scholarly journals The beta subunit of the signal recognition particle receptor is a transmembrane GTPase that anchors the alpha subunit, a peripheral membrane GTPase, to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

1995 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
J D Miller ◽  
S Tajima ◽  
L Lauffer ◽  
P Walter
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Transmembrane Protein ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Protein Chain ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle Receptor ◽  
Er Membrane

The signal recognition particle receptor (SR) is required for the cotranslational targeting of both secretory and membrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. During targeting, the SR interacts with the signal recognition particle (SRP) which is bound to the signal sequence of the nascent protein chain. This interaction catalyzes the GTP-dependent transfer of the nascent chain from SRP to the protein translocation apparatus in the ER membrane. The SR is a heterodimeric protein comprised of a 69-kD subunit (SR alpha) and a 30-kD subunit (SR beta) which are associated with the ER membrane in an unknown manner. SR alpha and the 54-kD subunits of SRP (SRP54) each contain related GTPase domains which are required for SR and SRP function. Molecular cloning and sequencing of a cDNA encoding SR beta revealed that SR beta is a transmembrane protein and, like SR alpha and SRP54, is a member of the GTPase superfamily. Although SR beta defines its own GTPase subfamily, it is distantly related to ARF and Sar1. Using UV cross-linking, we confirm that SR beta binds GTP specifically. Proteolytic digestion experiments show that SR alpha is required for the interaction of SRP with SR. SR alpha appears to be peripherally associated with the ER membrane, and we suggest that SR beta, as an integral membrane protein, mediates the membrane association of SR alpha. The discovery of its guanine nucleotide-binding domain, however, makes it likely that its role is more complex than that of a passive anchor for SR alpha. These findings suggest that a cascade of three directly interacting GTPases functions during protein targeting to the ER membrane.

Topology of signal recognition particle receptor in endoplasmic reticulum membrane

Nature ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 318 (6044) ◽  
pp. 334-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leander Lauffer ◽  
Pablo D. Garcia ◽  
Richard N. Harkins ◽  
Lisa Coussens ◽  
Axel Ullrich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle Receptor

scholarly journals NAC functions as a modulator of SRP during the early steps of protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (16) ◽  
pp. 3027-3040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Uta Berndt ◽  
Hanna Gölz ◽  
Arlette Tais ◽  
Stefan Oellerer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Signal Sequences ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Ribosomal Tunnel ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Combined Data

Nascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC) was initially found to bind to any segment of the nascent chain except signal sequences. In this way, NAC is believed to prevent mistargeting due to binding of signal recognition particle (SRP) to signalless ribosome nascent chain complexes (RNCs). Here we revisit the interplay between NAC and SRP. NAC does not affect SRP function with respect to signalless RNCs; however, NAC does affect SRP function with respect to RNCs targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). First, early recruitment of SRP to RNCs containing a signal sequence within the ribosomal tunnel is NAC dependent. Second, NAC is able to directly and tightly bind to nascent signal sequences. Third, SRP initially displaces NAC from RNCs; however, when the signal sequence emerges further, trimeric NAC·RNC·SRP complexes form. Fourth, upon docking to the ER membrane NAC remains bound to RNCs, allowing NAC to shield cytosolically exposed nascent chain domains not only before but also during cotranslational translocation. The combined data indicate a functional interplay between NAC and SRP on ER-targeted RNCs, which is based on the ability of the two complexes to bind simultaneously to distinct segments of a single nascent chain.

scholarly journals Transport of the Intracisternal A-Type Particle Gag Polyprotein to the Endoplasmic Reticulum Is Mediated by the Signal Recognition Particle

2003 ◽  
Vol 77 (11) ◽  
pp. 6293-6304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frauke Fehrmann ◽  
Martin Jung ◽  
Richard Zimmermann ◽  
Hans-Georg Kräusslich
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Endogenous Retroviruses ◽  
In Vitro Translation ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Hydrophobic Region ◽  
Gag Polyprotein ◽  
Er Targeting ◽  
Er Membrane

ABSTRACT Intracisternal A-type particles (IAP) are defective endogenous retroviruses that accumulate in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of rodent cells. The enveloped particles are produced by assembly and budding of IAP Gag polyproteins at the ER membrane. In this study, we analyzed the specific ER transport of the Gag polyprotein of the IAP element MIA14. To this end, we performed in vitro translation of Gag in the presence of microsomal membranes or synthetic proteoliposomes followed by membrane sedimentation or flotation. ER binding of IAP Gag occurred mostly cotranslationally, and Gag polyproteins interacted specifically with proteoliposomes containing only signal recognition particle (SRP) receptor and the Sec61p complex, which form the minimal ER translocation apparatus. The direct participation of SRP in ER targeting of IAP Gag was demonstrated in cross-linking and immunoprecipitation experiments. The IAP polyprotein was not translocated into the ER; it was found to be tightly associated with the cytoplasmic side of the ER membrane but did not behave as an integral membrane protein. Substituting the functional signal peptide of preprolactin for the hydrophobic sequence at the N terminus of IAP Gag also did not result in translocation of the chimeric protein into the ER lumen, and grafting the IAP hydrophobic sequence onto preprolactin failed to yield luminal transport as well. These results suggest that the N-terminal hydrophobic region of the IAP Gag polyprotein functions as a transport signal which mediates SRP-dependent ER targeting, but polyprotein translocation or integration into the membrane is prevented by the signal sequence itself and by additional regions of Gag.

scholarly journals Direct probing of the interaction between the signal sequence of nascent preprolactin and the signal recognition particle by specific cross-linking.

