landfill, and the actual efficiency of a treatment plant is measured in situ by comparing the quality of the water entering the plant with the quality of the water leaving the plant. The complex nature of the leachates puts high demands on the sampling, handling of sample before analyses, and analyses, as the character of the sample must not be altered. The demands increase with decreasing concentrations of the targeted compounds (µg/1 level or less). Despite this, no standard protocols for sampling and handling of leachate samples exist. The purpose of this study was to give examples of good sampling practices. Important aspects to consider during sampling and handling of samples are; i) sampling of nonhomogenized water bodies, ii) contamination, and iii) alterations of samples during collection and storage. It was found that a number of substances are enriched in the surface layer of a water body, why it was concluded that the surface layer is an important matrix to consider, both concerning the presence and the transport of harmful compounds. The risk of contamination during sampling was evaluated with the use of a field water blank, which was handled as a true water sample. It was found that despite careful handling contaminants were found at low concentrations (µg/1 level) in the field water blank, which indicated a severe risk of contamination during leachate sampling, handling of sample and/or analyses. Also in this study, the alteration of leachate samples during transport and storage was assessed. The results showed that preservation with 0.2 weight-% sodium azide immediately after sampling and storing at 48° C for a maximum of seven days in borosilicate glass bottles, resulted in the lowest loss of organic compounds from the samples. It has been evident since long that the reported character of sampled landfill leachates varies significantly. The variations can been assumed to sometimes origin from the sampling procedures used. In conclusion, the choice of sampling, transport, storage, and sample preparation before analyses is more crucial for the outcome of leachate characterisation studies than sometimes conceived.


Author(s):  
Shamimeh Babaei ◽  
Mohammad Reza Sabour ◽  
Saman Moftakhari Anasori Movahed

2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Wiszniowski ◽  
D. Robert ◽  
J. Surmacz-Gorska ◽  
K. Miksch ◽  
J. V. Weber

Author(s):  
Tu Anqi ◽  
Zhiyong Zhang ◽  
Hao Suhua ◽  
Li Xia

2008 ◽  
Vol 136 ◽  
pp. S511
Author(s):  
Tao Bai ◽  
Hengyi Lei ◽  
Guangwei Yu ◽  
Zhong Li ◽  
Xin Feng ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 448-453 ◽  
pp. 536-539
Author(s):  
Bin Liu ◽  
Xu Ya Peng ◽  
Qi Tian ◽  
Hua Zhao

Landfill leachate treatment is a major problem to be solved in the field of environmental protection, and ammonia nitrogen is one of the major pollutants in landfill leachate, whose processing technology needs further improvement. In this paper, ultrasound/ultraviolet co-oxidation technology was directly applied to the treatment of high concentration landfill leachate without the pretreatment operations of dilution, filter, and adjusting the pH conditions. The results showed that: ultrasonic and ultraviolet had certain effects on the ammonia nitrogen removal, and the ammonia nitrogen removing effects became better when the ultrasonic power was greater, or the ultraviolet wavelength was shorter. When the ultrasonic power was 100 W, the ammonia nitrogen removal efficiency was 25.2%, and the UV of 254 nm could decompose 20.2% of the ammonia nitrogen in landfill leathate. In the condition of aeration, ultrasonic and ultraviolet had good synergistic effect on leachate ammonia nitrogen treatment. When the ultrasonic power was 100 W, UV wavelength was 254 nm, and the aeration rate was 150 L/h, the ammonia removal efficiency of high concentration leachate (ammonia nitrogen concentration of 1800 mg/L) reached 98.5% after 6 hours. The paper's research results provide a useful reference for the removal of landfill leachate ammonia nitrogen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document