NSCLC, metastatic CheckMate 026: A phase 3 trial of nivolumab vs investigator's choice (IC) of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (PT-DC) as first-line therapy for stage iv/recurrent programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)−positive NSCLC

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is the standard first-line therapy for metastatic lung adenocarcinoma harboring sensitive EGFR mutations. Tumor surface programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is expressed in some metastatic EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, but its impact on the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs is unclear. We retrospectively investigated 117 untreated metastatic lung EGFR mutated adenocarcinoma patients with a PD-L1 immunohistochemistry test. The PD-L1 expression level was classified by tumor proportion scores (TPS). Forty-five patients had negative expression (TPS < 1%), 45 had a weak expression (TPS 1–49%), and 27 had a strong expression (≥50%). All patients recruited in this study received EGFR-TKIs as a first-line therapy. No significant differences were observed for objective response rates (68.9% versus 62.2% versus 73.1%, p = 0.807) and median time to treatment failure (TTF) (12.17 versus 13.17 versus 11.0 months, p = 0.443) of first-line EGFR-TKIS among the three groups of patients (negative versus weak versus strong). The median overall survival was 21.27 versus 20.63 versus 19.43 months among the three groups of patients (p = 0.77). Our results demonstrated that PD-L1 did not affect the efficacy of first-line EGFR-TKIs in metastatic EGFR mutated lung adenocarcinoma. Thus, EGFR-TKIs are suggested as the preferred clinical therapy for these patients, despite their PD-L1 levels.

Download Full-text

Pan-cancer evaluation of homologous repair deficiency somatic mutations and response to first-line anti-neoplastic therapy.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.10535 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 10535-10535

Author(s):

Jessica A Lavery ◽

Samantha Brown ◽

Gregory J. Riely ◽

Philippe L. Bedard ◽

Ben Ho Park ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Somatic Mutations ◽

De Novo ◽

Stage Iv ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

First Line ◽

Major Mechanism ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Oncogenic Mutation ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Response To Chemotherapy

10535 Background: Homologous recombination is a major mechanism of defective DNA repair, but it remains uncertain whether homologous repair deficient (HRD) tumors have favorable prognosis or are more/less likely to respond to treatment than tumors lacking such mutations. Objective: To determine whether lung (NSCLC) and colorectal (CRC) HRD+ tumors have better survival or response to chemotherapy than HRD- tumors. Methods: Patients with de novo stage IV NSCLC or CRC who had next generation sequencing (NGS) between 2015-2018 from one of four cancer centers were identified. Records were curated using the PRISSMM framework to ascertain treatment, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival based on imaging (PFS-I) and oncologists’ notes (PFS-M). Each NSCLC or CRC tumor was categorized as HRD+ if NGS revealed an oncogenic/likely oncogenic mutation in: ATM, BAP1, BARD1, BLM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CHEK2, FAM175A, FANCA, FANCC, NBN, PALB2, RAD50, RAD51, RAD51C, RTEL1, or MRE11A based on the OncoKB database. The tumor was categorized as HRD- if no oncogenic mutation in any of these genes was evident and HRD indeterminate (HRD?) if no mutation was identified but the panel did not include all genes. OS, PFS-I and PFS-M from start of first line therapy were reported by HRD status. The percentage with a good response to first line therapy (≥2x the median) and exceptional response (≥3x the median) was estimated for each endpoint. Results: For NSCLC 4% were HRD+, 59% HRD- and 37% HRD?. For CRC there were 5% HRD+, 60% HRD- and 35% HRD?. There were no significant differences for any survival endpoint between patients who were HRD+ vs HRD- in univariable analyses. The proportion of good and exceptional responders to first line systemic chemotherapy also did not vary by HRD status, though patients with HRD+ CRC were potentially more likely to be exceptional responders. Similarly, no differences between HRD+ and HRD- tumors were apparent for the subgroup receiving platinum containing therapy. Conclusions: NSCLC and CRC patients with somatic mutations in HRD oncogenic genes did not differ from patients lacking such a mutation with respect to OS or PFS. CRC patients with HRD+ tumors may be more likely to be exceptional responders, but sample sizes are limited. By May, the analysis will include breast and pancreatic cancer cases.[Table: see text]

Download Full-text