scholarly journals Dominant-Lethal α-Tubulin Mutants Defective in Microtubule Depolymerization in Yeast

2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3973-3986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirk R. Anders ◽  
David Botstein
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Instability ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Inducible Promoter ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Microtubule Depolymerization ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
Mutant Proteins ◽  
Gtpase Activation ◽  
Β Tubulin

The dynamic instability of microtubules has long been understood to depend on the hydrolysis of GTP bound to β-tubulin, an event stimulated by polymerization and necessary for depolymerization. Crystallographic studies of tubulin show that GTP is bound by β-tubulin at the longitudinal dimer-dimer interface and contacts particular α-tubulin residues in the next dimer along the protofilament. This structural arrangement suggests that these contacts could account for assembly-stimulated GTP hydrolysis. As a test of this hypothesis, we examined, in yeast cells, the effect of mutating the α-tubulin residues predicted, on structural grounds, to be involved in GTPase activation. Mutation of these residues to alanine (i.e., D252A and E255A) created poisonous α-tubulins that caused lethality even as minor components of the α-tubulin pool. When the mutant α-tubulins were expressed from the galactose-inducible promoter ofGAL1, cells rapidly acquired aberrant microtubule structures. Cytoplasmic microtubules were largely bundled, spindle assembly was inhibited, preexisting spindles failed to completely elongate, and occasional, stable microtubules were observed unattached to spindle pole bodies. Time-lapse microscopy showed that microtubule dynamics had ceased. Microtubules containing the mutant proteins did not depolymerize, even in the presence of nocodazole. These data support the view that α-tubulin is a GTPase-activating protein that acts, during microtubule polymerization, to stimulate GTP hydrolysis in β-tubulin and thereby account for the dynamic instability of microtubules.

scholarly journals Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells.

1990 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
C L Rieder ◽  
S P Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Separation ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Variable Number ◽  
Fiber Formation ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Microtubule Depolymerization ◽  
Chromosome Attachment ◽  
Kinetochore Region ◽  
Tubulin Immunofluorescence

During mitosis in cultured newt pneumocytes, one or more chromosomes may become positioned well removed (greater than 50 microns) from the polar regions during early prometaphase. As a result, these chromosomes are delayed for up to 5 h in forming an attachment to the spindle. The spatial separation of these chromosomes from the polar microtubule-nucleating centers provides a unique opportunity to study the initial stages of kinetochore fiber formation in living cells. Time-lapse Nomarski-differential interference contrast videomicroscopic observations reveal that late-attaching chromosomes always move, upon attachment, into a single polar region (usually the one closest to the chromosome). During this attachment, the kinetochore region of the chromosome undergoes a variable number of transient poleward tugs that are followed, shortly thereafter, by rapid movement of the chromosome towards the pole. Anti-tubulin immunofluorescence and serial section EM reveal that the kinetochores and kinetochore regions of nonattached chromosomes lack associated microtubules. By contrast, these methods reveal that the attachment and subsequent poleward movement of a chromosome correlates with the association of a single long microtubule with one of the kinetochores of the chromosome. This microtubule traverses the entire distance between the spindle pole and the kinetochore and often extends well past the kinetochore. From these results, we conclude that the initial attachment of a chromosome to the newt pneumocyte spindle results from an interaction between a single polar-nucleated microtubule and one of the kinetochores on the chromosome. Once this association is established, the kinetochore is rapidly transported poleward along the surface of the microtubule by a mechanism that is not dependent on microtubule depolymerization. Our results further demonstrate that the motors for prometaphase chromosome movement must be either on the surface of the kinetochore (i.e., within the corona but not the plate), distributed along the surface of the kinetochore microtubules, or both.

scholarly journals Evidence for conformational change-induced hydrolysis of β-tubulin-GTP

