Weight gain, thermic effect of glucose and resting metabolic rate during recovery from anorexia nervosa

1977 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
B J Stordy ◽  
V Marks ◽  
R S Kalucy ◽  
A H Crisp
Keyword(s):  
Anorexia Nervosa ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Resting Metabolic Rate ◽  
Effect Of Glucose ◽  
Thermic Effect

Resting metabolic rate of anorexia nervosa patients during weight gain

1994 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 666-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Obarzanek ◽  
M D Lesem ◽  
D C Jimerson
Keyword(s):  
Anorexia Nervosa ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Resting Metabolic Rate

Resting Metabolic Rate and Thermic Effect of a Meal in Low- and Adequate-Energy Intake Male Endurance Athletes

1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice Thompson ◽  
Melinda M. Manore ◽  
James S. Skinner
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Weight Maintenance ◽  
Resting Metabolic Rate ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
Endurance Athletes ◽  
Male Athletes ◽  
Thermic Effect

The resting metabolic rate (RMR) and thermic effect of a meal (TEM) were determined in 13 low-energy intake (LOW) and 11 adequate-energy intake (ADQ) male endurance athletes. The LOW athletes reported eating 1,490 kcal·day-1less than the ADQ group, while the activity level of both groups was similar. Despite these differences, both groups had a similar fat-free mass (FFM) and had been weight stable for at least 2 years. The RMR was significantly lower (p<0.05) in the LOW group compared to the values of the ADQ group (1.19 vs. 1.29 kcal·FFM-1·hr-l, respectively); this difference represents a lower resting expenditure of 158 kcal·day-1. No differences were found in TEM between the two groups. These results suggest that a lower RMR is one mechanism that contributes to weight maintenance in a group of low- versus adequate-energy intake male athletes.

scholarly journals A low resting metabolic rate in late childhood is associated with weight gain in adolescence

Metabolism ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 68-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian G. Hohenadel ◽  
Tim Hollstein ◽  
Marie Thearle ◽  
Martin Reinhardt ◽  
Paolo Piaggi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Gain ◽  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Resting Metabolic Rate ◽  
Late Childhood

Resting metabolic rate and thermic effect of a meal in the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle in well-nourished Indian women

1995 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
L S Piers ◽  
S N Diggavi ◽  
J Rijskamp ◽  
J M van Raaij ◽  
P S Shetty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Menstrual Cycle ◽  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Resting Metabolic Rate ◽  
Indian Women ◽  
Thermic Effect

scholarly journals Alcohol and its acute effects on resting metabolic rate and diet-induced thermogenesis

1990 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan A. Weststrate ◽  
Ingrid Wunnink ◽  
Paul Deurenberg ◽  
Joseph G. A. J. Hautvast
Keyword(s):  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Resting Metabolic Rate ◽  
Resting Energy Expenditure ◽  
Random Order ◽  
Systematic Difference ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Diet Induced Thermogenesis ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Thermic Effect

The impact of alcohol (ethanol) on resting energy expenditure of male non-obese volunteers was determined in two studies. In the first study the thermic effect of alcohol on resting metabolic rate (RMR) was assessed in ten male non-obese volunteers. In the second study the impact of alcohol on diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT) was determined in twelve male non-obese volunteers. Energy expenditure was measured with a ventilated-hood system. RMR was measured for 60 min with the subjects in a fasting state. In the first study subjects received in random order 20 g alcohol in concentrations of 75, 180 and 300 ml/I water respectively. After measurement of the RMR the thermic effect of alcohol was measured for 90 min. In the second study volunteers received in random order and in duplicate either a meal of food (2 MJ) plus an alcoholic aperitif (20 g alcohol in a 180 ml/1 solution) or an isoenergetic meal of food alone (2.55 MJ) plus a placebo aperitif containing no alcohol. DIT was measured for 240 min. Alcohol induced a significant thermic effect, which varied between 0.22 and 0.30 kJ/min. No systematic difference in DIT was observed among the different concentrations. DIT was not significantly affected by the ingestion of alcohol. Total DIT was 219 (SE 14) kJ for the alcohol treatment and 185 (SE 20) kJ for the control treatment. The results do not support the suggestion that alcohol is less efficiently used as an energy source in comparison with, for example, fats and carbohydrates.

Impact of body fat mass and percent fat on metabolic rate and thermogenesis in men

1989 ◽  
Vol 256 (5) ◽  
pp. E573-E579 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. R. Segal ◽  
I. Lacayanga ◽  
A. Dunaif ◽  
B. Gutin ◽  
F. X. Pi-Sunyer
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Body Fat ◽  
Fat Mass ◽  
Resting Metabolic Rate ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
Body Fat Mass ◽  
Thermic Effect Of Food ◽  
Group A ◽  
Effect Of Food ◽  
Thermic Effect

