scholarly journals Comparison of Kras Mutation Status Between Primary Tumors and Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (MCRC)

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. iv25
Author(s):  
Aristea Kalikaki ◽  
Helen Politaki ◽  
Maria Tzardi ◽  
Elisavet Papadimitraki ◽  
Demitris Mavroudis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Kras Mutation Status

scholarly journals Discordance of KRAS Mutational Status between Primary Tumors and Liver Metastases in Colorectal Cancer: Impact on Long-Term Survival Following Radical Resection

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2148
Author(s):  
Francesco Ardito ◽  
Francesco Razionale ◽  
Lisa Salvatore ◽  
Tonia Cenci ◽  
Maria Vellone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Colorectal Tumor ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Primary Colorectal Tumor ◽  
Kras Mutation Status

If KRAS mutation status of primary colorectal tumor is representative of corresponding colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) mutational pattern, is controversial. Several studies have reported different rates of KRAS discordance, ranging from 4 to 32%. Aim of this study is to assess the incidence of discordance and its impact on overall survival (OS) in a homogenous group of patients. KRAS mutation status was evaluated in 107 patients resected for both primary colorectal tumor and corresponding CRLM at the same institution, between 2007 and 2018. Discordance rate was 15.9%. Its incidence varied according to the time interval between the two mutation analyses (p = 0.025; Pearson correlation = 0.2) and it was significantly higher during the first 6 months from the time of primary tumor evaluation. On multivariable analysis, type of discordance (wild-type in primary tumor, mutation in CRLM) was the strongest predictor of poor OS (p < 0.001). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, the number of CRLM >3 was an independent risk factor for the risk of KRAS discordance associated with the worst prognosis (OR = 4.600; p = 0.047). Results of our study suggested that, in the era of precision medicine, possibility of KRAS discordance should be taken into account within multidisciplinary management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

scholarly journals KRAS mutation analysis of single circulating tumor cells from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuurin Kondo ◽  
Kazuhiko Hayashi ◽  
Kazuyuki Kawakami ◽  
Yukari Miwa ◽  
Hiroshi Hayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Mutation Analysis ◽  
Kras Mutation

scholarly journals KRAS mutation status, comorbidity, and mortality in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Denmark

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 1727-1729
Author(s):  
Anne Gulbech Ording ◽  
Buket Öztürk ◽  
Karen-Lise Garm Spindler ◽  
Henrik Toft Sørensen ◽  
Margaret McCusker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Kras Mutation Status

Use of the intensity of membranous EGFR staining by immunohistochemistry to predict the efficacy of chemotherapy containing cetuximab in KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective analysis.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 516-516
Author(s):  
Naoki Takahashi ◽  
Yasuhide Yamada ◽  
Hirokazu Taniguchi ◽  
Kohei Akiyoshi ◽  
Yoshitaka Honma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Endoscopic Biopsy ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Kras Mutation Status

516 Background: KRAS mutation status is a strong predictive factor for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In the BOND trial, objective response rates to cetuximab in irinotecan-refractory mCRC were not significantly different based on the intensity of EGFR staining by immunohistrochemistry (IHC). However, this result was not evaluated by KRAS mutation status, so we retrospectively evaluated the relationship between the efficacy of chemotherapy containing cetuximab and the intensity of membranous EGFR staining in KRAS wild type (KRAS-WT) patients. Methods: Between August 2008 and July 2011, specimens of 391 CRC patients were collected by endoscopic biopsy or surgical resection. EGFR staining by IHC and genetic screening for KRAS status were performed and intensity of EGFR staining was scored by the Guidelines for Interpreting EGFR pharmDx, DAKO. We analyzed 94 KRAS-WT patients who received combination chemotherapy with an irinotecan-regimen plus cetuximab or cetuximab monotherapy and met the following criteria: histologically proven mCRC adenocarcinoma , at least 1 previous regimen of standard fluoropyrimidine - containing chemotherapy , ECOG PS score 0-2, and adequate hepatic and renal function. Patients were classified into 2 groups by intensity of EGFR staining: (A) absence of staining and weakly to moderately positive (IHC 1+ and IHC 2+), (B) strongly positive (IHC 3+). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared in Groups A and B by the log-rank test. Results: There was no significant difference in patient characteristics between the 2 groups except for primary site. The median PFS of Groups A (n=76) and B (n=18) were 5.4 months and 9.1 months (p= 0.029), the median OS was 8.1 months and 13.2 months (p=0.054) and response rate was 20.1% and 33.3%, respectively. Conclusions: In KRAS-WT patients with fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy-refractory mCRC, strong intensity of EGFR staining by IHC might be predictive for efficacy of chemotherapy containing cetuximab.