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammadjavad Paydar ◽  
Benjamin H. Kwok
Keyword(s):  
Conformational Change ◽  
Intracellular Transport ◽  
Chemical Agent ◽  
Microtubule Depolymerization ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
Structural Framework ◽  
Microtubule Polymerization ◽  
Average Size ◽  
Cell Shape Formation ◽  
Β Tubulin

ABSTRACTMicrotubules, protein polymers of α/β-tubulin dimers, form the structural framework for many essential cellular processes including cell shape formation, intracellular transport, and segregation of chromosomes during cell division. It is known that tubulin-GTP hydrolysis is closely associated with microtubule polymerization dynamics. However, the precise roles of GTP hydrolysis in tubulin polymerization and microtubule depolymerization, and how it is initiated are still not clearly defined. We report here that tubulin-GTP hydrolysis can be triggered by conformational change induced by the depolymerizing kinesin-13 proteins or by the stabilizing chemical agent paclitaxel. We provide biochemical evidence that conformational change precedes tubulin-GTP hydrolysis, confirming this process is mechanically driven and structurally directional. Furthermore, we quantitatively measure the average size of the presumptive stabilizing “GTP cap” at growing microtubule ends. Together, our findings provide the molecular basis for tubulin-GTP hydrolysis and its role in microtubule polymerization and depolymerization.

scholarly journals Abstract P-36: Structural Analysis of Conformational Changes of Bacterial and Eukaryotic Tubulins

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S27-S28
Author(s):  
Liubov Makarova ◽  
Alena Korshunova
Keyword(s):  
Structural Analysis ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Dynamic Instability ◽  
Amino Acid Sequences ◽  
Anchor Point ◽  
Final State ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
Alpha Tubulin ◽  
Β Tubulin

Background: Eukaryotic α- and β-tubulin proteins stand out among tubulin-like proteins by their ability to form hollow dynamically unstable microtubules (MT) with 13 protofilaments. Microtubules are part of the cell cytoskeleton and play a key role in chromosome division in mitosis. A considerable amount of anticancer drugs works on microtubules level breaking its dynamic. But the mechanism of dynamic instability and works of these drugs remains unknown. Bacteria of the genus Prostecobacter have unique bacterial tubulins (BtubA/B) capable to form hollow dynamically unstable 5 protofilament MTs (miniMT). Instead of great differences, both tubulins have many common features. Eukaryotic tubulin was known to have structural changes through GTP hydrolysis (compactization for approximately 2 Å and a twist for 0,1˚). «Anchor point» structure in alpha-tubulin was noticed to be a fixed point in this movement. Methods: We performed comparative structural analysis of BtubA/B and α- and β-tubulin proteins using USCF Chimera10 and MEGA X software. This data was obtained due to a comparison of 3 structures of microtubules with different nucleotides [pdb6DPU, 6DPV, 6DPW] and two structures for bacterial tubulins (miniMT [pdb5o09] and BtubA/B-dimer [pdb2BTQ]). Results: We noticed that bacterial tubulins form shorter protofilaments in miniMT than eukaryotic ones. It can be explained as compaction in two sites instead of one site in eukaryotic MT. Also, the most motionless point of min MT turned out the same "anchor point." Phylogenetic analysis showed that this structure is very conservative in these orthologs. Moreover, the final state of both tubulins (GDP) repeats each other. Conclusion: Our results suggest that bacterial tubulin can have movements through GTP hydrolysis similar to eukaryotic one. And it means that despite different amino acid sequences, bacterial and eukaryotic tubulins have similar keys structures for dynamic instability.

