scholarly journals Watch and wait versus surgery with pathological complete response: Single institution experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. v204
Author(s):  
J. Souza ◽  
R. Guimarães ◽  
M.B. Siqueira ◽  
R. Gil ◽  
R. Araujo ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3615-TPS3615
Author(s):  
Weiwei Xiao ◽  
Xiaojun Wu ◽  
Peiqiang Cai ◽  
YeZhong Zhuang ◽  
Xiaozhong Wang ◽  
...  

TPS3615 Background: Standard treatment of rectal cancer is neoadjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy with radiotherapy, followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT), a new concept, suggests organ preservation as an alternative to rectal excision in good responders after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to decrease surgical morbidity and increase quality of life. RAPIDO and PRODIGE-23 trials showed that TNT strategy could improve the pathological complete response (pCR) rateand reduce the risk of distant metastasis. The objective of this trial is to increase the proportion of sphincter preservation rate for distal rectal cancer patients by optimizing tumor response, by using TNT regimen as compared to conventional chemoradiotherapy. TESS (clinicalTrials.gov, NCT03840239), a prospective, open label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 study, is underway. Methods: Main inclusion criteria include: cT3-4aNany or cTanyN+ rectal adenocarcinoma aged 18-70y; ECOG performance 0-1; distance≤5cm from anal verge. 168 patients will be randomized 1:1. Patients in the TNT group will receive 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy Capeox (capecitabine + oxaliplation) before, during and after radiotherapy 50Gy/25 fractions, before TME (or other treatment decisions, such as watch and wait) and adjuvant chemotherapy capecitabine 2 cycles. Patients in the standard treatment group will receive neoadjuvant radiotherapy 50Gy/25 fractions combined with capecitabine 5 weeks before TME (or other treatment decisions, such as watch and wait), and adjuvant chemotherapy Capeox 6 cycles. Primary endpoint is the rate of sphincter preservation rate (absence of stoma). Secondary endpoints include: Ratio of sphincter preservation strategy; pathological complete response rate and tumor regression grade distribution; acute toxicity; surgical complications; long-term anal function; late toxicity; ECOG standard score; disease-free survival; overall survival. First site opened in January 24, 2019. Clinical trial information: NCT03840239.


2015 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. S-1105-S-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian P. Probst ◽  
Adan Z. Becerra ◽  
Mohamedtaki A. Tejani ◽  
Christopher T. Aquina ◽  
Bradley J. Hensley ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian P. Probst ◽  
Adan Z. Becerra ◽  
Christopher T. Aquina ◽  
Mohamedtaki A. Tejani ◽  
Bradley J. Hensley ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
RC Walker ◽  
J Harrington ◽  
B Grace ◽  
M Lloyd ◽  
JP Byrne ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In oesophageal adenocarcinoma with an apparent pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) there remains debate as to whether oesophagectomy is required. Single Cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) enables identification and characterisation of cell populations at higher resolution than diagnostic techniques. Method ScRNAseq was used to determine transcriptomic profiles of cell populations in 24 OAC tumours and 13 matched normal samples. Five were also analysed using bulk RNA sequencing and high-precision mass spectrometry proteomics. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to validate pCR. Paired scRNAseq analysis of pre-and post-treatment specimens from three further patients was used to compare transcriptomic profiles before and after NAT. Cancer cells (CCs) were assigned a cancer stem cell (CSC) score curated from published gene sets. Result We analysed a total of 22,738 single cells forming 29 different cell phenotypes. In two samples with apparent pCR, IHC staining, bulk RNA sequencing and proteomics of post-treatment samples failed to identify CCs. ScRNAseq, conversely, revealed persistent CCs (12/978 and 45/774). Transcriptomic analysis identified upregulation of stem cell markers and high CSC scores in these cells. Conclusion We have shown that CCs persist beneath the lower detection limit of standard approaches in apparent pCR. These cells express marker genes and expression programs consistent with CSCs. CSCs are a critical subpopulation that drive tumour initiation, growth, invasion, metastasis and resistance to therapy. These gene expression programs are not enriched in non-responders and straight to surgery samples. Oesophagus sparing treatment algorithms in pCR may subject patients to unnecessary risk of progression. Take-home message Cancer cells remain within tumours after apparent complete pathological response. These cells express stem cell markers associated with resistance to therapy and cancer progression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document