To clarify further the independent relationships of body composition parameters to energy expenditure, resting metabolic rate (RMR) and postprandial thermogenesis were studied in four groups who were matched for absolute fat mass (study 1) and relative fatness (study 2). In study 1, five lean [group A, 15.4 +/- 0.6% (+/- SE) body fat] and five obese men (group B, 25.0 +/- 0.9% fat) were matched on body fat mass (13.0 +/- 0.9 vs. 14.4 +/- 0.8 kg, respectively). Fat-free mass (FFM) and total weight were greater for group A than B. RMR was measured for 3 h in the fasted state and after a 720-kcal mixed meal. RMR was greater for group A than B (1.38 +/- 0.08 vs. 1.14 +/- 0.04 kcal/min, P less than 0.05). The thermic effect of food, calculated as 3 h postprandial minus fasting RMR, was greater for group A than B (65 +/- 6 vs. 23 +/- 9 kcal/3 h; P less than 0.05). In study 2, two groups (n = 6 men/group) were matched for percent body fat (33 +/- 1% fat for both) but differed in lean, fat, and total weights: 50.8 +/- 3.1 kg FFM for the lighter (group C) vs. 68.0 +/- 2.8 kg FFM for the heavier (group D) group, P less than 0.05. RMR was lower for group C than D (1.17 +/- 0.06 vs. 1.33 +/- 0.04 kcal/min, P less than 0.05), but the thermic effect of food was not significantly different (31 +/- 3 vs. 20 +/- 6 kcal/3 h).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Energy Conservation in Amenorrheic Ballet Dancers

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-104
Author(s):  
Beth Glace ◽  
Ian Kremenic ◽  
Marijeanne Liederbach
Keyword(s):  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Energy Conservation ◽  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Body Fat ◽  
Lean Mass ◽  
Resting Metabolic Rate ◽  
Ballet Dancers ◽  
Thermic Effect Of Food ◽  
Effect Of Food ◽  
Thermic Effect

Ballet dancers may be at risk of eating disorders, and women with eating disorders are at increased risk for menstrual dysfunction. Caloric intakes of amenorrheic dancers have been reported to be less than those of eumenorrheic dancers, indicating a possible conservation of energy. We evaluated resting metabolic rate and the thermic effect of food following ingestion of a 500-kcal liquid supplement in 8 amenorrheic dancers and 10 eumenorrheic dancers. Body fat was higher for the eumenorrheic group (20%) than the amenorrheic group (15%). Resting metabolic rate did not differ between groups when corrected for body mass (24.2 ± 1.1 kcal/kg/day for amennorheic dancers vs. 25.0 ± 0.9 kcal/kg/day for eumennorheic dancers), nor did resting metabolic rate differ when adjusted for lean mass. However, amennorheic dancers expended significantly less energy post-prandially once adjusted for lean mass (ANOVA, effect of group p = 0.035). Dancers were asked to complete the Eating Disorder Inventory, a self-report scale that measures symptoms of disordered eating; 9 of 10 eumennorheic but only 4 of 8 amennorheic women were willing to complete the questionnaire. Eumennorheic dancers had profiles similar to or less pathologic than those of non-eating-disordered populations. Greater dissatisfaction was expressed by eumennorheic women as body fat increased. Contrary to the findings in previous studies, amennorheic ballet dancers did not exhibit energy conservation via reductions in resting metabolic rate but did expend slightly less energy in thermic effect of food compared to normally menstruating women.

Refeeding, metabolic rate, and weight gain in anorexia nervosa: A review

1995 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juanita J. Salisbury ◽  
Allen S. Levine ◽  
Scott J. Crow ◽  
James E. Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Anorexia Nervosa ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Metabolic Rate

Energy expenditure in non-insulin dependent diabetic subjects on metformin or sulphonylurea therapy

1987 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Leslie ◽  
R. T. Jung ◽  
T. E. Isles ◽  
J. Baty
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Resting Metabolic Rate ◽  
Confidence Limits ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Insulin Dependent ◽  
Predicted Values ◽  
Insulin Dependent Diabetic

1. In the management of the non-insulin dependent diabetic patient, metformin often facilitates weight loss whereas sulphonylurea may predispose to weight gain. To investigate whether this is due to alterations in energy expenditure we have studied energy expenditure in seven non-insulin dependent diabetic subjects while on metformin or sulphonylurea therapy. 2. Three components of energy expenditure were measured by indirect calorimetry, namely resting metabolic rate and the thermic responses to infused noradrenaline and to a mixed constituent meal. 3. There was no significant difference in the resting metabolic rate on metformin (5.29 ± 0.41 kJ/min; mean ± se) compared with sulphonylurea (5.34 ± 0.34 kJ/min). The resting metabolic rate was also similar to predicted values for non-diabetic subjects (r = 0.96). 4. The thermic response to infused noradrenaline was similar on metformin (23.14 ± 1.87 kJ) and sulphonylurea (21.40 ± 2.98 kJ). 5. There was no significant difference in the thermic response to the meal on sulphonylurea (75.8 ± 7.5 kJ) or on metformin (86.8 ± 10.8 kJ; 95% confidence limits − 17 to + 39 kJ). 6. We conclude that in non-insulin dependent diabetic subjects metformin does not enhance energy expenditure overall, compared with sulphonylurea.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document