scholarly journals Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin With and Without Cetuximab in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 663-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carsten Bokemeyer ◽  
Igor Bondarenko ◽  
Anatoly Makhson ◽  
Joerg T. Hartmann ◽  
Jorge Aparicio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Kras Mutation Status ◽  
First Line Treatment

Purpose This randomized study assessed whether the best overall response rate (ORR) of cetuximab combined with oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFOX-4) was superior to that of FOLFOX-4 alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. The influence of KRAS mutation status was investigated. Patients and Methods Patients received cetuximab (400 mg/m2 initial dose followed by 250 mg/m2/wk thereafter) plus FOLFOX-4 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, plus leucovorin 200 mg/m2 and fluorouracil as a 400 mg/m2 bolus followed by a 600 mg/m2 infusion during 22 hours on days 1 and 2; n = 169) or FOLFOX-4 alone (n = 168). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. KRAS mutation status was assessed in the subset of patients with assessable tumor samples (n = 233). Results The confirmed ORR for cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 was higher than with FOLFOX-4 alone (46% v 36%). A statistically significant increase in the odds for a response with the addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX-4 could not be established (odds ratio = 1.52; P = .064). In patients with KRAS wild-type tumors, the addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX-4 was associated with a clinically significant increased chance of response (ORR = 61% v 37%; odds ratio = 2.54; P = .011) and a lower risk of disease progression (hazard ratio = 0.57; P = .0163) compared with FOLFOX-4 alone. Cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 was generally well tolerated. Conclusion KRAS mutational status was shown to be a highly predictive selection criterion in relation to the treatment decision regarding the addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX-4 for previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Retrospective cohort study on the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer patients: The HGCSG0801 study—Efficacy of KRAS mutational status.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 680-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susumu Sogabe ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Hideyuki Hayashi ◽  
Hirohito Naruse ◽  
Michio Nakamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Kras Mutation Status

680 Background: Mutations of the KRAS gene were identified as a prognostic marker in metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC). Previously reported data suggests that the longer overall survival (OS) observed with bevacizumab(BV) treatment in mCRC is independent of alterations in the KRAS mutation status. So we analyzed efficacy of bevacizumab combined chemotherapy in mCRC relative to KRAS mutation status. Methods: In the retrospective analysis(n=212) of patients treated with BV(HGCSG0801), additional statistical analyses were done with data from KRAS mutation analyses. The Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.0 was used to assess tumor response. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to determine Progression-free survival(PFS) and OS. Log-rank test was used to compare with mutant or wild-type KRAS in terms of PFS and OS. All statistical tests were performed using SPSS. Results: KRAS status was assessed in 88 patients (41.5%). Response rate was 58.9% with wild-type and 62.5% with mutant KRAS, that was not significant(p=0.823). The median Progression-free survival was 11.5 months with wild-type and 11.5 months with mutant KRAS, that was not significant(p=0.222). And median OS was 31.8 months with wild-type and 27.5 months with mutant KRAS, that was not significant(p=0.760) as well. Similar results were seen among patients with first-line therapy. Conclusions: Bevacizumab provides clinical benefit in patients with mCRC expressing either mutant or wild-type KRAS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document