scholarly journals Introduction to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Solomkin ◽  
John Mazuski ◽  
Joan C. Blanchard ◽  
Kamal M.F. Itani ◽  
Philip Ricks ◽  
...  
2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 404-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keita Morikane ◽  
Midori Nishioka ◽  
Hisami Tanimura ◽  
Hiroe Noguchi ◽  
Toshiro Konishi ◽  
...  

AbstractWe initiated surveillance for surgical-site infections (SSIs) in a Japanese hospital using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions and the approach of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. Patients were observed following clean and clean-contaminated abdominal operations. SSI rates were higher than those of the NNIS System, but there was a trend toward decreased SSI rates in the latter half of the study period.


2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 570-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen V. Dicks ◽  
Sarah S. Lewis ◽  
Michael J. Durkin ◽  
Arthur W. Baker ◽  
Rebekah W. Moehring ◽  
...  

The updated 2013 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network definitions for surgical site infections (SSIs) reduced the duration of prolonged surveillance from 1 year to 90 days and defined which procedure types require prolonged surveillance. Applying the updated 2013 SSI definitions to cases analyzed using the pre-2013 surveillance definitions excluded 10% of previously identified SSIs.


2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (S2) ◽  
pp. S185-S192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathy Kinlaw ◽  
Drue H. Barrett ◽  
Robert J. Levine

ABSTRACTBecause of the importance of including ethical considerations in planning efforts for pandemic influenza, in February 2005 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention requested that the Ethics Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee to the Director develop guidance that would serve as a foundation for decision making in preparing for and responding to pandemic influenza. Specifically, the ethics subcommittee was asked to make recommendations regarding ethical considerations relevant to decision making about vaccine and antiviral drug distribution prioritization and development of interventions that would limit individual freedom and create social distancing. The ethics subcommittee identified a number of general ethical considerations including identification of clear goals for pandemic planning, responsibility to maximize preparedness, transparency and public engagement, sound science, commitment to the global community, balancing individual liberty and community interests, diversity in ethical decision making, and commitment to justice. These general ethical considerations are applied to the issues of vaccine and antiviral drug distribution and use of community mitigation interventions. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2009;3(Suppl 2):S185–S192)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document