Analysis of the Mechanism of Microtubule Dynamic Instability Using a UV Microbeam to Sever Elongating Microtubules

1988 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 122-123
Author(s):  
R.A Walker ◽  
S. Inoue ◽  
E.D. Salmon
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Instability ◽  
Microtubule Dynamic ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
Abrupt Transition ◽  
Microtubule Associated Proteins ◽  
Asymmetrical Structure ◽  
Associated Proteins

Microtubules polymerized in vitro from tubulin purified free of microtubule-associated proteins exhibit dynamic instability (1,2,3). Free microtubule ends exist in persistent phases of elongation or rapid shortening with infrequent, but, abrupt transitions between these phases. The abrupt transition from elongation to rapid shortening is termed catastrophe and the abrupt transition from rapid shortening to elongation is termed rescue. A microtubule is an asymmetrical structure. The plus end grows faster than the minus end. The frequency of catastrophe of the plus end is somewhat greater than the minus end, while the frequency of rescue of the plus end in much lower than for the minus end (4).The mechanism of catastrophe is controversial, but for both the plus and minus microtubule ends, catastrophe is thought to be dependent on GTP hydrolysis. Microtubule elongation occurs by the association of tubulin-GTP subunits to the growing end. Sometime after incorporation into an elongating microtubule end, the GTP is hydrolyzed to GDP, yielding a core of tubulin-GDP capped by tubulin-GTP (“GTP-cap”).

scholarly journals Role of a ribosomal RNA phosphate oxygen during the EF-G–triggered GTP hydrolysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (20) ◽  
pp. E2561-E2568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Koch ◽  
Sara Flür ◽  
Christoph Kreutz ◽  
Eric Ennifar ◽  
Ronald Micura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Rna ◽  
Electrostatic Interactions ◽  
Elongation Factor ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Phosphate Group ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
Elongation Cycle ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Catalytically Active ◽  
Gtpase Activation

Elongation factor-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis is a key reaction during the ribosomal elongation cycle. Recent crystal structures of G proteins, such as elongation factor G (EF-G) bound to the ribosome, as well as many biochemical studies, provide evidence that the direct interaction of translational GTPases (trGTPases) with the sarcin-ricin loop (SRL) of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is pivotal for hydrolysis. However, the precise mechanism remains elusive and is intensively debated. Based on the close proximity of the phosphate oxygen of A2662 of the SRL to the supposedly catalytic histidine of EF-G (His87), we probed this interaction by an atomic mutagenesis approach. We individually replaced either of the two nonbridging phosphate oxygens at A2662 with a methyl group by the introduction of a methylphosphonate instead of the natural phosphate in fully functional, reconstituted bacterial ribosomes. Our major finding was that only one of the two resulting diastereomers, the SP methylphosphonate, was compatible with efficient GTPase activation on EF-G. The same trend was observed for a second trGTPase, namely EF4 (LepA). In addition, we provide evidence that the negative charge of the A2662 phosphate group must be retained for uncompromised activity in GTP hydrolysis. In summary, our data strongly corroborate that the nonbridging proSP phosphate oxygen at the A2662 of the SRL is critically involved in the activation of GTP hydrolysis. A mechanistic scenario is supported in which positioning of the catalytically active, protonated His87 through electrostatic interactions with the A2662 phosphate group and H-bond networks are key features of ribosome-triggered activation of trGTPases.

scholarly journals Studies concerning the temporal and genetic control of cell polarity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1991 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 515-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Snyder ◽  
S Gehrung ◽  
B D Page
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Distribution ◽  
Restrictive Temperature ◽  
Microtubule Bundle ◽  
Pole Body ◽  
Capture Site

