Comparative Study of Dentine Permeability after Apicectomy and Surface Treatment with 9.6 µm TEA CO2and Er:YAG Laser Irradiation

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Gouw-Soares ◽  
A. Stabholz ◽  
J.L. Lage-Marques ◽  
D.M. Zezell ◽  
E.B. Groth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Er:Yag Laser

scholarly journals Effects of the combination of Er:YAG laser and sandblasting on the shear bond strength between zirconia and resin cement

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e191449
Author(s):  
Urias Silva Vasconcelos ◽  
Thalisson Saymo de Oliveira Silva ◽  
Daylana Pacheco da Silva ◽  
Graciela Maria Oliveira Sipaúba ◽  
Valdimar da Silva Valente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Strength ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Aluminum Oxide ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Zirconia Ceramic ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Luting Cement

Aim: This study was conducted to determine the bond strength between zirconia ceramic and resin luting cement according to the type of surface treatment applied. Methods: Sixty zirconia cylinders measuring 4 x 4 mm were manufactured and distributed into five experimental groups and a control group (n = 10): G1 - sandblasting with 110 μm aluminum oxide; G2 - sandblasting with 30 μm Rocatec Soft®; G3 - Er:YAG laser irradiation at 400 mJ; G4 - Er:YAG laser combined with sandblasting with aluminum oxide; G5 - Er:YAG laser combined with sandblasting with Rocatec Soft®; G6 - no treatment (Control). The zirconia cylinders were bonded in the center of composite resin cylinders (6 mm diameter) using RelyX Ultimate® cement. Shear strength was measured after thermocycling (6000 cycles and 5-55° C). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc with a 5% significance level. Results: Group 4 had a significantly higher shear strength than all the other groups, except Group 1. Group 3 had a significantly lower shear strength compared with Groups 1 and 4. Conclusion: Sandblasting with 110μm aluminum oxide particles after laser irradiation may be an effective zirconia surface treatment. The use of Er: YAG laser alone is not effective at increasing the bond between resin cement and zirconia.

scholarly journals Influence of CVD Diamond Tips and Er:YAG Laser Irradiation on Bonding of Different Adhesive Systems to Dentin

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daphne Câmara Barcellos ◽  
Alessandra Buhler Borges ◽  
Cesar Rogério Pucci ◽  
Carlos Rocha Gomes Torres ◽  
Melissa Aline da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Cvd Diamond ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Yag Laser

ABSTRACT Aim The aim of this study was to compare the microtensile bond strength of three adhesive systems, using different methods of dentin preparation. Materials and methods A hundred and eight bovine teeth were used. The dentin from buccal face was exposed and prepared with three different methods, divided in 3 groups: Group 1 (DT)- diamond tip on a high-speed handpiece; Group 2 (CVD)-CVD tip on a ultrasonic handpiece; Group 3 (LA)-Er: YAG laser. The teeth were divided into 3 subgroups, according adhesive systems used: Subgroup 1-Adper Single Bond Plus/3M ESPE (SB) total-etch adhesive; Subgroup 2-Adper Scotchbond SE/3M ESPE (AS) selfetching adhesive; Subgroup 3-Clearfil SE Bond/Kuraray (CS) selfetching adhesive. Blocks of composite (Filtek Z250–3M ESPE) 4 mm high were built up and specimens were stored in deionized water for 24 hours at 37°C. Serial mesiodistal and buccolingual cuts were made and stick-like specimens were obtained, with transversal section of 1.0 mm2. The samples were submitted to microtensile test at 1 mm/min and load of 10 kg in a universal testing machine. Data (MPa) were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey's tests (p < 0.05). Results and conclusion Surface treatment with Diamond or CVD tips associated with Clearfil SE Bond adhesive produced significantly lower bond strength values compared to other groups. Surface treatment with Er: YAG laser associated with Single Bond Plus or Clearfil SE Bond adhesives and surface treatment with CVD tip associated with Adper Scotchbond SE adhesive produced significantly lower bond strength values compared to surface treatment with diamond or CVD tips associated with Single Bond Plus or Adper Scotchbond SE adhesives. Clinical significance Interactions between laser and the CVD tip technologies and the different adhesive systems can produce a satisfactory bonding strength result, so that these associations may be beneficial and enhance the clinical outcomes. How to cite this article Silva MA, Di Nicolo R, Barcellos DC, Batista GR, Pucci CR, Torres CRG, Borges AB. Influence of CVD Diamond Tips and Er:YAG Laser Irradiation on Bonding of Different Adhesive Systems to Dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(1):14-20.

scholarly journals Influence of Diamond Sono-Abrasion, Air-Abrasion and Er:YAG Laser Irradiation on Bonding of Different Adhesive Systems to Dentin

