A dilemma for permissibility-based solutions to the paradox of supererogation
Abstract We argue that permissibility-based solutions to the paradox of supererogation encounter a nested dilemma. Such approaches solve the paradox by distinguishing moral and rational permissions. If they do not also include a bridge condition that relates these two permissions, then they violate a very plausible monotonicity condition. If they do include a bridge condition, then permissibility-based solutions either amount to rational satisficing or they collapse back into the classical account of supererogation and fail to resolve the paradox.
2007 ◽
Vol 115
(3)
◽
pp. 247-267
◽
Keyword(s):
2018 ◽
Vol 13
(2)
◽
pp. 283-305
◽
Keyword(s):
2014 ◽
Vol 30
(8)
◽
pp. 1289-1296
◽