scholarly journals Review on landfill leachate treatment methods

Author(s):  
Tu Anqi ◽  
Zhiyong Zhang ◽  
Hao Suhua ◽  
Li Xia
2021 ◽  
Vol 1051 (1) ◽  
pp. 012064
Author(s):  
H Haslina ◽  
J NorRuwaida ◽  
M Dewika ◽  
M Rashid ◽  
Abd Halim Md Ali ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 183-194
Author(s):  
Cecilia Öman ◽  
Christian Junestedt

A number of the compounds detected in landfill leachates have proved to be harmful to humans and to the natural environment. As a result, appropriate landfill leachate treatment methods must be developed, with the aim to reduce harmful concentrations of pollutants to levels which do not impose a threat to the natural environment. The complex nature of the leachates makes it difficult to select the most appropriate set of treatment methods for a specific landfill, and the actual efficiency of a treatment plant is measured in situ by comparing the quality of the water entering the plant with the quality of the water leaving the plant. The complex nature of the leachates puts high demands on the sampling, handling of sample before analyses, and analyses, as the character of the sample must not be altered. The demands increase with decreasing concentrations of the targeted compounds (µg/1 level or less). Despite this, no standard protocols for sampling and handling of leachate samples exist. The purpose of this study was to give examples of good sampling practices. Important aspects to consider during sampling and handling of samples are; i) sampling of nonhomogenized water bodies, ii) contamination, and iii) alterations of samples during collection and storage. It was found that a number of substances are enriched in the surface layer of a water body, why it was concluded that the surface layer is an important matrix to consider, both concerning the presence and the transport of harmful compounds. The risk of contamination during sampling was evaluated with the use of a field water blank, which was handled as a true water sample. It was found that despite careful handling contaminants were found at low concentrations (µg/1 level) in the field water blank, which indicated a severe risk of contamination during leachate sampling, handling of sample and/or analyses. Also in this study, the alteration of leachate samples during transport and storage was assessed. The results showed that preservation with 0.2 weight-% sodium azide immediately after sampling and storing at 48° C for a maximum of seven days in borosilicate glass bottles, resulted in the lowest loss of organic compounds from the samples. It has been evident since long that the reported character of sampled landfill leachates varies significantly. The variations can been assumed to sometimes origin from the sampling procedures used. In conclusion, the choice of sampling, transport, storage, and sample preparation before analyses is more crucial for the outcome of leachate characterisation studies than sometimes conceived.


Author(s):  
Shamimeh Babaei ◽  
Mohammad Reza Sabour ◽  
Saman Moftakhari Anasori Movahed

2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Wiszniowski ◽  
D. Robert ◽  
J. Surmacz-Gorska ◽  
K. Miksch ◽  
J. V. Weber

Author(s):  
Pradeep Kumar Singa ◽  
Jun-Wei Lim ◽  
Mohamed Hasnain Isa ◽  
Yeek-Chia Ho

This chapter presents an overview of emerging contaminants in landfill leachate and their treatment methods. In addition to introducing the conventional contaminants present in the leachate, the chapter also details emerging contaminants such as poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and phthalate acid esters (PAEs) and their concentrations in various environmental matrices. PAHs and PAEs are highly carcinogenic, mutagenic, and teratogenic substances which is why they have attracted a lot of concern in the studies of water, air, and soil pollution. They affect the endocrinal activities in animals and humans, therefore they are known as endocrine disrupting compounds. Drawing on the treatment methods of leachate, the chapter explains physico-chemical, biological, and advanced oxidation processes. The chapter also advances the discussion on their importance and efficiency in the leachate treatment.


2013 ◽  
Vol 671-674 ◽  
pp. 2679-2682
Author(s):  
Ping Chen ◽  
Lian Bao Kan ◽  
Ming Wei Liu

The aim of our research was to find the better treatment progress for landfill leachate. It elaborated the source and the quality variation law with time change and harm to human body of the leachate. Listed all kinds of treatment methods, including physical, chemical, biological. Thought the development trends of landfill leachate treatment was the combination of multiple progress.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 5009
Author(s):  
Mayk Teles de Oliveira ◽  
Ieda Maria Sapateiro Torres ◽  
Humberto Ruggeri ◽  
Paulo Scalize ◽  
Antonio Albuquerque ◽  
...  

Sanitary landfill leachate (LL) composition varies according to climate variables variation, solid waste characteristics and composition, and landfill age. Leachate treatment is essentially carried out trough biological and physicochemical processes, which have showed variability in efficiency and appear a costly solution for the management authorities. Electrocoagulation (EC) seems a suitable solution for leachate treatment taking into account the characteristics of the liquor. One of the problems of EC is the electrode passivation, which affects the longevity of the process. One solution to this problem could be the replacement of the electrode by one made of recyclable material, which would make it possible to change it frequently and at a lower cost. The objective of the present work was to evaluate the removal of heavy metals (As, Ba, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Ni, Se and Zn) and coliforms from a LL by EC using electrodes made from steel swarf (SfE) up to 8 h. Removal efficiencies of detected heavy metals were 51%(Cr), 59%(As), 71%(Cd), 72%(Zn), 92%(Ba), 95%(Ni) and >99%(Pb). The microbial load of coliforms in leachate was reduced from 10.76 × 104 CFU/mL (raw leachate) to less than 1 CFU/mL (after treatment with SfE) (i.e., approximately 100% reduction). The use of SfE in EC of LL is very effective in removing heavy metals and coliforms and can be used as alternative treatment solution for such effluents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document