The Prime Study: Survival Outcomes for Patients with RAS/BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, by Baseline ECOG Performance Status

108 Background: Primary tumor sidedness has emerged as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Tumor bulk has also been postulated to predict response to anti-EGFR therapy. We sought to evaluate the role of tumor bulk as a predictive biomarker to anti-EGFR therapy in pts with left- (LS) and right-sided (RS) mCRC. Methods: Data from 476 pts with mCRC enrolled across 2 first-line trials of anti-EGFR plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy were pooled. Pts were included if there was available information on tumor sidedness and tumor bulk. All were KRAS wild-type and BRAF wild-type or unknown BRAF status. The right colon was defined as the cecum through the transverse colon, and the left colon as the splenic flexure through the rectum. Tumor bulk was the mean tumor size of target lesions at baseline, bulky defined as > 3.5 cm. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models adjusting for performance status (PS), platelet count, primary tumor (PT) resection, number of metastatic sites, and stratified by study. Results: Pts with bulky tumors (211, 44%) had higher PS, white blood cell and platelet counts, higher CEA, fewer sites of metastatic disease, more liver than lung metastases, and fewer had PT resection. OS and PFS medians in months (mos) are presented in the table with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). Bulky tumors had inferior median OS compared with non-bulky (mOS, 17.9 vs. 21.3 mos, HRadj 1.33, 95% CI 1.05-1.69, P = 0.016) although median PFS was similar (mPFS, 8.6 vs. 8.7 mos, HRadj 1.15, 95% CI 0.92-1.42, P = 0.21). Conclusions: Tumor bulk is an independent prognostic factor for OS in KRAS wild-type and BRAF wild-type or unknown BRAF status pts. Pts with non-bulky RS tumors have survival outcomes similar to pts with bulky LS tumors. Although the mPFS for pts with RS tumors treated with anti-EGFR therapy was the lowest across subgroups, this finding was not statistically significant. Further research is warranted into whether pts with bulky RS tumors benefit from anti-EGFR therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT00182715, NCT00640081. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Initial experience of TAS-102 chemotherapy in Australian patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.3_suppl.71 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽

pp. 71-71

Author(s):

Azim Jalali ◽

Hui-Li Wong ◽

Rachel Wong ◽

Margaret Lee ◽

Lucy Gately ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Real World ◽

Performance Status ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Median Number ◽

Ecog Performance Status ◽

Number Of Patients

71 Background: For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment with Trifluridine/Tipiracil, also known as TAS-102, improves overall survival. In Australia, TAS-102 was initially made available locally through patients self-funding, later via an industry sponsored Medicine Access Program (MAP) and then via the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in real world Australian population. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry was undertaken. The characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving TAS-102 were assessed and compared to all TRACC patients and those enrolled in the registration study (RECOURSE). Results: Across 13 sites, 107 patients were treated with TAS-102 (non-PBS n = 27, PBS n = 80), The median number of patients per site was 7 (range: 1-17). The median age was 60 years (range: 31-83), compared to 67 for all TRACC patients and 63 for RECOURSE. Comparing registry TAS-102 and RECOURSE patients, 75% vs 100% were ECOG performance status 0-1, 74% vs 79% had initiated treatment more than 18 months from diagnosis of metastatic disease and 39% vs 49% were RAS wild type. Median time on treatment was 10.4 weeks (range: 1.7-32). Median clinician assessed progression-free survival was 3.3 compared to RECIST defined PFS of 2 months in RECOURSE study, while median overall survival was the same at 7.1 months. Two patients (2.3%) had febrile neutropenia and there were no treatment-related deaths in the real-world series, where TAS102 dose at treatment initiation was at clinician discretion. In the RECOURSE study there was a 4% febrile neutropenia rate and one treatment-related death. Conclusions: TRACC registry patients treated with TAS102 were younger than both TRACC patients overall and those from the RECOURSE trial. Less strict application of RECIST criteria and less frequent imaging may have contributed to an apparently longer PFS. However overall survival outcomes achieved with TAS102 in real world patients were comparable to findings from this pivotal trial with an acceptable rate of major adverse events.

Download Full-text

Beneficial Treatment Management with Trifluridine/Tipiracil in a Patient with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Pronounced Hematological Event History during Previous Treatments

Case Reports in Oncology ◽

10.1159/000486195 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

pp. 43-48 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Volker Kaechele ◽

Jürgen Hess ◽

Wolfgang Schneider-Kappus

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Dose Reduction ◽

Performance Status ◽

Recommended Dose ◽

Hematological Toxicity ◽

Ecog Performance Status ◽

History Of ◽

Grade 3

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) significantly improves overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The most common treatment-related event (grade ≥3) was hematological toxicity. We here report long-term disease-stabilizing FTD/TPI treatment of an mCRC patient (KRAS wild-type, ECOG performance status 1 at baseline and at the end of FTD/TPI therapy) with multifocal synchronous metastases and a longstanding history of extensive hematological events during previous treatments. Finally, this 62-year-old male patient was treated for 10 months with FTD/TPI by consecutive alteration of treatment parameters: (i) initial daily dose reduction to 80 mg (72% of the recommended dose), (ii) 20 days dose delay, (iii) a second and later third dose reduction to 70 mg and 60 mg (about 64% and 55%, respectively, of the recommended dose), and (iv) 30 µg per day of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration first for 3 days, and later for 5 days, for each treatment cycle.