1987 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Wiedmann ◽  
T V Kurzchalia ◽  
H Bielka ◽  
T A Rapoport
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Lysine Residues ◽  
Nascent Chain

We have studied the interaction between the signal sequence of nascent preprolactin and the signal recognition particle (SRP) during the initial events in protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. A new method of affinity labeling was used, whereby lysine residues, carrying the photoreactive group 4-(3-trifluoromethyldiazirino) benzoic acid in their side chains, are incorporated into a protein by means of modified lysyl-tRNA, and cross-linking to the interacting component is induced by irradiation. SRP interacts through its Mr 54,000 polypeptide component with the signal sequences of nascent preprolactin chains containing about 70 residues, and with decreasing affinity with longer chains as well; it causes inhibition of elongation. Binding of SRP is reversible and requires the nascent chain to be bound to a functional ribosome. SRP cross-linked to the signal sequence still inhibits elongation but does not prevent it completely. We conclude that SRP does not block the exit site of the polypeptide chain on the ribosome. The SRP receptor of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane displaces the signal sequence from SRP and, even if SRP is cross-linked, releases elongation arrest.

scholarly journals Spontaneous Release of Cytosolic Proteins from Posttranslational Substrates before Their Transport into the Endoplasmic Reticulum

2000 ◽  
Vol 151 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Plath ◽  
Tom A. Rapoport
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Active Role ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Cytosolic Proteins ◽  
Protein Substrates ◽  
Ring Complex ◽  
Reticulocyte Lysate

In posttranslational translocation in yeast, completed protein substrates are transported across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane through a translocation channel formed by the Sec complex. We have used photo-cross-linking to investigate interactions of cytosolic proteins with a substrate synthesized in a reticulocyte lysate system, before its posttranslational translocation through the channel in the yeast membrane. Upon termination of translation, the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the nascent polypeptide–associated complex (NAC) are released from the polypeptide chain, and the full-length substrate interacts with several different cytosolic proteins. At least two distinct complexes exist that contain among other proteins either 70-kD heat shock protein (Hsp70) or tailless complex polypeptide 1 (TCP1) ring complex/chaperonin containing TCP1 (TRiC/CCT), which keep the substrate competent for translocation. None of the cytosolic factors appear to interact specifically with the signal sequence. Dissociation of the cytosolic proteins from the substrate is accelerated to the same extent by the Sec complex and an unspecific GroEL trap, indicating that release occurs spontaneously without the Sec complex playing an active role. Once bound to the Sec complex, the substrate is stripped of all cytosolic proteins, allowing it to subsequently be transported through the membrane channel without the interference of cytosolic binding partners.

scholarly journals Binding of Signal Recognition Particle Gives Ribosome/Nascent Chain Complexes a Competitive Advantage in Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane Interaction

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Neuhof ◽  
Melissa M. Rolls ◽  
Berit Jungnickel ◽  
Kai-Uwe Kalies ◽  
Tom A. Rapoport
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Membrane Binding ◽  
Membrane Targeting ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Nascent Polypeptide ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Cytosolic Factors ◽  
Er Membrane

Most secretory and membrane proteins are sorted by signal sequences to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane early during their synthesis. Targeting of the ribosome-nascent chain complex (RNC) involves the binding of the signal sequence to the signal recognition particle (SRP), followed by an interaction of ribosome-bound SRP with the SRP receptor. However, ribosomes can also independently bind to the ER translocation channel formed by the Sec61p complex. To explain the specificity of membrane targeting, it has therefore been proposed that nascent polypeptide-associated complex functions as a cytosolic inhibitor of signal sequence- and SRP-independent ribosome binding to the ER membrane. We report here that SRP-independent binding of RNCs to the ER membrane can occur in the presence of all cytosolic factors, including nascent polypeptide-associated complex. Nontranslating ribosomes competitively inhibit SRP-independent membrane binding of RNCs but have no effect when SRP is bound to the RNCs. The protective effect of SRP against ribosome competition depends on a functional signal sequence in the nascent chain and is also observed with reconstituted proteoliposomes containing only the Sec61p complex and the SRP receptor. We conclude that cytosolic factors do not prevent the membrane binding of ribosomes. Instead, specific ribosome targeting to the Sec61p complex is provided by the binding of SRP to RNCs, followed by an interaction with the SRP receptor, which gives RNC–SRP complexes a selective advantage in membrane targeting over nontranslating ribosomes.

scholarly journals The Ribosome Regulates the Gtpase of the β-Subunit of the Signal Recognition Particle Receptor

1999 ◽  
Vol 146 (4) ◽  
pp. 723-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald Bacher ◽  
Martin Pool ◽  
Bernhard Dobberstein
Keyword(s):  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Bound State ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Β Subunit ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle Receptor ◽  
Membrane Bound ◽  
Gtpase Cycle

Protein targeting to the membrane of the ER is regulated by three GTPases, the 54-kD subunit of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the α- and β-subunit of the SRP receptor (SR). Here, we report on the GTPase cycle of the β-subunits of the SR (SRβ). We found that SRβ binds GTP with high affinity and interacts with ribosomes in the GTP-bound state. Subsequently, the ribosome increases the GTPase activity of SRβ and thus functions as a GTPase activating protein for SRβ. Furthermore, the interaction between SRβ and the ribosome leads to a reduction in the affinity of SRβ for guanine nucleotides. We propose that SRβ regulates the interaction of SR with the ribosome and thereby allows SRα to scan membrane-bound ribosomes for the presence of SRP. Interaction between SRP and SRα then leads to release of the signal sequence from SRP and insertion into the translocon. GTP hydrolysis then results in dissociation of SR from the ribosome, and SRP from the SR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document