2007 ◽  
Vol 01 (03) ◽  
pp. 158-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Tavares de Oliveira ◽  
Patrícia Moreira de Freitas ◽  
Carlos de Paula Eduardo ◽  
Glaucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano ◽  
Marcelo Giannini
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Hybrid Layer ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Etch And Rinse

ABSTRACTObjectives: Different surface treatments may affect bonding performance of adhesive systems to dentin. This study evaluated the influence of different methods of surface treatment on adhesion of bonding agents to dentin.Methods: TDentin surfaces abraded with #600-grit SiC paper were used as control. Three methods of surface treatment (sono-abrasion, air-abrasion and Er:YAG laser irradiation) were used under specific parameters. Four adhesive systems (Tyrian, Clearfil SE Bond, Unifil Bond and Single Bond) were applied to treated surfaces, according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Composite blocks were built on bonded surfaces, then restored teeth were vertically and serially sectioned to obtain bonded slices for interfacial micromorphologic analysis or to produce beam specimens for μ-TBS bond test. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey test at a significance level of 5%.Results: The results indicated that the preparation of dentin with sono-abrasion or laser did not affect the bond strength, while the preparation of dentin with SiC paper and air-abrasion influenced the bond strength for some systems. A clear difference of the preparation of dentin surfaces and formation of hybrid layer and resin tags were noted.Conclusions: Bonding effectiveness of both the etch-and-rinse and the self-etch adhesives can be influenced by different methods of dentin preparation. (Eur J Dent 2007;1:158-166)

Effects of the Er:YAG Laser Irradiation on Titanium Implant Materials and Contaminated Implant Abutment Surfaces

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoko Matsuyama ◽  
Akira Aoki ◽  
Shigeru Oda ◽  
Takayuki Yoneyama ◽  
Isao Ishikawa
Keyword(s):  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Titanium Implant ◽  
Implant Materials ◽  
Implant Abutment

Surface temperature during cavity preparation on human tooth by Er:YAG laser irradiation

CIRP Annals ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 555-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Furumoto ◽  
T. Ueda ◽  
A. Kasai ◽  
A. Hosokawa
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Human Tooth ◽  
Cavity Preparation

scholarly journals Er:YAG laser-induced damage to a dental composite in simulated clinical scenarios for inadvertent irradiation: an in vitro study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Kuhn ◽  
Carmen U. Schmid ◽  
Ralph G. Luthardt ◽  
Heike Rudolph ◽  
Rolf Diebolder
Keyword(s):  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Laser Fluence ◽  
Ablation Threshold ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Crater Diameter ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Laser Induced Damage

AbstractInadvertent Er:YAG laser irradiation occurs in dentistry and may harm restorative materials in teeth. The aim of this in vitro study was to quantify Er:YAG laser-induced damage to a nanohybrid composite in simulated clinical scenarios for inadvertent direct and indirect (reflection) laser irradiation. The simulation was performed by varying the output energy (OE;direct˃indirect) reaching the specimen and the operating distance (OD;direct˂indirect). Composite specimens were irradiated by an Er:YAG laser. The ablation threshold was determined and clinically relevant parameters were applied (n = 6 for each OE/OD combination) for direct (OE: 570 mJ/OD: 10 mm, OE: 190 mJ/OD: 10 mm) and indirect irradiation (OE: 466 mJ/OD: 15 mm, OE: 57 mJ/OD: 15 mm, OE: 155 mJ/OD: 15 mm, OE: 19 mJ/OD: 15 mm). The extent of damage in the form of craters was evaluated using a laser scanning microscope (LSM) and a conventional light microscope (LM). The ablation threshold was determined to be 2.6 J/cm2. The crater diameter showed the highest value (LM: 1075 ± 18 µm/LSM: 1082 ± 17 µm) for indirect irradiation (reflectant:dental mirror) (OE: 466 mJ/OD: 15 mm). The crater depth showed the highest and comparable value for direct (OE: 570 mJ/OD: 10 mm; LSM: 89 ± 2 µm) and indirect irradiation (OE: 466 mJ/OD: 15 mm; LSM: 90 ± 4 µm). For each OD, the crater diameter, depth, and volume increased with higher laser fluence. However, the OD—and thus the laser spot diameter—also had an enlarging effect. Thus, indirect irradiation (reflectant:dental mirror) with only 47% of the laser fluence of direct irradiation led to a larger diameter and a comparable depth. The three-dimensional extent of the crater was large enough to cause roughening, which may lead to plaque accumulation and encourage caries, gingivitis, and periodontitis under clinical conditions. Clinicians should be aware that reflected irradiation can still create such craters.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document