Download Full-text

P-78 Early tumour shrinkage, depth of response and survival outcomes for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients classified by baseline tumour load: Retrospective pooled analysis of panitumumab PRIME/PEAK studies

Annals of Oncology ◽

10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.160 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 31 ◽

pp. S114-S115

Author(s):

F. Loupakis ◽

M. Peeters ◽

M. Geissler ◽

D. Modest ◽

M. Valladares-Ayerbes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Pooled Analysis ◽

Survival Outcomes ◽

Wild Type ◽

Depth Of Response ◽

Tumour Load ◽

Tumour Shrinkage ◽

Colorectal Cancer Patients

Download Full-text

PARADIGM study: A multicenter, randomized, phase III study of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) plus panitumumab or bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with RAS (KRAS/NRAS) wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.tps776 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. TPS776-TPS776 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Takayuki Yoshino ◽

Hiroyuki Uetake ◽

Katsuya Tsuchihara ◽

Kohei Shitara ◽

Kentaro Yamazaki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Performance Status ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Type I ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Wild Type ◽

First Line ◽

Exon 2 ◽

First Line Treatment

TPS776 Background: Optimal combination of monoclonal antibody (anti-VEGF vs. anti-EGFR antibody) with standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients (pts) with RAS (KRAS/NRAS) wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains controversial. FIRE-3 study demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) with anti-EGFR over bevacizumab in pts with KRAS exon 2 wild type mCRC, while CALGB 80405 study did not. PARADIGM study is designed to compare panitumumab vs. bevacizumab combined with mFOLFOX6 in pts with RAS wild-type chemotherapy-naive mCRC. Methods: Eligible pts are aged 20-79 years with ECOG performance status (PS) 0-1 and histologically/cytologically confirmed RAS wild-type mCRC. 800 pts will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab or bevacizumab, and stratified according to institution, age (20-64 vs. 65-79 years), and liver metastases (present vs. absent). Each treatment regimen includes oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, l-leucovorin 200 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) iv 400 mg/m2 at day 1, 5-FU civ 2400 mg/m2 at day 1-3, and either panitumumab 6 mg/kg or bevacizumab 5 mg/kg at day 1 every two weeks. The primary endpoint is the OS; the study was designed to detect the OS hazard ratio of 0.76, with a one-sided type I error of 0.025 and 80% power. Secondary efficacy endpoints include progression-free survival, response rate, duration of response, and curative resection rate. One interim analysis is planned for the OS when approximately 70% of the targeted 570 events has been observed. Exploratory endpoint is to investigate possible biomarkers including oncogenic mutations using tumor tissue and circulating tumor DNA (Study ID: NCT02394834). As of August 2015, 21 pts have been randomized and recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02394795.

Download Full-text

Regorafenib (REG) versus trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) as salvage-line in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies (REGOTAS): A propensity score analysis from a JSCCR multicenter observational study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.3540 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 3540-3540 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Shota Fukuoka ◽

Toshikazu Moriwaki ◽

Hiroya Taniguchi ◽

Atsuo Takashima ◽

Yosuke Kumekawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Propensity Score Analysis ◽

Performance Status ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Ecog Performance Status ◽

Cox Models ◽

Multicenter Observational Study

3540 Background: It is unclear which drug of REG or TAS-102 should be used earlier for the patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have access to both drugs. This study investigated the comparison of the efficacy between REG and TAS-102 in patients with refractory to standard chemotherapies. Methods: The clinical data of patients who were treated with REG or TAS-102 among these drugs naive mCRC patients between Jun 2014 and Sep 2015 were retrospectively delivered from 24 institutions of Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Propensity score (PS) was calculated with a logistic regression, in which using baseline parameters were included. Two methods, adjusted and matched analysis, to take propensity score were used. The clinical outcomes were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier method and Cox models based on PS adjustment and matching. Results: Total of 589 patients were enrolled and 550 patients (223 patients in the REG group and 327 patients in the TAS-102 group) met criteria for inclusion in the analysis. The results from PS adjusted analyses showed that OS was similar between the two groups (HR of TAS-102 to REG, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–1.18). There were also no statistically significant differences between two groups for progression-free survival (HR 0.94) and time to ECOG Performance status≥2 (HR 1.00), expect for time to treatment failure (HR 0.81; P = 0.025). In the subgroup analysis, REG showed favorable survival compared with TAS-102 in the age of < 65 years patients and unfavorable survival in ≥65 years patients (P for interaction = 0.012). In the PS matched sample (174 patients in each group), the clinical outcomes were similar to the results of the PS adjusted analysis. Conclusions: Although REG and TAS-102 showed a similar efficacy in mCRC patients with refractory to standard chemotherapies, the choice of the drug by age might affect the survival. Supported by JSCCR. Clinical trial information: UMIN000020416

