At-Risk Students

Author(s):  
Gary Natriello

Students in danger of not completing a particular level of schooling have been termed “at-risk.” Reasons that students may be at risk include individual characteristics, family circumstances, poor school conditions, and lack of community resources. Studies of single factors, multiple factors, and programmatic interventions have all identified specific variables associated with greater risk of dropping out of school. The various factors associated with dropping out can offset one another to reduce the risk or reinforce one another to enhance the risk that students will leave school early.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Kevin Butler

Students of color and low-income students are at a much higher risk of dropping out of school than more privileged students. Dropping out of school can lead to severe social issues -- students who drop out of school are much more likely to end up incarcerated and to remain unemployed for long periods of time. However, strong empirical research indicates that certain teaching methods are highly beneficial for the academic achievement of at-risk students in addition to being beneficial for the achievement of all students in general. These teaching methods are based around direct, teacher-centered instruction. In contrast, teaching methods based around minimally-guided instruction tend to be ineffective (or even detrimental) for at-risk students. This text outlines the benefits of direct instruction and the potential risks of minimally-guided instruction, along with specific steps for implementing effective teaching strategies.


2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 667-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amparo Escartí ◽  
Melchor Gutiérrez ◽  
Carmina Pascual ◽  
Diana Marín

This study evaluated improvement in self-efficacy and personal and social responsibility among at-risk of dropping-out of school adolescents participating in a program in which Hellison's Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility Model was applied in physical education classes during the course of an academic year. Thirty at-risk adolescents aged 13-14 years old (23 boys, 7 girls) were assigned to an intervention group (12 boys and 3 girls) or a comparison group (11 boys, 4 girls), the latter of which did not participate in the program. Quantitative results showed a significant improvement in the students' self-efficacy for enlisting social resources and in self-efficacy for self-regulated learning. Qualitative results showed an improvement in responsibility behaviors of participants in the intervention group. This suggests that the model could be effective for improving psychological and social development in at-risk adolescents, and that physical education classes may be an appropriate arena for working with these young people.


2006 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia A. Lauer ◽  
Motoko Akiba ◽  
Stephanie B. Wilkerson ◽  
Helen S. Apthorp ◽  
David Snow ◽  
...  

Schools and districts are adopting out-of-school-time (OST) programs such as after-school programs and summer schools to supplement the education of low-achieving students. However, research has painted a mixed picture of their effectiveness. To clarify OST impacts, this synthesis examined research on OST programs for assisting at-risk students in reading and/or mathematics. Researchers analyzed 35 OST studies that employed control or comparison groups and met other inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses indicated small but statistically significant positive effects of OST on both reading and mathematics student achievement and larger positive effect sizes for programs with specific characteristics such as tutoring in reading. Whether the OST program took place after school or during the summer did not make a difference in effectiveness.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 385
Author(s):  
Donna L. Braun ◽  
Robert K. Gable ◽  
Felice D. Billups ◽  
Mary Vieira ◽  
Danielle Blasczak

<p>A mixed methods convergent evaluation informed the redesign of an innovative public school that uses an accelerated model to serve grades 7-9 students who have been retained in grade level and are at risk for dropping out of school. After over 25 years in operation, a shift of practices/policies away from grade retention and toward social promotion required the school to adapt their model to best served students with high risk factors for dropping out of school who have been socially promoted, rather than retained in grade level. This study provided the qualitative (perspectives of former students (<em>N</em> = 8) and quantitative (demographic and outcome variables for students (<em>N </em>= 164)<em> </em>who completed the program between 2007-2009)<em> </em>data to ground the evolution of the school model. Five critical aspects of the school model emerged from the former students: teacher as warm demander, diverse and creative practices, being one community, student self-efficacy, and upholding diversity and equity. Quantitative analyses revealed the key finding that the number of times a student accelerated to the next grade in their courses was a positive predictor of all the high school outcomes studied. Data mixed during interpretation generated recommendations to continue strong practices and strengthen the following: have students set, monitor, and share progress; increase clear and high expectations; engage the adult community in setting, tracking and assessing goals; and increase culturally competent practices. These findings can also be used by schools serving students who may be at risk for dropping out of school.</p>


Author(s):  
Howard M. Blonsky

I sincerely hope that the material presented in these pages will assist you, as a dropout prevention specialist, to be a catalyst in your school and/or district, in identifying those students, either individually or in groups, who are at risk for dropping out of school. By helping to craft and implement opportunities, services, and supports to address the issues and needs identified in the student body, you are helping tremendously to lower the potential for more students dropping out....


1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 675-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia L. Jew ◽  
Kathy E. Green

The relationships among five factors characterized as placing adolescents at risk for behavioral problems such as dropping out of school or drug and alcohol use, and resiliency and coping were evaluated for a sample of 392 students in Grades 7 to 12. Students self-reported to be at-risk differed in scores on resiliency but not in coping from those with no self-reported risk factors.


Author(s):  
Szilvia Schmitsek

This paper explores the educational experiences of young people who had been at risk of dropping out and gained a qualification at a second chance provision. It is based on comparative fieldwork in England, Denmark and Hungary with empirical data collected from observations; and 28 interviews with former students. By listening to the voices of students, the analysis focused on the relevance of different sources of support. The findings revealed that individual study pathways and intensified guidance effort led students to pursue their career in higher education and/or in the labour market.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document