The establishment of cell polarity was examined in the budding yeast, S. cerevisiae. The distribution of a polarized protein, the SPA2 protein, was followed throughout the yeast cell cycle using synchronized cells and cdc mutants. The SPA2 protein localizes to a patch at the presumptive bud site of G1 cells. Later it concentrates at the bud tip in budded cells. At cytokinesis, the SPA2 protein is at the neck between the mother and daughter cells. Analysis of unbudded haploid cells has suggested a series of events that occurs during G1. The SPA2 patch is established very early in G1, while the spindle pole body residues on the distal side of the nucleus. Later, microtubules emanating from the spindle pole body intersect the SPA2 crescent, and the nucleus probably rotates towards the SPA2 patch. By middle G1, most cells contain the SPB on the side of the nucleus proximal to the SPA2 patch, and a long extranuclear microtubule bundle intersects this patch. We suggest that a microtubule capture site exists in the SPA2 staining region that stabilizes the long microtubule bundle; this capture site may be responsible for rotation of the nucleus. Cells containing a polarized distribution of the SPA2 protein also possess a polarized distribution of actin spots in the same region, although the actin staining is much more diffuse. Moreover, cdc4 mutants, which form multiple buds at the restrictive temperature, exhibit simultaneous staining of the SPA2 protein and actin spots in a subset of the bud tips. spa2 mutants contain a polarized distribution of actin spots, and act1-1 and act1-2 mutants often contain a polarized distribution of the SPA2 protein suggesting that the SPA2 protein is not required for localization of the actin spots and the actin spots are not required for localization of the SPA2 protein. cdc24 mutants, which fail to form buds at the restrictive temperature, fail to exhibit polarized localization of the SPA2 protein and actin spots, indicating that the CDC24 protein is directly or indirectly responsible for controlling the polarity of these proteins. Based on the cell cycle distribution of the SPA2 protein, a "cytokinesis tag" model is proposed to explain the mechanism of the non-random positioning of bud sites in haploid yeast cells.

scholarly journals The Positioning and Dynamics of Origins of Replication in the Budding Yeast Nucleus

2001 ◽  
Vol 152 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Heun ◽  
Thierry Laroche ◽  
M.K. Raghuraman ◽  
Susan M. Gasser
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Nuclear Pore ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Green Fluorescent

We have analyzed the subnuclear position of early- and late-firing origins of DNA replication in intact yeast cells using fluorescence in situ hybridization and green fluorescent protein (GFP)–tagged chromosomal domains. In both cases, origin position was determined with respect to the nuclear envelope, as identified by nuclear pore staining or a NUP49-GFP fusion protein. We find that in G1 phase nontelomeric late-firing origins are enriched in a zone immediately adjacent to the nuclear envelope, although this localization does not necessarily persist in S phase. In contrast, early firing origins are randomly localized within the nucleus throughout the cell cycle. If a late-firing telomere-proximal origin is excised from its chromosomal context in G1 phase, it remains late-firing but moves rapidly away from the telomere with which it was associated, suggesting that the positioning of yeast chromosomal domains is highly dynamic. This is confirmed by time-lapse microscopy of GFP-tagged origins in vivo. We propose that sequences flanking late-firing origins help target them to the periphery of the G1-phase nucleus, where a modified chromatin structure can be established. The modified chromatin structure, which would in turn retard origin firing, is both autonomous and mobile within the nucleus.

scholarly journals Epistasis, aneuploidy, and gain-of-function mutations underlie the evolution of resistance to induced microtubule depolymerization

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mattia Pavani ◽  
Paolo Bonaiuti ◽  
Elena Chiroli ◽  
Fridolin Gross ◽  
Federica Natali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Adaptive Mutation ◽  
Microtubule Depolymerization ◽  
Gain Of Function ◽  
Beta Tubulin ◽  
Microtubule Polymerization ◽  
Evolution Experiment ◽  
Evolution Of Resistance ◽  
Cellular Components ◽  
Chromosome Viii