Download Full-text

Survival Outcomes of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients in Brunei Darussalam and the Impact of KRAS Mutations

10.20944/preprints202007.0277.v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Datul Damit ◽

Ravi Patnaik ◽

Liling Chaw ◽

Shir Kiong Lu ◽

Telisinghe Pemasiri Upali ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Survival Outcome ◽

Survival Outcomes ◽

P Value ◽

Wild Type ◽

Kras Gene ◽

Brunei Darussalam ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Chi Squared

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer, with rising incidence due to lifestyle and diet. 40% of CRC cases are found to have KRAS mutations. In this study, we investigate the survival outcome of metastatic Colorectal cancer mCRC) patients in Brunei Darussalam restrospectively. Chi-squared test was used to compare the survival outcomes of mCRC patients, and Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the median ages of both groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were drawn and logrank test was used to compare the survival outcome between two groups. There was a total of 105 patients with stage IV CRC being treated during the study period. 81.6% (n=62) of mCRC patients were found to have the primary tumours on the left side of the colon. 19 of these 26 (73.1%) mutant KRAS mCRC patients died, while 23 of 50 (46.0%) wild-type KRAS mCRC patients died at the end of the study period, contributing to death rates of 45.2% and 54.8%, correspondingly. 30.3% (n=23) of the study population had a single metastatic site detected (either liver, or lung or any other organs), while 69.7% (n=53) of the 76 mCRC patients had two (double) or more metastatic sites. 69.2% (n=18) and 30.8% (n=8) of the mutant KRAS mCRC patients had mutations within codons 12 and 13, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first study in Brunei Darussalam to analyse both the survival outcomes of metastatic CRC patients and those of mutant KRAS mCRC patients. Chi-squared analysis showed a significant difference between the survival outcomes of wild-type KRAS and mutant KRAS mCRC patients (p-value = 0.024). There was a significant difference in the survival outcome between the mutant KRAS mCRC patients with RCC and mutant KRAS mCRC with LCC patients. There was no significant difference between the survival outcomes of mutant KRAS patients with mutations in either codon 12 or 13 of the KRAS gene (Table 3). However, there is a significant difference in the median survival periods between the mutant KRAS mCRC patients with mutations in codon 12 and those with mutation in codon 13 of the KRAS gene (p-value = 0.003). In conclusion, we found that mutant KRAS mCRC patients had a significantly poorer OS, which was shown to be worse when the primary tumours were found at the left side of the colon. Mutant KRAS mCRC patients with mutations in codon 12 were found to have shorter survival median periods than those with mutations within codon 13.

Download Full-text

XELOX with bevacizumab in elderly patients age 75 or older with metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of a planned interim analysis for multicenter phase II ASCA study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.4_suppl.502 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 502-502 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Keiichiro Ishibashi ◽

Yoshinori Munemoto ◽

Masaki Matsuoka ◽

Taishi Hata ◽

Michiya Kobayashi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Renal Function ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Performance Status ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Open Label ◽

Ecog Performance Status ◽

Grade 3

502 Background: Combination chemotherapy of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) with bevacizumab is commonly used as standard chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A previous meta-analysis showed that there was no difference between two age groups of <65 years and ≥65 years on overall survival (OS) after treatment with chemotherapy with bevacizumab. However, the safety and efficacy of XELOX with bevacizumab in elderly patients (pts) ≥75 years with mCRC remain unclear. Methods: This study was an open-label multicentre phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of XELOX with bevacizumab in pts ≥75 years with metastatic CRC. The primary objective was to assess progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were the safety, response rate (RR), time to treatment-failure (TTF) and OS. Results: 36 pts were enrolled. Pts characteristics were; median age 78 (range 75-86); male/female, 21/15; ECOG performance status 0/1, 30/6; colon/rectum 24/12, creatinine clearance (CCr) 60.2 ml/min (range 32.6-84.6). Median follow-up period was 220 days. RR was 55.6% and median TTF was 209 days. The median PFS and median OS are not reached. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 22 pts (62.8%). Common grade 3 or 4 AEs were hypertension (11.4%), leukopenia (20.0%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (14.3%), hand foot syndrome (8.6%), and fatigue (8.6%). Examining the relationship between renal function (CCr) and AEs, the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 AEs in the lower CCr group was significantly higher than that in the higher CCr group (61.6% vs. 47.8%; p=0.013); hematological toxicities (87.5% vs. 14.8%; p=0.0003) and non-hematological toxicities (61.5% vs. 11.1%; p=0.018). Conclusions: XELOX with bevacizumab is safely administered in elderly patients ≥75 years. Renal function (CCr) could be a good predictive marker for grade 3 or 4 AEs. Clinical trial information: UMIN000003500.

Download Full-text