ABSTRACTMicrotubules, polymers of alpha- and beta-tubulin, are essential cellular components. When microtubule polymerization is hindered, cells are delayed in mitosis, but eventually they manage to proliferate with massive chromosome missegregation. Several studies have analyzed the first cell division upon microtubules impairing conditions. Here, we asked how cells cope on the long term. Taking advantage of mutations in beta-tubulin, we evolved in the lab for ∼150 generations 24 populations of yeast cells unable to properly polymerize microtubules. At the end of the evolution experiment, cells re-gained the ability to form microtubules, and were less sensitive to microtubule depolymerizing drugs. Whole genome sequencing allowed us to identify genes recurrently mutated (tubulins and kinesins) as well as the pervasive duplication of chromosome VIII. We confirmed that mutations found in these genes and disomy of chromosome VIII allow cells to compensate for the original mutation in beta-tubulin. The mutations we identified were mostly gain-of-function, likely re-allowing the proper use of the mutated form of beta-tubulin. When we analyzed the temporal order of mutations leading to resistance in independent populations, we observed multiple times the same series of events: disomy of chromosome VIII followed by one additional adaptive mutation in either tubulins or kinesins. Analyzing the epistatic interactions among different mutations, we observed that some mutations benefited from the disomy of chromosome VIII and others did not. Given that tubulins are highly conserved among eukaryotes, our results are potentially relevant for understanding the emergence of resistance to drugs targeting microtubules, widely used for cancer treatment.

scholarly journals Mps1 promotes poleward chromosome movements in meiotic pro-metaphase

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Régis E Meyer ◽  
Aaron R Tipton ◽  
Gary J Gorbsky ◽  
Dean S Dawson
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Pair ◽  
Single Unit ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Microtubule Depolymerization ◽  
Data Support ◽  
Chromosome Movements ◽  
Meiosis I ◽  
Prophase Of Meiosis

ABSTRACTIn prophase of meiosis I, homologous partner chromosomes pair and become connected by crossovers. Chiasmata, the connections formed between the partners enable the chromosome pair, called a bivalent, to attach as a single unit to the spindle. When the meiosis I spindle forms in prometaphase, most bivalents are associated with a single spindle pole and go through a series of oscillations on the spindle, attaching to and detaching from microtubules until the partners of the bivalent are bi-oriented, that is, attached to microtubules from opposite sides of the spindle, and prepared to be segregated at anaphase I. The conserved, kinetochore-associated kinase, Mps1, is essential for the bivalents to be pulled by microtubules across the spindle in prometaphase. Here we show that MPS1 is not required for kinetochores to attach microtubules but instead is necessary to trigger the migration of microtubule-attached kinetochores towards the poles. Our data support the model that Mps1 triggers depolymerization of microtubule ends once they attach to kinetochores in prometaphase. Thus, Mps1 acts at the kinetochore to co-ordinate the successful attachment of a microtubule and the triggering of microtubule depolymerization to move the chromosome.

scholarly journals Redistribution of centrosomal proteins by centromeres and Polo kinase controls nuclear envelope breakdown

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Bestul ◽  
Zulin Yu ◽  
Jay R. Unruh ◽  
Sue L. Jaspersen
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Ring Structure ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Structured Illumination ◽  
Structured Illumination Microscopy ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Breakdown ◽  
Polo Kinase

AbstractProper mitotic progression in Schizosaccharomyces pombe requires partial nuclear envelope breakdown (NEBD) and insertion of the spindle pole body (SPB – yeast centrosome) to build the mitotic spindle. Linkage of the centromere to the SPB is vital to this process, but why that linkage is important is not well understood. Utilizing high-resolution structured illumination microscopy (SIM), we show that the conserved SUNprotein Sad1 and other SPB proteins redistribute during mitosis to form a ring complex around SPBs, which is a precursor for NEBD and spindle formation. Although the Polo kinase Plo1 is not necessary for Sad1 redistribution, it localizes to the SPB region connected to the centromere, and its activity is vital for SPB ring protein redistribution and for complete NEBD to allow for SPB insertion. Our results lead to a model in which centromere linkage to the SPB drives redistribution of Sad1 and Plo1 activation that in turn facilitate NEBD and spindle formation through building of an SPB ring structure.SummaryNuclear envelope breakdown is necessary for fission yeast cells to go through mitosis. Bestul et al. show that the SUN protein, Sad1, is vital in carrying out this breakdown and is regulated by the centromere and Polo kinase.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document